DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Clinical Utility of Monitoring Circulating Tumor DNA Using a Targeted Next-generation Sequencing Panel in Patients with Colorectal Cancer

  • Hyoeun Shim (Department of Laboratory Medicine, National Cancer Center) ;
  • Soobeen Heo (Targeted Therapy Branch, Research Institute, National Cancer Center) ;
  • Jiyu Sun (Integrated Biostatistics Branch, Division of Cancer Data Science, National Cancer Center) ;
  • Moon Ki Choi (Center for Colorectal Cancer, National Cancer Center) ;
  • Sung Chan Park (Center for Colorectal Cancer, National Cancer Center) ;
  • Chang Won Hong (Center for Colorectal Cancer, National Cancer Center) ;
  • Seong Hoon Kim (Organ Transplantation Center, National Cancer Center) ;
  • Seog-Yun Park (Department of Pathology, National Cancer Center) ;
  • Sun-Young Kong (Department of Laboratory Medicine, National Cancer Center) ;
  • Ji Yeon Baek (Center for Colorectal Cancer, National Cancer Center)
  • Received : 2024.11.06
  • Accepted : 2025.06.04
  • Published : 2025.07.01

Abstract

Background: Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) profiling from peripheral blood allows relatively noninvasive monitoring of solid tumors; however, its utility post-surgery or chemotherapy in colorectal cancer remains underexplored. We evaluated the clinical implications of a ctDNA next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel post-surgery or chemotherapy in patients with colorectal cancer. Methods: We collected samples from 23 patients with colorectal cancer (17 men, median age 65 yrs) at baseline and post-surgery or chemotherapy at the National Cancer Center, Korea, between January 2021 and September 2023. ctDNA was analyzed using an NGS panel including 46 genes, and variant allele frequencies (VAFs) were determined. Follow-up samples were analyzed using the NGS panel or droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) when probes were available. Clinical status was compared with ctDNA results, and survival was analyzed using a time-dependent Cox model. Results: Mutations were identified in 13 out of 14 patients (92.8%) with stage II/III cancer and in all nine patients (100%) with stage IV cancer. Mutations were detected in KRAS (N=15, 65%), APC (N=8, 35%), TP53 (N=7, 30%), PIK3CA (N=5, 22%), and RET (N=4, 17%). A 1% increase in KRAS and TP53 VAFs was associated with 48% and 32% increased mortality risk, respectively. Changes in VAF correlated well with clinical findings. Conclusions: The detection of and an increase in KRAS and TP53 VAFs were associated with poor prognosis. ddPCR-based ctDNA monitoring results were comparable to those obtained with the NGS panel. ctDNA monitoring during treatment is clinically informative in managing colorectal cancer.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This study was supported by the National Cancer Center (Goyang, Korea; grant No. 2110220).

References

  1. Diaz LA Jr and Bardelli A. Liquid biopsies: genotyping circulating tumor DNA. J Clin Oncol 2014;32:579–86. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2012.45.2011
  2. Ge Q, Zhang ZY, Li SN, Ma JQ, Zhao Z. Liquid biopsy: comprehensive overview of circulating tumor DNA (Review). Oncol Lett 2024;28:548. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2024.14681
  3. Nakamura Y, Watanabe J, Akazawa N, Hirata K, Kataoka K, Yokota M, et al. ctDNA-based molecular residual disease and survival in resectable colorectal cancer. Nat Med 2024;30:3272–83. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-024-03254-6
  4. Chen G, Peng J, Xiao Q, Wu HX, Wu X, Wang F, et al. Postoperative circulating tumor DNA as markers of recurrence risk in stages II to III colorectal cancer. J Hematol Oncol 2021;14:80. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13045-021-01089-z
  5. Chidharla A, Rapoport E, Agarwal K, Madala S, Linares B, Sun W, et al. Circulating tumor DNA as a minimal residual disease assessment and recurrence risk in patients undergoing curative-intent resection with or without adjuvant chemotherapy in colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Mol Sci 2023;24:10230. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241210230
  6. Kataoka K, Mori K, Nakamura Y, Watanabe J, Akazawa N, Hirata K, et al. Survival benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy based on molecular residual disease detection in resected colorectal liver metastases: subgroup analysis from CIRCULATE-Japan GALAXY. Ann Oncol 2024;35:1015–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2024.08.2240
  7. Garlan F, Laurent-Puig P, Sefrioui D, Siauve N, Didelot A, Sarafan-Vasseur N, et al. Early evaluation of circulating tumor DNA as marker of therapeutic efficacy in metastatic colorectal cancer patients (PLACOL study). Clin Cancer Res 2017;23:5416–25. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-3155
  8. Raghav K, Ou FS, Venook AP, Innocenti F, Sun R, Lenz HJ, et al. Acquired genomic alterations on first-line chemotherapy with cetuximab in advanced colorectal cancer: circulating tumor DNA analysis of the CALGB/SWOG-80405 trial (alliance). J Clin Oncol 2023;41:472–8. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.22.00365
  9. Petrillo A, Salati M, Trapani D, Ghidini M. Circulating tumor DNA as a biomarker for outcomes prediction in colorectal cancer patients. Curr Drug Targets 2021;22:1010–20. https://doi.org/10.2174/1389450121999201103194248
  10. Malla M, Loree JM, Kasi PM, Parikh AR. Using circulating tumor DNA in colorectal cancer: current and evolving practices. J Clin Oncol 2022;40:2846–57. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.21.02615
  11. Raza A, Khan AQ, Inchakalody VP, Mestiri S, Yoosuf ZSKM, Bedhiafi T, et al. Dynamic liquid biopsy components as predictive and prognostic biomarkers in colorectal cancer. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 2022;41:99. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13046-022-02318-0
  12. Loft M, To YH, Gibbs P, Tie J. Clinical application of circulating tumour DNA in colorectal cancer. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2023;8:837–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-1253(23)00146-2
  13. Kotani D, Oki E, Nakamura Y, Yukami H, Mishima S, Bando H, et al. Molecular residual disease and efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with colorectal cancer. Nat Med 2023;29:127–34. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-022-02115-4
  14. Tie J, Kinde I, Wang Y, Wong HL, Roebert J, Christie M, et al. Circulating tumor DNA as an early marker of therapeutic response in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol 2015;26:1715–22. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdv177
  15. Max Ma X, Bendell JC, Hurwitz HI, Ju C, Lee JJ, Lovejoy A, et al. Disease monitoring using post-induction circulating tumor DNA analysis following first-line therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2020;26:4010–7. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-19-1209
  16. Lueong SS, Herbst A, Liffers ST, Bielefeld N, Horn PA, Tannapfel A, et al. Serial circulating tumor DNA mutational status in patients with KRASmutant metastatic colorectal cancer from the Phase 3 AIO KRK0207 trial. Clin Chem 2020;66:1510–20. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/hvaa223
  17. Osumi H, Shinozaki E, Yamaguchi K, Zembutsu H. Early change in circulating tumor DNA as a potential predictor of response to chemotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Sci Rep 2019;9:17358. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-53711-3
  18. Diaz LA, Jr., Williams RT, Wu J, Kinde I, Hecht JR, Berlin J, et al. The molecular evolution of acquired resistance to targeted EGFR blockade in colorectal cancers. Nature 2012;486:537–40. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11219
  19. Montagut C, Dalmases A, Bellosillo B, Crespo M, Pairet S, Iglesias M, et al. Identification of a mutation in the extracellular domain of the epidermal growth factor receptor conferring cetuximab resistance in colorectal cancer. Nat Med 2012;18:221–3. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.2609
  20. Sartore-Bianchi A, Pietrantonio F, Lonardi S, Mussolin B, Rua F, Crisafulli G, et al. Circulating tumor DNA to guide rechallenge with panitumumab in metastatic colorectal cancer: the phase 2 CHRONOS trial. Nat Med 2022;28:1612–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-022-01886-0
  21. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Guardant health Guardant360®. CDx. Available from: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cdrh_docs/pdf20/P200010S002B.pdf. 10S002B.pdf
  22. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. FoundationOne®LiquidCDx 2020. Available from: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cdrh_docs/pdf19/P190032C.pdf.
  23. Tabernero J, Lenz HJ, Siena S, Sobrero A, Falcone A, Ychou M, et al. Analysis of circulating DNA and protein biomarkers to predict the clinical activity of regorafenib and assess prognosis in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a retrospective, exploratory analysis of the CORRECT trial. Lancet Oncol 2015;16:937–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00138-2
  24. Lee JS, Cho EH, Kim B, Hong J, Kim YG, Kim Y, et al. Clinical practice guideline for blood-based circulating tumor DNA assays. Ann Lab Med 2024;44:195–209. https://doi.org/10.3343/alm.2023.0389
  25. Lim Y, Kim S, Kang JK, Kim HP, Jang H, Han H, et al. Circulating tumor DNA sequencing in colorectal cancer patients treated with first-line chemotherapy with anti-EGFR. Sci Rep 2021;11:16333. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-95345-4
  26. Kim BY, Kim YJ, Cho JY, Lee KA. Identification of potential genomic alterations using pan-cancer cell-free DNA next-generation sequencing in patients with gastric cancer. Ann Lab Med 2024;44:164–173. https://doi.org/10.3343/alm.2023.0187
  27. Zaidi SH, Harrison TA, Phipps AI, Steinfelder R, Trinh QM, Qu C, et al. Landscape of somatic single nucleotide variants and indels in colorectal cancer and impact on survival. Nat Commun 2020;11:3644. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-17386-z
  28. Roth AD, Tejpar S, Delorenzi M, Yan P, Fiocca R, Klingbiel D, et al. Prognostic role of KRAS and BRAF in stage II and III resected colon cancer: results of the translational study on the PETACC-3, EORTC 40993, SAKK 60-00 trial. J Clin Oncol 2010;28:466–74. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.3452
  29. Dienstmann R, Mason MJ, Sinicrope FA, Phipps AI, Tejpar S, Nesbakken A, et al. Prediction of overall survival in stage II and III colon cancer beyond TNM system: a retrospective, pooled biomarker study. Ann Oncol 2017;28:1023–31. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdx052