DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Adjustment Formula for Harmonizing Triglyceride Values in the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2005-2022

  • Rihwa Choi (Department of Laboratory Medicine, Green Cross Laboratories (GC Labs)) ;
  • Jong Do Seo (Department of Laboratory Medicine, Konkuk University Medical Center) ;
  • Eun-Jung Cho (Department of Laboratory Medicine, Hallym University Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine) ;
  • Woochang Lee (Department of Laboratory Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine) ;
  • Yeo-Min Yun (Department of Laboratory Medicine, Konkuk University Medical Center)
  • Received : 2024.06.24
  • Accepted : 2024.12.27
  • Published : 2025.05.01

Abstract

Background: Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES) triglyceride testing changed from the glycerol blanking method (2005-2021) to the glycerol non-blanking method (2022). We converted triglyceride data from 2005-2021 to that obtained since 2022 with different analytical methods. Methods: To develop a conversion equation, 98 fresh serum specimen pairs were compared using Passing-Bablok regression analysis. Implications of the conversion equation on epidemiological data were evaluated using KNHANES data from 2019-2021. Bias estimations determined using the Lipid Standardization Program (LSP) of the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) enhanced the accuracy and comparability of the triglyceride results. Results: Triglyceride concentrations measured via the glycerol non-blanking method were 10.7 mg/dL (0.12 mmol/L, 10.0%) higher than those from the glycerol blanking method, with a 9.9 mg/dL (0.11 mmol/L, 5.0%) difference at a concentration of 200 mg/dL (2.26 mmol/L, N=98). The conversion equation y (glycerol non-blanking, 2022)=11.94+0.99x (glycerol blanking, 2005-2021) changed the mean triglyceride concentrations of the KNHANES 2019-2021 data (N=16,015) from 123.7 mg/dL (1.40 mmol/L, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 122.2-125.1 mg/dL [1.38-1.41 mmol/L]) to 134.3 mg/dL (1.52 mmol/L, 95% CI: 132.9-135.8 mg/dL [1.50-1.53 mmol/L]). Since 2022, bias monitoring using the CDC's LSP has remained within a 5.0% limit. Conclusions: KNHANES triglyceride values in 2022 (non-blanking) were substantially higher than those from 2005-2021 (blanking). Conversion equations helped effectively adjust 2005-2021 data. Researchers should consider adjusting the KNHANES triglyceride data based on their study characteristics.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

The authors extend their gratitude to all participants, research staff, the Seegene Medical Foundation, and the KDCA for their contributions to the KNHANES study.

References

  1. National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). Third report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) expert panel on detection, evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III) final report. Circulation 2002;106:3143–421. https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.106.25.3143
  2. Laufs U, Parhofer KG, Ginsberg HN, Hegele RA. Clinical review on triglycerides. Eur Heart J 2020;41:99–109c. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehz785
  3. van Heerden C, Magwete A, Mabuza D. Evaluating the need for free glycerol blanking for serum triglyceride measurements at Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital. Clin Chem Lab Med 2020;58:1257–64. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2019-0991
  4. Yetley EA and Johnson CL. Folate and vitamin B-12 biomarkers in NHANES: history of their measurement and use. Am J Clin Nutr 2011;94:322S–31S. https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.111.013300
  5. Yun YM, Song J, Ji M, Kim JH, Kim Y, Park T, et al. Calibration of highdensity lipoprotein cholesterol values from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data, 2008 to 2015. Ann Lab Med 2017;37:1–8. https://doi.org/10.3343/alm.2017.37.1.1
  6. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Lipids Standardization Program. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/clinical-standardization-programs/php/cvd/monitoring-accuracy-lsp.html (Updated on Dec 2024).
  7. Edwards SH, Stribling SL, Pyatt SD, Kimberly MM. Reference measurement procedure for total glycerides by isotope dilution GC-MS. Clin Chem 2012;58:768–76. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2011.177063
  8. Ellerbe P, Sniegoski LT, Welch MJ. Isotope dilution mass spectrometry as a candidate definitive method for determining total glycerides and triglycerides in serum. Clin Chem 1995;41:397–404. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/41.3.397
  9. Stein EA and Myers GL. National Cholesterol Education Program recommendations for triglyceride measurement: executive summary. The National Cholesterol Education Program Working Group on Lipoprotein Measurement. Clin Chem 1995;41:1421–6. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/41.10.1421
  10. Ansell BJ, Watson KE, Fogelman AM. An evidence-based assessment of the NCEP Adult Treatment Panel II guidelines. National Cholesterol Education Program. JAMA 1999;282:2051–7. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.282.21.2051
  11. Park KY, Hong S, Kim KS, Han K, Park CY. Trends in prevalence of hypertriglyceridemia and related factors in Korean adults: a serial crosssectional study. J Lipid Atheroscler 2023;12:201–12. https://doi.org/10.12997/jla.2023.12.2.201
  12. Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency. Korea national health and nutrition examination survey. Available at: https://knhanes.kdca. go.kr/knhanes/eng/index.do.
  13. Zheng C, Zhou W, Zhou R, Zhang H, Liang S, Zhang W, et al. The necessity for improving lipid testing reagents: a real world study. Clin Chim Acta 2023;548:117529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2023.117529
  14. Warnick GR, Kimberly MM, Waymack PP, Leary ET, Myers GL. Standardization of measurements for cholesterol, triglycerides, and major lipoproteins. Lab Med 2008;39:481–90. https://doi.org/10.1309/6UL9RHJH1JFFU4PY
  15. Sundvall J, Laatikainen T, Hakala S, Leiviskä J, Alfthan G. Systematic error of serum triglyceride measurements during three decades and the effect of fasting on serum triglycerides in population studies. Clin Chim Acta 2008;397:55–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2008.07.015
  16. Martin SS, Niles JK, Kaufman HW, Awan Z, Elgaddar O, Choi R, et al. Lipid distributions in the Global Diagnostics Network across five continents. Eur Heart J 2023;44:2305–18. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehad371
  17. Policy research information service & management (PRISM), Korea. https://www.prism.go.kr/homepage/entire/researchDetail.do?researchId=1351000-201900092&gubun=totalSearch&menuNo=I0000002 (Updated on Dec 2024).
  18. CLSI. Measurement procedure comparison and bias estimation using patient samples. 3rd ed. CLSI EP09c. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, 2018.
  19. Committee of Clinical Practice Guideline of the Korean Society of Lipid and Atherosclerosis. Korean guidelines for the management of dyslipidemia 5th. https://www.lipid.or.kr/eng/pub/images/guidlines_2022.pdf.
  20. Johansen MØ, Afzal S, Vedel-Krogh S, Nielsen SF, Smith GD, Nordestgaard BG. From plasma triglycerides to triglyceride metabolism: effects on mortality in the Copenhagen General Population Study. Eur Heart J 2023;44:4174–82. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehad330
  21. Nakamura M, Iso H, Kitamura A, Imano H, Noda H, Kiyama M, et al. Comparison between the triglycerides standardization of routine methods used in Japan and the chromotropic acid reference measurement procedure used by the CDC Lipid Standardization Programme. Ann Clin Biochem 2016;53:632–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004563215624461
  22. Kim S, Min WK. Toward high-quality real-world laboratory data in the era of healthcare big data. Ann Lab Med 2025;45:1–11. https://doi.org/10.3343/alm.2024.0258
  23. Kim S, Jeong TD, Lee K, Chung JW, Cho EJ, Lee S, et al. Quantitative evaluation of the real-world harmonization status of laboratory test items using external quality assessment data. Ann Lab Med 2024;44:529–36. https://doi.org/10.3343/alm.2024.0082
  24. Cho EJ, Jeong TD, Kim S, Park HD, Yun YM, Chun S, et al. A new strategy for evaluating the quality of laboratory results for big data research: using external quality assessment survey data (2010-2020). Ann Lab Med 2023;43:425–33. https://doi.org/10.3343/alm.2023.43.5.425
  25. Kim JH, Cho Y, Lee SG, Yun YM. Report of Korean association of external quality assessment service on the accuracy-based lipid proficiency testing (2016-2018). J Lab Med Qual Assur 2019;41:121–9. https://doi.org/10.15263/jlmqa.2019.41.3.121
  26. Chen Y, Liu Q, Yong S, Teo HL, Lee TK. An improved reference measurement procedure for triglycerides and total glycerides in human serum by isotope dilution gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Clin Chim Acta 2014;428:20–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2013.10.014
  27. Ko YK, Lee HS, Lee K, Song JH, Park HD. The negative role of vitamin C in total cholesterol and triglycerides tests. Lab Med Online 2023;13:13–21. https://doi.org/10.47429/lmo.2023.13.1.13
  28. Nelson M, Mulloor J, Lang B, Toman B, Possolo A, Perry WJ, et al., 2024. NIST special publication 260. NIST SP 260-243. Certification of standard reference material® 1595a tripalmitin. https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.260-243 (Updated on Mar 2024).
  29. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Clinical standardization programs. CVD certified assays and participants. https://www.cdc.gov/clinical-standardization-programs/php/cvd/list-of-cvd-certified-assays.html#cdc_generic_section_3-list-of-certified-lsp-participants (Updated on Aug 2024).
  30. Coskun A. Bias in laboratory medicine: the dark side of the moon. Ann Lab Med 2024;44:6–20. https://doi.org/10.3343/alm.2024.44.1.6
  31. Kyoung DS and Kim HS. Understanding and utilizing claim data from the Korean National Health Insurance Service (NHIS) and health insurance review & assessment (HIRA) database for research. J Lipid Atheroscler 2022;11:103–10. https://doi.org/10.12997/jla.2022.11.2.103