DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Seismic vulnerability and loss assessment of buildings using mobile technology

  • Radhikesh P. Nanda (Department of Civil Engineering, NIT Durgapur) ;
  • Damarla Rithwez (Department of Civil Engineering, NIT Durgapur) ;
  • Kumbla Anupa Nayak (Department of Civil Engineering, NIT Durgapur)
  • Received : 2024.06.20
  • Accepted : 2025.04.30
  • Published : 2025.07.25

Abstract

Seismic vulnerability and loss estimation is an essential initial step toward taking appropriate actions for disaster mitigation and requires computational tools. Mobile technology has now become an integral part of human life. The present study proposes a user-friendly and multipurpose Android app, SVLA_IND, for Rapid Visual Screening (RVS) and estimating the seismic losses of existing buildings. A step-wise procedure is described, considering India's common building typology. However, it can be modified for other building typologies used worldwide. It was observed that the Android app gives vulnerability and loss estimation during a walk-down survey to a premier educational institute campus in India with different building inventories within a few minutes to a fingertip.

Keywords

References

  1. Abo El Ezz, A., Smirnoff, A., Nastev, M., Nollet, M.J. and McGrath, H. (2019), "ER2-Earthquake: Interactive webapplication for urban seismic risk assessment", Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct., 34, 326-336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.12.022.
  2. Adhikari, S.R., Basyal, G.K., Pradhan, S. and Shrestha, S. (2015), "Post-earthquake assessment of buildings using mobile technology and Google imaginary plus GIS visualization", Proceedings of 14th International Symposium on New Technology for Urban Safety of Mega Cities in Asia, Kathmandu, Nepal, October.
  3. Adhikary, S. and Singh, Y. (2012), "Limitations of soil amplification provisions in the 2002 Indian seismic code", J. Earthq. Eng., 16(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2011.594485.
  4. Adnan, A., Tiong, P.L.Y., Ismail, R. and Shamsuddin, S.M. (2012), "Artificial neural network application for predicting seismic damage index of buildings in Malaysia", Electron. J. Struct. Eng., 12, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.56748/ejse.12146.
  5. Asteris, P.G., Nozhati, S., Nikoo, M., Cavaleri, L. and Nikoo, M. (2019), "Krill herd algorithm-based neural network in structural seismic reliability evaluation", Mech. Adv. Mater. Struct., 26(13), 1146-1153. https://doi.org/10.1080/15376494.2018.1430874.
  6. Bommer, J.J. and Elnashai, A.S. (1999), "Displacement spectra for seismic design", J. Earthq. Eng., 3(1), 1-32. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469909350338.
  7. Booth, E., Saito, K., Spence, R., Madabhushi, G. and Eguchi, R.T. (2011), "Validating assessments of seismic damage made from remote sensing", Earthq. Spectra, 27(1), 157-177. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.3632109.
  8. Bozorgnia, Y., Hachem, M.M. and Campbell, K.W. (2010), "Ground motion prediction equation ("attenuation relationship") for inelastic response spectra", Earthq. Spectra, 26(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.3281182.
  9. Cardona, O.D., Reinoso, E. and Yamin, L.E. (2012), "CAPRAcomprehensive approach to probabilistic risk assessment: international initiative for risk management effectiveness", Proceedings of the 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Lisbon, Portugal, September.
  10. Chopra, A.K., Eeri, M. and Goel, R.K. (2001), "Direct displacement-based design: Use of inelastic vs. elastic design spectra", Earthq. spectra, 17(1), 47-64. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1586166.
  11. Coburn, A. and Spence, R. (2002), Earthquake Protection, John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester, UK.
  12. Cooner, A.J., Shao, Y. and Campbell, J.B. (2016), "Detection of urban damage using remote sensing and machine learning algorithms: Revisiting the 2010 Haiti earthquake", Remote Sens., 8(10), 868. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs8100868.
  13. Crowley, H., Pinho, R. and Bommer, J.J. (2004), "A probabilistic displacement-based vulnerability assessment procedure for earthquake loss estimation", Bull. Earthq. Eng., 2, 173-219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-004-2290-8.
  14. Erdikt, M., Aydinoglu, N., Fahjan, Y., Sesetyan, K., Demircioglu, M., Siyahi, B., Durukal, E., Ozbey, C., Biro, Y., Akman, H. and Yuzugullu, O. (2003), "Earthquake risk assessment for Istanbul metropolitan area", Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib., 2(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02857534.
  15. FEMA-310 (1998), Handbook for the Seismic Evaluation of Buildings, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C., USA.
  16. Giovinazzi, S., Lagomarsino, S. and Pampanin, S. (2006), "Vulnerability methods and damage scenario for seismic risk analysis as support to retrofit strategies: An European perspective", NZSEE 2006 New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering Annual Conference, Napier, New Zealand, March.
  17. Gonzalez, D., Rueda-Plata, D., Acevedo, A.B., Duque, J.C., Ramos-Pollán, R., Betancourt, A. and García, S. (2020), "Automatic detection of building typology using deep learning methods on street-level images", Build. Environ., 177, 106805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.106805.
  18. Gunturi, M. (2021), "A review on the internet of things in civil engineering: enabling technologies, applications and challenges", E3S Web Conf., 309, 01209. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202130901209.
  19. Haldar, P., Singh, Y., Lang, D.H. and Paul, D.K. (2010), "IVARA-A tool for seismic vulnerability and risk assessment of Indian housing", 14 Symposium On Earthquake Engineering, IIT Roorkee, Uttarakhand, India.
  20. Haldar, P., Singh, Y., Lang, D.H. and Paul, D.K. (2013), "Comparison of seismic risk assessment based on macroseismic intensity and spectrum approaches using "SeisVARA"", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 48, 267-281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2013.01.016.
  21. Harirchian, E. and Lahmer, T. (2019), "Earthquake hazard safety assessment of buildings via smartphone app: A comparative study", IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng., 652(1), 012069. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/652/1/012069.
  22. Harirchian, E., Aghakouchaki Hosseini, S.E., Jadhav, K., Kumari, V., Rasulzade, S., Işık, E., Wasif, M. and Lahmer, T. (2021), "A review on application of soft computing techniques for the rapid visual safety evaluation and damage classification of existing buildings", J. Build. Eng., 43, 102536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102536.
  23. Harirchian, E., Jadhav, K., Kumari, V. and Lahmer, T. (2022), "ML-EHSAPP: A prototype for machine learning-based earthquake hazard safety assessment of structures by using a smartphone app", Eur. J. Environ. Civil Eng., 26(11), 5279-5299. https://doi.org/10.1080/19648189.2021.1892829.
  24. Harirchian, E., Lahmer, T., Kumari, V. and Jadhav, K. (2020),"Application of support vector machine modeling for the rapid seismic hazard safety evaluation of existing buildings", Energ., 13(13), 3340. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13133340.
  25. Işik, M., Işik, E. and Haricihian, E. (2021), "Application of IOS/Android rapid evaluation of post-earthquake damages in masonry buildings", Gazi J. Eng. Sci., 7(1), 36-50. https://doi.org/10.30855/gmbd.2021.01.05.
  26. Işık, M.F., Işık, E. and Bülbül, M.A. (2018), "Application of IOS/Android-based assessment and monitoring system for building inventory under seismic impact", Gradjevinar, 70(12), 1043-1056. https://doi.org/10.14256/JCE.1522.2015.
  27. Kircher, C.A., Whitman, R.V., & Holmes, W.T. (2006), "HAZUS earthquake loss estimation methods", Nat. Hazards Rev., 7(2), 45-59. https://doi.org/10.1061/ASCE1527-698820067:245.
  28. Lang, D.H., Singh, Y. and Prasad, J.S.R. (2012), "Comparing empirical and analytical estimates of earthquake loss assessment studies for the city of Dehradun, India", Earthq. Spectra, 28(2), 595-619. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.4000004.
  29. Molina, S., Lang, D.H. and Lindholm, C.D. (2010), "SELENA - An open-source tool for seismic risk and loss assessment using a logic tree computation procedure", Comput. Geosci., 36(3), 257-269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2009.07.006.
  30. Nanda, R.P., Damarla, R. and Nayak, K.A. (2022), "Android application of rapid visual screening for buildings in Indian context", Struct., 46, 1823-1836. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2022.10.140.
  31. Nanda, R.P., Paul, N.K. and Chanu, N.M. (2019), "Seismic loss estimation tool as rapid survey for prioritizing buildings for disaster preparedness: Case study to hospital buildings", Nat. Hazards, 95(3), 769-781. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-018-3518-2.
  32. Nanda, R.P., Paul, N.K., Chanu, N.M. and Rout, S. (2015), "Seismic risk assessment of building stocks in Indian context", Nat. Hazards, 78(3), 2035-2051. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-015-1818-3.
  33. Pagani, M., Monelli, D., Weatherill, G., Danciu, L., Crowley, H., Silva, V., Henshaw, P., Butler, L., Nastasi, M., Panzeri, L., Simionato, M. and Vigano, D. (2014), "Openquake engine: An open hazard (and risk) software for the global earthquake model", Seismol. Res. Lett., 85(3), 692-702. https://doi.org/10.1785/0220130087.
  34. Pranantyo, I.R., Fadmastuti, M. and Chandra, F. (2015), "InaSAFE applications in disaster preparedness", AIP Conf. Proc., 1658(1), 060001. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4915053.
  35. Prasad, J.S.R., Singh, Y., Kaynia, A.M. and Lindholm, C. (2009), "Socioeconomic clustering in seismic risk assessment of urban housing stock", Earthq. Spectra, 25(3), 619-641. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.3158547.
  36. Roca, A., Goula, X., Susagna, T., Chávez, J., González, M. and Reinoso, E. (2006), "A simplified method for vulnerability assessment of dwelling buildings and estimation of damage scenarios in Catalonia, Spain", Bull. Earthq. Eng., 4(2), 141-158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-006-9003-4.
  37. Roeslin, S., Ma, Q., Juárez-Garcia, H., Gómez-Bernal, A., Wicker, J. and Wotherspoon, L. (2020), "A machine learning damage prediction model for the 2017 Puebla-Morelos, Mexico, earthquake", Earthq. Spectra, 36(2), 314-339. https://doi.org/10.1177/8755293020936714.
  38. Shaw, D., Yeh, C.H., Jean, W.Y., Loh, C.H. and Kuo, Y.L. (2007), "A probabilistic seismic risk analysis of building losses in Taipei: An application of Haz-Taiwan with its pre-processor and post-processor", J. Chin. Inst. Eng., 30(2), 289-297. https://doi.org/10.1080/02533839.2007.9671255.
  39. Sinha, R., Aditya, K.S.P. and Gupta, A. (2008), "GIS-based urban seismic risk assessment using RISK.iitb", ISET J. Earthq. Technol., 45, 41-63. https://doi.org/10.63898/JIVL4708
  40. Spence, R.J.S., Coburn, A.W., Pomonis, A. and Sakai, S. (1992), "Correlation of ground motion with building damage: The definition of a new damage-based seismic intensity scale", 10th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Madrid, Spain, July.
  41. Sreerama, A.K., Rajaram, C. and Pradeep Kumar, R. (2017), "Correlation between rapid visual survey score and possible damage of a building", Indian Concrete J., 91(5), 1-12.
  42. Stojadinović, Z., Kovačević, M., Marinković, D. and Stojadinović, B. (2022), "Rapid earthquake loss assessment based on machine learning and representative sampling", Earthq. Spectra, 38(1), 152-177. https://doi.org/10.1177/87552930211042393.
  43. Strasser, F.O., Bommer, J.J., Şeşetyan, K., Erdik, M., Çaǧnan, Z., Irizarry, J., Goula, X., Lucantoni, A., Sabetta, F., Bal, I.E., Crowley, H. and Lindholm, C. (2008), "A comparative study of European earthquake loss estimation tools for a scenario in Istanbul", J. Earthq. Eng., 12(2), 246-256. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632460802014188.
  44. Uva, G., Fatiguso, F., Adam, J.M., Iacobellis, G. and Sangiorgio, V. (2019), "User-reporting based decision support system for reinforced concrete building monitoring", Proceedings - 2018 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, SMC 2018, Miyazaki, Japan, October.
  45. Venkatraman, S. and Yoong, P. (2009), "Role of mobile technology in the construction industry - A case study", Int. J. Busin. Inform. Syst., 4(2), 195-209. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBIS.2009.022823.
  46. Yeh, C.H., Jean, W.Y. and Loh, C.H. (2000), "Building damage assessment for earthquake loss estimation in Taiwan", Twelfth World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Auckland, New Zealand, January-February