분석과 대안 (Analyses & Alternatives)

  • 제9권2호
  • /
  • Pages.179-204
  • /
  • 2025
  • /
  • 2508-822X(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2508 - 8238(eISSN)
사단법인 코리아컨센서스연구원 (Korea Consensus Institute(KCI))
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Role of Government in the Implementation of Corporate Voluntary Climate Initiatives: The Case of Samsung's RE100 in Korea

  • Heejin Han (Pukyong National University )
  • 투고 : 2025.05.15
  • 심사 : 2025.06.09
  • 발행 : 2025.06.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

As the adverse effects of climate change extend beyond states to various non-state actors worldwide, multinational corporations have begun adopting voluntary initiatives to mitigate climate risks and align with global climate governance. Among these, RE100 represents a leading voluntary campaign that encourages companies to commit to 100% renewable electricity procurement. While existing research on RE100 has predominantly focused on corporate motivations for participating in the initiative, the role of governments in facilitating or constraining its implementation remains underexplored. This case study addresses this gap by examining Samsung's RE100 implementation within the policy and institutional context of South Korea. This study highlights how limited policy support and regulatory constraints from the Korean government have hindered the progress of Samsung's domestic RE100 implementation, especially in contrast to its achievements in overseas operations. The case study demonstrates that even market-driven, voluntary climate initiatives require enabling institutional conditions, particularly in developmental states like South Korea, where governmental influence remains decisive.

키워드

과제정보

This work was supported by a Research Grant of Pukyong National University (2023).

참고문헌

  1. Abdmouleh, Z., Alammari, R. A. M, & Gastli, A. (2015). Review of policies encouraging renewable energy integration & best practices. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 45: 249-262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.01.035
  2. Adeola, F. O. (2017). Environmental injustice and human rights abuse: The states, MNCs, and repression of minority groups in the world system. In Environmental Rights (pp. 3-23). Routledge.
  3. Ayele, S., Shen, W., Mulugetta, Y., & Worako, T. K. (2024). Governance of renewable energy procurement via private suppliers: The Ethiopian experience. Energy Policy, 184: 113889.
  4. BAI. (2023). The Board of Audit and Inspection of Korea, announcing the inspection result on renewable energy projects." November 23.
  5. Bird, L., Heeter, J., O'Shaughnessy, E., Speer, B., Cook, O., Jones, T., ... & Nilson, E. (2017). Policies for enabling corporate sourcing of renewable energy internationally: A 21st century power partnership report (No. NREL/TP-6A50-68149). National Renewable Energy Lab.(NREL), Golden, CO (United States).
  6. Cadez, S., Czerny, A., & Letmathe, P. (2019). "Stakeholder pressures and corporate climate change mitigation strategies. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(1): 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2070
  7. Cha, M. J. (2022). Korean renewable energy going backward…Its export can drop by 40%." Newstree. November 4. https://www.newstree.kr/newsView/ntr202211040004. (Accessed: October 3 2024).
  8. Chu, Y. W. (2021). Democratization, globalization, and institutional adaptation: The developmental states of South Korea and Taiwan. Review of International Political Economy, 28(1): 59-80. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2019.1652671
  9. Climate Group (CG) and CDP. (2022). Stepping up: RE100 Gathers Speed in Challenging Markets. https://www.there100.org/sites/re100/files/2022-01/RE100%202021%20Annual%20Disclosure%20Report.pdf (Accessed: November 1 2024)
  10. Coen, D., Herman, K., & Pegram, T. (2022). Are corporate climate efforts genuine? An empirical analysis of the climate 'talk–walk' hypothesis. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(7): 3040-3059. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3063
  11. Corporate Renewable Energy Initiative (CoREi). (2022). Status of renewable energy procurement and the business perception regarding the procurement system. July. http://unglobalcompact.kr/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/un-7.18.pdf (Accessed: November 3 2024)
  12. Dahlmann, F., Branicki, L., & Brammer, S. (2019). Managing carbon aspirations: The influence of corporate climate change targets on environmental performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 158(1): 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3731-z
  13. Dietz, S. et al. (2018). An assessment of climate action by high-carbon global corporations. Nature Climate Change, 8: 1072–1075. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0343-2
  14. Egli, F., Zhang, R., Hopo, V., Schmidt, T., & Steffen, B. (2023). The contribution of corporate initiatives to global renewable electricity deployment. Nature Communications, 14(1): 4678.
  15. Federation of Korean Industries. (2023). Half of firms, CF100, necessary but…still unfamiliar. Press Release. June 7. https://www.fki.or.kr/main/news/statement_detail.do?bbs_id=00035035&category=ST (Accessed: November 2 2024)
  16. Fields, K. J. (2012). Not of a piece: Developmental states, industrial policy, and evolving patterns of capitalism in Japan, Korea, and Taiwan. East Asian Capitalism: Diversity, Continuity, and Change, 46-67.
  17. Goh, S. H. (2022). Enrolled in RE100, 13 out of 25 firms record 0 purchase of renewable energy. Daily Joongang. December 13. https://www.joongang.co.kr/article/25125204#home (Accessed: November 5 2024)
  18. Hale, T. N. et al. (2020). Sub- and non-state climate action: A framework to assess progress, implementation and impact. Climate Policy, 21, 406–420. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2020.1828796
  19. International Energy Agency. (n. a.). Korea. https://www.iea.org/countries/korea/electricity (Accessed: January 3 2025)
  20. Ives, J. H. (2017). The export of hazard: Transnational corporations and environmental control issues. Routledge.
  21. Jeong, M. (2025). Lee Jae-myung proposes West coast energy highway amid KEPCO's financial woes. Chosun Biz. April 25. https://biz.chosun.com/en/en-industry/2025/04/25/ANN2K6PJ2FEXREIIYII7FDLVAA/ (Accessed: June 6, 2025).
  22. Kalinowski, T. (2021). The politics of climate change in a neo-developmental state: The case of South Korea. International Political Science Review, 42(1): 48-63. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512120924741
  23. Kim, D. S. (2023). Public private joint CFE forum launched…Seeking an alternative to RE100. ESG Economy. May 17. http://www.esgeconomy.com/news/articleView.html?idxno=3600 (Accessed December 5 2024)
  24. Kim, S. Y., & Thurbon, E. (2015). Developmental environmentalism: Explaining South Korea's ambitious pursuit of green growth. Politics & Society, 43(2): 213-240. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329215571287
  25. Korea Chamber of Commerce and Industry. (2022). The survey on the status of participation of domestic manufacturing companies in RE100 and future policy agenda. Media release. August 29. https://www.korcham.net/nCham/Service/Economy/appl/KcciReportDetail.asp?SEQ_NO_C010=20120935475&CHAM_CD=B001 (Accessed: December 5 2024) 10=20120935475&CHAM_CD=B001
  26. Krabbe, O. et al. (2015). Aligning corporate greenhouse-gas emissions targets with climate goals. Nature Climate Change, 5: 1057–1060. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2770
  27. Kuo, L., & Chang, B. G. (2021). Ambitious corporate climate action: Impacts of science-based target and internal carbon pricing on carbon management reputation-evidence from Japan. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 27: 1830-1840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.04.025
  28. Kuramochi, T. et al. (2020). Beyond national climate action: The impact of region, city, and business commitments on global greenhouse gas emissions. Climate Policy, 20: 275–291. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2020.1740150
  29. Lee, J. D. & Park, S. Y. (2023). RE100 of high-tech companies such as Samsung and Naver facing a challenge as the government announces a plan for a new nuclear power plant. The Kyunghyang Shinmun. July 11. https://m.khan.co.kr/economy/economy-general/article/202307111711001?utm_source=urlCopy&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=sharing#c2b (Accessed: December 27 2024)
  30. Lee, J. H. (2023). Attack from RE100 from Europe…Korean parts company under green protectionism. The Korea Economy Daily, May 15. https://www.hankyung.com/article/2023051546741 (Accessed: October 27 2024)
  31. Lee, K. M. (2022). Korea's nuclear biz exports drive gains steam. The Korea Times. June 15. https://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/tech/2022/06/419_330893.html?na (Accessed: November 25 2024)
  32. Lee. S. G. (2023). Korea revives nuclear power for its 2024-2038 energy plan. The Korea Economic Daily. July 11. https://www.kedglobal.com/business-politics/newsView/ked202307110012 (Accessed: November 26 2024) 10012
  33. Lee, T. D. & Morgan, S. (2024). Nuclear energy policy swing: Expansion and contraction in South Korea. Journal of Future Politics, 14(2): 79-120. https://doi.org/10.20973/JOFP.2024.14.2.79
  34. Littlewood, D., Decelis, R., Hillenbrand, C., & Holt, D. (2018). Examining the drivers and outcomes of corporate commitment to climate change action in European high emitting industry. Business Strategy and the Environment, 27(8): 1437-1449. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2194
  35. Park. G. Y. (2023). Samsung feels most frustrated at the Yoon government's backtracking. Hankyoreh 21. August 12. https://h21.hani.co.kr/arti/society/environment/54241.html (Accessed: November 25 2024)
  36. Park, H. (2021). Carbon neutrality and corporations. In Carbon neutrality and green new deal: Politics and policy (pp. 213-237). Seoul: Hanul Academy.
  37. Park, S. W. (2022a). RE100 becoming agenda only after the 23rd company joins it. JTBC News. September 19. https://news.jtbc.co.kr/article/article.aspx?news_id=NB12078471 (Accessed: October 20 2024)
  38. Park, S. W. (2022b). RE100 of the biggest power consuming company in the ICT arena…This is only the beginning. JTBC News. September 26. https://news.jtbc.co.kr/article/article.aspx?news_id=NB12080813 (Accessed: October 4 2024)
  39. Park, Y. B. (2022). MoTIE says no problem about RE100 after lowering the target of electricity generation from renewable energy. The Segye Daily. December 8. https://www.segye.com/newsView/20221207514502?OutUrl=naver (Accessed: October 4 2024)
  40. RE100 website. (n. a.). https://www.there100.org/ (Accessed: December 12 2024) 100.org/
  41. Riley, T. (2017). Just 100 companies responsible for 71% of global emissions, study Says. Guardian. July 10. https://www.theguardian.com/sustainable-business/2017/jul/10/100-fossil-fuel companies-investors-responsible-71-global-emissions-cdp-study-climate-change (Accessed: November 20 2024) 10/100-fossil-fuelcompanies-investors-responsible-71-global-emissions-cdp-study-climate-change
  42. Samsung. (2023). "A Journey Towards a Sustainable Future."
  43. Samsung Semiconductor, (n. a.). https://semiconductor.samsung.com/kr/sustainability/environment/climate-action/the-energy-that-keeps-life-going/ (Accessed: October 28 2024)
  44. Stadelmann, M., & Gangneux, D. (2022). The future of climate finance: Multinational company participation under rising peer pressure. In Handbook of International Climate Finance (pp. 403-419). Edward Elgar Publishing.