DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis of DNA methylation changes following Cfp1 knockout in mouse spermatocytes

  • Chanhyeok Park (Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biotechnology, Institute of Advanced Regenerative Science, Konkuk University) ;
  • Youngsok Choi (Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biotechnology, Institute of Advanced Regenerative Science, Konkuk University) ;
  • Seonho Yoo (Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biotechnology, Institute of Advanced Regenerative Science, Konkuk University) ;
  • Hyeonwoo La (Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biotechnology, Institute of Advanced Regenerative Science, Konkuk University) ;
  • Kwonho Hong (Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biotechnology, Institute of Advanced Regenerative Science, Konkuk University)
  • 투고 : 2024.11.18
  • 심사 : 2025.01.10
  • 발행 : 2025.08.01

초록

Objective: Spermatogenesis is a complex biological process that encompasses meiosis in spermatocytes and the dynamic epigenetic alterations that ensure the inheritance of genetic traits. CXXC finger protein 1 (CFP1, Cfp1, CXXC1, Cxxc1) is a critical component of the SET domain-containing 1A histone lysine methyltransferase complex that catalyzes histone H3K4 methylation and has a specific binding domain for unmethylated CpG DNA. However, our current understanding of CFP1’s role in the genome-wide regulation of DNA and H3K4 methylation remains limited. Methods: We performed genome-wide methylation analysis using reduced-representation bisulfite sequencing on spermatocytes isolated from Cfp1 knockout and wild-type mice. Promoter methylation changes were integrated with publicly available microarray and ChIP-seq data to identify genes regulated by CFP1. Results: CFP1 depletion led to significant alterations in DNA methylation, particularly in promoter regions of genes associated with meiosis, transcription regulation, and chromatin remodeling. A total of 21 genes were identified as direct targets of CFP1, exhibiting reduced promoter methylation and CFP1 binding. Conclusion: Our study findings contribute to elucidating the regulatory mechanisms of CFP1 in spermatocytes, providing valuable insights into the reproductive process and advancing our understanding of the underlying causes of infertility.

키워드

과제정보

This research was supported by the Ministry of Science and ICT (RS-2024-00344340) of the Korean government.

참고문헌

  1. Fayomi AP, Orwig KE. Spermatogonial stem cells and spermatogenesis in mice, monkeys and men. Stem Cell Res 2018;29:207-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scr.2018.04.009
  2. Zelkowski M, Olson MA, Wang M, Pawlowski W. Diversity and determinants of meiotic recombination landscapes. Trends Genet 2019;35:359-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tig.2019.02.002
  3. Gaysinskaya V, Miller BF, De Luca C, van der Heijden GW, Hansen KD, Bortvin A. Transient reduction of DNA methylation at the onset of meiosis in male mice. Epigenetics Chromatin 2018;11:15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13072-018-0186-0
  4. Ben Maamar M, Beck D, Nilsson E, McCarrey JR, Skinner MK. Developmental alterations in DNA methylation during gametogenesis from primordial germ cells to sperm. iScience 2022;25:103786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2022.103786
  5. Pan H, Jiang N, Sun S, et al. UHRF1-repressed 5'-hydroxy-methylcytosine is essential for the male meiotic prophase I. Cell Death Dis 2020;11:142. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-020-2333-3
  6. La Salle S, Trasler JM. Dynamic expression of DNMT3a and DNMT3b isoforms during male germ cell development in the mouse. Dev Biol 2006;296:71-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2006.04.436
  7. Webster KE, O'Bryan MK, Fletcher S, et al. Meiotic and epigenetic defects in Dnmt3L-knockout mouse spermatogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005;102:4068-73. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0500702102
  8. Messerschmidt DM, Knowles BB, Solter D. DNA methylation dynamics during epigenetic reprogramming in the germline and preimplantation embryos. Genes Dev 2014;28:812-28. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.234294.113
  9. Thomson JP, Skene PJ, Selfridge J, et al. CpG islands influence chromatin structure via the CpG-binding protein Cfp1. Nature 2010;464:1082-6. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08924
  10. Bilmez Y, Ozturk S. Dynamic changes of histone methylation in male germ cells during spermatogenesis. FS Rev 2023;4:187-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xfnr.2023.07.001
  11. Godmann M, Auger V, Ferraroni-Aguiar V, et al. Dynamic regulation of histone H3 methylation at lysine 4 in mammalian spermatogenesis. Biol Reprod 2007;77:754-64. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.107.062265
  12. Sha QQ, Dai XX, Jiang JC, et al. CFP1 coordinates histone H3 lysine-4 trimethylation and meiotic cell cycle progression in mouse oocytes. Nat Commun 2018;9:3477. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-05930-x
  13. Sha QQ, Zhang J, Fan HY. Function and regulation of histone H3 lysine-4 methylation during oocyte meiosis and maternal-to-zygotic transition. Front Cell Dev Biol 2020;8:597498. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2020.597498
  14. Jiang Y, Zhang HY, Lin Z, et al. CXXC finger protein 1-mediated histone H3 lysine-4 trimethylation is essential for proper meiotic crossover formation in mice. Development 2020;147:dev183764. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.183764
  15. Ki BS, Shim SH, Park C, et al. Epigenetic regulator Cfpl safe-guards male meiotic progression by regulating meiotic gene expression. Exp Mol Med 2022;54:1098-108. https://doi.org/10.1038/s12276-022-00813-0
  16. Xu C, Bian C, Lam R, Dong A, Min J. The structural basis for selective binding of non-methylated CpG islands by the CFP1 CXXC domain. Nat Commun 2011;2:227. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms1237
  17. Tate CM, Lee JH, Skalnik DG. CXXC finger protein 1 restricts the Setd1A histone H3K4 methyltransferase complex to euchromatin. FEBS J 2010;277:210-23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-4658.2009.07475.x
  18. Chun KT, Li B, Dobrota E, et al. The epigenetic regulator CXXC finger protein 1 is essential for murine hematopoiesis. PLOS ONE 2014;9:e113745. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0113745
  19. Ogura A, Suzuki O, Tanemura K, et al. Development of normal mice from metaphase I oocytes fertilized with primary spermatocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998;95:5611-5. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.95.10.5611
  20. Wang J, Xia Y, Li L, et al. Double restriction-enzyme digestion improves the coverage and accuracy of genome-wide CpG methylation profiling by reduced representation bisulfite sequencing. BMC Genomics 2013;14:11. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-14-11
  21. Guo J, Grow EJ, Mlcochova H, et al. The adult human testis transcriptional cell atlas. Cell Res 2018;28:1141-57. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41422-018-0099-2
  22. Krueger F, Andrews SR. Bismark: a flexible aligner and methylation caller for Bisulfite-Seq applications. Bioinformatics 2011;27:1571-2. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btr167
  23. Langmead B, Salzberg SL. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat Methods 2012;9:357-9. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1923
  24. Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, et al. The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 2009;25:2078-9. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352
  25. Ramírez F, Ryan DP, Grüning B, et al. deepTools2: a next generation web server for deep-sequencing data analysis. Nucleic Acids Res 2016;44:W160-5. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkw257
  26. Ramírez F, Dündar F, Diehl S, Grüning BA, Manke T. deepTools: a flexible platform for exploring deep-sequencing data. Nucleic Acids Res 2014;42:W187-91. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gku365
  27. Quinlan AR, Hall IM. BEDTools: a flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features. Bioinformatics 2010;26:841-2. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btq033
  28. Zhang W, Wu Y, Schnable JC, et al. High-resolution mapping of open chromatin in the rice genome. Genome Res 2012;22:151-62. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.131342.111
  29. Park PJ. ChIP-seq: advantages and challenges of a maturing technology. Nat Rev Genet 2009;10:669-80. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg2641
  30. Clouaire T, Webb S, Skene P, et al. Cfp1 integrates both CpG content and gene activity for accurate H3K4me3 deposition in embryonic stem cells. Genes Dev 2012;26:1714-28. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.194209.112
  31. Zhang J, Li X, Wang R, et al. DNA methylation patterns in patients with asthenospermia and oligoasthenospermia. BMC Genomics 2024;25:602. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-024-10491-z
  32. Siebert-Kuss LM, Dietrich V, Di Persio S, et al. Genome-wide DNA methylation changes in human spermatogenesis. Am J Hum Genet 2024;111:1125-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2024.04.017
  33. Oakes CC, La Salle S, Smiraglia DJ, Robaire B, Trasler JM. A unique configuration of genome-wide DNA methylation patterns in the testis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007;104:228-33. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0607521104
  34. Wang Y, Song W, Li S, et al. GC-1 mRHBDD1 knockdown spermatogonia cells lose their spermatogenic capacity in mouse seminiferous tubules. BMC Cell Biol 2009;10:25. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2121-10-25
  35. Xu K, Su X, Fang K, et al. The Slingshot phosphatase 2 is required for acrosome biogenesis during spermatogenesis in mice. eLife 2023;12:e83129. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.83129
  36. Gunes S, Arslan MA, Hekim GNT, Asci R. The role of epigenetics in idiopathic male infertility. J Assist Reprod Genet 2016;33:553-69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-016-0682-8