DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Evaluating nuclear (18S, ITS, and 28S) and chloroplast (psbB, psbC, rbcL, and tufA) genes of the green algae Monoraphidium (Sphae-ropleales, Chlorophyta) for DNA barcoding

  • Ha-Eun Lee (Department of Life Science, Sangmyung University) ;
  • Taehee Kim (Department of Life Science, Sangmyung University) ;
  • Han-Sol Kim (Department of Life Science, Sangmyung University) ;
  • Ok-Min Lee (Department of Life Science, Kyonggi University) ;
  • Jang-Seu Ki (Department of Life Science, Sangmyung University)
  • Received : 2024.11.12
  • Accepted : 2025.04.15
  • Published : 2025.06.15

Abstract

The genus Monoraphidium is a green microalgae distributed globally in freshwater ecosystems, and it is difficult to classify morphologically. Molecular genetic markers have been used for their taxonomy, although they have not been thoroughly evaluated. Here, we investigated three nuclear rRNA molecules (18S, internal transcribed spacer [ITS] + 5.8S, and 28S) and four chloroplast genes (psbB, psbC, rbcL, and tufA) using 16 Monoraphidium strains consisting of 9 species. Upon comparisons of genetic diversity and marker performance evaluation, we found that ITS was the best marker for Monoraphidium to discriminate each species, followed by tufA. The taxonomic discrimination power of the ITS was supported by the neighbor-joining tree. In addition, a secondary structure of ITS2 combined with compensatory base changes showed the distinct differences among individual species of Monoraphidium. These suggest that ITS may be the best marker for species differentiation of the coccoid green algae Monoraphidium.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

We thank Dr. BL Muhammad for valuable comments to the early version of our manuscript. This work was supported by Korea Environment Industry & Technology Institute (KEITI) through Aquatic Ecosystem Conservation Research Program funded by Korea Ministry of Environment (MOE) (2022003050002 or RS2022-KE002119211530) and by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT) (RS-2024-00354842).

References

  1. Ankenbrand, M. J., Keller, A., Wolf, M., Schultz, J. & Förster, F. 2015. ITS2 database V: twice as much. Mol. Biol. Evol. 32:3030–3032. doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msv174
  2. Badotti, F., de Oliveira, F. S., Garcia, C. F., et al. 2017. Effectiveness of ITS and sub-regions as DNA barcode markers for the identification of Basidiomycota (Fungi). BMC Microbiol. 17:42. doi.org/10.1186/s12866-017-0958-x
  3. Bandyopadhyaya, S., Ramakrishnan, M., Kulkarni, S. & Rajanna, L. 2013. DNA barcoding and its applications: a critical review. CMRIMS J. Res. Dev. 1:77–81.
  4. Byun, Y. & Han, K. 2009. PseudoViewer3: generating planar drawings of large-scale RNA structures with pseudoknots. Bioinformatics 25:1435–1437. doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp252
  5. Caisová, L., Marin, B. & Melkonian, M. 2013. A consensus secondary structure of ITS2 in the Chlorophyta identified by phylogenetic reconstruction. Protist 164:482–496. doi.org/10.1016/j.protis.2013.04.005
  6. Cameron, K. M. & Carmen Molina, M. 2006. Photosystem II gene sequences of psbB and psbC clarify the phylogenetic position of Vanilla (Vanilloideae, Orchidaceae). Cladistics 22:239–248. doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-0031.2006.00102.x
  7. CBOL Plant Working Group, Hollingsworth, P. M., Forrest, L. L., et al. 2009. A DNA barcode for land plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 106:12794–12797. doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0905845106
  8. Coleman, A. W. 2000. The significance of a coincidence between evolutionary landmarks found in mating affinity and a DNA sequence. Protist 151:1–9. doi.org/10.1078/1434-4610-00002
  9. Evans, N. & Paulay, G. 2012. DNA barcoding methods for invertebrates. Methods Mol. Biol. 858:47–77. doi.org/10.1007/978-1-61779-591-6_4
  10. Famà, P., Wysor, B., Kooistra, W. H. C. F. & Zuccarello, G. C. 2002. Molecular phylogeny of the genus Caulerpa (Caulerpales, Chlorophyta) inferred from chloroplast tufA gene. J. Phycol. 38:1040–1050. doi.org/10.1046/j.1529-8817.2002.t01-1-01237.x
  11. Fawley, M. W., Dean, M. L., Dimmer, S. K. & Fawley, K. P. 2006. Evaluating the morphospecies concept in the Selenastraceae (Chlorophyceae, Chlorophyta). J. Phycol. 42:142–154. doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-8817.2006.00169.x
  12. Fawley, M. W., Fawley, K. P. & Dean, M. L. 2002. Assessing the biodiversity of Monoraphidium using 18S rDNA sequences. J. Phycol. 38:9. doi.org/10.1046/j.1529-8817.38.s1.25.x
  13. Garcia da Silva, T., Bock, C., Sant'Anna, C. L., Bagatini, I. L., Wodniok, S. & Vieira, A. A. H. 2017. Selenastraceae (Sphaeropleales, Chlorophyceae): rbcL, 18S rDNA and ITS-2 secondary structure enlightens traditional taxonomy, with description of two new genera, Messastrum gen. nov. and Curvastrum gen. nov. Fottea 17:1-19. doi.org/10.5507/fot.2016.010
  14. Hajibabaei, M.,Singer, G.A.C., Clare, E.L. &Hebert, P.D.N. 2007. Design and applicability of DNA arrays and DNA barcodes in biodiversity monitoring. BMC Biol. 5:24. doi.org/10.1186/1741-7007-5-24
  15. Hall, J. D., Fučíková, K., Lo, C., Lewis, L. A. & Karol, K. G. 2010. An assessment of proposed DNA barcodes in freshwater green algae. Cryptogam. Algol. 31:529–555.
  16. Hanyuda, T., Arai, S. & Ueda, K. 2000. Variabilityin the rbcL introns of Caulerpalean algae (Chlorophyta, Ulvo-phyceae). J. Plant Res. 113:403-413. doi.org/10.1007/PL00013948
  17. Hebert, P. D. N. & Barrett, R. D. H. 2005. Reply to the comment by L. Prendini on "Identifying spiders through DNA barcodes". Can. J. Zool. 83:505–506. doi.org/10.1139/z05-026
  18. Hebert, P. D. N., Cywinska, A., Ball, S. L. & DeWaard, J. R. 2003. Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proc. Biol. Sci. 270:313–321. doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2002.2218
  19. Hebert, P. D. N., deWaard, J.R. & Landry, J.-F. 2010. DNA barcodes for 1/1000 of the animal kingdom. Biol. Lett. 6:359-362. doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2009.0848
  20. Heynig, H. & Krienitz, L. 1982. Monoraphidium neglectum n. sp. and some remarks on the genera Monoraphid-ium, Chlorolobion and Keratococcus (Chlorococcales). Arch. Protistenkd. 125:335-344. doi.org/10.1016/S0003-9365(82)80032-8
  21. Hindak, F. 1977. Studies on the chlorococcal algae (Chloro-phyceae).I. Biol. Prace 28:1-263.
  22. Hindak, F. 1984. Studies on the chlorococcal algae (Chloro-phyceae) III. Biol. Prace 30:1-312.
  23. Holbrook, G. P., Davidson, Z., Tatara, R. A., Ziemer, N. L., Rosentrater, K. A. & Grayburn, W. S. 2014. Use of the microalga Monoraphidium sp. grown in wastewater as a feedstock for biodiesel: cultivation and fuel characteristics. Appl. Energy 131:386–393. doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.06.043
  24. Katoh, K. & Standley, D.M. 2013. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol. Biol. Evol. 30:772-780. doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mst010
  25. Kimura, M. 1980. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J. Mol. Evol. 16:111–120. doi.org/10.1007/BF01731581
  26. Komárek, J. 1974. Monoraphidium flexuosum, a new chlorococcal alga from the lakes of northwestern Ontario (Canada). Preslia 46:118–122.
  27. Komárek, J. & Fott, B. 1983. Chlorophyceae (Grünalgen), Ordnung Chlorococcales. In Huber-Pestalozzi, G. (Ed.) Das Phytoplankton des Süsswassers, Die Binnengewässer 16, 7/1. Schweizerbart Verlag, Stuttgart, pp. 1–1044.
  28. Komárková-Legnerová, J. 1969. The systematics and ontogenesis of the genera Ankistrodesmus Corda and Monoraphidium gen. nov. In Fott, B. (Ed.) Studies in Phycology. Academia Publishing House of the Czechosolvak Academy of Sciences, Prague, pp. 75–144.
  29. Kress, W. J. & Erickson, D. L. 2007. A two-locus global DNA barcode for land plants: the coding rbcL gene complements the non-coding trnH-psbA spacer region. PLoS ONE 2:e508. doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0000508
  30. Kress, W. J. & Erickson, D. L. 2012. DNA barcodes: methods and protocols. In Kress, W. J. & Erickson, D. L. (Eds.) DNA Barcodes: Methods and Protocols. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ, pp. 3–8.
  31. Kress, W. J., García-Robledo, C., Uriarte, M. & Erickson, D. L. 2015. DNA barcodes for ecology, evolution, and conservation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 30:25–35. doi.org/10.1016/j. tree.2014.10.008
  32. Krienitz, L. & Bock, C. 2012. Present state of the systematics of planktonic coccoid green algae of inland waters. Hydrobiologia 698:295–326. doi.org/10.1007/s10750-012-1079-z
  33. Krienitz, L., Bock, C., Dadheech, P. K. & Pröschold, T. 2011. Taxonomic reassessment of the genus Mychonastes (Chlorophyceae, Chlorophyta) including the description of eight new species. Phycologia 50:89–106. doi. org/10.2216/10-15.1
  34. Krienitz, L., Ustinova, I., Friedl, T. & Huss, V. A. R. 2001. Traditional generic concepts versus 18S rRNA gene phylogeny in the green algal family Selenastraceae (Chlorophyceae, Chlorophyta). J. Phycol. 37:852–865. doi. org/10.1046/j.1529-8817.2001.01004.x
  35. Lin, Y., Ge, J., Ling, H., Zhang, Y., Yan, X. & Ping, W. 2018. Isolation of a novel strain of Monoraphidium sp. and characterization of its potential for α-linolenic acid and biodiesel production. Bioresour. Technol. 267:466–472. doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.07.081
  36. Lin, Y., Ge, J., Zhang, Y., Ling, H., Yan, X. & Ping, W. 2019.Monoraphidium sp. HDMA-20 is a new potential source of α-linolenic acid and eicosatetraenoic acid. Lipids Health Dis. 18:56. doi.org/10.1186/s12944-019-0996-5
  37. Liu, X., Ma, N., Feng, J., et al. 2024. Selenastrum densum sp. nov., a new member of the genus Selenastrum (Selenastraceae, Chlorophyceae, Chlorophyta). J. Oceanol. Limnol. Advanced online publication. doi.org/10.1007/s00343-024-4082-0
  38. Martynenko, N., Gusev, E., Kapustin, D. & Kulikovskiy, M. 2022. A new cryptic species of the genus Mychonastes (Chlorophyceae, Sphaeropleales). Plants 11:3363. doi. org/10.3390/plants11233363
  39. Marvan, P., Komárek, J. & Comas, A. 1984. Weighting and scaling of features in numerical evaluation of coccal green algae (genera of the Selenastraceae). Arch. Hydrobiol. Suppl. 67:363–399. doi.org/10.1127/algol_stud/67/1984/363
  40. McManus, H. A. & Lewis, L. A. 2005. Molecular phylogenetics, morphological variation and colony-form evolution in the family Hydrodictyaceae (Sphaeropleales, Chlorophyta). Phycologia 44:582–595. doi.org/10.2216/0031-8884(2005)44[582:MPMVAC]2.0.CO;2
  41. Minicante, S. A., Genovese, G. & Morabito, M. 2014. Two new alien macroalgae identified by the DNA barcoding. Biol. Mar. Mediterr. 21:70–72.
  42. Müller, T., Philippi, N., Dandekar, T., Schultz, J. & Wolf, M. 2007. Distinguishing species. RNA 13:1469–1472. doi.org/10.1127/10.1261/rna.617107
  43. Nguyen, M. L., Mai, X. C., Chu, N. H., Trinh, D. M., Liu, C. L. & Shen, C.-R. 2023. DNA signaturing derived from the internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS2): a novel tool for identifying Desmodesmus species (Scenedesmaceae, Chlorophyta). Fottea 23:1–7. doi.org/10.5507/fot.2022.005
  44. Nygaard, G. 1977. New or interesting plankton algae: with a contribution on their ecology. Biol. Skr. 21:1–107.
  45. Richards, E., Reichardt, M. & Rogers, S. 1994. Preparation of genomic DNA from plant tissue. Curr. Protoc. Mol. Biol. 2:Unit2.3. doi.org/10.1002/0471142727.mb0203s27
  46. Saitou, N. & Nei, M. 1987. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 4:406–425. doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040454
  47. Saunders, G. W. & Kucera, H. 2010. An evaluation of rbcL, tufA, UPA, LSU and ITS as DNA barcode markers for the marine green macroalgae. Cryptogam. Algol. 31:487–528.
  48. Saunders, G. W. & McDevit, D. C. 2012. Methods for DNA barcoding photosynthetic protists emphasizing the macroalgae and diatoms. Methods Mol. Biol. 858:207-222. doi.org/10.1007/978-1-61779-591-6_10
  49. Schultz, J., Maisel, S., Gerlach, D., Müller, T. & Wolf, M. 2005. A common core of secondary structure of the internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS2) throughout the Eukaryota. RNA 11:361–364. doi.org/10.1261/rna.7204505
  50. Schultz, J. & Wolf, M. 2009. ITS2 sequence–structure analysis in phylogenetics: a how-to manual for molecular systematics. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 52:520–523. doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2009.01.008
  51. Seibel, P. N., Müller, T., Dandekar, T., Schultz, J. & Wolf, M. 2006. 4SALE: a tool for synchronous RNA sequence and secondary structure alignment and editing. BMC Bioinformatics 7:498. doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-7-498
  52. Shetty, P., Farkas, A., Pap, B., et al. 2021. Comparative and phylogenomic analysis of nuclear and organelle genes in cryptic Coelastrella vacuolata MACC-549 green algae. Algal Res. 58:102380. doi.org/10.1016/j.algal.2021.102380
  53. Tamura, K., Stecher, G. & Kumar, S. 2021. MEGA11: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 11. Mol. Biol. Evol. 38:3022–3027. doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msab120
  54. Thompson, J. D., Higgins, D. G. & Gibson, T. J. 1994. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 22:4673–4680. doi.org/10.1093/nar/22.22.4673
  55. Verbruggen, H., Ashworth, M., LoDuca, S. T., et al. 2009. A multi-locus time-calibrated phylogeny of the siphonous green algae. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 50:642–653. doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2008.12.018
  56. Vieira, H. H., Bagatini, I. L., Guinart, C. M. & Vieira, A. A. H. 2016. tufA gene as molecular marker for freshwater Chlorophyceae. Algae 31:155–165. doi.org/10.4490/algae.2016.31.4.14
  57. Vimali, E., Sakthi Vignesh, N., Kandasamy, M., et al. 2022. Influence of food waste and graphene oxide manosheets on Monoraphidium sp. VV1 biomass and biodiesel production. Top. Catal. Advanced online Publication. doi.org/10.1007/s11244-022-01755-7
  58. Yee, W. 2016. Microalgae from the Selenastraceae as emerging candidates for biodiesel production: a mini review. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 32:64. doi.org/10.1007/s11274-016-2023-6
  59. Zou, S., Fei, C., Wang, C., et al. 2016. How DNA barcoding can be more effective in microalgae identification: a case of cryptic diversity revelation in Scenedesmus (Chlorophyceae). Sci. Rep. 6:36822. doi.org/10.1038/srep36822