Animal Bioscience

  • 제38권3호
  • /
  • Pages.381-394
  • /
  • 2025
  • /
  • 2765-0189(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2765-0235(eISSN)
아세아태평양축산학회 (Asian Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Discriminant canonical analysis as a tool to determine traces of endangered native hen breed introgression through egg hatchability phenomics

  • 투고 : 2022.04.21
  • 심사 : 2022.10.30
  • 발행 : 2025.03.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Objective: The main objective of this study was to develop a pipeline to detect phenogenomic introgression across different multivariety breeds and to validate such classification focusing on external egg and hatchability-related traits using a discriminant canonical analysis approach. Methods: For this, 1,368 eggs belonging a flock of 94 endangered Spanish autochthonous breed breeding hens (Andalusian Tufted, Blue Andalusian, Spanish White-Faced, and Utrerana) and a control outgroup comprising 32 eggs belonging to 4 Araucana hens were considered. Multicollinearity analysis of hatchability-related traits revealed embryonic mortality, embryonic mortality in the second stage of incubation, viable hatching chick, major diameter, and minor diameter should be discarded from the analysis (variance inflation factor ≤5) given they did not significantly contribute to variability explanation potential of the discriminant model. Results: A stepwise discriminant canonical analysis was developed and egg weight, shape index, hatchability, and fertility variables reported the highest discriminant power (Wilks' Lambda values of 0.7861, 0.7871, 0.8076, and 0.9457, respectively). The first two functions explained 85.25% intergroup variability. Interbreed and varieties proximity was evaluated using Mahalanobis distances representation and data mining cross-validation allowed to detect genetic introgression between different genotypes. Conclusion: Easily collectable traits as egg weight and shape index must be considered for the development of breeding programs as a measure to ensure breed protection. The model may be translatable to other endangered breeds to optimize avian breeds conservation plans worldwide.

키워드

과제정보

This work would not have been possible if it had not been for the funding of FEDER Project PP.AVA.AVA201601.16, as well as the assistance of the IFAPA, Diputacion de Cordoba, and PAIDI AGR 218 research group. The study took place during the covering period of a Ramon y Cajal Post-Doctoral Contract with the reference MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 and the European Union "NextGenerationEU"/PRTR.

참고문헌

  1. Shen X, Bai X, Luo C, et al. Quantitative proteomic analysis of chicken serum reveals key proteins affecting follicle develop­ment during reproductive phase transitions. Poult Sci 2021;100:325­33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2020.09.058
  2. Archer GS. Exposing broiler eggs to green, red and white light during incubation. Animal 2017;11:1203­9. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731117000143
  3. Grochowska E, Kinal A, Sobek Z, Siatkowski I, Bednarczyk M. Field study on the factors affecting egg weight loss, early embryonic mortality, hatchability, and chick mortality with the use of classification tree technique. Poult Sci 2019;98:3626­36. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pez180
  4. Özlü S, Elibol O, Brake J. Effect of storage temperature fluc­tuation on embryonic development and mortality, and hatch­ability of broiler hatching eggs. Poult Sci 2018;97:3878­83.https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pey253
  5. González Ariza A, Arando Arbulu A, Navas González FJ, et al. Sensory preference and professional profile affinity definition of endangered native breed eggs compared to commercial laying lineages' eggs. Animals 2019;9:920. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9110920
  6. González Ariza A, Arando Arbulu A, León Jurado JM, Navas González FJ, Delgado Bermejo JV, Camacho Vallejo ME. Discriminant canonical tool for differential biometric charac­terization of multivariety endangered hen breeds. Animals2021;11:2211. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11082211
  7. González Ariza A, Navas González FJ, Arando Arbulu A, León Jurado JM, Barba Capote CJ, Camacho Vallejo ME. Non­parametrical canonical analysis of quality­-related charac­teristics of eggs of different varieties of native hens compared to laying lineage. Animals 2019;9:153. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9040153
  8. González Ariza A, Arando Arbulu A, Navas González FJ, Delgado Bermejo JV, Camacho Vallejo ME. Discriminant canonical analysis as a validation tool for multivariety native breed egg commercial quality classification. Foods 2021;10:632. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10030632
  9. Li S, He Y, Mann DA, Deng X. Global spread of Salmonella Enteritidis via centralized sourcing and international trade of poultry breeding stocks. Nat Commun 2021;12:5109. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467­021­25319­7
  10. Marín Navas C, Delgado Bermejo JV, McLean AK, León Jurado JM, Navas González FJ. Discriminant canonical analysis of the contribution of spanish and arabian purebred horses to the genetic diversity and population structure of hispano­arabian horses. Animals 2021;11:269. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11020269
  11. Taha AE. Analyzing of quail eggs hatchability, quality, embryonic mortality and malpositions in relation to their shell colors. Online J Anim Feed Res 2011;1:267­73.
  12. Eleroğlu H, Yıldırım A, Duman M, Okur N. Effect of eggshell color on the egg characteristics and hatchability of Guinea fowl (Numida meleagris) eggs. Braz J Poult Sci. 2016;18:61­8. https://doi.org/10.1590/1806­9061­2015­0154
  13. Ishaq HM, Akram M, Baber ME, et al. Embryonic mortality in cobb broiler breeder strain with three egg weight and storage periods at four production phases. J Anim Plant Sci 2014;24:1623­8. https://doi.org/10.21897/rmvz.1245
  14. Lordelo M, Cid J, Cordovil CMDS, Alves SP, Bessa RJB, Carolino I. A comparison between the quality of eggs from indigenous chicken breeds and that from commercial layers. Poult Sci 2020;99:1768­76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2019.11.023
  15. Liptoi K, Hidas A. Investigation of possible genetic background of early embryonic mortality in poultry. Worlds Poult Sci J 2006;62:326­37. https://doi.org/10.1079/WPS2005101
  16. Fechheimer N, Jaap R. Origins of euploid chimerism in embryos of Gallus domesticus. Genetica 1980;52:69­72. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00121816
  17. Vieira SL, Moran ET. Effects of egg of origin and chick post-­hatch nutrition on broiler live performance and meat yields. Worlds Poult Sci J 1999;55:125-­42. https://doi.org/10.1079/WPS19990009
  18. Yerpes M, Llonch P, Manteca X. Factors associated with cumulative first-week mortality in broiler chicks. Animals 2020;10:310. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10020310
  19. Tadelle D, Alemu Y, Peters KJ. Indigenous chickens in Ethiopia: genetic potential and attempts at improvement. Worlds Poult Sci J 2007;56:45­54. https://doi.org/10.1079/WPS200
  20. Szwaczkowski T. Use of mixed model methodology in poultry breeding: estimation of genetic parameters. Poult Genet Breed Biotechnol 2003;11:165­202. https://doi.org/10.1079/9780851996608.0165
  21. Obrzut J, Calik J, Krawczyk J. Temporal trends in performance and hatchability traits of eight strains of hens covered by the gene pool protection programme in Poland. Ann Anim Sci 2021;21:1347­66. https://doi.org/10.2478/aoas­2021­0062
  22. Wen C, Mai C, Wang B, Li J, Sun C, Yang N. Detrimental effects of excessive fatty acid secretion on female sperm storage in chickens. J Anim Sci Biotechnol 2020;11:26. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104­020­0432­8
  23. Gebriel G, El­-Fiky A, Samak H, Abou-­Elewa E, El­-Mougy BA. Determination of maternal antibody (IgY) concentration as a genetic marker to improve fertility, hatchability and livability percentages in two local strains of chickens. Menoufia J Anim Poult Fish Prod 2018;2:23­37. https://doi.org/10.21608/mjapfp.2018.175614
  24. Bain MM, Nys Y, Dunn IC. Increasing persistency in lay and stabilising egg quality in longer laying cycles. What are the challenges? Br Poult Sci 2016;57:330­8. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2016.1161727
  25. Harun M, Veeneklaas R, Visser G, Van Kampen M. Artificial incubation of Muscovy duck eggs: why some eggs hatch and others do not. Poult Sci 2001;80:219­24. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/80.2.219
  26. Blanco AE, Icken W, Ould­-Ali D, Cavero D, Schmutz M. Genetic parameters of egg quality traits on different pedigree layers with special focus on dynamic stiffness. Poult Sci 2014;93:2457­63. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2014­04132
  27. Bauer F, Tullett SG, Wilson HR. Effects of setting eggs small end up on hatchability and posthatching performance of broilers. Br Poult Sci 1990;31:715­24. https://doi.org/10.1080/
  28. Hamidu JA, Fasenko GM, Feddes JJR, et al. The effect of broiler breeder genetic strain and parent flock age on eggshell conductance and embryonic metabolism. Poult Sci 2007;86:2420­32. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2007­00265
  29. Latour MA, Peebles E, Doyle S, Pansky T, Smith T, Boyle CR. Broiler breeder age and dietary fat influence the yolk fatty acid profiles of fresh eggs and newly hatched chicks. Poult Sci 1998;77:47­53. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/77.1.47
  30. Maiorka A, da Silva AF, Santin E, Pizauro JM, Macari M. Broiler breeder age and dietary energy level on performance and pancreas lipase and trypsin activities of 7-days old chicks. Int 1 Poult Sci 2004;3:234-7. https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2004.234.237
  31. Brah G, Chaudhary M, Sandhu J. Analysis of relation of egg weight with embryonic mortality, hatching time, chick weight and embryonic efficiency in chickens. Indian J Poult Sci 1999;34:308-12.
  32. Araujo de Carvalho D, Martinez Martinez A, Carolino I, et al. Diversity and genetic relationship of free-range chickens from the Northeast Region of Brazil. Animals 2020;10:1857. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10101857
  33. Macri M, Martinez A, Landi V, et al. Genetic diversity of Utrerana chicken breed. AICA 2019;13:52-9.
  34. Delgado Bermejo JV, Martinez Martinez MA, Rodriguez Galvan G, Stemmer A, Navas Gonzalez FJ, Camacho Vallejo ME. Organization and management of conservation programs and research in domestic animal genetic resources. Diversity 2019;11:235. https://doi.org/10.3390/d11120235