International Journal of Internet, Broadcasting and Communication

  • 제16권4호
  • /
  • Pages.21-35
  • /
  • 2024
  • /
  • 2288-4920(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-4939(eISSN)
한국인터넷방송통신학회 (The Institute of Internet, Broadcasting and Communication)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analyzing the Influence of COVID-19 on Overseas Korean Voting Intentions: Insights from Twitter Discourse

  • Sou Hyun JANG (Department of Sociology, Korea University) ;
  • Yong Jeong YI (Department of Applied Artificial Intelligence, School of Convergence, Sungkyunkwan University) ;
  • Wonbin CHO (Department of Political Science, Sungkyunkwan University )
  • 투고 : 2024.09.04
  • 심사 : 2024.09.14
  • 발행 : 2024.11.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

We investigate the discourse on Twitter among overseas Koreans regarding voting intentions during the COVID-19 pandemic. Employing Snscrape 0.3.4 for data collection, we gathered tweets using a set of predefined keywords related to voting, COVID-19, and overseas Korean experiences. Our content analysis, grounded in both quantitative and qualitative methodologies, followed a rigorous coding scheme developed iteratively to capture the essence of the discourse, focusing on attitudes, subjective norms, and perceived barriers to voting during the pandemic. We found a significant shift in discourse, from initial information sharing and voting encouragement to a focus on the obstacles posed by COVID-19, including the closure of diplomatic missions and the impact of social distancing measures. The findings reveal a strong collective self-efficacy among overseas Koreans, who actively sought and shared voting-related information, encouraged participation, and proposed alternative voting methods. Theoretical implications extend to the realms of self-efficacy and the theory of planned behavior, illustrating how digital platforms can mediate political mobilization and participation in unprecedented circumstances. This study contributes to the understanding of global citizenship and political engagement in the 21st century, emphasizing the importance of structural support and digital platforms in facilitating the exercise of citizenship rights during global crises.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Mann, D. M., et al. (2020). COVID-19 transforms health care through telemedicine: evidence from the field. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, vol. 27, no. 7, pp. 1132-1135, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocaa072
  2. Bartik, A. W., et al. (2020). The impact of COVID-19 on small business outcomes and expectations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 117, no. 30, pp. 17656-17666, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2006991117
  3. Moser-Plautz, B., & Schmidthuber, L. (2023). Digital government transformation as an organizational response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Government Information Quarterly, vol. 40, no. 3, 101815, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2023.101815
  4. Padeiro, M., et al. (2021). Local governments' use of social media during the COVID-19 pandemic: The case of Portugal. Government Information Quarterly, vol. 38, no. 4, 101620, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101620
  5. Kim, H. (2014). Enacted social support on social media and subjective well-being. International Journal of Communication, vol. 8, pp. 21, 2014. DOI: Not available.
  6. Kwon, K. H., et al. (2019). Proximity and networked news public: Structural topic modeling of global Twitter conversations about the 2017 Quebec mosque shooting. International Journal of Communication, vol. 13, pp. 24, 2019. DOI: Not available.
  7. Bertot, J. (2019). Social Media, Open Platforms, and Democracy: Transparency Enabler, Slayer of Democracy, Both?. Proceedings of the 52nd Hawaii International Conference on System Science, pp. 7835-7844, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24251/HICSS.2019.939
  8. Raynauld, V., & Greenberg, J. (2014). Tweet, click, vote: Twitter and the 2010 Ottawa municipal election. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 412-434, 2014. DOI: Not available.
  9. Singh, P., et al. (2020). Can Twitter analytics predict election outcome? An insight from 2017 Punjab assembly elections. Government Information Quarterly, vol. 37, no. 2, 101444, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.101444
  10. Yaqub, U., et al. (2017). Analysis of political discourse on Twitter in the context of the 2016 US presidential elections. Government Information Quarterly, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 613-626, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2017.11.001
  11. National Election Commission. (2020a). Analysis of the Voter Turnout of the 21st National Assembly Members. DOI: Not available.
  12. National Election Commission. (2020b). Decision to Suspend Additional Overseas Elections at 5 Diplomatic Missions, including the Indian embassy. DOI: Not available.
  13. Holbein, J. B., & Hillygus, D. S. (2020). Making young voters: Converting civic attitudes into civic action. Cambridge University Press, 2020. DOI: ttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781108770446
  14. Fraga, B. L. (2018). The turnout gap: Race, ethnicity, and political inequality in a diversifying America. Cambridge University Press, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108566483
  15. Dassonneville, R., & Kostelka, F. (2021). The cultural sources of the gender gap in voter turnout. British Journal of Political Science, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 1040-1061, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123419000644
  16. Holbert, R. L., et al. (2021). Exploring the role of media use within an Integrated Behavioral Model (IBM) approach to vote likelihood. American Behavioral Scientist, vol. 65, no. 3, pp. 412-431, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764220975054
  17. Jang, S. H. (2022). Political Transnationalism: Factors Associated With Immigrants' Voting in Their Home Country Elections. Political Studies Review, 14789299221097043, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/14789299221097043
  18. Jang, S. H. (2023). Transnationalism with Multi-Leveled Actors: A Systematic Review of Studies on Overseas Koreans' Voting. Political Studies Review, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 127-143, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/14789299211052901
  19. Korea Legislation Research Institute. (2020). Public Official Election Act. DOI: Not available.
  20. Guzarnizo, L. E., Portes, A., & Haller, W. (2003). From Assimilation to Transnationalism: Determinants of Transnational Political Action among Contemporary Migrants. American Journal of Sociology, vol. 108, pp. 1211-1248, 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/375195
  21. Marcelli, E. A., & Cornelius, W. A. (2005). Immigrant voting in home-country elections: Potential consequences of extending the franchise to expatriate Mexicans residing in the United States. Mexican Studies/Estudios Mexicanos, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 429-460, 2005. DOI: Not available.
  22. Khang, S. (2013). Analysis of Survey Results on Overseas Election. The Korean Civic Ethics Review, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 123-142, 2013. DOI: Not available.
  23. Park, B. (2016). Overseas Koreans' Politics Recognition and Voting Behavior in 18th Presidential Elections - Focusing on the America, Japan and China. The Journal of International Relations, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 49-74, 2016. DOI: Not available.
  24. Kim, J., & Yim, Y. (2018). A Study on the Abstention Factor of Overseas Korean Election. Studies of Koreans Abroad, vol. 44, pp. 33-52, 2018. DOI: Not available.
  25. Al-Fadhat, F., & Choi, J. W. (2023). Insights From The 2022 South Korean Presidential Election: Polarisation, Fractured Politics, Inequality, And Constraints on Power. Journal of Contemporary Asia, pp. 1-13, 2023. DOI: Not available.
  26. Kim, R. D., & Wu, C. E. (2023). The Political Economy of Minimum Wage Policies in South Korea and Taiwan: Decision-Making under Strong versus Weak Partisanship. Journal of Contemporary Asia, pp. 1-24, 2023. DOI: Not available.
  27. Doucette, J. (2010). The terminal crisis of the "participatory government" and the election of Lee Myung Bak. Journal of Contemporary Asia, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 22-43, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00472330903270338
  28. Kim, S., & Han, C. (2023). The Origins of Collaborative Governance in South Korea: An Analysis of the First Ten Years After Democratisation. Journal of Contemporary Asia, pp. 1-18, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2023.2248602
  29. Kim, T., & Lee, S. S. Y. (2023). Double Poverty: Class, Employment Type, Gender and Time Poor Precarious Workers in the South Korean Service Economy. Journal of Contemporary Asia, pp. 1-20, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2023.2208374
  30. Chu, Y. W., & Kong, T. Y. (2022). East Asian Varieties of Capitalism and Socio-Economic Inequality: South Korea and Hong Kong Compared. Journal of Contemporary Asia, pp. 1-29, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2022.2105738
  31. Literat, I., & Kligler-Vilenchik, N. (2021). How popular culture prompts youth collective political expression and cross-cutting political talk on social media: A cross-platform analysis. Social Media + Society, vol. 7, no. 2, 20563051211008821, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051211008821
  32. Bermingham, A., & Smeaton, A. F. (2011). On using Twitter to monitor political sentiment and predict election results. DOI: Not available.
  33. Chen, E., Deb, A., & Ferrara, E. (2021). #Election2020: the first public Twitter dataset on the 2020 US Presidential election. Journal of Computational Social Science, pp. 1-18, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2010.00600
  34. Larsson, A. O., & Moe, H. (2012). Studying political microblogging: Twitter users in the 2010 Swedish election campaign. New Media & Society, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 729-747, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444811422894
  35. Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In Action control: From cognition to behavior (pp. 11-39). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
  36. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 179-211. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
  37. Ajzen, I. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
  38. Godin, G., & Kok, G. (1996). The theory of planned behavior: A review of its applications to health-related behaviors. American Journal of Health Promotion, 11(2), 87-98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4278/0890-1171-11.2.87
  39. Ajzen, I. (2002). Perceived behavioral control, self-efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32(4), 665-683. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb00236.x
  40. Bosnjak, M., Ajzen, I., & Schmidt, P. (2020). The theory of planned behavior: Selected recent advances and applications. Europe's Journal of Psychology, 16(3), 352-356. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v16i3.3107
  41. Hansen, T., & Jensen, J. M. (2007). Understanding voters' decisions: A Theory of Planned Behaviour approach. Innovative Marketing, 3(4), 14-20.
  42. Glasford, D. E. (2008). Predicting voting behavior of young adults: The importance of information, motivation, and behavioral skills. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38(11), 2648-2672. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2008.00408.x
  43. Marcinkowski, F., & Metag, J. (2014). Why do candidates use online media in constituency campaigning? An application of the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 11(2), 151-168. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2014.895690
  44. Zahra, A., & Munandar, J. M. (2022). Factors affecting the decision using theory of planned behavior (Case Study: Election of the 2019 President). Journal Indonesia Sosial Sains, 3(08), 1136-1148. DOI: https://doi.org/10.59141/jiss.v3i08.659
  45. JustAnotherArchivist. (2021). Snscrape 0.3.4. GitHub. DOI: Not available.
  46. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W.H. Freeman, New York, 1997. DOI: Not available.