DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Effects of Verbal Feedback on Core Muscle Activation During Different Pilates Mat Exercises

  • Do-Eun Kim (Department of Physical Therapy, Graduate School, Daegu Catholic University) ;
  • Dong-Cheon Jeon (Department of Physical Therapy, Graduate School, Daegu Catholic University) ;
  • Ji-Won Park (Department of Physical Therapy, Graduate School, Daegu Catholic University)
  • 투고 : 2024.07.19
  • 심사 : 2024.08.19
  • 발행 : 2024.08.31

초록

Purpose: This study sought to identify the effect of verbal feedback on core muscle activation during different Pilates mat exercises. Methods: The exercises were performed by fifteen healthy female adults who met the given health conditions criteria and voluntarily agreed to participate in the study. These participants (average age 31.2±6.5 years old; 19.6±1.1 body mass index) performed four specific Pilates mat exercises with and without verbal feedback from an instructor. The surface electromyography (EMG) activities of the external oblique (EO), internal oblique (IO), and multifidus (MU) muscles were recorded during each condition and then normalized using the maximal voluntary isometric contraction to compare the recorded data. Since the normality was accepted, the paired t-test was used as a method to determine data differences (p<0.05). Results: Significant differences in muscle activation were observed. When the participants were asked to perform the mat exercises with verbal feedback, higher activation was observed in the EO, IO, and MU muscles. This indicates the effectiveness of providing verbal feedback while Pilates mat exercises are being performed. Conclusion: Based on these results, it would be fair to conclude that verbal instructions may be an effective way to enhance the EMG activities of the powerhouse muscles during Pilates mat exercises.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Critchley DJ, Pierson Z, Battersby G. Effect of pilates mat exercises and conventional exercise programmes on transversus abdominis and obliquus internus abdominis activity: pilot randomised trial. Man Ther. 2011;16(2):183-9.
  2. Latey P. The pilates method: history and philosophy. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2001;5(4):275-82.
  3. Muscolino JE, Cipriani S. Pilates and the "powerhouse"-I. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2004a;8(1):15-24.
  4. Muscolino JE, Cipriani S. Pilates and the "powerhouse"-II. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2004b;8(2):122-30.
  5. Isacowitz R, Clippinger KS. Pilates anatomy. Champaign, Human Kinetics, 2011:52-194.
  6. Nadler SF, Malanga GA, Bartoli LA et al. Hip muscle imbalance and low back pain in athletes: influence of core strengthening. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2002;34(1):9-16.
  7. Wells C, Kolt GS, Bialocerkowski A. Defining pilates exercise: a systematic review. Complement Ther Med. 2012;20(4):253-62.
  8. Han JS, Cho WS, Lim JH. The effects of pilates mat exercise on trunk muscle thickness and balance. J Kor Phys Ther. 2017;29(4):201-6.
  9. Kim HJ, Kim CS. Continued mat pilates exercise improve basal physical fitness, core stability and back pain in healthy college female. Exerc Sci. 2022;31(3):345-56.
  10. Batibay S, Kulcu DG, Kaleoglu O et al. Effect of pilates mat exercise and home exercise programs on pain, functional level, and core muscle thickness in women with chronic low back pain. J Orthop Sci. 2021;26(6):979-85.
  11. Kendall FP, McCreary EK, Provance PG. Muscles: testing and function with posture and pain. 5th ed. Baltimore, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2005:49-117.
  12. Choi HN. The effect of pilates instructor's expertise on teaching efficiency and re-enrollment Intention. Kyunghee University. Dissertation of Master's Degree. 2019.
  13. Meier C, Frank C, Groben B et al. Verbal instructions and motor learning: how analogy and explicit instructions influence the development of mental representations and tennis serve performance. Front Psychol. 2020;11:2.
  14. Bressel E, Willardson JM, Thompson B et al. Effect of instruction, surface stability, and load intensity on trunk muscle activity. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2009;19(6):e500-4.
  15. Karst GM, Willett GM. Effects of specific exercise instructions on abdominal muscle activity during trunk curl exercises. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2004;34(1):4-12.
  16. Vera-Garcia FJ, Brown SH, Gray JR et al. Effects of different levels of torso coactivation on trunk muscular and kinematic responses to posteriorly applied sudden loads. Clin Biomech. 2006;21(5):443-55.
  17. Vera-Garcia FJ, Elvira JL, Brown SH et al. Effects of abdominal stabilization maneuvers on the control of spine motion and stability against sudden trunk perturbations. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2007;17(5):556-67.
  18. Silva JB, Szkudlarek AC, Gallo RB et al. Verbal and visual feedback immediately affect the electromyographic activity of female pelvic floor muscles. J Manip Physiol Ther. 2021;44(9):743-50.
  19. Grenier SG, McGill SM. Quantification of lumbar stability by using 2 different abdominal activation strategies. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;88(1):54-62.
  20. Kim CM, Kim DE. Mat pilates. Seoul, Hakjisa Medical, 2021:253-408.
  21. Bae WS, Kim CH. The effect of closed kinetic and open kinetic exercise on thickness of low back stabilization exercise using an ultrasonography imaging. J Korean Soc Integr Med. 2013;1(2):67-80.
  22. Fayh A, Brodt GA, Souza C et al. Pilates instruction affects stability and muscle recruitment during the long stretch exercise. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2018;22(2):471-5.
  23. Zaton K, Szczepan S. The effect of immediate verbal feedback on the efficiency and the effectiveness of swimming. Balt J Health Phys Act. 2012;4(2):91-103.
  24. Hofste A, Soer R, Salomons E et al. Intramuscular EMG versus surface emg of lumbar multifidus and erector spinae in healthy participants. Spine. 2020;45(20):E1319-25.
  25. Okubo YU, Kaneoka K, Imai A et al. Comparison of the activities of the deep trunk muscles measured using intramuscular and surface electromyography. J Mech Med Biol. 2010;10(4):611-20.
  26. Arokoski J, Kankaanpaa M, Valta T et al. Back and hip extensor muscle function during the therapeutic exercises. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999;80(7):842-50.