The Journal of Korean Physical Therapy

The Korean Society of Physical Therapy (대한물리치료학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Effect of Unstable Support Surface Changes on Upper and Lower Limbs on Core Stabilizing Muscle Activation during Plank Exercise

  • Sung-Hak Cho (Department of Physical Therapy, Kaya University)
  • Received : 2024.05.27
  • Accepted : 2024.06.26
  • Published : 2024.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to suggest effective exercise methods for individual situations by examining changes in trunk muscle activity when plank exercise is performed using unstable support surfaces for the upper and lower limbs, respectively. Methods: Thirty-six adult males were divided into 3 groups. The subjects were divided into three groups of 12 people through a lottery. The first group was the standard plank group (Plank), the second group was the Upper Unstable Plank group (UUP), which provided instability to the upper extremities, and the third group was the Lower Unstable Plank group (LUP), which provided instability to the lower extremities. To compare the activity of trunk muscles during each plank movement, EMG was used to compare the muscle activity of the external oblique (EO), rectus abdominis (RA), and erector spinae (ES) muscles. Muscle thickness of the transverse abdominis (TrA) was measured using ultrasound. Results: This study showed that mean muscle activity of EO and RA was significantly increased in the UUP and LUP groups compared to the Plank group (p<0.05). ES was not significantly different among the three groups. The mean muscle thickness of TrA was significantly increased in LUP (p<0.05). Conclusion: According to the results of this study, when providing instability in the plank posture to enhance trunk stability, it is recommended to provide instability to the lower extremities rather than the upper extremities.

Keywords

References

  1. Jung JH, Kim WW, Seong IH et al. The study on effectiveness of oriental medicine treatment for lumbar disc herniation inpatients on 208 cases. J Korean Acad Rehabil Med. 2013;23(1):77-86.
  2. Shumway-Cook A, Horak FB. Rehabilitation strategies for patients with vestibular deficits. Neurol Clin. 1990;8(2):441-57.
  3. Mawston GA, G. Boocock M. Lumbar posture biomechanics and its influence on the functional anatomy of the erector spinae and multifidus. Phys Ther Rev. 2015;20(3):178-86.
  4. Kim KH, Cho SH, Goo BO et al. Differences in transversus abdominis muscle function between chronic low back pain patients and healthy subjects at maximum expiration: measurement with real-time ultrasonography. J Phys Ther Sci. 2013;25(7):861-3.
  5. Elataar FF, Salwa FA, Nasef MNA et al. Core muscles' endurance in flexible flatfeet: a cross-sectional study. J Musculoskeletal Neuronal Interact. 2020;20(3):404-10.
  6. Foster DN. Fulton MN. Back pain and the exercise prescription. Clin Sports Med. 1991;10(1):197-209.
  7. Kim EO, Kim TH, Roh JS et al. The influence of abdominal drawing-in maneuver on lumbar lordosis and trunk and lower extremity muscle activity during bridging exercise. Phys Ther Korea. 2009;16(1):1-9.
  8. Tampier C, Janessa DMD, Jack PC et al. Progressive disc herniation: an investigation of the mechanism using radiologic, histochemical, and microscopic dissection techniques on a porcine model. Spine. 2007;32(25):2869-74.
  9. Park JC, Jeong JG. Effects of plank exercises with resistance of one-sided hip adduction on the abdominal muscle thickness. J Kor Phys Ther. 2019;31(2):82-7.
  10. Topcu H, Arabaci R, Gungor A et al. Muscle activity of core muscles during plank exercise on different surfaces. Turk J Sport Exerc. 2022;24(3):298-305.
  11. Suresh S, Chan VW. Ultrasound guided transversus abdominis plane block in infants, children and adolescents: a simple procedural guidance for their performance. Pediatr Anesth. 2009;19(4):296-9.
  12. Marshall PW, Murphy BA. Core stability exercises on and off a Swiss ball. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86(2):242-9.
  13. Kang KW, Son SM, Ko YM. Changes in abdominal muscle thickness and balance ability on plank exercises with various surfaces. J Korean Phys Ther. 2016;28(5):264-8.
  14. Bordoni B, Myers T. A review of the theoretical fascial models: biotensegrity, fascintegrity, and myofascial chains. Cureus. 2020;12(2):e7092.
  15. Do YC, Yoo WG. Comparison of the thicknesses of the transversus abdominis and internal abdominal obliques during plank exercises on different support surfaces. J Phys Ther Sci. 2015;27(1):169-70.
  16. Hodges PW, Moseley GL, Gabrielsson A et al. Experimental muscle pain changes feedforward postural responses of the trunk muscles. Exp Brain Res. 2003;151(2):262-71.
  17. Marshall P, Murphy B. Changes in muscle activity and perceived exertion during exercises performed on a swiss ball. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2006;31(4):376-83.
  18. Snarr RL, Esco MR. Electromyographical comparison of plank variations performed with and without instability devices. J Strength Cond Res. 2014;28(11):3298-305.