한국임상수의학회지 (Journal of Veterinary Clinics)

  • 제41권5호
  • /
  • Pages.270-276
  • /
  • 2024
  • /
  • 1598-298X(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2384-0749(eISSN)
한국임상수의학회 (The Korean Society of Veterinary Clinics)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of a Monophasic Cross-Linked Hyaluronic-Acid Gel in Prevention against Postoperative Adhesion Formation in Rats

  • Junho Lee (Department of Veterinary Surgery, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Jun-Il Kim (Department of Veterinary Surgery, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Young-Sam Kwon (Department of Veterinary Surgery, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kyungpook National University)
  • 투고 : 2024.09.24
  • 심사 : 2024.10.07
  • 발행 : 2024.10.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

This study was conducted to evaluate the anti-adhesion effect by applying monophasic cross-linked hyaluronic acid after induction of intraperitoneal adhesions in rats. A total of 18 rats were divided into the control group, the hyaluronic acid (HA) group treated intraperitoneally with HA gel, and the monophasic crosslinked hyaluronic acid (MCHA) group treated with a MCHA gel intraperitoneally. To evaluate the degree of intra-abdominal adhesion, the thickness of the adhesion site, the degree of inflammatory cell infiltration, the degree of collagen fiber formation, and the adhesion formation score were evaluated. The thickness of adhesion site between the abdominal wall and intestinal mucosa was 1,591.25 ± 263.10 ㎛ in the control group, 989.12 ± 163.46 ㎛ in the HA group, and 716.83 ± 94.01 ㎛ in the MCHA group. The number of inflammatory cells was 341.67 ± 115.69 cells/mm2, 175.00 ± 29.14 cells/mm2 and 99.67 ± 17.22 cells/mm2 in the control, HA, and MCHA group, respectively. The degree of collagen fiber formation at the adhesion site was 71.77 ± 10.26%/mm2, 50.12 ± 5.41%/mm2 and 42.83 ± 7.30 %/mm2 in the control, HA, and MCHA group, respectively. The histopathological grades of adhesion sites were 2.90 ± 0.32, 2.30 ± 0.48, and 1.00 ± 0.47 in the control, HA, and MCHA group, respectively. The results showed the anti-adhesive effect through the anti-inflammatory and anti-fibrotic activity according to the intraperitoneal treatment of monophasic cross-linked hyaluronic acid gel. Therefore, intraperitoneal treatment of monophasic cross-linked hyaluronic acid gel can be used as an effective anti-adhesion agent in abdominal surgery.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Akerberg D, Grunditz C, Posaric-Bauden M, Isaksson K, Andersson R, Tingstedt B. The influence on abdominal adhesions and inflammation in rabbits after exposure to differently charged polypeptides. J Biomed Sci Eng 2012; 5: 432-438.
  2. Bakkum EA, van Blitterswijk CA, Dalmeijer RA, Trimbos JB. A semiquantitative rat model for intraperitoneal postoperative adhesion formation. Gynecol Obstet Invest 1994; 37: 99-105.
  3. Bayhan Z, Zeren S, Kocak FE, Kocak C, Akcilar R, Kargi E, et al. Antiadhesive and anti-inflammatory effects of pirfenidone in postoperative intra-abdominal adhesion in an experimental rat model. J Surg Res 2016; 201: 348-355.
  4. Beyene RT, Kavalukas SL, Barbul A. Intra-abdominal adhesions: anatomy, physiology, pathophysiology, and treatment. Curr Probl Surg 2015; 52: 271-319.
  5. Carta G, Cerrone L, Iovenitti P. Postoperative adhesion prevention in gynecologic surgery with hyaluronic acid. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 2004; 31: 39-41.
  6. Diamond MP, Linsky CB, Cunningham T, Constantine B, diZerega GS, DeCherney AH. A model for sidewall adhesions in the rabbit: reduction by an absorbable barrier. Microsurgery 1987; 8: 197-200.
  7. Elkins TE, Bury RJ, Ritter JL, Ling FW, Ahokas RA, Homsey CA, et al. Adhesion prevention by solutions of sodium carboxymethylcellulose in the rat. I. Fertil Steril 1984; 41: 926-928.
  8. Gomel V, Koninckx PR. Microsurgical principles and postoperative adhesions: lessons from the past. Fertil Steril 2016; 106: 1025-1031.
  9. Hong MK, Ding DC. Seprafilm® application method in laparoscopic surgery. JSLS 2017; 21: e2016.00097.
  10. Ito T, Yeo Y, Highley CB, Bellas E, Benitez CA, Kohane DS. The prevention of peritoneal adhesions by in situ cross-linking hydrogels of hyaluronic acid and cellulose derivatives. Biomaterials 2007; 28: 975-983.
  11. Johns DB, Rodgers KE, Donahue WD, Kiorpes TC, diZerega GS. Reduction of adhesion formation by postoperative administration of ionically cross-linked hyaluronic acid. Fertil Steril 1997; 68: 37-42.
  12. Kennedy R, Costain DJ, McAlister VC, Lee TD. Prevention of experimental postoperative peritoneal adhesions by N,O-carboxymethyl chitosan. Surgery 1996; 120: 866-870.
  13. Kim SG, Song KY, Lee HH, Kim EY, Lee JH, Jeon HM, et al. Efficacy of an antiadhesive agent for the prevention of intra-abdominal adhesions after radical gastrectomy: a prospective randomized, multicenter trial. Medicine (Baltimore) 2019; 98: e15141.
  14. Larsson B, Lalos O, Marsk L, Tronstad SE, Bygdeman M, Pehrson S, et al. Effect of intraperitoneal instillation of 32% dextran 70 on postoperative adhesion formation after tubal surgery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1985; 64: 437-441.
  15. Li TC, Cooke ID. The value of an absorbable adhesion barrier, Interceed, in the prevention of adhesion reformation following microsurgical adhesiolysis. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1994; 101: 335-339.
  16. Lin LX, Yuan F, Zhang HH, Liao NN, Luo JW, Sun YL. Evaluation of surgical anti-adhesion products to reduce postsurgical intra-abdominal adhesion formation in a rat model. PLoS One 2017; 12: e0172088.
  17. Okabayashi K, Ashrafian H, Zacharakis E, Hasegawa H, Kitagawa Y, Athanasiou T, et al. Adhesions after abdominal surgery: a systematic review of the incidence, distribution and severity. Surg Today 2014; 44: 405-420.
  18. Park KY, Kim HK, Kim BJ. Comparative study of hyaluronic acid fillers by in vitro and in vivo testing. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2014; 28: 565-568.
  19. Peppas NA, Bures P, Leobandung W, Ichikawa H. Hydrogels in pharmaceutical formulations. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2000; 50: 27-46.
  20. Rhee DY, Won CH, Chang SE, Noh TK, Kim MS, Kim BJ, et al. Efficacy and safety of a new monophasic hyaluronic acid filler in the correction of nasolabial folds: a randomized, evaluator-blinded, split-face study. J Dermatolog Treat 2014; 25: 448-452.
  21. Sawada T, Hasegawa K, Tsukada K, Kawakami S. Adhesion preventive effect of hyaluronic acid after intraperitoneal surgery in mice. Hum Reprod 1999; 14: 1470-1472.
  22. Singer ER, Livesey MA, Barker IK, Hurtig MB, Conlon PD. Utilization of the serosal scarification model of postoperative intestinal adhesion formation to investigate potential adhesion-preventing substances in the rabbit. Can J Vet Res 1996; 60: 305-311.
  23. Song MY, Kang GI, Hwang WK, Choi WG, Kim HH, Heo HJ, et al. The preventive effect of sodium hyaluronic acid solution and crosslinked hyaluronic acid mixture on postoperative intraperitoneal adhesion formation in rats. J Vet Clin 2011; 28: 28-32.
  24. van der Wal JB, Jeekel J. Biology of the peritoneum in normal homeostasis and after surgical trauma. Colorectal Dis 2007; 9 Suppl 2: 9-13.
  25. van Steensel S, Liu H, Vercoulen TF, Hadfoune M, Breukink SO, Stassen LP, et al. Prevention of intra-abdominal adhesions by a hyaluronic acid gel; an experimental study in rats. J Biomater Appl 2021; 35: 887-897.
  26. Vrijland WW, Jeekel J, van Geldorp HJ, Swank DJ, Bonjer HJ. Abdominal adhesions: intestinal obstruction, pain, and infertility. Surg Endosc 2003; 17: 1017-1022.
  27. Weibel MA, Majno G. Peritoneal adhesions and their relation to abdominal surgery. A postmortem study. Am J Surg 1973; 126: 345-353.
  28. Yeo Y, Highley CB, Bellas E, Ito T, Marini R, Langer R, et al. In situ cross-linkable hyaluronic acid hydrogels prevent post-operative abdominal adhesions in a rabbit model. Biomaterials 2006; 27: 4698-4705.
  29. Yeo Y, Kohane DS. Polymers in the prevention of peritoneal adhesions. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2008; 68: 57-66.
  30. Yildiz T, Ilce Z, Yildirim M, Akdogan M, Yurumez Y, Varlikli O, et al. Antienflamatuar and antiadhesive effect of clioquinol. Int J Surg 2015; 15: 17-22.