Steel and Composite Structures

  • 제53권2호
  • /
  • Pages.243-252
  • /
  • 2024
  • /
  • 1229-9367(pISSN)
  • /
  • 1598-6233(eISSN)
테크노프레스 (Techno-Press)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Development predictive equations for tensile properties of S235JR structural steels after fire

  • Ozer Zeybek (Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Mugla Sitki Kocman University) ;
  • Veysel Polat (Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Mugla Sitki Kocman University) ;
  • Yasin Onuralp Ozkilic (Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Necmettin Erbakan University)
  • 투고 : 2024.08.18
  • 심사 : 2024.10.16
  • 발행 : 2024.10.25
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Conventional carbon mild steel is a type of steel known for its low carbon content and generally used in the construction industry. Its easily formable and weldable properties make this steel a widely preferred material for buildings, bridges and various construction projects. Other advantages of these steels are their low cost and good mechanical properties. However, high temperatures have an impact on the microstructure and mechanical characteristics of these materials. When high temperatures are present during a fire, steels show significant microstructural changes. Elevated temperatures often decrease the mechanical characteristics of steels. For this purpose, evaluating the post-fire behavior of conventional structural mild steel is an important issue in terms of safety. A combined experimental and parametric study was conducted to estimate fire damage to steel buildings, which is an important issue in the construction field. Tensile test coupons were cut from conventional structural S235JR mild steel sheets with thicknesses ranging from 6 mm to 12 mm. These samples were exposed to temperatures as high as 1200 ℃. After heat treatment, the specimens were allowed to naturally cool to ambient temperature using air cooling before being tested. A tensile test was performed on these coupons to evaluate their mechanical properties after fire, such as their elastic modulus, yield strength, and ultimate tensile strength. The mechanical behavior of conventional S235JR structural steel changed significantly when the heating temperature reached 600℃. The thickness of the steel had a negligible effect on yield strength loss, with the highest measured loss being 50% for 8 mm thickness at 1200℃. For thinner sections (6 mm), yield strength decreased by up to 40%, while thicker samples (12 mm) showed similar reductions. Ultimate tensile strength also showed minimal changes up to 600℃, but beyond this point, a notable decline occurred, with approximately 30% strength loss at 1200℃. The modulus of elasticity remained almost constant up to 800℃, but at 1200℃, the loss reached around 20% for thicker sections (10 mm and 12 mm) and up to 35% for thinner sections (6 mm and 8 mm). Overall, high temperatures led to significant deterioration in both yield and ultimate strength, with a general loss of load-bearing capacity above 600℃. A new equation was formulated from experimental results to predict changes in the mechanical properties of S235JR steels. This equation offers a precise evaluation of buildings made from conventional structural S235JR mild steel after fire exposure. Furthermore, the empirical equation is applicable to low-strength steels with yield strengths ranging from 235 MPa to 420 MPa.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Arumugam, D., Naik, D.L., Sajid, H.U. and Kiran, R. (2022), "Relationship between nano and macroscale properties of postfire ASTM A36 steels", J. Mater. Civ. Eng., 34(6), 04022100. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.0004218.
  2. ASTM International (2015), ASTM E1876-15: Standard Test Method for Dynamic Young's Modulus, Shear Modulus, and Poisson's Ratio by Impulse Excitation of Vibration. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.
  3. Balakrishnan, M., Leitao, C., Craveiro, D., Rodrigues, D.M., Santiago, A., da Silva, L.S. and Subramanian, C. (2022), "Post-fire tensile properties of S355 J2 structural steel welded connections for construction industrial applications", Metall. Res. Technol., 119, 511. https://doi.org/10.1051/metal/2022056.
  4. Dan, W.J., Gou, R.B., Yu, M., Ge, Y.B., & Li, T.J. (2022), "Experimental study on the post-fire mechanical behaviours of structural steels", J. Constr. Steel Res., 199, 107629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2022.107629.
  5. Deutsches Institut fur Normung e.V. (DIN), DIN 50125:2009-07: Testing of metallic materials - Tensile Test Pieces. Berlin, Germany: Beuth Verlag.
  6. European Committee for Standardization (2004), EN 10025-2:2004: European Standard for Hot-Rolled Structural Steel. Part 2: Technical Delivery Conditions for Non-Alloy Structural Steels. Brussels: European Committee for Standardization.
  7. European Committee for Standardization (2005), EN 1993-1-2: Eurocode 3: Design of Steel Structures - Part 1-2: General Rules - Structural Fire Design, Brussels: European Committee for Standardization.
  8. Glassman, J.D., Gomez, A., Garlock, M.E.M. and Ricles, J. (2020), "Mechanical properties of weathering steels at elevated temperatures", J. Constr. Steel Res., 168, 105996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2020.105996.
  9. Gunalan, S. and Mahendran, M. (2014), "Experimental investigation of post-fire mechanical properties of cold-formed steels", Thin-Wall. Struct., 85, 166-175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2014.06.010.
  10. Institution BS. (2003), BS 5950-8. Structural Use of Steelwork in Building, Part 8: Code of Practice for Fire Resistant Design. London.
  11. Karina, C.N., Chun, P.J. and Okubo, K. (2017), "Tensile strength prediction of corroded steel plates by using machine learning approach", Steel Compos. Struct., 24(5), 635-641. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2017.24.5.635.
  12. Kiran, R. and Sajid, H.U. (2019), "Post-fire mechanical behavior of ASTM A572 steels subjected to high stress triaxialities", Eng. Struct., 190, 220-233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.04.055.
  13. Lee, J., Engelhardt, M.D. and Taleff, E.M. (2012), "Mechanical properties of ASTM A992 steel after fire", Eng. J., 49(1), 33-44. https://doi.org/10.3744/SNAK.2012.49.1.33.
  14. Lu, J., Liu, H., Chen, Z. and Liao, X. (2016), "Experimental investigation into the post-fire mechanical properties of hot-rolled and cold-formed steels", J. Constr. Steel Res., 121, 291-310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2016.03.005.
  15. Maraveas, C., Fasoulakis, Z. and Tsavdaridis, K.D. (2017), "Post-fire assessment and reinstatement of steel structures", J. Struct. Fire Eng., 8(2), 181-201. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSFE-03-2017-0028.
  16. Molkens, T., Cashell, K. and Rossi, B. (2020), "Material properties of structural, high strength and very high strength steels for post-fire assessment of existing structures", In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Structures in Fire, 51-762. University of Queensland. https://doi.org/10.14264/411eca7.
  17. Outinen, J. and Makelainen, P. (2002), "Mechanical properties of structural steel at elevated temperatures", In Advances in Steel Structures (ICASS'02), 1103-1110. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-008044017-0/50129-3
  18. Outinen, J. and Makelainen, P. (2004), "Mechanical properties of structural steel at elevated temperatures and after cooling down", Fire Mater., 28(2-4), 237-251. https://doi.org/10.1002/fam.849.
  19. Ren, C., Dai, L., Huang, Y. and He, W. (2020), "Experimental investigation of post-fire mechanical properties of Q235 cold-formed steel", Thin-Wall. Struct., 150, 106651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2020.106651.
  20. Sajid, H.U. and Kiran, R. (2018), "Influence of stress concentration and cooling methods on post-fire mechanical behavior of ASTM A36 steels", Constr. Build. Mater., 186, 920-945. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.08.006.
  21. Sajid, H.U., Naik, D.L. and Kiran, R. (2020), "Microstructure-mechanical property relationships for post-fire structural steels", J. Mater. Civ. Eng., 32(6), 04020133. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003190.
  22. Smith, C.I., Kirby, B.R., Lapwood, D.G., Cole, K.J., Cunningham, A.P. and Preston, R.R. (1981), "The reinstatement of fire damaged steel framed structures", Fire Saf. J., 4(1), 21-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/0379-7112(81)90004-7.
  23. Yan, M., Guo, Z., Li, C., Liu, Y. and Wang, X. (2021), "Effect of welding defects on mechanical properties of welded joints subjected to temperature", Steel Compos. Struct., 40(2), 193-202.
  24. Yang, N., Su, C., Wang, X.F. and Bai, F. (2016), "Mechanical properties of material in Q345GJ-C thick steel plates", Steel Compos. Struct., 21(3), 517-536.
  25. Yazici, C. (2024), "Mechanical properties of S235 steel protected with intumescent coatings under high temperatures: An experimental study", Buildings, 14(6). 2075-5309.
  26. Yin, H., Zhao, E., Zhang, X. and Yan, K. (2023), "Evaluating post-fire mechanical performance of S355J2W weathering steel with different artificial cooling approaches", Case Stud. Constr. Mater., 18(3), e02101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2023.e02101.
  27. Yu, Y., Lan, L., Ding, F. and Wang, L. (2019), "Mechanical properties of hot-rolled and cold-formed steels after exposure to elevated temperature: A review", Constr. Build. Mater., 213, 360-376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.04.062.
  28. Zeybek, O ., Polat, V. and Ozkilic, Y.O. (2024), "The response of high strength S700 MC steel after fire exposure", J. Constr. Steel Res., 219, 108790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2024.108790.
  29. Zhang, C., Jia, B. and Wang, J. (2020), "Influence of artificial cooling methods on post-fire mechanical properties of Q355 structural steel", Constr. Build. Mater., 252, 119092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119092.
  30. Zhao, Y., Guo, Q., Zhao, Z., Wu, X. and Xing, Y. (2023), "Prediction of tensile strength degradation of corroded steel based on in-situ pitting evolution", Steel Compos. Struct., 46(3), 385-401. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2023.46.3.385.