Annals of Clinical Neurophysiology

  • 제26권1호
  • /
  • Pages.14-21
  • /
  • 2024
  • /
  • 2508-691X(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2508-6960(eISSN)
대한임상신경생리학회 (The Korean Society of Clinical Neurophysiology)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Significance of thalamic hyperperfusion patterns in computed tomography perfusion in patients with nonconvulsive status epilepticus: possible utility in predicting antiseizure medication resistance

  • GyeongMo Sohn (Department of Neurology, Haeundae Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine)
  • 투고 : 2023.08.14
  • 심사 : 2024.03.22
  • 발행 : 2024.04.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Background: This study aimed to determine the characteristics of computed tomography perfusion (CTP) patterns and their utility in predicting antiseizure medication (ASM) resistance in patients with nonconvulsive status epilepticus (NCSE). Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients diagnosed with NCSE at Inje University Haeundae Paik Hospital Epilepsy Center between March 2015 and March 2022. CTP patterns were analyzed for those patients. A hyperperfusion pattern (HPP) in CTP was defined as a region of both increased cerebral blood flow and cerebral blood volume that did not necessarily follow the vascular territories. The primary endpoint was the responses to ASMs according to CTP patterns. Results: Fourteen (74%) of the 19 included patients met the criteria for definite NCSE, with the remaining 26% showing nonepileptiform activities with fluctuating quasirhythmic delta activities at >0.5 Hz on electroencephalogram. Three of the four patients who had HPPs with thalamic involvement were refractory to ASMs, whereas all eight patients who had HPPs without thalamic involvement were responsive to ASMs (p = 0.018). Although HPPs themselves were not associated with ASM responses, HPPs with thalamic involvement were associated with resistance to ASMs. Conclusions: HPP with thalamic involvement in CTP might be associated with ASM resistance. Therefore, CTP may be useful for predicting ASM resistance in NCSE patients.

키워드

과제정보

This study was supported by Inje University Haeundae Paik Hospital (IRB No. 2023-08-009).

참고문헌

  1. Walker M, Cross H, Smith S, Young C, Aicardi J, Appleton R, et al. Nonconvulsive status epilepticus: epilepsy research foundation workshop reports. Epileptic Disord 2005;7:253-296.
  2. Hauf M, Slotboom J, Nirkko A, von Bredow F, Ozdoba C, Wiest R. Cortical regional hyperperfusion in nonconvulsive status epilepticus measured by dynamic brain perfusion CT. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30:693-698.
  3. Sutter R, Kaplan PW. Electroencephalographic criteria for nonconvulsive status epilepticus: synopsis and comprehensive survey. Epilepsia 2012;53 Suppl 3:1-51.
  4. Young GB, Jordan KG, Doig GS. An assessment of nonconvulsive seizures in the intensive care unit using continuous EEG monitoring: an investigation of variables associated with mortality. Neurology 1996;47:83-89.
  5. Litt B, Wityk RJ, Hertz SH, Mullen PD, Weiss H, Ryan DD, et al. Nonconvulsive status epilepticus in the critically ill elderly. Epilepsia 1998;39:1194-1202.
  6. Leitinger M, Beniczky S, Rohracher A, Gardella E, Kalss G, Qerama E, et al. Salzburg consensus criteria for non-convulsive status epilepticus--approach to clinical application. Epilepsy Behav 2015;49:158-163.
  7. Leitinger M, Trinka E, Gardella E, Rohracher A, Kalss G, Qerama E, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of the Salzburg EEG criteria for non-convulsive status epilepticus: a retrospective study. Lancet Neurol 2016;15:1054-1062.
  8. Goselink RJM, van Dillen JJ, Aerts M, Arends J, van Asch C, van der Linden I, et al. The difficulty of diagnosing NCSE in clinical practice; external validation of the Salzburg criteria. Epilepsia 2019;60:e88-e92.
  9. Davies E, Elnagi F, Smith T. CT perfusion: stroke, seizure or both? BMJ Case Rep 2021;14:e245723.
  10. Giovannini G, Malagoli M, Turchi G, Miani A, Orlandi N, Vaudano AE, et al. Cortical and thalamic hyper-perfusion in non-convulsive status epilepticus. Relationship between perfusion CT patterns and Salzburg EEG criteria. Seizure 2021;92:10-17.
  11. Khoo CS, Kim SE, Lee BI, Shin KJ, Ha SY, Park J, et al. Characteristics of perfusion computed tomography imaging in patients with seizures mimicking acute stroke. Eur Neurol 2020;83:56-64.
  12. Gugger JJ, Llinas RH, Kaplan PW. The role of CT perfusion in the evaluation of seizures, the post-ictal state, and status epilepticus. Epilepsy Res 2020;159:106256.
  13. Sheikh IS, Park S, Ali I. Using CT perfusion in the interictal state. J Clin Neurophysiol 2021;38:e25-e28.
  14. Leitinger M, Trinka E, Zimmermann G, Beniczky S. Salzburg criteria for nonconvulsive status epilepticus: details matter. Epilepsia 2019;60:2334-2336.
  15. Gelfand JM, Wintermark M, Josephson SA. Cerebral perfusion-CT patterns following seizure. Eur J Neurol 2010;17:594-601.
  16. Lucas L, Gariel F, Menegon P, Aupy J, Thomas B, Tourdias T, et al. Acute ischemic stroke or epileptic seizure? Yield of CT perfusion in a "code stroke" situation. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2021;42:49-56.
  17. Williams J, Mullins G, Delanty N, Bede P, Doherty CP. The spectrum of peri-ictal MRI changes; four illustrative cases. Seizure 2017; 50:189-193.
  18. Samanta D, Garrity L, Arya R. Refractory and super-refractory status epilepticus. Indian Pediatr 2020;57:239-253.
  19. Husain AM, Horn GJ, Jacobson MP. Non-convulsive status epilepticus: usefulness of clinical features in selecting patients for urgent EEG. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2003;74:189-191.
  20. Lee JJ, Park KI, Park JM, Kang K, Kwon O, Lee WW, et al. Clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of de novo nonconvulsive status epilepticus: a retrospective study. J Clin Neurol 2021; 17:26-32.
  21. Gschwind M, Foletti G, Baumer A, Bottani A, Novy J. Recurrent nonconvulsive status epilepticus in a patient with coffin-lowry syndrome. Mol Syndromol 2015;6:91-95.
  22. Stackhouse TL, Mishra A. Neurovascular coupling in development and disease: focus on astrocytes. Front Cell Dev Biol 2021;9:702832.
  23. Phillips AA, Chan FH, Zheng MM, Krassioukov AV, Ainslie PN. Neurovascular coupling in humans: physiology, methodological advances and clinical implications. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2016;36:647-664.
  24. Kaplan L, Chow BW, Gu C. Neuronal regulation of the bloodbrain barrier and neurovascular coupling. Nat Rev Neurosci 2020;21:416-432.
  25. Spencer SS. Neural networks in human epilepsy: evidence of and implications for treatment. Epilepsia 2002;43:219-227.
  26. Rosenberg DS, Mauguiere F, Catenoix H, Faillenot I, Magnin M. Reciprocal thalamocortical connectivity of the medial pulvinar: a depth stimulation and evoked potential study in human brain. Cereb Cortex 2009;19:1462-1473.
  27. Stein T, Moritz C, Quigley M, Cordes D, Haughton V, Meyerand E. Functional connectivity in the thalamus and hippocampus studied with functional MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000; 21:1397-1401.
  28. Lee DA, Lee J, Kim HC, Park KM, Kim SE. Hippocampal injury in patients with status epilepticus: quantitative analysis of hippocampal volume and structural co-variance network. Seizure 2022; 95:84-89.
  29. Navidhamidi M, Ghasemi M, Mehranfard N. Epilepsy-associated alterations in hippocampal excitability. Rev Neurosci 2017; 28:307-334.
  30. Fisher RS. Deep brain stimulation of thalamus for epilepsy. Neurobiol Dis 2023;179:106045.
  31. Thijs RD, Surges R, O'Brien TJ, Sander JW. Epilepsy in adults. Lancet 2019;393:689-701.
  32. Kremkow J, Alonso JM. Thalamocortical circuits and functional architecture. Annu Rev Vis Sci 2018;4:263-285.
  33. Rodriguez-Moreno J, Porrero C, Rollenhagen A, Rubio-Teves M, Casas-Torremocha D, Alonso-Nanclares L, et al. Area-specific synapse structure in branched posterior nucleus axons reveals a new level of complexity in thalamocortical networks. J Neurosci 2020; 40:2663-2679.
  34. Lux HD, Heinemann U, Dietzel I. Ionic changes and alterations in the size of the extracellular space during epileptic activity. Adv Neurol 1986;44:619-639.
  35. Jabeen SA, Cherukuri P, Mridula R, Harshavardhana KR, Gaddamanugu P, Sarva S, et al. A prospective study of diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging abnormalities in patients with cluster of seizures and status epilepticus. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2017; 155:70-74.
  36. Hochman DW. The extracellular space and epileptic activity in the adult brain: explaining the antiepileptic effects of furosemide and bumetanide. Epilepsia 2012;53 Suppl 1:18-25.
  37. Mendes A, Sampaio L. Brain magnetic resonance in status epilepticus: a focused review. Seizure 2016;38:63-67.
  38. Lee DA, Park KM, Kim HC, Khoo CS, Lee BI, Kim SE. Spectrum of ictal-interictal continuum: the significance of 2HELPS2B score and background suppression. J Clin Neurophysiol 2023;40:364-370.
  39. Abend NS, Dlugos DJ, Hahn CD, Hirsch LJ, Herman ST. Use of EEG monitoring and management of non-convulsive seizures in critically ill patients: a survey of neurologists. Neurocrit Care 2010; 12:382-389.
  40. Towne AR, Waterhouse EJ, Boggs JG, Garnett LK, Brown AJ, Smith JR Jr, et al. Prevalence of nonconvulsive status epilepticus in comatose patients. Neurology 2000;54:340-345.