Nuclear Engineering and Technology

  • 제56권10호
  • /
  • Pages.4327-4334
  • /
  • 2024
  • /
  • 1738-5733(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2234-358X(eISSN)
한국원자력학회 (Korean Nuclear Society)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The application study of preventive maintenance during normal operation for APR1400 nuclear power plants considering risk

  • Jung-Wun Kim (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Chungnam National University) ;
  • YoungJu Lee (Korea Hydro & Nuclear Power (KHNP) Central Research Institute) ;
  • Weon Gyu Shin (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Chungnam National University)
  • 투고 : 2024.01.19
  • 심사 : 2024.05.28
  • 발행 : 2024.10.25
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Preventive Maintenance(PM) for safety component during power operation at nuclear power plants, On-Line Maintenance(OLM) refers to intentionally entering the Limited Condition of Operation(LCO) specified in the Technical Specification(TS) for safety-related systems and components in order to perform preventive maintenance within the Allowed Outage Time (AOT). This study assessed the feasibility of conducting OLM at the domestic APR1400 nuclear power plant. It focused on preventive maintenance duration and risk perspectives. A total of 78 FEGs were developed for 4450 facilities, considering system functions and preventive maintenance scope during output operation for eight safety-related systems. Additionally, maintenance items included in FEGs were selected, designated as targets for OLM, and their maintenance durations were evaluated and compared with AOT for each maintenance item. As a result, the Auxiliary Feedwater and Essential Chilled Water systems were identified as systems allowing OLM. Furthermore, utilizing the Risk Monitoring System (RIMS), the increased risk value due to the unavailability of target equipment during preventive maintenance was analyzed to determine whether it falls within the acceptable range. Regarding the temporary risk increase caused by OLM, it was observed that in all systems, it falls within Zone III according to NUMARC93-01 standards, allowing for normal equipment arrangement for OLM. However, according to the risk increase standards rate in domestic nuclear power plants, when maintaining the A-train in four systems including Component Cooling Water, they are all evaluated as 'Orange,' indicating that measures for risk mitigation are necessary for OLM to be feasible. When considering extending AOT up to 1.6 times the maintenance time, the risk increase falls within Zone III according to permissible change in risk standards, indicating that AOT extension might be feasible based solely on risk changes. To apply OLM within the permissible risk management scope in domestic nuclear power plants, regulatory policies need to allow voluntary LCO entry for preventive maintenance, necessitating clear determination by regulatory agencies using risk-informed policies. While OLM seems viable concerning maintenance duration and quantitative risk aspects, for inducing regulatory policy changes, comprehensive OLM guidelines are necessary, including risk management strategies.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Korea Institute of Nuclear Safety, Development on Assessment Technology of Safety Effect for On-Line Maintenance, 2012. KINS/GR-480. 
  2. J.W. Hyun, et al., A study of the effective of online maintenance for nuclear power plant, J. Energy Eng. 29 (1) (2020) 52-57. 
  3. CEOG, Joint Applications Report for Safety Injection Tank AOT/STI Extension, 1995. CE- NPSD-994. 
  4. CEOG, Joint Applications Report for Low Pressure Safety Injection System AOT Extension, 1995. CE-NPSD-995. 
  5. Wolf Creek Unit 1, License Amendment request - diesel generator completion time extension for technical specification 3.8.1, AC Sources - Operating (2021) 50-482. Docket No. 
  6. The Maintenance Rule, 10 CFR50.65, Requirements for Monitoring the Effectiveness of Maintenance at Nuclear Power Plants, 1991. 
  7. Electric Power Research Institute, Technical Report No. 1018422, On-Line Maintenance at Nuclear Power Plants: History, Implementation, and Benefits, 2009. 
  8. Electric Power Research Institute, Technical Report No. 1022680, On-Line Maintenance International Benchmarking, 2011. 
  9. Korea Hydro & Nuclear Power Co., The Technical Specifications for Shin-Kori 3,4. 
  10. Korea Hydro & Nuclear Power Co, The Final Report of Development a Risk Monitoring Model for Shin-Kori 3 (2015) 4. 
  11. Korea Hydro & Nuclear Power Co, Probabilistic Safety Assessment Report for ShinKori 3 (2011) 4. 
  12. Electric Power Research Institute, Technical Report No. 105396, PSA Application Guide, 1995. 
  13. Nuclear Energy Institute, Industry guideline for monitoring the effectiveness of maintenance at nuclear power plants, NUMARC 93-01, Rev. 4F. 
  14. Korea Hydro & Nuclear Power Co., Risk Monitoring System Operational Procedure (Standard Safety-1730A). 
  15. U.S NRC, Regulation Guide 1.174, an Approach for Using Probabilistic RiskAssessment in Risk-Informed Decisions on Plant- Specific Change to the Licensing Basis, Rev.03. 
  16. Korea Institute of Nuclear Safety, The General Requirement in Risk-Informed Decisions on Plant- Specific Change to the Licensing Basis, KINS/RG-N16.09, Rev.01. 
  17. Nuclear Energy Agency, Inspection of Maintenance on Safety Systems during NPP Operation, 2001. NEA/CNRA/R.