DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Hydrodynamics control for the well field of in-situ leaching of uranium

  • Yongmei Li (School of Resource Environment and Safety Engineering, University of South China) ;
  • Chong Zhang (Beijing Research Institute of Chemical Engineering and Metallurgy, China National Nuclear Corporation) ;
  • Zhipeng Tang (School of Resource Environment and Safety Engineering, University of South China) ;
  • Chunguang Li (School of Resource Environment and Safety Engineering, University of South China) ;
  • Zhenzhong Liu (School of Resource Environment and Safety Engineering, University of South China) ;
  • Kaixuan Tan (School of Resource Environment and Safety Engineering, University of South China) ;
  • Longcheng Liu (Beijing Research Institute of Chemical Engineering and Metallurgy, China National Nuclear Corporation)
  • Received : 2024.02.13
  • Accepted : 2024.05.17
  • Published : 2024.10.25

Abstract

In this study, the groundwater hydrodynamics of two adjacent well sites were simulated under different pumping-injection ratios. The aim is to select an optimal pumping-injection ratio that can ensure the groundwater of the two well sites don't affect each other. In addition, the sulfur isotope composition of groundwater in the two well sites were analyzed to verify the simulated results. The results show that the flow velocity at different points outside the edge drilling hole decreases exponentially with the distance between the point and the edge hole. The streamline gradually extends outside of the borehole with the increase of leaching time. It is found that the optimal pumping-injection ratio is 1.003. In this case, the maximum distance between the moving front and the injection borehole is 28.44 m after leaching for 5 years. This indicates that the groundwater flow fields of the two well sites are well controlled. The significant difference in sulfur isotopes between the two well-sites further proves that the SO42- in the acid mining zone does not affect the groundwater in the zone leached by CO2+O2.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This study was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (U1703123), the Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province (No. 2023JJ40522) and the Research Foundation of Education Bureau of Hunan Province (No. 22B0430).

References

  1. B. Wang, Y. Luo, J.H. Liu, et al., Ion migration in in-situ leaching (ISL) of uranium: field trial and reactive transport modelling, J. Hydrol. 615 (2022) 128634. 
  2. S.K. Bhargava, R. Ram, M. Pownceby, S. Grocott, B. Ring, J. Tardio, L. Jones, A review of acid leaching of uraninite, Hydrometallurgy 151 (2015) 10-24. 
  3. W.L. Chen, Study on the Chemical Jamming Mechanism of In-Situ Leaching Process in Ledge of Banyan Ula Uranium Ore Deposit, Nanchang: East China University of Technology, 2017. 
  4. Y. Zhao, X.Q. Li, L. Lei, L. Chen, Z.P. Luo, Permeability evolution mechanism and the optimum permeability determination of uranium leaching from low-permeability sandstone treated with low-frequency vibration, J. Rock Mech. Geotech. Eng. 15 (2023) 2597-2610. 
  5. X.B. Su, X.L. Li, N.Z. Liu, J.H. Wang, L. Zhang, Application of the environment friendly technology of in-situ leaching of uranium, China Mining Magazine 25 (9) (2016) 97-100. 
  6. C.Y. He, K.X. Tan, Y.M. Li, Z.Z. Liu, Q.L. Zhang, D. Li, Z. Liu, Pollution characteristics and mechanism of groundwater of acid and CO2 in-situ leaching mining area of uranium deposit in Xinjiang, China, Nonferrous Met. 6 (2021) 53-59. 
  7. Y.X. Cao, W. Zuo, Z.X. Bao, P. Gu, T. Ye, Practice and exploring of different proportional control of drawing and injection of leaching solution for the in-situ leaching uranium and its impact on the groundwater environment, Uranium Mining and Metallurgy 36 (2) (2017) 134-143. 
  8. H.F. Wang, S.D. Ye, Engineering Technology of In-Situ Leaching of uranium[M], China Atomic Energy Publishing and Media Co. Ltd, Beijing, 2011. 
  9. B. Yang, S.Y. Chen, G.X. Lian, H.M. Guo, S.J. Li, D.Y. Liang, H.H. Hui, C.H. Zhao, Numerical simulation of groundwater flow field change in the whole mining area of an acid in-situ leaching uranium mine, China Mining Magazine 30 (12) (2021) 146-153. 
  10. M.B. Kurmanseiit, M.S. Tungatarova, J.J. Royer, D.Y. Aizhulov, N. M. Shayakhmetov, A. Kaltayev, Streamline-based reactive transport modeling of uranium mining during in-situ leaching: advantages and drawbacks, Hydrometallurgy 220 (2023) 106107. 
  11. Z.Z. Liu, C.G. Li, K.X. Tan, Y.M. Li, W.Y. Tan, X.Q. Li, C. Zhang, S. Meng, L.C. Liu, Study of natural attenuation after acid in situ leaching of uranium mines using isotope fractionation and geochemical data, Sci. Total Environ. 865 (2023) 161033. 
  12. C. Zhang, T.T. Xie, K.X. Tan, Y.X. Yao, C.G. Li, Y.M. Li, Y. Zhang, H. Wang, Hydrodynamic simulation of the influence of injection flowrate regulation on in-situ leaching range, Minerals 12 (2022) 787. 
  13. Z.B. Liu, H.F. Wang, Z.Q. Wen, Y. Ding, Y. Jiang, T.T. Xie, G. Xu, G. Wang, Study on the characteristics of solution migration and drawing and injection control at well field in-situ leaching uranium, Uranium Mining and Metallurgy 36 (2017) 23-26. 
  14. C. Zhang, K.X. Tan, T.T. Xie, Y.H. Tan, L.D. Fu, N. Gan, L.Z. Kong, Flow microbalance simulation of pumping and injection unit in in situ leaching uranium mining area, Processes 9 (2021) 1288. 
  15. Y.P. Zhou, Z.L. Shen, Z.X. Sun, J.T. He, Y.G. Xing, Study on the influence of pumping-injection equilibrium on outflow of leaching solution and inflow of groundwater during in-situ leaching of uranium, Uranium Mining and Metallurgy 65 (2013) 1-4. 
  16. J.B. Shanley, B. Mayer, M.J. Mitchell, S.W. Bailey, Seasonal and event variations in δ34S values of stream sulfate in a Vermont forested catchment: implications for sulfur sources and cycling, Sci. Total Environ. 404 (2008) 262-268. 
  17. M.L.W. Tuttle, G.N. Breit, I.M. Cozzarelli, Processes affecting δ34S and δ18O values of dissolved sulfate in alluvium along the Canadian River, central Oklahoma, USA, Chem. Geol. 265 (2009) 455-467. 
  18. S. Seibert, C. Descourvieres, G. Skrzypek, H.L. Deng, H. Prommer, Model-based analysis of 34S signatures to trace sedimentary pyrite oxidation during managed aquifer recharge in a heterogeneous aquifer, J. Hydrol. 548 (2017) 368-381. 
  19. L.G. Zheng, X. Chen, X.L. Dong, X.P. Wei, C.L. Jiang, Q. Tang, Using δ34S-SO4 and δ18O-SO4 to trace the sources of sulfate in different types of surface water from the Linhuan coal-mining subsidence area of Huaibei, China, Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 181 (2019) 231-240. 
  20. J.W. Zhou, Y.P. Zhang, A.G. Zhou, C.F. Liu, H.S. Cai, Y.D. Liu, Application of hydrochemistry and stable isotopes (δ34S, δ18O and δ37Cl) to trace natural and anthropogenic influences on the quality of groundwater in the piedmont region, Shijiazhuang, China, Appl. Geochem. 17 (2016) 63-72. 
  21. A.P.G. Fowler, Q.L. Liu, Y.S. Huang, et al., Pyrite δ34S and Δ33S constraints on sulfur cycling at sublacustrine hydrothermal vents in Yellowstone Lake, Wyoming, USA, Geochem. Cosmochim. Acta 265 (2019) 148-162. 
  22. N. Otero, A. Soler, A. Canals, Controls of δ34S and δ18O in dissolved sulphate: learning from a detailed survey in the Llobregat River (Spain), Appl. Geochem. 23 (2008) 1166-1185. 
  23. X.H. Cheng, Geological Characteristics and Genetic Analysis of Sandstone Uranium Deposits in Wukuerqi-Mongqiguer Area, Southern Margin of YiLi Basin[D]. Xi'an, Northwest University, 2019. 
  24. Y.Y. Zhang, H.X. Liu, X.Q. Xiu, Relationship between Micro-organisms and uranium metallogeny of the interlayer oxidation zone sandstone-type uranium deposits in NW China, Acta Geol. Sin. 90 (12) (2016) 3508-3518. 
  25. W.J. Qiu, Y. Yang, J. Song, W.M. Que, Z.B. Liu, H.C. Weng, J.F. Wu, J.C. Wu, What chemical reaction dominates the CO2 and O2 in-situ uranium leaching? Insights from a three-dimensional multicomponent reactive transport model at the field scale, Appl. Geochem. 148 (2023) 105522. 
  26. P.R. Holmes, F.K. Crundwell, The kinetics of the oxidation of pyrite by ferric ions and dissolved oxygen: an electrochemical study, Geochem. Cosmochim. Acta 64 (2) (2000) 263-274. 
  27. N. Balci, W.C. Shanks, B. Mayer, K.W. Mandernack, Oxygen and sulfur isotope systematics of sulfate produced by bacterial and abiotic oxidation of pyrite, Geochem. Cosmochim. Acta 71 (15) (2007) 3796-3811.