Journal of Korean Society of Industrial and Systems Engineering (산업경영시스템학회지)

Society of Korea Industrial and System Engineering (한국산업경영시스템학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study for Calculating The Contribution of Group Members Using Pair-wise Comparison Matrix

쌍대비교행렬을 이용한 그룹 구성원의 기여도 산정을 위한 연구

  • Kiseong Kim (Department of Industrial and Information Systems Engineering, Jeonbuk National University) ;
  • Jaekyung Yang (Department of Industrial and Information Systems Engineering, Jeonbuk National University) ;
  • Byungho Jeong (Department of Industrial and Information Systems Engineering, Jeonbuk National University)
  • 김기성 (전북대학교 산업정보시스템공학과) ;
  • 양재경 (전북대학교 산업정보시스템공학과) ;
  • 정병호 (전북대학교 산업정보시스템공학과)
  • Received : 2024.08.27
  • Accepted : 2024.09.11
  • Published : 2024.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

It is important to measure the performance of group project but also very important to evaluate the contribution of individual members fairly. The degree of contribution of group members can be assessed by pair-wise comparison method of the Analytic Hierarchy Process. The degree of contribution of group members can be biased in a way that is advantageous to evaluator oneself during the pair-wise comparison process. In this paper, we will examine whether there is a difference in the contribution weight vectors obtained when including evaluator and excluding oneself in the pair-wise comparison. To do this, the experimental data was obtained by making pair-wise comparison in two ways for 15 5-person groups that perform term projects in university classes and 15 pairs of weight vectors for contribution were obtained. The results of the nonparametric test for these 15 pairs of weights vectors are given.

Keywords

References

  1. Anderson, T. W., An Introduction to Multivariate Statistical Analysis, Wiley, 2003.
  2. Cook, W.D. and Kress, M., Deriving weights from pairwise comparison ratio matrices: An axiomatic approach, European Journal of Operational Research, 1988, Vol. 37, pp. 355-362.
  3. Gielen, S., Dochy, F., Onghena, P., Struyven, K., and Smeets, S., Goals of peer assessment and their associated quality concepts, Studies in Higher Education, 2011, Vol. 36, pp. 719-735.
  4. Hwang, C.L. and Yoon, K., Multiple Attribute Decision Making Methods and Applications, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, Springer- Verlag, New York, 1981.
  5. Jones, I. and Wheadon, C., Peer assessment using comparative and absolute judgement, Studies in Educational Evaluation, 2015, Vol. 47, pp. 93-101.
  6. Kench, P.L., Field, N., Agudera, M., and Gill, M., Peer assessment of individual contributions to a group project: Student perceptions, Radiography, 2009, Vol. 15, pp. 158-165.
  7. Kim, S.H., Jeong, B.H., and Kim, J.K., Application of Decision Analysis, Youngi Pritings, 1999
  8. Rencher, A.C., Methods of Multivariate Analysis, Wiley, 2002.
  9. Saaty, T.L., The Analytic Hierarchy Process, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1980.
  10. Saaty, T.L., Axiomatic Foundation of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, Management Science, 1986, Vol. 32, pp. 841-855.
  11. Zahedi, F., The Analytic Hierarchy Process-A Survey of The Method and Its Applications, Interfaces, 1986, Vol. 166, pp. 96-108.