DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

NEURAL OPERATOR BASED REYNOLDS AVERAGED TURBULENCE MODELLING

  • SEUNGTAE PARK (DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, POSTECH) ;
  • JUNSEUNG RYU (DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS, POSTECH) ;
  • HYUNGJU HWANG (DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS, POSTECH)
  • Received : 2024.09.02
  • Accepted : 2024.09.24
  • Published : 2024.09.25

Abstract

The Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) simulations are commonly used in industrial applications due to their computational efficiency. However, the linear eddy viscosity model (LEVM) used in RANS often fails to accurately capture the anisotropy of Reynolds stress in complex flow conditions. To enhance RANS predictive accuracy, data-driven closure models, such as Tensor Basis Neural Network (TBNN) and Tensor Basis Random Forest (TBRF), have been proposed. However existing models, including TBNN and TBRF, have limitations in capturing the nonlocal patterns of turbulence models, resulting in irregular and unsmooth predictions. Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) are considered as an alternative approach, but their reliance on discretization poses challenges when dealing with arbitrarily designed meshes in RANS simulations. In this study, we propose a nonlinear convolutional neural operator as the RANS closure model. Our model satisfies Galilean invariance, can learn nonlocal physics, and recovers high-resolution physics even when trained on undersampled grids. The model outperforms existing TBNN and TBRF models, successfully predicting smooth fields of Reynolds stress in flows with adverse pressure gradients, separations, and streamline curvature, where existing models struggle or fail to provide accurate predictions.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Hyung Ju Hwang was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea(NRF) grant funded by the Korea government(MSIT) (RS-2023-00219980 and RS-2022-00165268) and by the Ministry of Education (2023RIS-009).

References

  1. David C Wilcox et al. Turbulence modeling for CFD, volume 2. DCW industries La Canada, CA, 1998.
  2. Pietro Catalano and Marcello Amato. An evaluation of RANS turbulence modelling for aerodynamic applications. Aerospace science and Technology, 7(7):493-509, 2003.
  3. Stephen B Pope. A more general effective-viscosity hypothesis. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 72(2):331-340, 1975.
  4. Julia Ling, Andrew Kurzawski, and Jeremy Templeton. Reynolds averaged turbulence modelling using deep neural networks with embedded invariance. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 807:155-166, 2016.
  5. Mikael LA Kaandorp and Richard P Dwight. Data-driven modelling of the Reynolds stress tensor using random forests with invariance. Computers & Fluids, 202:104497, 2020.
  6. Jin-Long Wu, Heng Xiao, and Eric Paterson. Physics-informed machine learning approach for augmenting turbulence models: A comprehensive framework. Physical Review Fluids, 3(7):074602, 2018.
  7. Jiequn Han, Xu-Hui Zhou, and Heng Xiao. An equivariant neural operator for developing nonlocal tensorial constitutive models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2201.01287, 2022.
  8. Thomas B Gatski, M Yousuff Hussaini, and John L Lumley. Simulation and modeling of turbulent flows. Oxford University Press, 1996.
  9. Julia Ling, Reese Jones, and Jeremy Templeton. Machine learning strategies for systems with invariance properties. Journal of Computational Physics, 318:22-35, 2016.
  10. Zongyi Li, Nikola B. Kovachki, Kamyar Azizzadenesheli, Burigede Liu, Kaushik Bhattacharya, Andrew M. Stuart, and Anima Anandkumar. Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equations. CoRR, abs/2010.08895, 2020.
  11. John Guibas, Morteza Mardani, Zongyi Li, Andrew Tao, Anima Anandkumar, and Bryan Catanzaro. Adaptive Fourier Neural Operators: Efficient Token Mixers for Transformers. CoRR, abs/2111.13587, 2021.
  12. PG Georgopoulos and JH Seinfeld. Nonlocal description of turbulent dispersion. Chemical engineering science, 44(9):1995-2016, 1989.
  13. Nikola B. Kovachki, Zongyi Li, Burigede Liu, Kamyar Azizzadenesheli, Kaushik Bhattacharya, Andrew M. Stuart, and Anima Anandkumar. Neural Operator: Learning Maps Between Function Spaces. CoRR, abs/2108.08481, 2021.
  14. Zongyi Li, Nikola Kovachki, Kamyar Azizzadenesheli, Burigede Liu, Kaushik Bhattacharya, Andrew Stuart, and Anima Anandkumar. Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equations, 2020.
  15. John Guibas, Morteza Mardani, Zongyi Li, Andrew Tao, Anima Anandkumar, and Bryan Catanzaro. Efficient Token Mixing for Transformers via Adaptive Fourier Neural Operators. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2021.
  16. Thorsten Kurth, Shashank Subramanian, Peter Harrington, Jaideep Pathak, Morteza Mardani, David Hall, Andrea Miele, Karthik Kashinath, and Anima Anandkumar. Fourcastnet: Accelerating global high-resolution weather forecasting using adaptive fourier neural operators. In Proceedings of the Platform for Advanced Scientific Computing Conference, pages 1-11, 2023.
  17. Gege Wen, Zongyi Li, Kamyar Azizzadenesheli, Anima Anandkumar, and Sally M Benson. U-FNO-An enhanced Fourier neural operator-based deep-learning model for multiphase flow. Advances in Water Resources, 163:104180, 2022.
  18. Burigede Liu, Nikola Kovachki, Zongyi Li, Kamyar Azizzadenesheli, Anima Anandkumar, Andrew M Stuart, and Kaushik Bhattacharya. A learning-based multiscale method and its application to inelastic impact problems. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 158:104668, 2022.
  19. Yan Yang, Angela F Gao, Jorge C Castellanos, Zachary E Ross, Kamyar Azizzadenesheli, and Robert W Clayton. Seismic wave propagation and inversion with neural operators. The Seismic Record, 1(3):126-134, 2021.
  20. Peishi Jiang, Nis Meinert, Helga Jordao, Constantin Weisser, Simon Holgate, Alexander Lavin, Bjorn Lutjens, Dava Newman, Haruko Wainwright, Catherine Walker, et al. Digital Twin Earth-Coasts: Developing a fast and physics-informed surrogate model for coastal floods via neural operators. arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.07100, 2021.
  21. Gao Huang, Zhuang Liu, Laurens Van Der Maaten, and Kilian Q Weinberger. Densely connected convolutional networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 4700-4708, 2017.
  22. Heng Xiao, Jin-Long Wu, Sylvain Laizet, and Lian Duan. Flows over periodic hills of parameterized geometries: A dataset for data-driven turbulence modeling from direct simulations. Computers & Fluids, 200:104431, 2020.
  23. Racheet Matai and Paul Durbin. Large-eddy simulation of turbulent flow over a parametric set of bumps. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 866:503-525, 2019.
  24. Ryley McConkey, Eugene Yee, and Fue-Sang Lien. A curated dataset for data-driven turbulence modelling. Scientific data, 8(1):255, 2021.