Fourth Industrial Review (4차산업연구)

Korea Fourth Industrial Association (한국4차산업학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis of e-Learning Style Based on Learner Characteristics

  • In-Suk RYU (Graduate School of Edutech, Korea National Open University) ;
  • Jin-Gon SHON (Graduate School of Edutech, Korea National Open University)
  • Received : 2024.08.27
  • Accepted : 2024.09.23
  • Published : 2024.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: While most studies focus on learning styles in face-to-face education, research on online learning environments, especially by age in lifelong education, is limited. This study aims to propose a direction for online learning by analyzing digital literacy and e-Learning learning styles by age in lifelong education. Research design, data and methodology: The study surveyed 100 online learners from an open university in Seoul. Using an e-Learning learning styles test, frequency analysis was conducted by gender, age, and digital literacy. A learning plan was then proposed based on the results. Results: The study found no age-related differences in digital literacy. Both men and women shared similar ratios of Environment-dependent and self-directed learning styles, reflecting the characteristics of online learners using digital devices. Conclusions: In lifelong education, e-Learning design should accommodate diverse learning styles: web/app designs for Environment-independent and self-directed learners, short/long formats for Passive learners, real-time (LMS)/non-real-time (ZOOM) systems for Positive and cooperative learners, and AI/human tutors for Environment-dependent and self-directed learners.

Keywords

References

  1. Ahn, K. S. (2005). The development of the measuring tool of learning styles in an e-learning. Daejeon, Korea: Doctorial dissertation, Chungnam national University.
  2. Allport (1961). Pattern and growth in personality. New York: Holt.
  3. Basem O. S. (2022). Al-hawamdeh and Sohaib Ala, Praxis and Effectiveness of Pedagogy during Pandemic: An Investigation of Learners' Perspective. Hindawi Education Research International.
  4. Belanger, F., & Jordan, D. H. (1999). Evaluation and implementation of distance learning: technologies, tools and techniques: technologies, tools and techniques. IGI Global.
  5. Cheong, Y. S. (2015). A Study on types of self-regulated learning and change in the type over time. Seoul, Korea: Doctorial dissertation, Kyung Hee University.
  6. Cho, I. S. (2020). Issues and Improvement Challenges Related to Remote Classes in Universities, the National Assembly Research Service.
  7. Choi, J. W. & Lee, S. E. (2024). Exploring Multidimensionality of Binge-Watching: User Clustering Based on Content Type, Format, and Viewing Style. Korean Journal of Journalism & Communication Studies, 68(1), 121-156.
  8. Choi, W. S., Ahn, K. S., & Rho, T. C. (2005). Development of the Measuring Tool of Learning Behavioral Styles in an e-learning Environment in Korea. The Journal of Vocational Education Research, 24(1), 133-158. UCI: G704-000975.2005.24.1.004
  9. Chung, Y. K., & Kim, J. R. (2018). Factors to Disturb Adult Learner's e-Learning Persistence: A Case Study of H-Cyber University in Seoul Korea. Journal of Digital Convergence, 16(12), 109-122. DOI: 10.14400/ JDC.2018.16.12.109
  10. Dunn, R. (1984). Learning Style: state of the science. Theory into Practice, 23(1), 10-19.
  11. Gregorc, A. F. (1979). Learning/Teaching styles: Potent forces behind them. Educational Leadership, 36(4), 234-236.
  12. Hwang, S. M. (2005). A Study on the Behavioral Characteristics of Learning Activities and Learners in Cyber Space: Focusing on the Behavioral Characteristics of Users of Online Games and Mini-Hompee Sites. KERIS.
  13. Jeong, B. (2016). Q-analsys on Attitute of E-learning Eser in Developing Countries. International Development and Cooperation Review, 8(1), 33-65. UCI: G704-SER000004222.2016.8.1.002 G704-SER000004222.2016.8.1.002
  14. Kim, G. S. & Moon, Y. K. (2022). A Study on the Trend Analysis of Distance Education for Young Children. The Society of Convergence Knowledge Transactions, 10(4), 13-25. http://dx.doi.org/10.22716/sckt.2022.10.4.032
  15. Kim, J. K. (2016). The relationship between the ratio of mobile learning time to total learning time, number of connections, and learning regularity in the mobile linked learning environment of e-learning, Seoul, Korea: master's thesis, Ewha Women's University.
  16. Kim, J. S. (1987). The theory of lifelong education. Seoul: kyoyookbook.
  17. Kim, J. S. (2009). Introduction to Lifelong Education. Seoul: kyoyookbook.
  18. Kim, S. H. (2009). The Effect of Usability and Easiness Perceived by e-learnerson the Flow and Satisfaction of Learning. Seoul, Korea: master's thesis, Sookmyung Women's University
  19. Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential Learning. New Jersey:Prentice Hall
  20. Kolb, D. A. (1985). Learning-Style Inventory. Boston: McBer & Company,
  21. Kolb, D. A. (1993). Learning Style Inventory. LSI-II a.Bolton :McBer & Company,
  22. Lee, A. (2022). An Action Research on Development of Digital Literacy Program for Elderly Literacy Learners. Seoul, Korea: Doctorial dissertation, Kyung Hee University.
  23. Lee, H. J. Choi, W. S, Kwon, D. S. & Chang, W. W. (2017). Program Development for Lifelong Education. Seoul: KNOUPRESS.
  24. Lee, S. D. (2005) The comparison of student preference of instructional methods according to Kolb's learning styles. Asian Journal of Education, 6(4), 125-144.
  25. Lifelong Education Promotion Plan (2023-2027). Ministry of Education.
  26. Lim, C. J. (1999). Educational Psychology. Seoul:HAKJISA,
  27. Pungente M. D., Wasan, K. M., & Moffett C. (2002). Using learning styles to evaluate first-year pharmacy student's preferences toward different activities associated with the problem-based learning approach. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 66, 119-124.
  28. Kim, M. Y. (2006). A Study on the learning styles in an e-learning and Psychological Types in University Student. Journal of Korean Institute of Industrial Educators, 31(2), 332-349.
  29. Park, S. H., KIM, E. H., Kim, T. W., & Yang, S. H. (2020). Distance education class implementation plan. KERIS.
  30. Pask, G. (1976). Style and strategies of learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 128-148.
  31. Porter, L. R. (1997). Creating the virtual classroom, New York: Wiley Computer Publishing.
  32. Reichman, S. W. and Grasha, A. F. (1974). A rational Approach to Developing and Assessing the Construct Validity of a Study learning style scale inventory. The Journal of Psychology, 87, 213-223.
  33. Ryu, I. C. (2001). Successful e-LEARNING Business Strategy. Seoul:ebeecomm.
  34. Shin, J. H., Choi, J. W. & Koh W. (2015). A study on the Use of Learning Analytics in Higher Education: Focusing on the perspective of professors. Journal of Educational Technology, 31(2), 223-252. DOI : 10.17232/KSET.31.2.223.
  35. Shin, M. H. (1998) Self-Regulated Learning Thoery: Meaning Components and Design Principles. Journal of educational technology, 14(1), 143 - 156.
  36. Statistics of Lifelong Education (2023). KEDI.
  37. The dictionary of educational studies, (2000). Education Research Institute. Seoul: Hawoo Publishing.
  38. The Report on the Digital Divide (2023). Ministry of Science and ICT.
  39. UNESCO (2018). A Global Framework of Reference on Digital Literacy Skills for Indicator 4.4.2. UNESCO Institute for Statistics, Information Paper, No.51.
  40. Woolfolk, A. E. (1995). Educational psychology (6th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon