DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Minimally invasive techniques as adjuncts in low- versus high-lying retained rectal foreign bodies of autoerotic nature in young men: a tailored management algorithm with two contrasting case reports from India

  • Shubham Kumar Gupta (Department of General Surgery, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University) ;
  • Vivek Kumar Katiyar (Department of General Surgery, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University) ;
  • Sumit Sharma (Department of General Surgery, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University) ;
  • Shashi Prakash Mishra (Department of General Surgery, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University) ;
  • Satyanam Kumar Bhartiya (Department of General Surgery, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University)
  • Received : 2024.01.05
  • Accepted : 2024.07.07
  • Published : 2024.09.30

Abstract

Retained rectal foreign bodies (RFBs) of an autoerotic nature represent an emerging and rare surgical emergency, posing a sensitive challenge for surgeons. RFBs exhibit a wide range of presentations and require varied management approaches, with the choice of treatment modality differing from case to case. Recently, minimally invasive techniques have been employed for the retrieval of RFBs. In 2021, the World Society of Emergency Surgery and the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma released guidelines on anorectal emergencies, highlighting the usefulness of these techniques as adjunctive tools for both diagnosis and ruling out associated complications. In this report, we describe two noteworthy cases of men who presented to the trauma emergency department with foreign bodies lodged in their rectums. We also highlight the potential role of minimally invasive techniques within a "step-up" approach for the management of retained RFBs.

Keywords

References

  1. Loria A, Marianetti I, Cook CA, et al. Epidemiology and healthcare utilization for rectal foreign bodies in United States adults, 2012-2021. Am J Emerg Med 2023;69:76-82.
  2. Cologne KG, Ault GT. Rectal foreign bodies: what is the current standard? Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2012;25:214-8.
  3. Koornstra JJ, Weersma RK. Management of rectal foreign bodies: description of a new technique and clinical practice guidelines. World J Gastroenterol 2008;14:4403-6.
  4. Tarasconi A, Perrone G, Davies J, et al. Anorectal emergencies: WSES-AAST guidelines. World J Emerg Surg 2021;16:48.
  5. Ng CY, Hayati F, Ali AA, Ani MF, Zakaria AD. Rectal foreign bodies: sexual gratification turned misery. Brunei Int Med J 2020;16:73-6.
  6. Kim JH, Um E, Jung SM, et al. The management of retained rectal foreign body. Ann Coloproctol 2020;36:335-43.
  7. Tseng HJ, Hanna TN, Shuaib W, Aized M, Khosa F, Linnau KF. Imaging foreign bodies: ingested, aspirated, and inserted. Ann Emerg Med 2015;66:570-82.