References
- M. Porthin, M. Liinasuo, T. Kling, Effects of digitalization of nuclear power plant control rooms on human reliability analysis - a review, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 194 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2019.03.022.
- J. Choi, H. Kim, W. Jung, S.J. Lee, Analysis of interface management tasks in a digital main control room, Nucl. Eng. Technol. 51 (2019) 1554-1560, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2019.04.010.
- Y.Z. Liu, Y. Luan, G. Zhang, H. Hu, J.J. Jiang, L. Zhang, et al., Human reliability analysis for operators in the digital main control rooms of nuclear power plants, J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 57 (2020) 719-733, https://doi.org/10.1080/00223131.2020.1720848.
- E. Zarei, F. Khan, R. Abbassi, Importance of human reliability in process operation: a critical analysis, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 211 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2021.107607.
- A.D. Swain, THERP, 1964. United States.
- L. Zhang, Y.J. Zhu, L.X. Hou, H.C. Liu, New method for dependence assessment in human reliability analysis based on linguistic hesitant fuzzy information, Nucl. Eng. Technol. 53 (2021) 3675-3684, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2021.05.012.
- E. Hollnagel, Cognitive Reliability and Error Analysis Method (CREAM), Elsevier, 1998.
- V. Garg, G. Vinod, V. Kant, Auto-CREAM: software application for evaluation of HEP with basic and extended CREAM for PSA studies, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 236 (2023), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2023.109318.
- D.E. Embrey, P. Humphreys, E.A. Rosa, B. Kirwan, K. Rea, SLIM-MAUD: an Approach to Assessing Human Error Probabilities Using Structured Expert Judgment Volume II Detailed Analysis of the Technical Issues, 1984, p. 161. United States.
- S. Abrishami, N. Khakzad, S.M. Hosseini, A data-based comparison of BN-HRA models in assessing human error probability: an offshore evacuation case study, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 202 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2020.107043.
- S. Abrishami, N. Khakzad, S.M. Hosseini, P. van Gelder, BN-SLIM: a Bayesian network methodology for human reliability assessment based on success likelihood index method (SLIM), Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 193 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2019.106647.
- D.I. Gertman, H.S. Blackman, J.L. Marble, C. Smith, R.L. Boring, The SPAR-H human reliability analysis method. American nuclear society international topical meeting on nuclear plant instrumentation, Contr. Hum. Mach. Interface Technol. (2004).
- J.Q. Liu, Y.H. Zou, W. Wang, L. Zhang, T. Qing, T.J. Zheng, et al., A study on assigning performance shaping factors of the SPAR-H method for adequacy human reliability analysis of nuclear power plants, Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 81 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2020.103051.
- G. Elidolu, S.I. Ahn, S.I. Sezer, R.E. Kurt, E. Akyuz, P. Gardoni, Applying evidential reasoning extended SPAR-H modelling to analyse human reliability on crude oil tanker cargo operation, Saf. Sci. 164 (2023), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2023.106169.
- S.I. Ahn, R.E. Kurt, E. Akyuz, Application of a SPAR-H based framework to assess human reliability during emergency response drill for man overboard on ships, Ocean Eng. 251 (2022), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.111089.
- Z L Yang, S Bonsall, A Wall, et al., A modified CREAM to human reliability quantification in marine engineering[J], Ocean Eng. 58 (2013) 293-303, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2012.11.003.
- D.K. Chen, Y. Fan, W.H. Li, Y.H. Wang, S. Zhang, Human reliability prediction in deep-sea sampling process of the manned submersible, Saf. Sci. 112 (2019) 1-8, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2018.10.001.
- S.T. Ung, Evaluation of human error contribution to oil tanker collision using fault tree analysis and modified fuzzy Bayesian Network based CREAM, Ocean Eng. 179 (2019) 159-172, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.03.031.
- Jinhe Wang, Improvement of CREAM extension method based on Fuzzy theory and AHP, CHINA Safety Sci. J. 25 (2015) 123-128, https://doi.org/10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2015.11.021.
- H.C. Liu, Z.J. Li, J.Q. Zhang, X.Y. You, A large group decision making approach for dependence assessment in human reliability analysis, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 176 (2018) 135-144, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2018.04.008.
- Q.J. Zhou, Y.D. Wong, H.S. Loh, K.F. Yuen, A fuzzy and Bayesian network CREAM model for human reliability analysis - the case of tanker shipping, Saf. Sci. 105 (2018) 149-157, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2018.02.011.
- S.I. Ahn, R.E. Kurt, Application of a CREAM based framework to assess human reliability in emergency response to engine room fires on ships, Ocean Eng. 216 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.108078.
- C.A. Lin, Q.F. Xu, Y.F. Huang, An HFM-CREAM model for the assessment of human reliability and quantification, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int. 38 (2022) 2372-2387, https://doi.org/10.1002/qre.3081.
- K. Yao, S.Y. Yan, C.C. Tran, A fuzzy CREAM method for human reliability analysis in digital main control room of nuclear power plants, Nucl. Technol. 208 (2022) 761-774, https://doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2021.1947123.
- S.T. Ung, A weighted CREAM model for maritime human reliability analysis, Saf. Sci. 72 (2015) 144-152, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2014.08.012.
- T. Bedford, C. Bayley, M. Revie, Screening, sensitivity, and uncertainty for the CREAM method of human reliability analysis, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 115 (2013) 100-110, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2013.02.011.
- A.R. Kim, J. Park, Y. Kim, J. Kim, P.H. Seong, Quantification of performance shaping factors (PSFs)' weightings for human reliability analysis (HRA) of low power and shutdown (LPSD) operations, Ann. Nucl. Energy 101 (2017) 375-382, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2016.11.009.
- X.Q. Chen, X.W. Liu, Y. Qin, An extended CREAM model based on analytic network process under the type-2 fuzzy environment for human reliability analysis in the high-speed train operation, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int. 37 (2021) 284-308, https://doi.org/10.1002/qre.2736.
- F.M. Rezaie, A.M.F. Saghih, N.M. Farimani, A novel hybrid approach based on CREAM and fuzzy ANP to evaluate human resource reliability in the urban railway, J. Transport. Saf. Secur. 13 (2021) 1326-1364, https://doi.org/10.1080/19439962.2020.1738611.
- R.Y. Zhang, H. Tan, W. Afzal, A modified human reliability analysis method for the estimation of human error probability in the offloading operations at oil terminals, Process Saf. Prog. 40 (2021) 84-92.
- Yanhao Sun, Tao Zhang, Improved weighted CREAM model based on evidence reasoning, Saf. Environ. Eng. 29 (2022) 16-22+31, https://doi.org/10.13578/j.cnki.issn.1671-1556.20210734.
- H. Shi, J.H. Wang, L. Zhang, H.C. Liu, New improved CREAM model for human reliability analysis using a linguistic D number-based hybrid decision making approach, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 120 (2023), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2023.105896.
- W.D. Jung, W.C. Yoon, J.W. Kim, Structured information analysis for human reliability analysis of emergency tasks in nuclear power plants, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 71 (2001) 21-32, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0951-8320(00)00067-3.
- J. Annett. Hierarchical task analysis (HTA)[M]//Handbook of human factors and ergonomics methods, CRC Press, 2004, pp. 355-363.
- Y.W. Du, X.X. Li, Hierarchical DEMATEL method for complex systems, Expert Syst. Appl. 167 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113871.
- S.R. Mohandes, H. Sadeghi, A. Fazeli, A. Mahdiyar, M.R. Hosseini, M. Arashpour, et al., Causal analysis of accidents on construction sites: a hybrid fuzzy Delphi and DEMATEL approach, Saf. Sci. 151 (2022), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2022.105730.
- S. Chen, J. Li, Assessing the architectural design services by using DEMATEL approach, in: 2009 International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Natural Computing, 2009, pp. 463-466.
- J. Lin, J.B. Lan, Y.H. Lin, Multi-attribute Group Decision-Making Method Based on the Aggregation Operators of Interval 2-tuple Linguistic Information, 2009.
- F. Herrera, L. Martinez, A 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model for computing with words, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 8 (2000) 746-752.
- Z. Zhang, Z. Zhang, S. Dai, Y. Zhang, X. Chen, A large group hesitant 2-tuple linguistic decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL) method to evaluate performance indicators, Inf. Sci. 647 (2023) 119408, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2023.119408.