Nuclear Engineering and Technology

Korean Nuclear Society (한국원자력학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis of values-beliefs-norms of decommissioned nuclear power plant reestablishment acceptance in developing countries: a perspective from the Philippines

  • Leo Miguel V. Tolentino (School of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, Mapua University) ;
  • Ardvin Kester S. Ong (School of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, Mapua University) ;
  • Josephine D. German (School of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, Mapua University)
  • Received : 2024.02.11
  • Accepted : 2024.03.17
  • Published : 2024.08.25
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Amid the ongoing discourse on clean energy solutions, the reopening of decommissioned plants, such as the Bataan Nuclear Power Plant (BNPP) in the Philippines has become a focal point in the country. This study delved into the complex web of factors influencing public acceptance of BNPP, employing the values-beliefs-norms theory. By utilizing partial-least square structural equation modeling, the research unravelled the intricate relationships among biospheric values, altruistic values, egoistic values, ecological worldview, awareness of consequences, personal norm, social norm, and the broader acceptance of BNPP establishment. With 434 respondents participating in a self-administered online survey, the study identified key correlations. Emphasizing the collaborative impact on decision-making processes by social and personal norms, the study also highlighted the role of ecological values in shaping awareness. The foundational impact of values on ecological worldviews was explored, shedding light on public attitudes toward nuclear energy. This research offers actionable insights for policymakers, advocating for targeted communication strategies and public engagement initiatives to navigate barriers and promote informed decision-making in the dynamic landscape of nuclear energy development. The study contributes to the global conversation on sustainable energy strategies, emphasizing the pivotal role of public perception in shaping the trajectory of nuclear power.

Keywords

References

  1. K. Park, S. Son, J. Oh, S. Kim, Sustainable decommissioning strategies for nuclear power plants: a Systematic literature review, Sustainability 14 (10) (2022) 5947. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/10/5947.  1050/14/10/5947
  2. A.K.S. Ong, Y.T. Prasetyo, J.M.L. Salazar, J.J.C. Erfe, A.A. Abella, M.N. Young, T. Chuenyindee, R. Nadlifatin, A.a.N.P. Redi, Investigating the acceptance of the reopening Bataan nuclear power plant: Integrating protection motivation theory and extended theory of planned behavior, Nucl. Eng. Technol. 54 (3) (2022) 1115-1125. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1738573321005209?via%3Dihub.  1005209?via%3Dihub
  3. World Nuclear Association, Nuclear Energy and Sustainable Development, 2022. https://world-nuclear.org/information-library/energy-and-the-environment/nuclear-energy-and-sustainable-development.aspx. 
  4. M.A. Rosen, I. Dincer, Nuclear energy as a component of sustainable energy systems, Int. J. Low Carbon Technol. 2 (2) (2007) 109-125. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/239429812_Nuclear_energy_as_a_component_of_sustainable_energy_systems. 
  5. J. Krumins, M. Klavins, Investigating the potential of nuclear energy in achieving a Carbon-Free energy future, Energies 16 (9) (2023) 3612. https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/9/3612.  1073/16/9/3612
  6. World Nuclear Association, Nuclear Energy and Sustainable Development, 2022. https://world-nuclear.org/information-library/energy-and-the-environment/nuclear-energy-and-sustainable-development.aspx. 
  7. B.W. Brook, A. Alonso, D. Meneley, J. Misak, T. Blees, J. Van Erp, Why nuclear energy is sustainable and has to be part of the energy mix, Sustainable Materials and Technologies 1-2 (2014) 8-16. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214993714000050?via%3Dihub. 
  8. I. Fulgar, The exciting reopening of Bataan Nuclear Power Plant in 2027. Architect in the Philippines into, New Designs & Land Ventures (2022). www.ianfulgar.com/news/the-exciting-reopening-of-bataan-nuclear-power-plant-in-2027/. 
  9. K. De Guia, Is opening the Bataan nuclear power plant worth it in 2023? - BillionBricks, 2023. https://billionbricks.org/updates/n6vza85y7vdwdh9p1npoy8qjtp8op6. 
  10. R. Tan, J.O. Enano, Clean-energy push puts abandoned Philippine nuclear plant back in spotlight, Wash. Post (2023). https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2023/01/25/philippines-nuclear-marcos-climate-change/. 
  11. Ma J. Gumasing, A. Bayola, S.L. Bugayong, K.R. Cantona, Determining the factors affecting Filipinos' acceptance of the use of renewable energies: a proenvironmental planned behavior model, Sustainability 15 (9) (2023) 7702. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/9/7702.  1050/15/9/7702
  12. A.K. Ong, L.N. Cordova, F.A. Longanilla, N.L. Caprecho, R.A. Javier, R.D. Borres, J. D. German, Purchasing intentions analysis of hybrid cars using random forest classifier and deep learning, World Electric Vehicle Journal 14 (8) (2023) 227. https://www.mdpi.com/2032-6653/14/8/227. 
  13. A.G. Andal, S. Praveenkumar, E.G. Andal, M.A. Qasim, V.I. Velkin, Perspectives on the barriers to nuclear power generation in the Philippines: prospects for directions in energy research in the Global South, Inventions 7 (3) (2022) 53. https://www.mdpi.com/2411-5134/7/3/53. 
  14. A. Estanislao, Nuclear power: a go or no?. https://www.cnnphilippines.com/news/2016/09/01/nuclear-power-bataan-powerplant-alternative-source-energy-senate-power-crisis.html, 2016. 
  15. A. Gulagi, M. Alcanzare, D. Bogdanov, E.A. Esparcia, J.D. Ocon, C. Breyer, Transition pathway towards 100% renewable energy across the sectors of power, heat, transport, and desalination for the Philippines, Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 144 (2021) 110934. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032121002264?via%3Dihub.  1002264?via%3Dihub
  16. B.R. Wingfield-Hayes, Philippines: the 70s nuclear relic that may open at last, BBC News (2023). https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-64634816. 
  17. J. Mangaluz, South Korea still 'interested', in: Bataan Nuclear Power Plant Project - Palace, Inquirer News, 2023. https://newsinfo.inquirer.net/1799755/south-korea-still-interested-in-bataan-nuclear-power-plant-project-palace. 
  18. I. Gozum, Nuclear is clean. But can the Philippines handle its risks?. https://www.pids.gov.ph/details/news/in-the-news/nuclear-is-clean-but-can-the-philippines-handle-its-risks, 2023. 
  19. A.L. Balinbin, Filipino Consumers Want Sustainable Lifestyles but Face Challenges - Study, BusinessWorld Online, 2023. https://www.bworldonline.com/the-nation/2023/07/31/536972/filipino-consumers-want-sustainable-lifestyles-but-face-challenges-study/. 
  20. J.C. Baquillas, Mind the green: what drives the sustainable consumption behavior of Filipino consumers? Animo Repository. https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/etdd_manorg/2/, 2022. 
  21. UNECE, Application of the united nations framework classification for resources and the united nations resource management system: use of nuclear fuel resources for sustainable development - entry pathways | UNECE. https://unece.org/sustainable-energy/publications/nuclear-entry-pathways, 2021. 
  22. J. Conca, Is nuclear power a renewable or a sustainable energy source? Forbes (2016). https://www.forbes.com/sites/jamesconca/2016/03/24/is-nuclear-power-a-renewable-or-a-sustainable-energy-source/?sh=6a442614656e. 
  23. Z.J.A. Belmonte, Y.T. Prasetyo, O.P. Benito, J. Liao, K.C. Susanto, M.N. Young, S. F. Persada, R. Nadlifatin, The acceptance of nuclear energy as an alternative source of energy among Generation Z in the Philippines: an extended theory of planned behavior approach, Nucl. Eng. Technol. 55 (8) (2023) 3054-3070. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1738573323002231?via%3Dihub. 
  24. R.R. Diwa, J.D. Ramirez, N. Haneklaus, Uranium supply potential from imported phosphate rocks for the Philippine nuclear power program, Extr. Ind. Soc. 15 (2023) 101303. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2214790X2300093X?via%3Dihub. 
  25. L.L. Delina, Committing to coal? Scripts, sociotechnical imaginaries, and the resurgence of a coal regime in the Philippines, Energy Res. Social Sci. 81 (2021) 102258. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629621003510?via%3Dihub.  1003510?via%3Dihub
  26. P.C. Stern, T. Dietz, T.D. Abel, G. Guagnano, L. Kalof, A Value-Belief-Norm Theory of support for social movements: the case of environmentalism, Western CEDAR. https://cedar.wwu.edu/hcop_facpubs/1/, 1999. 
  27. A. Mahpour, I. Farzin, A.R. Izadi, S. Ashouri, Expanding the VBN theory on succeeding the transportation demand management policies, Transp. Res. Interdiscip. Perspect. 21 (2023) 100903. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590198223001501?via%3Dihub. 
  28. H. Choi, J. Jang, J. Kandampully, Application of the extended VBN theory to understand consumers' decisions about green hotels, Int. J. Hospit. Manag. 51 (2015) 87-95. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S027843191500122X?via%3Dihub. 
  29. C.T. Whitley, B. Takahashi, A. Zwickle, J.C. Besley, A.P. Lertpratchya, Sustainability behaviors among college students: an application of the VBN theory, Environ. Educ. Res. 24 (2) (2016) 245-262. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/309515677_Sustainability_behaviors_among_college_students_an_application_of_the_VBN_theory. 
  30. Y. Zhang, Z. Wang, G. Zhou, Determinants of employee electricity saving: the role of social benefits, personal benefits and organizational electricity saving climate, J. Clean. Prod. 66 (2014) 280-287. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0959652613006975?via%3Dihub. 
  31. E.M. Ghazali, B. Nguyen, D.S. Mutum, S.F. Yap, Pro-Environmental Behaviours and Value-Belief-Norm Theory: assessing unobserved heterogeneity of two ethnic groups, Sustainability 11 (12) (2019) 3237. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/12/3237.  1050/11/12/3237
  32. A.A. Mamun, N. Hayat, M.M. Masud, Z.K.M. Masud, T. Jannat, M.F.M. Salleh, Modelling the significance of Value-Belief-Norm theory in predicting solid waste management intention and behavior, Front. Environ. Sci. 10 (2022). https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2022.906002/full. 
  33. P. Tiwari, Influence of Millennials' eco-literacy and biospheric values on green purchases: the mediating effect of attitude, Publ. Organ. Rev. 23 (3) (2022) 1195-1212. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/362531288_Influence_of_Millennials'_eco-literacy_and_biospheric_values_on_green_purchases_the_mediating_effect_of_attitude. 
  34. L. Wu, Y. Zhu, How love of nature promotes green consumer behaviors: the mediating role of biospheric values, ecological worldview, and personal norms, PsyCh J. 10 (3) (2021) 402-414. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/349464054_How_love_of_nature_promotes_green_consumer_behaviors_The_mediating_role_of_biospheric_values_ecological_worldview_and_personal_norms. 
  35. J.I.M. De Groot, L. Steg, Value orientations to explain beliefs related to environmental significant behavior to measure egoistic, altruistic, and biospheric value orientations, Environ. Behav. 40 (3) (2007) 330-354. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/254088130_Value_Orientations_to_Explain_Beliefs_Related_to_Environmental_Significant_BehaviorHow_to_Measure_Egoistic_Altruistic_and_Biospheric_Value_Orientations. 
  36. T. Bouman, L. Steg, H.A. Kiers, Measuring values in environmental research: a test of an environmental portrait value questionnaire, Front. Psychol. 9 (2018). https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00564/full. 
  37. L. Zhang, J. Ruiz-Menjivar, B. Luo, Z. Liang, M.E. Swisher, Predicting climate change mitigation and adaptation behaviors in agricultural production: a comparison of the theory of planned behavior and the Value-Belief-Norm Theory, J. Environ. Psychol. 68 (2020) 101408. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0272494419300465?via%3Dihub. 
  38. L. Steg, E. Van Der Werff, Understanding the human dimensions of a sustainable energy transition, Front. Psychol. 6 (2015). https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00805/full. 
  39. A. Hansla, A. Gamble, A. Juliusson, T. Garling, The relationships between awareness of consequences, environmental concern, and value orientations, J. Environ. Psychol. 28 (1) (2008) 1-9. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0272494407000576?via%3Dihub. 
  40. G. Liobikiene, M.S. Poskus, The importance of environmental knowledge for private and public sphere Pro-Environmental Behavior: modifying the Value-Belief-Norm Theory, Sustainability 11 (12) (2019) 3324. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/12/3324.  1050/11/12/3324
  41. R. Arundati, H.T. Sutiono, I.A. Suryono, Effect of ecological awareness, personal norms, and ecological attitude on conservation behavior, Proceedings on Engineering Sciences 2 (2) (2020) 187-196. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/341799848_EFFECT_OF_ECOLOGICAL_AWARENESS_PERSONAL_NORMS_AND_ECOLOGICAL_ATTITUDE_TO_CONSERVATION_BEHAVIOR. 
  42. J.I.M. De Groot, L. Steg, Morality and nuclear energy: perceptions of risks and benefits, personal norms, and willingness to take action related to nuclear energy, Risk Anal. 30 (9) (2010) 1363-1373. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01419.x. 
  43. N. Niu, W. Fan, M. Ren, M. Lei, Y. Zhong, The role of social norms and personal costs on pro-environmental behavior: the mediating role of personal norm, Phychological Research and Behavior Management 16 (2023) 2059-2069. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371320897_The_Role_of_Social_Norms_and_Personal_Costs_on_Pro-Environmental_Behavior_The_Mediating_Role_of_Personal_Norms. 
  44. S.H. Kim, Y. Seock, The roles of values and social norm on personal norms and proenvironmentally friendly apparel product purchasing behavior: the mediating role of personal norms, J. Retailing Consum. Serv. 51 (2019) 83-90. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0969698918308798?via%3Dihub. 
  45. J. Yang, J. Wang, X. Zhang, C. Shen, Z. Shen, How social impressions affect public acceptance of nuclear energy: a case study in China, Sustainability 14 (18) (2022) 11190. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/18/11190.  1050/14/18/11190
  46. O. Kacha, S. Van Der Linden, The moderating role of moral norms and personal cost in compliance with pro-environmental social norms, Current Research in Ecological and Social Psychology 2 (2021) 100020. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666622721000137?via%3Dihub.  1000137?via%3Dihub
  47. H. Chan, A.M. Udall, K. Tam, Effects of perceived social norms on support for renewable energy transition: moderation by national culture and environmental risks, J. Environ. Psychol. 79 (2022) 101750. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0272494421002036?via%3Dihub.  1002036?via%3Dihub
  48. G.L. Perry, S.J. Richardson, N. Harre, D. Hodges, P.O. Lyver, F.J.F. Maseyk, R. Taylor, J.H. Todd, J.M. Tylianakis, J. Yletyinen, A. Brower, Evaluating the role of social norms in fostering Pro-Environmental behaviors, Front. Environ. Sci. 9 (2021). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/352136330_Evaluating_the_Role_of_Social_Norms_in_Fostering_Pro-Environmental_Behaviors. 
  49. P.M. Podsakoff, S.B. MacKenzie, J.-Y. Lee, N.P. Podsakoff, Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies, J. Appl. Psychol. 88 (5) (2003) 879-903. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/9075176_Common_Method_Biases_in_Behavioral_Research_A_Critical_Review_of_the_Literature_and_Recommended_Remedies. 
  50. J.F.H. Hair, C.M.R. Ringle, M.S. Sarstedt, PLS-SEM: indeed a silver bullet, Jorunal of Marketing Theory and Practice (2011) 139-152. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/236033273_PLS-SEM_Indeed_a_silver_bullet. 
  51. B. Setiawan, D.P. Nugraha, A. Irawan, R.J. Nathan, Z. Zeman, User innovativeness and fintech adoption in Indonesia, Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity 7 (3) (2021) 188. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S219985312200957X?via%3Dihub. 
  52. T. Beran, C. Violato, Structural equation modeling in medical research: a primer, BMC Res. Notes 3 (1) (2010). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/47532601_Structural_equation_modeling_in_medical_research_A_primer. 
  53. G. Dash, J. Paul, CB-SEM vs PLS-SEM methods for research in social sciences and technology forecasting, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 173 (2021) 121092. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162521005254?via%3Dihub.  1005254?via%3Dihub
  54. A. Leguina, A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLSSEM), Int. J. Res. Method Educ. 38 (2) (2015) 220-221. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/354331182_A_Primer_on_Partial_Least_Squares_Structural_Equation_Modeling_PLS-SEM. 
  55. J.F. Hair, J.J. Risher, M. Sarstedt, C.M. Ringle, When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM, Eur. Bus. Rev. 31 (1) (2019) 2-24. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/329443894_When_to_use_and_how_to_report_the_results_of_PLS-SEM. 
  56. J. Henseler, C.M. Ringle, M. Sarstedt, A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling, J. Acad. Market. Sci. 43 (1) (2014) 115-135. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8. 
  57. L. Hu, P.M. Bentler, Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives, Struct. Equ. Model.: A Multidiscip. J. 6 (1) (1999) 1-55. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10705519909540118. 
  58. D. Connolly, J. Dockrell, B. Shield, R. Conetta, T.J. Cox Conetta, Students' perceptions of school acoustics and the impact of noise on teaching and learning in secondary schools: findings of a questionnaire survey, Energy Proc. 78 (2015) 3114-3119. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876610215024984?via%3Dihub.  10215024984?via%3Dihub
  59. H. Baumgartner, C. Homburg, Applications of structural equation modeling in marketing and consumer research: a review, Int. J. Res. Market. 13 (2) (1996) 139-161. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/0167811695000380?via%3Dihub. 
  60. M. Del Carmen Aguilar-Luzon, J.M.A. Garcia-Martinez, A. Calvo-Salguero, J. M. Salinas, Comparative study between the Theory of planned Behavior and the Value-Belief-Norm model regarding the environment, on Spanish housewives' recycling behavior, J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 42 (11) (2012) 2797-2833. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/264466224_Comparative_Study_Between_the_Theory_of_Planned_Behavior_and_the_Value-Belief-Norm_Model_Regarding_the_Environment_on_Spanish_Housewives'_Recycling_Behavior. 
  61. A.C. Niloy, J. Sultana, J.B. Alam, A. Ghosh, K.M. Farhan, What triggers you to buy green products? explaining through an extended TPB model, Asia-Pacific Journal of Management Research and Innovation 19 (1) (2023) 25-39. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/370666104_What_Triggers_You_to_Buy_Green_Products_Explaining_Through_an_Extended_TPB_Model.  104_What_Triggers_You_to_Buy_Green_Products_Explaining_Through_an_Extended_TPB_Model
  62. G. Bai, Y. Bai, Voluntary or forced: different effects of personal and social norms on urban residents' environmental protection behavior, Int. J. Environ. Res. Publ. Health 17 (10) (2020) 3525. https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/10/3525.  10/3525
  63. A.F. Zillich, C. Riesmeyer, Be Yourself: the relative importance of personal and social norms for Adolescents' Self-Presentation on Instagram, Social Media + Society 7 (3) (2021) 205630512110338. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/353480674_Be_Yourself_The_Relative_Importance_of_Personal_and_Social_Norms_for_Adolescents'_Self-Presentation_on_Instagram. 
  64. J.I.M. De Groot, K. Bondy, G. Schuitema, Listen to others or yourself? The role of personal norms on the effectiveness of social norm interventions to change proenvironmental behavior, J. Environ. Psychol. 78 (2021) 101688. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272494421001419?via%3Dihub.  1001419?via%3Dihub
  65. S. Larsen, The relative importance of social and personal norms in explaining intentions to choose Eco-Friendly travel options, Int. J. Tourism Res. 18 (2) (2024) 159-166. https://www.academia.edu/57139605/The_Relative_Importance_of_Social_and_Personal_Norms_in_Explaining_Intentions_to_Choose_Eco_Friendly_Travel_Options. 
  66. C. Martin, S. Czellar, Where do biospheric values come from? A connectedness to nature perspective, J. Environ. Psychol. 52 (2017) 56-68. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0272494417300592?via%3Dihub. 
  67. O. Sarrasin, J. GaleButera, F. Butera, Should we talk (more) about climate change when promoting energy conservation? An intervention in Swiss households, Current Research in Ecological and Social Psychology (2023) 100179. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666622723000928?via%3Dihub. 
  68. U.K. Kement, S.C. Cavusoglu, I.C. Calik, Y.D. Durmaz, The effect of environmental value and ecological worldview on eco-recreative attitude: an application in Turkey, Tourism and Management Studies 19 (2) (2023) 7-19. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/370765773_The_effects_of_environmental_value_and_ecological_worldview_on_eco-recreative_attitude_an_application_in_Turkey. 
  69. D.C. Bell, M.L. Cox, Social norms: do we love norms too much? Journal of Family Theory and Review 7 (1) (2015) 28-46. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/273158775_Social_Norms_Do_We_Love_Norms_Too_Much. 
  70. Y. Hong, A.A. Mamun, M. Masukujjaman, Q. Yang, Significance of the environmental value-belief-norm model and its relationship to green consumption among Chinese youth, Asia Pac. Manag. Rev. 29 (1) (2024) 127-140. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1029313223000908?via%3Dihub.  1029313223000908?via%3Dihub
  71. Y. Xu, W. Li, S. Chi, Altruism, environmental concerns, and pro-environmental behaviors of urban residents: a case study in a typical Chinese city, Front. Psychol. 12 (2021). https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.643759/full. 
  72. M. Kim, S.S. Stepchenkova, Altruistic values and environmental knowledge as triggers of pro-environmental behavior among tourists, Curr. Issues Tourism 23 (10) (2019) 1-6. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/333730941_Altruistic_values_and_environmental_knowledge_as_triggers_of_pro-environmental_behavior_among_tourists. 
  73. M.A. Ribeiro, S. Seyfi, S. Elhoushy, K.M. Woosnam, V. Patwardhan, Determinants of generation Z pro-environmental travel behaviour: the moderating role of green consumption values, J. Sustain. Tourism (2023) 1-21. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/372022023_Determinants_of_generation_Z_pro-environmental_travel_behaviour_the_moderating_role_of_green_consumption_values. 
  74. P.W. Schultz, V.V. Gouveia, L.D. Cameron, G. Tankha, Values and their relationship to environmental concern and conservation behavior, J. Cross Cult. Psychol. 36 (4) (2005) 457-475. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/247723805_Values_and_Their_Relationship_to_Environmental_Concern_and_Conservation_Behavior.