DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Clinical evaluation of root coverage in Miller class III/RT2 labial gingival recession treated with interdisciplinary periodontal-orthodontic therapy: a randomized controlled clinical trial

  • Sakshi Malhotra (Department of Periodontics, Post Graduate Institute of Dental Sciences) ;
  • Shikha Tewari (Department of Periodontics, Post Graduate Institute of Dental Sciences) ;
  • Rekha Sharma (Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Post Graduate Institute of Dental Sciences) ;
  • Rajinder Kumar Sharma (Department of Periodontics, Post Graduate Institute of Dental Sciences) ;
  • Nishi Tanwar (Department of Periodontics, Post Graduate Institute of Dental Sciences) ;
  • Ritika Arora (Department of Periodontics, Post Graduate Institute of Dental Sciences)
  • Received : 2022.10.13
  • Accepted : 2023.04.30
  • Published : 2024.08.31

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of current study was to evaluate percentage root coverage (RC%) in isolated Miller class III/RT2 labial gingival recession (GR) associated with malaligned mandibular anteriors, using interdisciplinary periodontal-orthodontic treatment as compared to mucogingival surgery alone. Methods: Thirty-six systemically healthy patients having isolated Miller class III/RT2 GR with respect to malaligned mandibular anteriors, were randomly divided into test group: mucogingival surgery using subepithelial connective tissue graft followed by orthodontic treatment and control group: mucogingival surgery alone. Primary clinical parameters included (RC%), recession depth, keratinized tissue width, mid-labial clinical attachment level, interdental clinical attachment level (iCAL), periodontal phenotype (PP), gingival thickness (GT), root coverage esthetics score (RES) and hypersensitivity. Total duration of follow up was 12 months. Results: Mean RC% was significantly more achieved in test group (66.67%±40.82%) in comparison to control group (39.93%±31.41%) at the end of study (P=0.049). Further, complete root coverage was attained in 5/8 cases of test group versus 1/2 cases of control group after 3/12 months respectively. RES and hypersensitivity, showed statistically significant improvement after complete follow up period in both the groups. An ideal RES score of 10 was achieved in 4/7 cases of test group while in 1/2 cases of control group after 3/12 months respectively. Correlation analysis revealed significant negative correlation between RC% and iCAL. Correlation of RC% with GT and PP was non-significant. Conclusions: Interdisciplinary periodontal-orthodontic approach may be more beneficial in terms of achieving improved RC%, esthetic and resolution of hypersensitivity in the management of Miller class III/RT2 GR in malaligned mandibular anteriors.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

The authors acknowledge the "Post Graduate Institute of Dental Sciences, Rohtak" for providing all the facilities to conduct this study.

References

  1. The American Academy of Periodontology. Glossary of periodontal terms. Chicago: American Academy of Periodontology; 2013.
  2. Khocht A, Simon G, Person P, Denepitiya JL. Gingival recession in relation to history of hard toothbrush use. J Periodontol 1993;64:900-5. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1993.64.9.900
  3. Smith RG. Gingival recession. Reappraisal of an enigmatic condition and a new index for monitoring. J Clin Periodontol 1997;24:201-5. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1997.tb00492.x
  4. Al-Wahadni A, Linden GJ. Dentine hypersensitivity in Jordanian dental attenders. A case control study. J Clin Periodontol 2002;29:688-93. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-051X.2002.290804.x
  5. Lawrence HP, Hunt RJ, Beck JD. Three-year root caries incidence and risk modeling in older adults in North Carolina. J Public Health Dent 1995;55:69-78. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-7325.1995.tb02335.x
  6. Kassab MM, Cohen RE. The etiology and prevalence of gingival recession. J Am Dent Assoc 2003;134:220-5. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2003.0137
  7. Wennstrom JL, Lindhe J, Sinclair F, Thilander B. Some periodontal tissue reactions to orthodontic tooth movement in monkeys. J Clin Periodontol 1987;14:121-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1987.tb00954.x
  8. Lost C. Depth of alveolar bone dehiscences in relation to gingival recessions. J Clin Periodontol 1984;11:583-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1984.tb00911.x
  9. Olsson M, Lindhe J. Periodontal characteristics in individuals with varying form of the upper central incisors. J Clin Periodontol 1991;18:78-82. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1991.tb01124.x
  10. Gorman WJ. Prevalence and etiology of gingival recession. J Periodontol 1967;38:316-22. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1967.38.4.316
  11. Romandini M, Soldini MC, Montero E, Sanz M. Epidemiology of mid-buccal gingival recessions in NHANES according to the 2018 World Workshop Classification System. J Clin Periodontol 2020;47:1180-90. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.13353
  12. Pini Prato GP, Magnani C, Chambrone L. Long-term evaluation (20 years) of the outcomes of coronally advanced flap in the treatment of single recession-type defects. J Periodontol 2018;89:265-74. https://doi.org/10.1002/JPER.17-0379
  13. Ozcelik O, Seydaoglu G, Haytac MC. An explorative study to develop a predictive model based on avascular exposed root surface area for root coverage after a laterally positioned flap. J Periodontol 2015;86:356-66. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2014.140453
  14. Ngan PW, Burch JG, Wei SH. Grafted and ungrafted labial gingival recession in pediatric orthodontic patients: effects of retraction and inflammation. Quintessence Int 1991;22:103-11.
  15. Thalmair T, Fickl S, Wachtel H. Coverage of multiple mandibular gingival recessions using tunnel technique with connective tissue graft: a prospective case series. Int J Periodont Restor Dent 2016;36:859-67. https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.2278
  16. Garg S, Arora SA, Chhina S, Singh P. Multiple gingival recession coverage treated with vestibular incision subperiosteal tunnel access approach with or without platelet-rich fibrin - a case series. Contemp Clin Dent 2017;8:464-8. https://doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_142_17
  17. Cairo F, Cortellini P, Tonetti M, Nieri M, Mervelt J, Cincinelli S, et al. Coronally advanced flap with and without connective tissue graft for the treatment of single maxillary gingival recession with loss of interdental attachment. A randomized controlled clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol 2012;39:760-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2012.01903.x
  18. Pandit N, Gaba AK, Malik R, Pandit IK. A new index proposed for determination of outcome of recession coverage procedures. Clin Adv Periodontics 2012;2:49-55. https://doi.org/10.1902/cap.2011.110012
  19. de Molon RS, de Avila ED, de Souza JA, Nogueira AV, Cirelli CC, Cirelli JA. Combination of orthodontic movement and periodontal therapy for full root coverage in a Miller class III recession: a case report with 12 years of follow-up. Braz Dent J 2012;23:758-63. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-64402012000600022
  20. Laursen MG, Rylev M, Melsen B. The role of orthodontics in the repair of gingival recessions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2020;157:29-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2019.01.023
  21. Mehta L, Tewari S, Sharma R, Sharma RK, Tanwar N, Arora R. Assessment of the effect of orthodontic treatment on the stability of pre-orthodontic recession coverage by connective tissue graft: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Quintessence Int 2022;53:236-48.
  22. Shieh AT, Wang HL, O'Neal R, Glickman GN, MacNeil RL. Development and clinical evaluation of a root coverage procedure using a collagen barrier membrane. J Periodontol 1997;68:770-8. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1997.68.8.770
  23. Abraham S, Athira PR. Correlation of gingival tissue biotypes with age, gender and tooth morphology: a cross sectional study using probe transparency method. IOSR J Dent Med Sci 2015;14:64-9.
  24. Sharma S, Thakur SL, Joshi SK, Kulkarni SS. Measurement of gingival thickness using digital vernier caliper and ultrasonographic method: a comparative study. J Investig Clin Dent 2014;5:138-43. https://doi.org/10.1111/jicd.12026
  25. Cairo F, Rotundo R, Miller PD Jr, Pini Prato GP. Root coverage esthetic score: a system to evaluate the esthetic outcome of the treatment of gingival recession through evaluation of clinical cases. J Periodontol 2009;80:705-10. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2009.080565
  26. Lang NP, Adler R, Joss A, Nyman S. Absence of bleeding on probing. An indicator of periodontal stability. J Clin Periodontol 1990;17:714-21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1990.tb01059.x
  27. Silness J, Loe H. Periodontal disease in pregnancy II. Correlation between oral hygiene and periodontal condition. Acta Odontol Scand 1964;22:121-35. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016356408993968
  28. Loe H, Silness J. Periodontal disease in pregnancy I. Prevalence and severity. Acta Odontol Scand 1963;21:533-51. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016356309011240
  29. Saghaei M. Random allocation software for parallel group randomized trials. BMC Med Res Methodol 2004;4:26.
  30. Allen AL. Use of the supraperiosteal envelope in soft tissue grafting for root coverage. I. Rationale and technique. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1994;14:216-27.
  31. Chowdary PC, Pavan Kumar YS, Murthy KR, Kishore DT. A novel modified-Vista technique with connective tissue graft in the treatment of gingival recession: a case report. Clin Adv Periodontics 2022;12:75-9. https://doi.org/10.1002/cap.10135
  32. Hurzeler MB, Weng D. A single-incision technique to harvest subepithelial connective tissue grafts from the palate. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1999;19:279-87.
  33. Fernandez-Jimenez A, Estefania-Fresco R, Garcia-De-La-Fuente AM, Marichalar-Mendia X, Aguirre-Urizar JM, Aguirre-Zorzano LA. Comparative study of the modified VISTA technique (m-VISTA) versus the coronally advanced flap (CAF) in the treatment of multiple Miller class III/RT2 recessions: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig 2023;27:505-17.
  34. Guiha R, el Khodeiry S, Mota L, Caffesse R. Histological evaluation of healing and revascularization of the subepithelial connective tissue graft. J Periodontol 2001;72:470-8. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2001.72.4.470
  35. Wennstrom JL. Mucogingival considerations in orthodontic treatment. Semin Orthod 1996;2:46-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1073-8746(96)80039-9
  36. Fernandez-Jimenez A, Estefania-Fresco R, Garcia-De-La-Fuente AM, Marichalar-Mendia X, Aguirre-Zorzano LA. Description of the modified vestibular incision subperiosteal tunnel access (m-VISTA) technique in the treatment of multiple Miller class III gingival recessions: a case series. BMC Oral Health 2021;21:142.
  37. Tonetti MS, Greenwell H, Kornman KS. Staging and grading of periodontitis: Framework and proposal of a new classification and case definition. J Periodontol 2018;89 Suppl 1:S159-72. https://doi.org/10.1002/JPER.18-0006
  38. Jepsen K, Stefanini M, Sanz M, Zucchelli G, Jepsen S. Long-term stability of root coverage by coronally advanced flap procedures. J Periodontol 2017;88:626-33. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2017.160767
  39. Karam PS, Sant'Ana AC, de Rezende ML, Greghi SL, Damante CA, Zangrando MS. Root surface modifiers and subepithelial connective tissue graft for treatment of gingival recessions: a systematic review. J Periodontal Res 2016;51:175-85. https://doi.org/10.1111/jre.12296