DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Correlation of electrical conductivity and color with water loss and shear force of pork loin

  • Hayeon Jeon (Division of Animal and Dairy Science, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Seul-Ki-Chan Jeong (Division of Animal and Dairy Science, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Seonmin Lee (Division of Animal and Dairy Science, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Dongjun Kim (Korea Institute for Animal Products Quality Evaluation) ;
  • Hyeun Bum Kim (Department of Animal Biotechnology, Dankook University) ;
  • In-Seon Bae (National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Yunseok Kim (National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Pil Nam Seong (National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Samooel Jung (Division of Animal and Dairy Science, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Kyung Jo (Division of Animal and Dairy Science, Chungnam National University)
  • Received : 2024.04.23
  • Accepted : 2024.07.04
  • Published : 2024.09.01

Abstract

This study investigated the relationship of electrical conductivity and color to water loss and shear force of pork loin. In addition, the differences in quality properties with the sex and carcass grades were investigated. There were no differences in drip loss, cooking loss, and total loss of pork loin between barrow and gilt (p > 0.05). The shear force of pork loin was lower in barrow than in gilt (p < 0.05). The quality properties of pork loin did not differ among the carcass grades (1+, 1, and 2). The electrical conductivity measured at 45 min, 3 h, and 12 h had no noticeable correlation coefficients with the quality properties of pork loin. The L*, a*, and b* values correlated significantly with cooking loss and total loss. The highest correlation coefficient was 0.45 between L* and total loss. From the results, we conclude that the electrical conductivity and color values are not suitable variables for predicting pork loin quality. Therefore, further study to develop ways for predicting the pork quality during the grading of pork carcasses is required.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

본 연구는 농촌진흥청(Rural Development Administration)의 농업과학기술협력사업(Project No. RS-2021-RD010001)의 지원으로 수행되었습니다.

References

  1. Aaslyng MD, Bejerholm C, Ertbjerg P, Bertram HC, Andersen HJ. 2003. Cooking loss and juiciness of pork in relation to raw meat quality and cooking procedure. Food Quality and Preference 14:277-288.
  2. Bai X, Hou J, Wang K, Wang M, Wang X, Wu C, Yu L, Yang J, Leng Y, Sun Y. 2018. Electrical impedance analysis of pork tissues during storage. Journal of Food Measurement and Characterization 12:164-172.
  3. Castro-Giraldez M, Aristoy MC, Toldra F, Fito P. 2010. Microwave dielectric spectroscopy for the determination of pork meat quality. Food Research International 43:2369-2377.
  4. Grunert KG, Bredahl L, Brunso K. 2004. Consumer perception of meat quality and implications for product development in the meat sector-A review. Meat Science 66:259-272.
  5. Hoa VB, Seong PN, Cho SH, Kang SM, Kim YS, Moon SS, Choi YM, Kim JH, Seol KH. 2019. Quality characteristics and flavor compounds of pork meat as a function of carcass quality grade. Animal Bioscience 32:1448-1457.
  6. Huff-Lonergan E, Lonergan SM. 2005. Mechanisms of water-holding capacity of meat: The role of postmortem biochemical and structural changes. Meat Science 71:194-204.
  7. Hughes J, Clarke F, Li Y, Purslow P, Warner R. 2019. Differences in light scattering between pale and dark beef longissimus thoracis muscles are primarily caused by differences in the myofilament lattice, myofibril and muscle fibre transverse spacings. Meat Science 149:96-106.
  8. Hughes JM, Oiseth SK, Purslow PP, Warner RD. 2014. A structural approach to understanding the interactions between colour, water-holding capacity and tenderness. Meat Science 98:520-532.
  9. Jeong HG, Jo K, Lee S, Yong HI, Choi YS, Jung S. 2023a. Characteristics of pork emulsion gel manufactured with hot-boned pork and winter mushroom powder without phosphate. Meat Science 197:109070.
  10. Jeong SKC, Lee S, Jo K, Choi YS, Jung S. 2023b. Quality properties of pork gel manufactured by the pork treated with high hydrostatic pressure without phosphate. Food and Life 1:29-38.
  11. Jo K, Lee S, Jeong HG, Lee DH, Kim HB, Seol KH, Kang S, Jung S. 2022. Prediction of cooking loss of pork belly using quality properties of pork loin. Meat Science 194:108957.
  12. Jo K, Lee S, Jeong HG, Lee DH, Yoon S, Chung Y, Jung S. 2023. Utilization of electrical conductivity to improve prediction accuracy of cooking loss of pork loin. Food Science of Animal Resources 43:113-123.
  13. Jukna V, Jukna C, Peciulaitiene N. 2012. Electrical conductivity of pig meat and its relation with quality. Veterinarija ir Zootechnika 57:18-21.
  14. KAPE (Korea Institute for Animal Products Quality Evaluation). 2024. Criteria for grading pork carcass. Accessed in https://ekape.or.kr/contents/list.do on 5 April 2024. [in Korean]
  15. Kellner TA, Prusa KJ, Patience JF. 2014. Impact of dietary fat source and concentration and daily fatty acid intake on the composition of carcass fat and iodine value sampled in three regions of the pork carcass. Journal of Animal Science 92:5485-5495.
  16. Kim GW, Kim HY. 2017. Effects of carcass weight and back-fat thickness on carcass properties of Korean native pigs. Korean Journal for Food Science of Animal Resources 37:385-391.
  17. Kim S, Choi J, Kim ES, Keum GB, Doo H, Kwak J, Ryu S, Choi Y, Pandey S, Lee NR, et al. 2023. Evaluation of the correlation between the muscle fat ratio of pork belly and pork shoulder butt using computed tomography scan. Korean Journal of Agricultural Science 50:809-815.
  18. Lana A, Zolla L. 2016. Proteolysis in meat tenderization from the point of view of each single protein: A proteomic perspective. Journal of Proteomics 147:85-97.
  19. Lee S, Jo K, Jeong SKC, Jeon H, Choi YS, Jung S. 2024. Characterization of peptides released from frozen-then-aged beef after digestion in an in vitro infant gastrointestinal model. Meat Science 212:109468.
  20. Lee S, Norman JM, Gunasekaran S, van Laack RLJM, Kim BC, Kauffman RG. 2000. Use of electrical conductivity to predict water-holding capacity in post-rigor pork. Meat Science 55:385-389.
  21. Leng Y, Sun Y, Wang X, Hou J, Zhao X, Zhang Y. 2020. Electrical impedance estimation for pork tissues during chilled storage. Meat Science 161:108014.
  22. MAFRA (Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs). 2024. Major statistics on agricultural, livestock, and food Products 2023. Accessed in https://www.mafra.go.kr/home/5104/subview.do on 5 April 2024. [in Korean]
  23. Overholt MF, Arkfeld EK, Mohrhauser DA, King DA, Wheeler TL, Dilger AC, Shackelford SD, Boler DD. 2016. Comparison of variability in pork carcass composition and quality between barrows and gilts. Journal of Animal Science 94:4415-4426.
  24. Park Y, Kim K, Kim J, Seo J, Choi J. 2023. Verification of reproducibility of VCS2000 equipment for mechanical measurement of Korean Landrace×Yorkshire (F1), F1×Duroc (LYD) pig carcasses. Food Science of Animal Resources 43:553-562.
  25. Tuell JR, Nondorf MJ, Kim YHB. 2022. Post-harvest strategies to improve tenderness of underutilized mature beef: A review. Food Science of Animal Resources 42:723-743.