DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of biochar derived from rice husk and chicken manure on lettuce growth and soil chemical properties

  • Jun-Yeong Lee (Department of Bio-Environmental Chemistry, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Do-Gyun Park (Department of Bio-Environmental Chemistry, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Yun-Gu Kang (Department of Bio-Environmental Chemistry, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Jun-Ho Kim (Department of Bio-Environmental Chemistry, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Ji-Hoon Kim (Department of Bio-Environmental Chemistry, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Ji-Won Choi (Department of Bio-Environmental Chemistry, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Yeo-Uk Yun (Department of Bio-Environmental Chemistry, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Taek-Keun Oh (Department of Bio-Environmental Chemistry, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Chungnam National University)
  • Received : 2024.04.16
  • Accepted : 2024.06.25
  • Published : 2024.09.01

Abstract

The application of biochar to soil for sustainable agriculture has been considered to have a positive impact on soil fertility and crop productivity. In this study, biochar derived from rice husk and chicken manure was applied to the soil at rates of 1% and 3% by weight, respectively, for lettuce cultivation experiments. The results indicated that both rice husk biochar and chicken manure biochar were effective in improving soil fertility through soil pH correction and increased nutrient content. The nitrogen content and pH of the biochar increased the available nitrogen and phosphate in the soil, creating a soil environment conducive to the growth enhancement of lettuce. In particular, after the application of 3% chicken manure biochar, the soil exhibited the highest levels of available nitrogen and phosphate at 87.42 mg·kg-1 and 69.07 mg·kg-1, respectively. Plant fresh weight increased with rising biochar amount, with the 3% chicken manure biochar treatment (228.25 g·plant-1 fresh weight [FW]) exhibiting superior fresh weight compared to 3% rice husk biochar treatment (120.88 g·plant-1 FW). The nutrient content in lettuce, except for K2O, was higher in the chicken manure biochar treatment compared to the same dosage of rice husk biochar. Therefore, for enhancing lettuce productivity and soil fertility, chicken manure biochar appears to be more effective than rice husk biochar, and increasing the application rate up to 3% showed improvement effects without adverse impacts. However, excessive application of chicken manure biochar may lead to an increase in soil pH and electrical conductivity (EC) beyond the optimal range, requiring further assessment of application rates.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This research study was conducted with support from a research grant awarded by the Cooperative Research Program for Agriculture Science & Technology Development of Rural Development Administration, Korea (Project No. RS-2022-RD010351).

References

  1. Adhikari S, Moon E, Timms W. 2024. Identifying biochar production variables to maximise exchangeable cations and increase nutrient availability in soils. Journal of Cleaner Production 446:141454.
  2. Biederman LA, Harpole, W. 2012. Biochar and its effects on plant productivity and nutrient cycling: A meta-analysis. GCB Bioenergy 5:202-214. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12037
  3. Biswas S, Kim IH. 2023. Determination of garlic extract efficacy on growth, nutrient digestibility, and fecal score of growing pigs via diet supplementation. Korean Journal of Agricultural Science 50:391-398. https://doi.org/10.7744/kjoas.500304
  4. Carter S, Shackley S, Sohi S, Suy TB, Haefele S. 2013. The impact of biochar application on soil properties and plant growth of pot grown lettuce (Lactuca sativa) and cabbage (Brassica chinensis). Agronomy 3:404-418. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy3020404
  5. Ch'ng HY, Haruna AO, Majid MNA, Jalloh MB. 2019. Improving soil phosphorus availability and yield of Zea mays l. using biochar and compost derived from agro-industrial wastes. Italian Journal of Agronomy 14:34-42. https://doi.org/10.4081/ija.2019.1107
  6. Chen H, Ma J, Wei J, Gong X, Yu X, Guo H, Zhao Y. 2018. Biochar increases plant growth and alters microbial communities via regulating the moisture and temperature of green roof substrates. Science of The Total Environment 635:333-342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.127
  7. Chirinda N, Olesen JE, Porter JR, Schjonning P. 2010. Soil properties, crop production and greenhouse gas emissions from organic and inorganic fertilizer-based arable cropping systems. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 139:584-594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2010.10.001
  8. Da Silva Mendes J, Fernandes JD, Chaves LHG, Guerra HOC, Tito GA, Chaves IDB. 2021. Chemical and physical changes of soil amended with biochar. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution 232:338.
  9. Dai Y, Zheng H, Jiang Z, Xing B. 2020. Combined effects of biochar properties and soil conditions on plant growth: A meta-analysis. Science of The Total Environment 713:136635.
  10. Farrar MB, Wallace HM, Xu CY, Joseph S, Nguyen TTN, Dunn PK, Bai SH. 2022. Biochar compound fertilisers increase plant potassium uptake 2 years after application without additional organic fertiliser. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 29:7170-7184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-16236-9
  11. Gao S, DeLuca TH, Cleveland CC. 2019. Biochar additions alter phosphorus and nitrogen availability in agricultural ecosystems: A meta-analysis. Science of The Total Environment 654:463-472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.124
  12. Glaser B, Lehr VI. 2019. Biochar effects on phosphorus availability in agricultural soils: A meta-analysis. Scientific Reports 9:9338.
  13. Guo JH, Liu XJ, Zhang Y, Shen JL, Han WX, Zhang WF, Christie P, Goulding KWT, Vitousek PM, Zhang FS. 2010. Significant acidification in major chinese croplands. Science 327:1008-1010. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1182570
  14. Hailegnaw NS, Mercl F, Pracke K. 2019. Mutual relationships of biochar and soil pH, CEC, and exchangeable base cations in a model laboratory experiment. Journal of Soils and Sediments 19:2405-2416. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-019-02264-z
  15. Hannet G, Singh K, Fidelis C, Farrar, MB, Muqaddas B, Bai SH. 2021. Effects of biochar, compost, and biochar-compost on soil total nitrogen and available phosphorus concentrations in a corn field in Papua New Guinea. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 28:27411-27419. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-12477-w
  16. Kang YG, Lee JH, Chun JH, Yun YU, Hatamleh AA, Al-Dosary MA, Al-Wasel YA, Lee KS, Oh TK. 2022. Influence of individual and co-application of organic and inorganic fertilizer on NH3 volatilization and soil quality. Journal of King Saud University - Science 34:102068.
  17. Kang YG, Lee JH, Chun JH, Yun YU, Oh TK, Sung JK. 2021. Evaluation of NH3 emissions in accordance with the pH of biochar. Korean Journal of Agricultural Science 48:787-796. [in Korean] https://doi.org/10.7744/KJOAS.20210066
  18. Kang YG, Lee JH, Lee JY, Kim JH, Oh TK. 2023a. Effects of biochar-based fertilizer on ammonia volatilization under controlled conditions. Korean Journal of Agricultural Science 50:479-488. [in Korean]
  19. Kang YG, Lee JH, Lee JY, Oh TK. 2023b. Effects of application rate and pH of carbonized rice husk on the reduction of NH3 volatilization and soil quality. Korean Journal of Agricultural Science 50:273-281. [in Korean]
  20. Kang YG, Lee JY, Kim JH, Oh TK, Yun YU. 2023c. Effects of organic amendments on lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) growth and soil chemical properties in acidic and non-acidic soils. Korean Journal of Agricultural Science 50:713-721. [in Korean] https://doi.org/10.7744/KJOAS.500410
  21. Kocsis T, Kotroczo Z, Kardos L, Biro B. 2020. Optimization of increasing biochar doses with soil-plant-microbial functioning and nutrient uptake of maize. Environmental Technology & Innovation 20:101191.
  22. Kumar A, Singh E, Singh L, Kumar S, Kumar R. 2021. Carbon material as a sustainable alternative towards boosting properties of urban soil and foster plant growth. Science of The Total Environment 751:141659.
  23. Laird D, Fleming P, Wang B, Horton R, Karlen D. 2010. Biochar impact on nutrient leaching from a Midwestern agricultural soil. Geoderma 158:436-442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2010.05.012
  24. Lee JH, Luyima D, Ahn JY, Park SY, Choi BS, Oh TK, Lee CH. 2019. Effect of different biochar formulations on the growth of cherry tomatoes. Korean Journal of Agricultural Science 46:931-939. [in Korean] https://doi.org/10.7744/KJOAS.20190075
  25. Lee JY, Kang YG, Kim JH, Oh TK, Yun YK. 2023. Effects of nutrient-coated biochar amendments on the growth and elemental composition of leafy vegetables. Korean Journal of Agricultural Science 50:967-976. [in Korean] https://doi.org/10.7744/KJOAS.500430
  26. Nguyen TTN, Wallace HM, Xu CY, Xu Z, Farrar MB, Joseph S, Zwieten LV, Bai SH. 2017a. Short-term effects of organomineral biochar and organic fertilisers on nitrogen cycling, plant photosynthesis, and nitrogen use efficiency. Journal of Soils and Sediments 17:2763-2774. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-017-1839-5
  27. Nguyen TTN, Xu CY, Tahmasbian I, Che R, Xu Z, Zhou X, Wallace HM, Bai SH. 2017b. Effects of biochar on soil available inorganic nitrogen: A review and meta-analysis. Geoderma 288:79-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2016.11.004
  28. Oh TK, Lee JH, Kim SH, Lee HC. 2017. Effect of biochar application on growth of Chinese cabbage (Brassica chinensis). Korean Journal of Agricultural Science 44:359-365. [in Korean] https://doi.org/10.7744/KJOAS.20170039
  29. Park JW, Youn WB, Park BB, Cho MS. 2023. Effect of 16 different (N, P combination) fertilizer treatments on the growth of Liriodendron tulipifera seedlings and soil chemical properties in the Nursery Station. Korean Journal of Agricultural Science 50:223-234. [in Korean] https://doi.org/10.7744/kjoas.20230014
  30. Phares CA, Amoakwah E, Danquah A, Afrifa A, Beyaw LR, Frimpong KA. 2022. Biochar and NPK fertilizer co-applied with plant growth promoting bacteria (PGPB) enhanced maize grain yield and nutrient use efficiency of inorganic fertilizer. Journal of Agriculture and Food Research 10:100434.
  31. Phillips CL, Meyer KM, Garcia-Jaramillo M, Weidman CS, Stewart CE, Wanzek T, Grusak MA, Watts DW, Novak J, Trippe KM. 2022. Towards predicting biochar impacts on plant-available soil nitrogen content. Biochar 4:9.
  32. Rahman KMA, Zhang D. 2018. Effects of fertilizer broadcasting on the excessive use of inorganic fertilizers and environmental sustainability. Sustainability 10:759.
  33. RDA (Rural Development Administration). 2018. Agricultural Technology Guide 160: Lettuce. RDA, Jeonju, Korea. [in Korean]
  34. RDA (Rural Development Administration). 2022. Fertilizer Recommendation for Crops (5th). RDA, Jeonju, Korea. [in Korean]
  35. RDA (Rural Development Administration). 2024. Establishing Fertilizer Process Specifications. RDA, Jeonju, Korea. [in Korean]
  36. Sanchez-Sastre LF, Martin-Ramos P, Navas-Gracia LM, Hernandez-Navarro S, Martin-Gil J. 2018. Impact of climatic variables on carbon content in sugar beet root. Agronomy 8:147.
  37. Schulz H, Dunst G, Glaser B. 2013. Positive effects of composted biochar on plant growth and soil fertility. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 33:817-827. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-013-0150-0
  38. Semida WM, Beheiry HR, Setamou M, Simpson CR, El-Mageed TAA, Rady MM, Nelson SD. 2019. Biochar implications for sustainable agriculture and environment: A review. South African Journal of Botany 127:333-347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2019.11.015
  39. Sigua GC, Novak JM, Watts DW, Johnson MG, Spokas K. 2016. Efficacies of designer biochars in improving biomass and nutrient uptake of winter wheat grown in a hard setting subsoil layer. Chemosphere 142:176-183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.06.015
  40. Tesfaye F, Liu X, Zheng J, Cheng K, Bian R, Zhang X, Li L, Drosos M, Joseph S, Pan G. 2021. Could biochar amendment be a tool to improve soil availability and plant uptake of phosphorus? A meta-analysis of published experiments. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 28:34108-34120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14119-7
  41. Torres WGA, Colen F, Pandey SD, Frazao LA, Sampaio RA, Fernandes LA. 2020. Phosphorus availability in soil amended with biochar from rice rusk and cattle manure and cultivated with common bean. Ciencia e Agrotecnologia 44:e014620.
  42. Uchimiya M, Lima IM, Klasson KT, Wartelle LH. 2010. Contaminant immobilization and nutrient release by biochar soil amendment: Roles of natural organic matter. Chemosphere 80:935-940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.05.020
  43. Wang Y, Yin R, Liu R. 2014. Characterization of biochar from fast pyrolysis and its effect on chemical properties of the tea garden soil. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis 110:375-381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2014.10.006
  44. Wijeysingha S, Walpola BC, Kang YG, Yoon MH, Oh TK. 2023. Practical significance of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria in sustainable agriculture: A review. Korean Journal of Agricultural Science 50:759-771. https://doi.org/10.7744/KJOAS.500414
  45. Wisnubroto EI, Utomo WH, Soelistyari HT. 2017. Biochar as a carrier for nitrogen plant nutrition: The release of nitrogen from biochar enriched with ammonium sulfate and nitrate acid. International Journal of Applied Engineering Research 12:1035-1042.