Journal of Animal Science and Technology

  • 제66권3호
  • /
  • Pages.457-470
  • /
  • 2024
  • /
  • 2672-0191(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2055-0391(eISSN)
한국축산학회 (Korean Society of Animal Sciences and Technology)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparative effects of proteases on performance, carcass traits and gut structure of broilers fed diets reduced in protein and amino acids

  • Alexandra L. Wealleans (Kemin Animal Nutrition and Health) ;
  • Roba Abo Ashour (Kemin Animal Nutrition and Health) ;
  • Majdi A. Abu Ishmais (Department of Animal Production, Faculty of Agriculture, Jordan University of Science and Technology) ;
  • Sadiq Al-Amaireh (Suliman Al-Amaireh & Partners Co.) ;
  • David Gonzalez-Sanchez (Kemin Animal Nutrition and Health)
  • 투고 : 2022.10.13
  • 심사 : 2023.02.19
  • 발행 : 2024.05.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of supplementing different protease enzymes on growth performance, intestinal morphology, and selected carcass traits in broilers fed diets reduced 3.5% in crude protein (CP) and amino acids (AA). One thousand one-day-old Ross 308 broilers (41 g) were assigned to five dietary treatments with ten replicates of 20 birds each: a positive control (PC) diet formulated to meet Ross 308 AA requirements, a negative control (NC) diet reformulated to provide 3.5% lower CP and AA compared to PC, NC supplemented with a multi-protease (PR1) solution, containing 3 different coated proteases produced from Aspergillus niger, Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus licheniformis, NC supplemented with a serine protease (PR2) produced from Bacillus licheniformis, and NC supplemented with an alkaline protease (PR3) produced from Bacillus licheniformis. At slaughter, 40 birds per treatment were used to assess the effect of the different treatments on carcass traits. At 32 days, samples of the duodenum, jejunum, and ileum of 10 birds per treatment were collected for intestinal morphology evaluation. Birds fed PC and NC supplemented with multi-protease exhibited better (p < 0.05) feed efficiency compared to NC and NC supplemented with all the other protease enzymes. Multi-protease supplementation was linked to the highest (p < 0.05) carcass weight and yield. There were significant differences (p < 0.05) between treatments in all gut segments, with PC, PR1, PR2, and PR3 exhibiting longer villi height (VH) compared to NC. This study demonstrates that 3.5% reduction of CP and AA negatively affected for the overall period feed efficiency, carcass yield, and intestinal morphology. The supplementation of the multi-protease restored feed efficiency and improved carcass yield.

키워드

과제정보

This study was supported by Kemin Europa N.V. (KAE-22-114).

참고문헌

  1. Thirumalaisamy G, Muralidharan J, Senthilkumar S, Hema Sayee R, Priyadharsini M. Cost-effective feeding of poultry. Int J Sci Environ Technol. 2016;5:3997-4005. 
  2. Greenhalgh S, Chrystal PV, Selle PH, Liu SY. Reduced-crude protein diets in chicken-meat production: justification for an imperative. Worlds Poult Sci J. 2020;76:537-48. https://doi.org/10.1080/00439339.2020.1789024 
  3. van Harn J, Dijkslag MA, van Krimpen MM. Effect of low protein diets supplemented with free amino acids on growth performance, slaughter yield, litter quality, and footpad lesions of male broilers. Poult Sci. 2019;98:4868-77. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pez229 
  4. Wilkie DC, Van Kessel AG, White LJ, Laarveld B, Drew MD. Dietary amino acids affect intestinal Clostridium perfringens populations in broiler chickens. Can J Anim Sci. 2005;85:185-93. https://doi.org/10.4141/A04-070 
  5. Ravindran V, Cabahug S, Ravindran G, Bryden WL. Influence of microbial phytase on apparent ileal amino acid digestibility of feedstuffs for broilers. Poult Sci. 1999;78:699-706. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/78.5.699 
  6. Dersjant-Li Y, Awati A, Schulze H, Partridge G. Phytase in non-ruminant animal nutrition: a critical review on phytase activities in the gastrointestinal tract and influencing factors. J Sci Food Agric. 2015;95:878-96. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.6998 
  7. Cowieson AJ, Ruckebusch JP, Sorbara JOB, Wilson JW, Guggenbuhl P, Roos FF. A systematic view on the effect of phytase on ileal amino acid digestibility in broilers. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 2017;225:182-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2017.01.008 
  8. Hew LI, Ravindran V, Mollah Y, Bryden WL. Influence of exogenous xylanase supplementation on apparent metabolisable energy and amino acid digestibility in wheat for broiler chickens. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 1998;75:83-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8401(98)00206-5 
  9. Liu WC, Kim IH. Effects of dietary xylanase supplementation on performance and functional digestive parameters in broilers fed wheat-based diets. Poult Sci. 2017;96:566-73. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pew258 
  10. Van Hoeck V, Somers I, Abdelqader A, Wealleans AL, Van de Craen S, Morisset D. Xylanase impact beyond performance: a microbiome approach in laying hens. PLOS ONE. 2021;16:e0257681. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0257681 
  11. Van Hoeck V, Wu D, Somers I, Wealleans A, Vasanthakumari BL, Gonzalez Sanchez AL, et al. Xylanase impact beyond performance: a prebiotic approach in broiler chickens. J Appl Poult Res. 2021;30:100193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.japr.2021.100193 
  12. Wealleans AL, Buyse J, Scholey D, Van Campenhout L, Burton E, Di Benedetto M, et al. Lysolecithin, but not lecithin, improves nutrient digestibility and growth rates in young broilers. Br Poult Sci. 2020;61:414-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2020.1736514 
  13. Haetinger VS, Dalmoro YK, Godoy GL, Lang MB, de Souza OF, Aristimunha P, et al. Optimizing cost, growth performance, and nutrient absorption with a bio-emulsifier based on lysophospholipids for broiler chickens. Poult Sci. 2021;100:101025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2021.101025 
  14. Cowieson AJ, Roos FF. Bioefficacy of a mono-component protease in the diets of pigs and poultry: a meta-analysis of effect on ileal amino acid digestibility. J Appl Anim Nutr. 2013;2:e13. https://doi.org/10.1017/jan.2014.5 
  15. Xu X, Wang HL, Pan L, Ma XK, Tian QY, Xu YT, et al. Effects of coated proteases on the performance, nutrient retention, gut morphology and carcass traits of broilers fed corn or sorghum based diets supplemented with soybean meal. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 2017;223:119-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2016.10.015 
  16. Cowieson AJ, Toghyani M, Kheravii SK, Wu SB, Romero LF, Choct M. A mono-component microbial protease improves performance, net energy, and digestibility of amino acids and starch, and upregulates jejunal expression of genes responsible for peptide transport in broilers fed corn/wheat-based diets supplemented with xylanase and phytase. Poult Sci. 2019;98:1321-32. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pey456 
  17. McCafferty KW, Toghyani M, Morgan NK, Cowieson AJ, Choct M, Moss AF. Effects of protease supplementation and diet type on jejunal and ileal digestibility and total tract metabolisability of nitrogen, starch, and energy in broilers. Br Poult Sci. 2022;63:386-94. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2021.1975260 
  18. Rada V, Lichovnikova M, Foltyn M. The effect of serine protease on broiler growth and carcass quality. Acta Fytotech Zootech. 2014;17:87-9. https://doi.org/10.15414/afz.2014.17.03.87-89 
  19. Giannenas I, Bonos E, Anestis V, Filioussis G, Papanastasiou DK, Bartzanas T, et al. Effects of protease addition and replacement of soybean meal by corn gluten meal on the growth of broilers and on the environmental performances of a broiler production system in greece. PLOS ONE. 2017;12:e0169511. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169511 
  20. Borda-Molina D, Zuber T, Siegert W, Camarinha-Silva A, Feuerstein D, Rodehutscord M. Effects of protease and phytase supplements on small intestinal microbiota and amino acid digestibility in broiler chickens. Poult Sci. 2019;98:2906-18. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pez038 
  21. Lourenco JM, Nunn SC, Lee EJ, Dove CR, Callaway TR, Azain MJ. Effect of supplemental protease on growth performance and excreta microbiome of broiler chicks. Microorganisms. 2020;8:475. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8040475 
  22. Leinonen I, Williams AG. Effects of dietary protease on nitrogen emissions from broiler production: a holistic comparison using Life Cycle Assessment. J Sci Food Agric. 2015;95:3041-6. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.7202 
  23. Lee SA, Bedford MR, Walk CL. Meta-analysis: explicit value of mono-component proteases in monogastric diets. Poult Sci. 2018;97:2078-85. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pey042 
  24. Tari LM, Perera N, Zaefarian F, Abdollahi MR, Cowieson AJ, Ravindran V. Influence of barley inclusion method and protease supplementation on growth performance, nutrient utilisation, and gastrointestinal tract development in broiler starters. Anim Nutr. 2022;8:61-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aninu.2021.06.008 
  25. Schindler T, Michel S, Wilson AWM. Nutrition management of cystic fibrosis in the 21st century. Nutr Clin Pract. 2015;30:488-500. https://doi.org/10.1177/0884533615591604 
  26. Aviagen. Ross broiler nutrition specifications 2019 [Internet]. Aviagen 2019 [cited 2022 Oct 13]. https://www.cipa.com.co/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/RossBroilerNutritionSpecs 2019-EN.pdf 
  27. Aftab U. Energy and amino acid requirements of broiler chickens: keeping pace with the genetic progress. Worlds Poult Sci J. 2019;75:507-14. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043933919000564 
  28. Johnson CA, Duong T, Latham RE, Shirley RB, Lee JT. Increasing amino acid density improves growth performance and processing yield in Cobb 700 × MV broilers. J Appl Poult Res. 2020;29:465-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.japr.2020.02.004 
  29. Johnson CA, Duong T, Latham RE, Shirley RB, Lee JT. Effects of amino acid and energy density on growth performance and processing yield of mixed-sex Cobb 700 × MV broiler chickens. J Appl Poult Res. 2020;29:269-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.japr.2019.10.014 
  30. Barekatain R, Nattrass G, Tilbrook AJ, Chousalkar K, Gilani S. Reduced protein diet and amino acid concentration alter intestinal barrier function and performance of broiler chickens with or without synthetic glucocorticoid. Poult Sci. 2019;98:3662-75. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pey563 
  31. Pesti GM. Impact of dietary amino acid and crude protein levels in broiler feeds on biological performance. J Appl Poult Res. 2009;18:477-86. https://doi.org/10.3382/japr.2008-00105 
  32. Yin D, Chrystal PV, Moss AF, Liu SY, Yuan J, Selle PH. Effects of reducing dietary crude protein and whole grain feeding on performance and amino acid metabolism in broiler chickens offered wheat-based diets. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 2020;260:114386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2019.114386 
  33. Maynard CW, Kidd MT, Chrystal PV, McQuade LR, McInerney BV, Selle PH, et al. Assessment of limiting dietary amino acids in broiler chickens offered reduced crude protein diets. Anim Nutr. 2022;10:1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aninu.2021.11.010 
  34. Law FL, Zulkifli I, Soleimani AF, Liang JB, Awad EA. The effects of low-protein diets and protease supplementation on broiler chickens in a hot and humid tropical environment. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2018;31:1291-300. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.17.0581 
  35. Hafez HM, Attia YA. Challenges to the poultry industry: current perspectives and strategic future after the COVID-19 outbreak. Front Vet Sci. 2020;7:516. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.00516 
  36. Rehman ZU, Kamran J, Abd El-Hack ME, Alagawany M, Bhatti SA, Ahmad G, et al. Influence of low-protein and low-amino acid diets with different sources of protease on performance, carcasses and nitrogen retention of broiler chickens. Anim Prod Sci. 2018;58:1625-31. https://doi.org/10.1071/AN16687 
  37. Cho HM, Hong JS, Kim YB, Nawarathne SR, Choi I, Yi YJ, et al. Responses in growth performance and nutrient digestibility to a multi-protease supplementation in amino acid-deficient broiler diets. J Anim Sci Technol. 2020;62:840-53. https://doi.org/10.5187/jast.2020.62.6.840 
  38. Cowieson AJ, Abdollahi MR, Zaefarian F, Pappenberger G, Ravindran V. The effect of a mono-component exogenous protease and graded concentrations of ascorbic acid on the performance, nutrient digestibility and intestinal architecture of broiler chickens. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 2018;235:128-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2017.11.018 
  39. Mohammadigheisar M, Kim IH. Addition of a protease to low crude protein density diets of broiler chickens. J Appl Anim Res. 2018;46:1377-81. https://doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2018.1512862 
  40. Wang T, Ling H, Zhang W, Zhou Y, Li Y, Hu Y, et al. Protease or Clostridium butyricum addition to a low-protein diet improves broiler growth performance. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2022;106:7917-31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-022-12264-8 
  41. McCafferty KW, Choct M, Musigwa S, Morgan NK, Cowieson AJ, Moss AF. Protease supplementation reduced the heat increment of feed and improved energy and nitrogen partitioning in broilers fed maize-based diets with supplemental phytase and xylanase. Anim Nutr. 2022;10:19-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aninu.2021.10.011 
  42. Amerah AM, Romero LF, Awati A, Ravindran V. Effect of exogenous xylanase, amylase, and protease as single or combined activities on nutrient digestibility and growth performance of broilers fed corn/soy diets. Poult Sci. 2017;96:807-16. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pew297 
  43. Wealleans AL, Walsh MC, Romero LF, Ravindran V. Comparative effects of two multienzyme combinations and a Bacillus probiotic on growth performance, digestibility of energy and nutrients, disappearance of non-starch polysaccharides, and gut microflora in broiler chickens. Poult Sci. 2017;96:4287-97. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pex226 
  44. Angel CR, Saylor W, Vieira SL, Ward N. Effects of a monocomponent protease on performance and protein utilization in 7- to 22-day-old broiler chickens. Poult Sci. 2011;90:2281-6. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2011-01482 
  45. Park JH, Lee SI, Kim IH. The effect of protease on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, and expression of growth-related genes and amino acid transporters in broilers. J Anim Sci Technol. 2020;62:614-27. https://doi.org/10.5187/jast.2020.62.5.614 
  46. Jabbar A, Tahir M, Khan RU, Ahmad N. Interactive effect of exogenous protease enzyme and dietary crude protein levels on growth and digestibility indices in broiler chickens during the starter phase. Trop Anim Health Prod. 2021;53:23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-020-02466-5 
  47. Jabbar A, Tahir M, Alhidary IA, Abdelrahman MA, Albadani H, Khan RU, et al. Impact of microbial protease enzyme and dietary crude protein levels on growth and nutrients digestibility in broilers over 15-28 days. Animals. 2021;11:2499. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11092499 
  48. Cowieson AJ, Zaefarian F, Knap I, Ravindran V. Interactive effects of dietary protein concentration, a mono-component exogenous protease and ascorbic acid on broiler performance, nutritional status and gut health. Anim Prod Sci. 2017;57:1058-68. https://doi.org/10.1071/AN15740 
  49. Wedekind KJ, Chen J, Yan F, Escobar J, Vazquez-Anon M. Efficacy of a mono-component protease is affected by trypsin inhibitor concentration in soybean meal. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 2020;265:114502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2020.114502 
  50. Aderibigbe A, Cowieson AJ, Sorbara JO, Pappenberger G, Adeola O. Growth performance and amino acid digestibility responses of broiler chickens fed diets containing purified soybean trypsin inhibitor and supplemented with a monocomponent protease. Poult Sci. 2020;99:5007-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2020.06.051 
  51. Erdaw MM, Perez-Maldonado RA, Iji PA. Apparent and standardized ileal nutrient digestibility of broiler diets containing varying levels of raw full-fat soybean and microbial protease. J Anim Sci Technol. 2017;59:23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40781-017-0148-2 
  52. Caspary WF. Physiology and pathophysiology of intestinal absorption. Am J Clin Nutr. 1992;55:299S-308S. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/55.1.299s 
  53. Choct M. Enzymes for the feed industry: past, present and future. Worlds Poult Sci J. 2006;62:5-16. https://doi.org/10.1079/WPS200480 
  54. Craven SE. Colonization of the intestinal tract by Clostridium perfringens and fecal shedding in diet-stressed and unstressed broiler chickens. Poult Sci. 2000;79:843-9. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/79.6.843 
  55. Ding XM, Li DD, Li ZR, Wang JP, Zeng QF, Bai SP, et al. Effects of dietary crude protein levels and exogenous protease on performance, nutrient digestibility, trypsin activity and intestinal morphology in broilers. Livest Sci. 2016;193:26-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2016.09.002 
  56. Kamel NF, Naela, Ragaa M, El-Banna RA, Mohamed FF. Effects of a monocomponent protease on performance parameters and protein digestibility in broiler chickens. Agric Agric Sci Procedia. 2015;6:216-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aaspro.2015.08.062 
  57. Kidd MT, Maynard CW, Mullenix GJ. Progress of amino acid nutrition for diet protein reduction in poultry. J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2021;12:45. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-021-00568-0 
  58. Eits RM, Kwakkel RP, Verstegen MWA, Stoutjesdijk P, De Greef KH. Protein and lipid deposition rates in male broiler chickens: separate responses to amino acids and protein-free energy. Poult Sci. 2002;81:472-80. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/81.4.472 
  59. Liu SY, Selle PH, Court SG, Cowieson AJ. Protease supplementation of sorghum-based broiler diets enhances amino acid digestibility coefficients in four small intestinal sites and accelerates their rates of digestion. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 2013;183:175-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2013.05.006 
  60. Hejdysz M, Kaczmarek SA, Kubis M, Wisniewska Z, Peris S, Budnik S, et al. The effect of protease and Bacillus licheniformis on nutritional value of pea, faba bean, yellow lupin and narrow-leaved lupin in broiler chicken diets. Br Poult Sci. 2020;61:287-93. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2020.1716303