재활치료과학 (Therapeutic Science for Rehabilitation)

  • 제13권3호
  • /
  • Pages.51-67
  • /
  • 2024
  • /
  • 2635-9340(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2671-4329(eISSN)
대한신경계작업치료학회 (Korean Society of Neurological Occupational Therapy)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

한국 작업치료사의 평가도구 사용 동향: 성인 및 노인 분야를 중심으로

Trends in the Use of Assessment Tools by Korean Occupational Therapists: Focus on Adult and Older Adult Populations

  • 하예나 (연세대학교 일반대학원 작업치료학과) ;
  • 정지인 (연세대학교 일반대학원 작업치료학과) ;
  • 강병호 (서울특별시 어린이병원) ;
  • 유은영 (연세대학교 소프트웨어디지털헬스케어융합대학 작업치료학과)
  • Ha, Yae-Na (Dept. of Occupational Therapy, Graduate School of Yonsei University) ;
  • Jeong, Ji-In (Dept. of Occupational Therapy, Graduate School, Yonsei University) ;
  • Kang, Byoung-Ho (Seoul Metropolitan Children's Hospital) ;
  • Yoo, Eun-Young (Dept. of Occupational Therapy, College of Software and Digital Healthcare Convergence, Yonsei University)
  • 투고 : 2024.06.10
  • 심사 : 2024.07.24
  • 발행 : 2024.08.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

목적 : 성인 및 노인 분야에 종사하는 작업치료사를 대상으로 평가도구 사용 동향을 알아보고자 하였다. 연구방법 : 작업치료사를 대상으로 일반적 특성, 평가도구 사용 대상, 평가 시간 및 주기, 영역별 평가도구 사용 동향, 평가도구 사용 및 교육에 대해 설문조사를 실시하였다. 평가도구 영역은 Occupational Therapy Practice Framework (OTPF)에 따라 작업의 Activities of Daily Living (ADL), Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL), 놀이 및 여가 영역과 클라이언트 요인의 인지 기능, 운동 기능, 심리사회 영역으로 구분하였다. 설문에 응답한 98명의 자료는 SAS 9.4를 사용하여 빈도 분석과 일원배치 분산분석을 하였다. 결과 : 설문에 참여한 작업치료사는 대학병원과 종합병원(40.82%)에 가장 높은 빈도로 근무하고 있었다. 환자 한 명당 소요되는 평가 시간은 30분 미만이 62.25%, 재평가 주기는 1~3개월 미만이 68.38%로 가장 높은 빈도를 보였다. 평가도구의 영역 별 사용 빈도는 작업의 ADL은 Modified Barthel Index (94.90%), IADL은 Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (31.63%), 클라이언트 요인의 인지기능은 Mini-Mental Status Examination (89.80%), 시지각은 Motor-free Visual Perception Test (56.12%), 치매는 Global Deterioration Scale (63.27%), 운동 기능은 Jamar Dynamometer & Pinch Gauge (59.18%), 연하는 Video Fluoroscopic Swallowing Study (28.57%), 이학적 검사법은 Range of Motion (59.18%), 심리사회는 Geriatric Depression Scale (33.67%)을 가장 높은 빈도로 사용하고 있었다. 결론 : 본 연구를 통해 성인 및 노인 분야의 평가도구 사용 동향과 그 근거를 확인하였다. 이는 작업치료학과 교육과정 및 보수교율 등 전문성 강화를 위한 정보로 활용될 것으로 기대된다.

Objective : This study investigated trends in the use of assessment tools by occupational therapists working with adults and older adults. Methods : Occupational therapists were surveyed to gather data on general characteristics, assessment tool usage, assessment time and frequency, usage trends by area, and education. The tools were categorized by the Occupational Therapy Practice Framework (OTPF) into Activities of Daily Living (ADL), Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL), and play and leisure for occupations, and cognitive functions, motor functions, and psychosocial aspects for client factors. Data from 98 respondents were analyzed using frequency analysis and one-way ANOVA with SAS. Results : Most surveyed occupational therapists worked in university or general hospitals (40.82%). The assessment time per patient was under 30 min (62.25%), and re-assessment frequency was one~three months (68.38%). The most frequently used assessment tools by the OTPF were as follows: ADL: Modified Barthel Index (94.90%), IADL: Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (31.63%), cognitive functions: Mini-Mental Status Examination (89.80%), visual perception: Motor-free Visual Perception Test (56.12%), dementia: Global Deterioration Scale (63.27%), motor functions: Jamar Dynamometer & Pinch Gauge (59.18%), dysphagia: Video Fluoroscopic Swallowing Study (28.57%), physical examination: Range of Motion (59.18%), and psychosocial: Geriatric Depression Scale (33.67%). Conclusion : This study identified the use and rationale of assessment tools for occupational therapy in adults and older adults. These findings aim to enhance the curriculum and continuing education of occupational therapists.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Alvi, M. (2016). A manual for selecting sampling techniques in research (Paper No. 70218). Munich Personal RePEC Archive. https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/70218
  2. American Occupational Therapy Association (AOTA). (2011). Definition of occupational therapy practice for the AOTA model practice act. https://www.aota.org/-/media/corporate/files/advocacy/state/resources/practiceact/ot-definition-for-aota-model-practice-act.pdf
  3. American Occupational Therapy Association (AOTA). (2020). Occupational therapy practice framework: Domain and process (4th ed.). American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 74(Suppl. 2), 7412410010p1-7412410010p1-p87. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2020.74S2001
  4. American Occupational Therapy Association (AOTA). (2021). Standards of practice for occupational therapy. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 75(Supplement_3), 7513410030. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2021.75S3004
  5. Amini, D. A., Kannenberg, K., Bodison, S., Chang, P., Colaianni, D., Goodrich, B., & Lieberman, D. (2014). Occupational therapy practice framework: Domain & process (3rd ed.). American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 68(Supplement 1), S1-S48. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2014.682006
  6. Asher, I. E. (2021). Asher's occupational therapy assessment tools (4th ed.). Slack Incorporated.
  7. Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., & Carbin, M. G. (1988). Psychometric properties of the beck depression inventory: Twenty-five years of evaluation. Clinical Psychology Review, 8(1), 77-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-7358(88)90050-5
  8. Brown, T., & Peres, L. (2018). A critical review of the Motor-Free Visual Perception Test, Fourth edition (MVPT-4). Journal of Occupational Therapy, Schools, & Early Intervention, 11(2), 229-244. https://doi.org/10.1080/19411243.2018.1432441
  9. Carnaby, G. D., & Harenberg, L. (2013). What is "usual care" in dysphagia rehabilitation: A survey of USA dysphagia practice patterns. Dysphagia, 28, 567-574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-013-9467-8
  10. Case-Smith, J., & O'Brien, J. C. (2010). Occupational therapy for children (6th ed.). Elsevier Health Sciences. 
  11. Colarusso, R. P., & Hammill, D. D. (1972). Motor-free visual perception test. Academic Therapy Publications.
  12. Cole, M. B. (2024). Occupational therapy theory development and organization. Routledge.
  13. Delwiche, L. D., & Slaughter, S. J. (2019). The little SAS book: A primer. SAS Institute.
  14. Doucet, B. M., & Gutman, S. A. (2013). Quantifying function: The rest of the measurement story. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 67(1), 7-9. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2013.007096
  15. Halle, A. D., Mroz, T. M., Fogelberg, D. J., & Leland, N. E. (2018). Occupational therapy and primary care: Updates and trends. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 72(3), 7203090010p1-7203090010p6. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2018.723001
  16. Hinojosa, J., & Kramer, P. (Eds.). (2014). Evaluation in occupational therapy (4th ed.). AOTA Press.
  17. Hwang, D. Y., Ryu, S. H., Kwon, K. H., Choi, C. R., & Kim, S. A. (2022). Correlation between Cognitive Impairment Screening Test (CIST), Korean-Mini Mental State Examination, 2nd edition (K-MMSE-2) and Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) of patients with stroke. Therapeutic Science for Rehabilitation, 11(2), 53-62. https://doi.org/10.22683/tsnr.2022.11.2.053
  18. Jo, E. M., Jeong, Y. J., Choi, Y. M., & Yoo, E. Y. (2015). Current trends of occupational therapy assessment tool by Korean pediatric occupational therapist. Journal of Korean Society of Occupational Therapy for Child and School, 6, 53-64.
  19. Jo, J. M. (2023, August 12). Not covered by health insurance and ignored by hospitals and clinics 'Korean dementia screening tool'. Dailymedi. https://www.dailymedi.com/news/news_view.php?wr_id=900993
  20. Kandel, E. R., Schwartz, J. H., Jessell, T. M., Siegelbaum, S., Hudspeth, A. J., & Mack, S. (Eds.) (2000). Principles of neural science (4th ed.). McGraw-hill.
  21. Kang, J. S., Kim, S. E., & Yang, Y. A. (2019). Current trends and future direction of cognitive assessment tools in brain lesion disorder: Adult occupational therapists. Journal of Society of Occupational Therapy for the Aged and Dementia, 13(1), 63-70.
  22. Kaszniak, A. W., Grant, I., & Adams, K. M. (1986). The neuropsychology of dementia. Oxford University Press.
  23. Katz, N., Elazar, B., & Itzkovich, M. (1995). Construct validity of a geriatric version of the Loewenstein Occupational Therapy Cognitive Assessment (LOTCA) battery. Physical & Occupational Therapy in Geriatrics, 13(3), 31-46. https://doi.org/10.1080/J148v13n03_03
  24. Katz, N., Itzkovich, M., Averbuch, S., & Elazar, B. (1989). Loewenstein Occupational Therapy Cognitive Assessment (LOTCA) battery for brain-injured patients: Reliability and validity. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 43(3), 184-192. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.43.3.184
  25. Kim, J. K., Kim, H. S., & Park, S. J. (2019). The use of cognitive evaluation tools by Korean occupational therapists: A pilot study. Korean Academy of Basic Medicine & Health Science, 12(1), 26-30.
  26. Korean Association of Occupational Therapists (KAOT). (2022). Status of occupational therapists. https://www.kaot.org/
  27. Law, M., Baptiste, S., Carswell, A., McColl, M. A., Polatajko, H., & Pollock, N. (2014). Canadian occupational performance measure (5th ed.). CAOT Publications.
  28. Lee, Y. C., Lee, S. C., & Chiu, E. C. (2022). Practice effect and test-retest reliability of the mini-mental state examination-2 in people with dementia. BMC Geriatrics, 22(1), 67. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-021-02732-7
  29. Manni, B., Gitlin, L., Garzetta, G., Collier, L., & Fabbo, A. (2020). Occupational therapy in nursing home. Occupational Therapy for Older People, 101-124. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35731-3_6
  30. Mathers-Schmidt, B. A., & Kurlinski, M. (2003). Dysphagia evaluation practices: Inconsistencies in clinical assessment and instrumental examination decision-making. Dysphagia, 18(2), 114-125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-002-0094-z
  31. Ministry of Health and Welfare. (2003). Disability grading criteria (Ministry of Health and Welfare Notification No. 37). https://www.law.go.kr/%ED%96%89%EC%A0%95%EA%B7%9C%EC%B9%99/%EC%9E%A5%EC%95%A0%EB%93%B1%EA%B8%89%ED%8C%90%EC%A0%95%EA%B8%B0%EC%A4%80/(37,20030628)
  32. Ministry of Health and Welfare. (2009). Disability grading criteria (Ministry of Health and Welfare Notification No. 2009-227). https://www.law.go.kr/%ED%96%89%EC%A0%95%EA%B7%9C%EC%B9%99/%EC%9E%A5%EC%95%A0%EB%93%B1%EA%B8%89%ED%8C%90%EC%A0%95%EA%B8%B0%EC%A4%80/(2009-227,20091217)
  33. Ministry of Health and Welfare. (2021). Cognitive impairment screening test (CIST) manual. National Institute of Dementia. https://www.mohw.go.kr
  34. Ministry of Health and Welfare. (2022). Disability grading criteria (Ministry of Health and Welfare Notification No. 2022-16). https://www.law.go.kr/%ED%96%89%EC%A0%95%EA%B7%9C%EC%B9%99/%EC%9E%A5%EC%95%A0%EC%A0%95%EB%8F%84%ED%8C%90%EC%A0%95%EA%B8%B0%EC%A4%80/(2022-16,20220128)
  35. Moon, S. B., Yeo, K. E., & Cho, Y. T. (2003). Korean developmental test of visual perception (K-DTVP-2), Hakjisa.
  36. Nasreddine, Z. S., Phillips, N. A., Bdirian, V., Charbonneau, S., Whitehead, V., Collin, I., Cummings, J. L.,. & Chertkow, H. (2005). The montreal cognitive assessment, MoCA: A brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 53(4), 695-699. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53221.x
  37. Nundy, S., Kakar, A., & Bhutta, Z. A. (2022). How to practice academic medicine and publish from developing countries?: A practical guide. Springer Nature.
  38. Oh, J. S., Jeon, B. J., & Son, S. M. (2021). Research trend analysis of occupational therapy using keyword network analysis: Focusing on the Korean journal of occupational therapy. Korean Journal of Occupational Therapy, 29(2), 65-77. https://doi.org/10.14519/kjot.2021.29.2.06
  39. Park, J. Y., & Bae, W. J. (2019). The use of occupational therapy assessment tool by occupational therapists in long-term care hospital. Journal of Occupational Therapy for the Aged and Dementia, 13(1), 23-31. https://doi.org/10.34263/jsotad.2019.13.1.23
  40. Park, S. Y., & Yoo, E. Y. (2002). The use of occupational therapy assessment tool by Korean occupational therapist, Journal of the Korean Society of Occupational Therapy, 10(2), 99-108.
  41. Pashmdarfard, M., & Azad, A. (2020). Assessment tools to evaluate Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) in older adults: A systematic review. Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran, 34, 33. https://doi.org/10.34171/mjiri.34.33
  42. Pendleton, H. M., & Schultz-Krohn (2017). Occupational therapy: Practice skills for physical dysfunction (8th ed.). Mosby.
  43. Roberts, H. C., Denison, H. J., Martin, H. J., Patel, H. P., Syddall, H., Cooper, C., & Sayer, A. A. (2011). A review of the measurement of grip strength in clinical and epidemiological studies: Towards a standardised approach. Age and Ageing, 40(4), 423-429. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afr051
  44. Robertson, L., & Blaga, L. (2013). Occupational therapy assessments used in acute physical care settings. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 20(2), 127-135. https://doi.org/10.3109/11038128.2012.737369
  45. Seo, S. M., Song, Y. J., & Woo, H. S. (2020). Study on the Status of dysphagia rehabilitation. Journal of the Korean Dysphagia Society, 10(1), 47-55. http://doi.org/10.34160/jkds.2020.10.1.006
  46. Smallfield, S., & Elliott, S. J. (2020). Occupational therapy interventions for productive aging among community-dwelling older adults. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 74(1), 7401390010p1-7401390010p5. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2020.741003
  47. Song, C. S. (2012). Current trends and future-oriented view of clinical measurement used by neurological occupational therapist. Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial Cooperation Society, 13(11), 5229-5237. https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2012.13.11.5229
  48. Stern, B. Z. (2022). Clinical potential of patient-reported outcome measures in occupational therapy. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 76(2), 7602090010. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2022.049367
  49. Takla, M. K., Mahmoud, E. A., & El-Latif, N. A. (2018). Jebsen Taylor hand function test: Gender, dominance, and age differences in healthy Egyptian population. Bulletin of Faculty of Physical Therapy, 23, 85-93. https://doi.org/10.4103/bfpt.bfpt_11_18
  50. Wales, K., Clemson, L., Lannin, N., & Cameron, I. (2016). Functional assessments used by occupational therapists with older adults at risk of activity and participation limitations: A systematic review. PloS ONE, 11(2), e0147980. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147980
  51. Warren, M. (2001). Evaluation and treatment of visual deficits In L. W. Pedretti & M. B. Early (Eds.), Occupational pratice skill for physical dysfunction (5th ed., pp. 386-415). Missouri Mosby.
  52. World Federation of Occupational Therapists (WFOT). (2017). Definition of occupational therapy. https://www.wfot.org
  53. Yesavage, J. A., Brink, T. L., Rose, T. L., Lum, O., Huang, V., Adey, M., & Leirer, V. O. (1982). Development and validation of a geriatric depression screening scale: A preliminary report. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 17(1), 37-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3956(82)90033-4
  54. Yoo, E. Y., Jung, M. Y., Park, S. Y., & Choi, E. H. (2006). Current trends of occupational therapy assessment tool by Korea occupational therapist. Journal of the Korean Society of Occupational Therapy, 14(3), 27-37.