Journal of Research and Publication Ethics (연구윤리)

Korea Distribution Science Association (한국유통과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Research Trends on PBM (Performance-based Management) in Korea

  • Ho Taek KIM (Department of Industrial Management Engineering, Hansung University) ;
  • Jin Won KIM (Department of Vocational Education and Workforce, Seoul National University) ;
  • Hyun Sung PARK (Department of Industrial Management Engineering, Hansung University)
  • Received : 2024.08.30
  • Accepted : 2024.09.15
  • Published : 2024.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: PBM is emerging as a major management system for securing corporate productivity and enhancing competitiveness, and various studies are being conducted. The purpose of this study is to analyze research trends published in KCI-listed journals and papers since 1999 to understand the current status of research and provide basic data for more extensive research and development of performance management in the future. Research design, data and methodology: A detailed examination of research trends was conducted through the analysis of abstracts from 154 research papers on PBM. To facilitate a comprehensive analysis of these trends, LDA topic modelling was employed. Results: First, it should be noted that research on PBM is not limited to the area of HRM. Instead, PBM research is expanding to encompass comprehensive personnel systems. Second, the results of topic modeling analysis show that although the initial focus of research was on human resource management, there is now a growing interest in fairness and organizational culture in the entire organization. Conclusions: PBM is becoming a dominant paradigm as it shifts from HR systems to organizational fairness and culture. This suggests that future research should consider both quantitative and qualitative aspects of PBM to improve corporate performance while prioritizing organizational fairness and culture.

Keywords

References

  1. Adams, J. S.(1965). Inequity in social exchange. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 2, 267-299.
  2. Bae, J., & Rowley ,C.(2003). Changes and continuities in Seoul Korean HRM. Asia Pacific Business Review, 9(4), 76-105.
  3. Blei, D.M. (2012) Probabilistic Topic Models. Communications of the ACM, 55(4), 77-84. http://doi.org/10.1145/2133806.2133826
  4. Chandler, AD. (1990). Scale and Scope: The Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism. Belknap Press of Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, MA, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/027046769101100121
  5. Cho, S. B., & Shin, S. A., & Kang, D. S. (2018). A Study on the Research Trends on Open Innovation using Topic Modeling. Informatization policy, 25(3), 52-74. http://doi.org/10.22693/NIAIP.2018.25.3.052
  6. Choi, J. A., & Lee, I. S. & Jeon, M. K. (2014). he Moderating Effects of Interactional Justice in the Relations between Procedural Justice of HRM Performance Appraisal and Employees' Job Attitudes. The journal of professional management, 17(1), 103-123. UCI: G704-SER000009850.2014.17.1.005
  7. Choi, S. C., & Park, H. W. (2020). A Study on the Trend of Topic Modeling in South Korea using KCI Journal Publications. Journal of the Korean Data Analysis Society, 22(2), 815-826. https://doi.org/10.37727/jkdas.2020.22.2.815
  8. DeNisi, A. S., & Pritchard, R. D. (2006). Performance appraisal, performance management and improving individual performance: A motivational framework. Management and Organization Review, 2(2), 253-277. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-8784.2006.00042.x
  9. Folger, R., & Konovsky, M. A. (1989). Effects of procedural and distributive justice on reactions to pay raise decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 32(1), 115-130. https://doi.org/10.2307/256422
  10. Franco-Santos, M., Lucianetti, L., & Bourne, M. (2012). Contemporary performance measurement systems: A review of their consequences and framework for research. Management accounting research, 23(2), 79-119. SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2045992
  11. Gerstner, C. R., & Day, D. V. (1997). Meta-Analytic review of leader-member exchange theory: Correlates and construct issues. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(6), 827-844. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.82.6.827
  12. Jung, S. R. (2004). A Study of the Influence on the Wage Satisfaction and the Organization Commitment by the Annual Wage System in the Organization Culture. [Doctoral Thesis], Graduate School of Hoseo University. RISS
  13. Jung, K. T., & Park, K. K., & Lim, H. C. (2008). The Effects of performance-based HR Practices on Frim Performance. Korean Journal of Human Resources Development, 11(2),79-106.
  14. Kang, S. D. (2018). Interactive Justice as a Moderated Mediator between Open Communication and Knowledge-sharing Intention. Quarterly Journal of Labor Policy, 18(1), 1-38. https://doi.org/10.22914/jlp.2018.18.1.001.
  15. Kim, S, K. (1999). The essence of performance-oriented human resource management is differentiation. Monthly HR Magazine, 1999 (4), 18-21.
  16. Kim, D.B., & Kim, J. H. (2011). Antecedents of the Performance Based Pay: A Comparison of Japanese and Korean Firms. Quarterly Journal of Labor Policy, 11(1), 24-54. https://doi.org/10.22914/jlp.2011.11.1.002
  17. Kim, G. C., Noh, H. J. (2019). Research Trends of Regional Geography Education Using Topic Modeling. Social studies education, 58(4), 49-67. https://doi.org/10.37561/sse.2019.12.58.4.49
  18. Kim, M. R., & Hwang, H. S., & Li, W. (2020). Research Trends of Consumer Education Using Topic Modeling. Consumer policy and education review, 16(2), 83-115. https://doi.org/10.15790/cope.2020.16.2.083
  19. Kim, Y. N. (2024). Workers' right to participate in personnel evaluation. [Doctoral Thesis], Graduate School of Hanyang University. RISS.
  20. Moon. Y. H., & Lee, S. H., & Sohn, S. H. (2013). Analysis of Practical Reasoning Processes Presented in Consumer Education of Technology & Home Economics Textbooks. Korean Home Economics Education Association, 25(2), 79-101.
  21. Lee, S. G. (2013). The Problems and Improvements in Performance-based Compensation System. Journal of Human Resource Management Research, 20(3), 187-208.
  22. Lee, S. S. (2016). A Study on the Application of Topic Modeling for the Book Report. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 47(4), 1-18. https://10.16981/kliss.47.4.201612.1
  23. Lee, D. J. (2023). Asymmetric Changes in Korean Industry and Labor after Economic Crises. Analyses & Alternatives, 7(1), 45-81. https://doi.org/10.22931/aanda.2023.7.1.002.
  24. Oh, S. T. (2023). A Study on Relationship between LMX and OCB under Forced Distribution Rating System : The Mediating Effect of Justice Perception and the Moderating Effect of POS. Journal of the Korean Entrepreneurship Society, 18(5), 839-867. https:// doi.org/10.24878/tkes.2023.18.5.839
  25. Papadimitriou, C. H., Raghavan, P., Tamaki, H., Vempala, S. (1998). Latent semantic indexing: a probabilistic analysis, Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 61(2), 217-235. https://doi.org/10.1006/jcss.2000.1711
  26. Park, J. H., & KWUN, S, K. (2006). The effects of pay-for-performance on motivation in team-based work systems. Journal of Organization and Management, 30(3), 87-119.
  27. Park, S. E. (2007). A Study on the Dilemmas of Performance-Based HRM System : Based on a Case Analysis of Fujitsu's HRM System. Korean Journal of Human Resources Development, 11(2), 79-106.
  28. Schuler, Randall S., & Macmillan, Lan. C. (1984). Gaining competitive advantage through human resource management practices. Human Resource Management, 23(3), 225-344. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.3930230304
  29. Seo, I. D. (1986). A Study on the Relationship between Organizational Culture Types and Organizational Characteristics of Korean Firms. [Doctoral Thesis] Graduate School of Seoul National University.
  30. Shin, S. Y., & Yang, H. S. (2005) Team-Based Evaluation System for Implementing Performance-Oriented HR System: LG Chem Case. Korea Business Review, 9(1), 79-99.
  31. Song, J. E. & LEE, C. (2020). The Mediating Effect of Employee Experience of Performance appraisal on the Relationships between Performance-Based evaluation/compensation System and Job Performance. Journal of Corporate Education and Talent Research, 22(4), 81-112. https://doi.org/10.46260/KSLP.22.4.4
  32. Wright, P. M., Gardner, T. M. & Moynihan, L. M. (2003). The impact of HR practices on the performance of business units, Human Resource Management Journal, 13(3), 21-36. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-8583.2003.TB00096.X
  33. Yang, H. S. (2003). The impact of social situational factors on performance evaluation results. Korean Journal of Management, 11(1), 113-131.