기독교교육논총 (Journal of Christian Education in Korea)

  • 제77권
  • /
  • Pages.251-276
  • /
  • 2024
  • /
  • 1229-781X(pISSN)
한국기독교교육학회 (The Korean Society of Christian Religious Education)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

교수유형 진단에 따른 교수 맞춤형 교육과정 개발 연구 : 교육역량 기반의 교수유형을 중심으로

Research on the Development of Customized Faculty Training Curriculum based on Diagnosis of Teaching Styles: Focusing on Teaching Styles based on Educational Competencies

  • 투고 : 2024.03.07
  • 심사 : 2024.03.29
  • 발행 : 2024.03.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

연구 목적: 본 연구는 대학의 교육 질을 제고하기 위해 교수들의 교육 역량을 강화할 수 있는 방안으로 교수 유형을 설정하고, 해당 유형을 평가할 수 있는 진단 도구를 개발한 후, 유형에 맞는 맞춤형 교육 과정을 개발하는 것이다. 연구 내용 및 방법: 이 연구를 위해 문헌 연구와 델파이 기법을 활용했다. 연구 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 선행 연구를 분석하여 세 가지 새로운 교수 스타일 유형(스타강사형, 학습 멘토형, 디자이너형)을 도출했다. 둘째, 국내외에서 널리 사용되는 Grasha의 티칭 스타일 검사를 수정 및 보완해 유형별로 8문항씩 총 24개 문항으로 진단 도구를 개발했다. 셋째, 교수 유형별 교육 커리큘럼을 개발했는데, 모든 유형에서 필요한 공통 과정과 각 유형별 특화 과정으로 구성했다. 넷째, 개발된 모형, 도구, 커리큘럼의 타당성을 10명의 전문가 델파이 방법을 통해 검증하고 확정했다. 결론 및 제언: 본 연구를 통해 교수는 자신의 유형을 인식하고 맞춤형 교육을 받을 수 있는 기반을 마련했다. 이는 개별 교수의 강점과 선호하는 교수법을 강화하고, 교육 역량을 향상시키는 데 기여할 것이다. 그러나 이러한 성과를 시스템적으로 활용하기 위해서는 추가적인 연구가 필요하다. 특히, 교수자에 대한 인센티브 제공과 참여 교수 간의 정보 공유를 촉진할 방안에 대한 연구가 더 필요할 것이다.

This study aimed to enhance the educational competencies of instructors and improve the quality of higher education by identifying instructing types, developing an assessment diagnostic tool, and designing a customized faculty training curriculum for each type. To achieve this, a literature review and Delphi research were conducted. The results are summarized as follows: First, instructing types such as 'Star Lecturer', 'Learning Mentor', and 'Designer' were identified through the analysis of previous studies. Second, a diagnostic tool for determining an instructor's type was developed by modifying and enhancing Grasha's Teaching Style Inventory, which is widely used both domestically and internationally. This tool comprises 24 questions, with 8 questions for each type. Third, a curriculum was designed for each instructing type, consisting of common courses necessary for all types and specialized courses tailored to the characteristics of each type. The common courses cover essentials for lesson design, implementation, and evaluation, while the specialized courses cater to the unique needs of each instructing type. Fourth, the developed model, tools, and curriculum underwent validation. A Delphi method was employed with a group of 10 experts, leading to revisions and finalizations based on their feedback. This study has laid the groundwork for instructors to identify their own teaching styles and receive customized training, thereby enhancing their teaching effectiveness and overall educational quality. However, further research is necessary to develop systems and mechanisms for the operationalization of these findings, including incentives for instructors and strategies for disseminating information among participants.

키워드

과제정보

This research was conducted as part of the University Innovation at Korean Bible University

참고문헌

  1. Kwon, N., Park, S., & Choo, K.(2006). Exploring the meaning and formation process of teaching skills as personal practical knowledge. The Journal of Korean Teacher Education, 23(3), 187-207.
  2. Kwon, J., & Jung, Y. (2018). Development approach for a teaching methodology training program based on competency assessment. Asia-pacific Journal of Multimedia Services Convergent with Art, Humanities, and Sociology. 8(2). 359-367. https://doi.org/10.35873/AJMAHS.2018.8.2.036
  3. Kim, M., Kim. H., & Lee, Y.(2018). Development of an educational system to support the teaching competencies of comprehensive university faculty.. The Journal of Korean Teacher Education, 35(2). 289-317.
  4. Kim, I.(2021). Analysis of educational needs for teaching competencies among university faculty. Journal of Competency Development & Learning, 23(4). 59-80.
  5. Min, Y.(2004). Analysis of teaching types among Korean teachers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Korea National University of Education. CheongJu.
  6. Min, J.(2021). Study on the teaching competencies of university faculty and improvement strategies for teaching competency enhancement programs: A case study of University A. The Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 21(23). 887-903.
  7. Jung, Y.(2019). Research on the Fusion of Active Learning and Facilitation for Enhancing Core Competencies (4C). Smart Media Journal, 8(1). 67-74.
  8. Choi, M.(2017). A Study on the Analysis of Teaching Styles and Teaching Philosophy Preferences among Pre-Service Teachers.. Cheongju University Academic Journal. S(11). 85-102.
  9. Choi, J., Choi, J., Seo, Y., & Min H.(2011). A Study on the Analysis of International Trends for Enhancing Competencies in Higher Education. Korea Educational Development Institute. RR 2011-14.
  10. Han, S., Kim, H., & Lee, J.(2009). A Study on Improving Teaching Performance for the Activation of Higher Education, The Journal of Educational Administration, 27, 233-255.
  11. Anderson, H. H.(1967). The measurement of domination and socially integrative behavior in teachers' contact with children. In E. J. Amidon & J. B. Hough(Eds.), Interaction analysis: Theory, research and application(pp. 25-66). Reading Mass: Addison-Wesley.
  12. Axelrod, J.(1970). Teaching styles in the humanities. In W. H. Morris(Ed.), Effective college teaching: The quest for relevance(pp. 38-55). Washington, D. C. : American Council on Education.
  13. Bennett, N.(1976). Teaching styles and pupil progress. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press 
  14. Conti, G. J. (1998). Identifying your teaching style. In Galbraith, M. W.(Ed.). Adult learning methods: A guide for effective instruction(2nd ed.). Florida: Krieger Publishing Company.
  15. Darkenwald, G. G., & Merriam, S. B.(1982). Adult education: Foundations of practice. New York: Harper & Row.
  16. Dunn, R. S. & Dunn, K. J. (1979). Learning styles/ teaching styles: should they can they be matched?. Educational Leadership, 36. 238-244.
  17. Fischer, B. & Fischer, L.(1979). Styles in teaching and learning. Educational Leadership, 34, 251.
  18. Flanders, N. A.(1960). Teacher influence, pupil attitudes, and achievement: Final report. Cooperative Research Monograph No. 397. Washington, D. C.: Office ofEducation, U.S.Department of Health, Education and Welfare.
  19. Galbraith, M. & Sanders, R. (1987). Relationship between perceived learning style and teaching style of junior college educators. Community College Quarterly of Research and Practice, 77(3), 169-177. https://doi.org/10.1080/0361697870110304
  20. Grasha, A. F.(1996). Teaching with Style: A Practical Guide to Enhancing Learning by Understanding Teaching and Learning Styles. Alliance Publishers.
  21. Grasha, A. F.(2002). The dynamics of one-on-one teaching. College Teaching, 50(4), 139-146. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567550209595895
  22. Heimlich, J. E., & Norland, E. (2002). Teaching Style: Where Are We Now?. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 93, 17-26. https://doi.org/10.1002/ace.46
  23. Jarvis, P.(1985). The sociology of adult and continuing education. London: Croom Helm.
  24. Lewin, K., Lippitt, R., & White, R. K.(1939). Patterns of aggressive behavior in experimentally created "social climates" Journal of Social Psychology, 10, 271-299. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1939.9713366
  25. May Oi, E. W., & Stimpson, P.(1994). Teaching styles of Hong Kong's environmental educators in secondary schools. Research in Education, 52(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1177/003452379405200101
  26. Nuthall, G., & Snook, I.(1973). Contemporary models of teaching. In R. M. W. Travers(Ed.), Second handbook of research on teaching. Chicago : Rand McNally.
  27. Robinson, R. D.(1986). Geography teachers' reflections on their teaching about development. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 18(4), 409-427. https://doi.org/10.1080/0022027860180405
  28. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1999). Models of the teaching process. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 18(3), 243-261. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0732-3123(99)00031-0
  29. Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Havard Educational Review,57(1),1-22.
  30. Solomon, D., & Miller, H. L.(1961). Exploration in teaching styles: Report of preliminary investigations and development of categories. Chicago : Center for the Study of Liberal Education for Adults.
  31. Thelen, H. A.(1967). Classroom grouping for teachability. New York : Wiley.
  32. Withall, J.(1949). The development of a technique for the measurement of social-emotional climate in classrooms. Journal of Experimental Education, 17, 347-361. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.1949.11010391
  33. Wubbels, Th., Brekelmans, M., Creton, H. A., & Hooymayers, H. P.(1989). Teacher behavior style and learning environments. In Ch. Ellet & H. Waxman(Eds.), The Study of Learning Environments, 4.(pp. 1-12) Houston, College of Education.