기독교교육논총 (Journal of Christian Education in Korea)

  • 제77권
  • /
  • Pages.171-201
  • /
  • 2024
  • /
  • 1229-781X(pISSN)
한국기독교교육학회 (The Korean Society of Christian Religious Education)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

기독교대학의 AI활용가이드 구성요소 개발 연구

A Study on the Development of AI Utilization Guide Components at a Christian University

  • 감성원 (백석예술대학교) ;
  • 김민호 (백석예술대학교)
  • Sungwon Kam (Baekseok Arts University) ;
  • Minho Kim (Baekseok Arts University)
  • 투고 : 2024.03.07
  • 심사 : 2024.03.29
  • 발행 : 2024.03.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

연구 목적 : 2022년 11월 ChatGPT 출시 이후 교육 현장에서 생성형 AI에 대한 우려와 흥미가 교차하면서, 학습 방식과 교육 자료 개발에 새로운 혁신을 가져왔으나, 동시에 학생들의 사고력 및 의사소통 능력에 대한 우려를 낳았다. 기독교대학은 기독교적 세계관을 반영한 교육 도구로서 AI 활용을 명시한 반면, 일반 교육 기관은 정보의 편향성 및 지속적 필요성에 대한 윤리적 접근을 강조했다. 생성형AI가 제공하는 서비스 중 내용의 정확도를 충분히 검토하지 않은 사례가 빈번해지고 윤리관련 이슈가 언급되는 시점에 기독교 교육현장은 이를 가볍게 여길수 없는 중요한 문제가 되었다. 이에 본 연구는 교육기관과 기독교대학의 AI사용에 관하여 윤리가이드의 현황을 연구하고 구성요소를 찾아 기독교대학 AI활용가이드의 구성요소를 탐색하고 이를 교육 현장에 반영하고자 한다. 연구 내용 및 방법 : 국내외 50개 대학 및 교육 기관의 AI 활용 및 윤리 가이드라인을 분석하여, 기독교 대학과 일반 교육 기관의 가이드라인에서의 차이점을 탐색했다. 수집된 자료는 특징에 따라 분류하였고 개방 코딩을 통한 개념화를 하였으며 축 코팅을 통한 구성요소를 추출하였다. 분석된 자료는 최초 수집된 50개의 자료의 포함정도와 선행연구에 따라 채점식으로 구성요소의 중요도를 분석하여 최종 기독교대학의 AI활용가이드 구성요소를 개발하였다. 결론 및 제언 : 연구결과, 일반교육기관에서 6개의 AI활용가이드 구성요소를 확인하였고 AI윤리가이드는 7개의 구성요소를 확인하였다. 기독교대학에서는 7개의 구성요소를 AI활용가이드와 윤리가이드에서 각각 확인하였다. AI윤리가이드는 진실성, 윤리적 책임감, 정보보안, 표절위험, 다양성, 편향적, 저작권보호가 확인 되었다. 연구결과를 토대로 기독교 대학의 AI의 윤리적 사용, 새로운 교육 패러다임의 정의, 소외 계층 교육 지원 등에 대한 연구로 확장하여기독교 대학 내 AI 윤리가이드라인 개발의 중요성을 알리고 추가적인 사례 연구를 통해 교육 현장에 실질적 도움을 줄 수 있는 기반을 마련하고자 한다.

Purpose of Research : Since ChatGPT's 2022 release, the educational sector faces mixed reactions to generative AI, sparking innovation but raising concerns about student cognition and communication. While Christian colleges employ AI reflecting their values, secular institutions stress ethical usage. This study explores ethical AI use in these settings, aiming to integrate findings into educational practices. Research content and method : Analyzing AI use and ethics guidelines from 50 domestic and international universities, differences between Christian and secular institutions were explored. Data was categorized, conceptualized via open coding, and components were identified through axial coding. The importance of components for Christian colleges' AI guides was assessed based on the initial data and previous research, leading to the development of tailored AI utilization components for Christian universities. Conclusion : Studies revealed secular institutions have six AI guide components, while Christian colleges found seven in both utilization and ethics guides, focusing on truthfulness, responsibility, and diversity. Emphasizing the need for ethical AI use in Christian colleges, the findings advocate developing AI ethics guidelines to aid marginalized groups and establish a new educational paradigm through further research.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Bae, A. R., & Lee, H. C. (2021). Applying Grounded Theory for Methodological Expansion in the Field of Missiology. Reform Journal, 58, 167-196.
  2. Cho, Y. H. (2006). A Study on the History of Christian Universities in Korea. Korean Journal of University Missions, 11, 9-31.
  3. Cho, E. Y., & Kim, J. Y. (2023). The Reality of Middle School Students' Poetry Writing Education Using Artificial Intelligence (ChatGPT). Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 23(21), 77-98.
  4. Ham, Y. J. (2015). Development of a Bible Teaching Model Using Flipped Learning. Reform Journal, 34, 241-267.
  5. Han, H. J. (2023). Developing Lesson Design Strategies for the Integration of ChatGPT in College Education. Res earch in Educational Culture, 29(4), 243-275.
  6. Hong, Y. M. (2023). The Impact of Core Competencies in Webtoon Major on the Use of Generative AI. Social Science Review, 8(4), 451-468
  7. Jang, H. J., & So, H. J. (2023). Trends and Topic Analysis of Educational Use of ChatGPT. Research in Curriculum Education, 27(4), 387-401.
  8. Jang, J. H. (2023). ChatGPT and Pastoral Ethics: Theological Discourses on the Pastoral Use of Artificial Intelligence. Theology Thought, 201, 257-283.
  9. Jang, S. K., Kim, K. M., & Choi, E. W. (2023). Exploring Ethical Standards for Creative Activities Using Generative AI: Focused on Online Comic Artists. Presented at the Korean Design Society Autumn International Conference, The Landscape of Evolving Convergence, October 28. Sejong: Hongik University.
  10. Jung, E. H. (2023). The Status of Artificial Intelligence (AI) Education in Major Countries. Seoul Education, Overseas Education, 224. https://webzine-serii.re.kr/
  11. Joo, M. S. (2017). How Has Artificial Intelligence Developed? The History of Artificial Intelligence. Retrieved Sept ember 15, 2017, from https://www.samsungsds.com/kr/insights/091517_cx_cvp3.html
  12. Kim, E. H. (2020). Theological Reflection on Non-face-to-face Culture: Understanding Digital Culture and the Possibility of Relational Ministry. Mission and Theology, 52, 237-269.
  13. Kim, E. J. (2012). Crisis Management PR Analysis in Hospital Medical Disputes Using Grounded Theory. Communication Theory, 8(3), 53-107.
  14. Kim, S. C. (2023). A Study on the Current Status and Design Directions of AI Utilization Guidelines in Universities. Knowledge and Education, 13, 11-44.
  15. Kim, W. S. (2022). The 32nd Science and Theology Colloquium: Artificial Intelligence and Christian Ethics. Dialogue Between Science and Theology. https://www.scitheo.or.kr/column/?idx=11808771&bmode=view.
  16. Kim, Y. J., Kang, J. E., & Kim, H. S. (2023). Prompt Engineering for Bias Improvement in Language Models: Focused on a Sentiment Analysis Corpus of Politicians Using ChatGPT. Corpus Linguistics Research, 8(1), 49-66.
  17. Kwon, H. W., & Choi, D. R. (2011). Understanding the Logic of Theorization in Grounded Theory Method: Focused on the Non-contextuality and Methodological Bias in Korean Administration. Korean Public Administration Review, 45(1), 275-302.
  18. Lee, B. C. (2023). A Study on the Direction of Classical Chinese Interpretation in the Era of ChatGPT: Focusing on the Issues of Universality and Diversity. Language Research, 116, 147-171.
  19. Lee, D. S., & Kim, Y. C. (2012). A Study on the Philosophical Background and Methodological Characteristics of Grounded Theory as a Qualitative Research Method. Open Education Research, 20(2), 1-26.
  20. Lee, E. H., & Park, M. R. (2023). A Study on the Relationship between Self-Regulated Learning (SRL) Abilities, Perception, and Usage Purposes of ChatGPT among College Students Learning English. English Language and Literature Education, 29(4), 71-99.
  21. Lee, E. S. (2017). Exploring Strategic Operations for Character Education in Christian Universities Through General Education Courses. Journal of Christian Education, (51), 101-124.
  22. Lee, S. K. (2023). Medical Use of Generative AI and Personal Information Protection. Medical Law, 24(4), 67-101.
  23. Lee, S. J., & Lee, K. A. (2007). Theory and Practice of Grounded Theory as a Qualitative Research Method in Special Education. Mental Retardation Research, 9(1), 123-147.
  24. Lee, Y. E., & Yoo, I. W. H. (2023). A Study on the Effect of Flipped Learning in College English Grammar Classes. Foreign Language Education Research, 37(3), 1-25.
  25. Lee, Y. H. (2023). Analysis of University Students' Perception of Generative Artificial Intelligence ChatGPT. Formative Media Studies, 26(4), 46-55.
  26. Lee, Y. H., & Kim, H. S. (2023). Legal Issues for Introducing Generative Artificial Intelligence in Elementary and Secondary Education: Focused on Digital-based Education Innovation Policies. Computer Education Society, 26(5), 129-138.
  27. Nam, B. R., Shim, C. Y., Kim, H. R., & Choi, H. K. (2023). Utilizing ChatGPT and its Extensions for Research: New Perspectives on AI-Based Research Techniques. Secondary English Education, 16(3), 139-154.
  28. Nam, H. D. (2023). Copyright Law Issues in AI-Based Literary Translation. Copyright Quarterly, 36(4), 33-88.
  29. Na, K. E. (2012). A Grounded Theory Study on the Field Experience of Pre-service Special Education Teachers. Special Education Journal: Theory and Practice, 13(3), 269-289.
  30. Oh, M. J. & Kim, J. G. (2023). A New Transformation of Literacy Education in the Era of Generative AI. Journal of Humanities, 89, 255-285.
  31. Oh, S. K., Jang, M. J., & Park, J. E. (2023). Undergraduate Students' Perception of Ethics in Using Generative AI for College Writing. Literacy Research, 14(4), 69-96.
  32. Oh, S. N., & Kim, H. J. (2023). The Relationship between College Students' Use of ChatGPT and Their Perception of Assignment Plagiarism. Korean Literature, 50, 253-281.
  33. Park, H. S. (2022). Development of a Narrative-based Curriculum for University Freshmen: Focused on General Education Courses in Christian Universities. Christian Education Information, 73, 197-224.
  34. Schreiber, R. S., & Stern, P. N. (2003). Methodology of Grounded Theory. (Translated by Shin, K. Y. & Kim, M. Y.). Seoul: Hyunmoon Publishing House. (Originally published in 2001).
  35. Shin, H. W., Lee, J. W., & Kim, H. R. (2023). A Study on University Students' Perception of ChatGPT. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education, 35(4), 1-12.
  36. Shin, Y. J. (2021). Applying Responsibility and Principles for Personal Information Protection in AI Services. Kor ean Crime Information Research, 7(1), 45-74.
  37. Son, D. I. (2023). The Potential and Limitations of Using ChatGPT in Liberal Arts Writing Classes. Thought and Expression, 16(2), 33-65.
  38. Son, H. C. (2023). ChatGPT and Research Ethics. Knowledge Management Research, 24(3), 1-15.
  39. Son, Y. H. (2023). Copyright of Works Created by Generative AI. Law and Policy Research, 23(3), 357-389.
  40. Song, E. J. (2023). The Use of Generative AI in Education and Governance. Presented at the Annual Conference of the Korean Association for Education Politics, October 28. Seoul: Kyung Hee University.
  41. Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. (2001). Basics of Grounded Theory. (Translated by Shin, K. Y.). Seoul: Hyunmoon Publishing House. (Originally published in 1998).
  42. UNESCO. (2023). ChatGPT and Artificial Intelligence in Higher education. Education 2030.
  43. Yang, E. Y. (2023). The Necessity of Regulations for the Development and Use of Generative AI: Focused on Conversational Artificial Intelligence Services Based on Large Language Models (LLMs AI). Sungkyunkwan Law Review, 35(2), 293-325.
  44. Yoo, K. D. (2019). Artificial Intelligence and Christian Ethics: From the Perspective of Theological Anthropology. Yeongsan Theological Journal, 48, 87-116.
  45. Yoo, J. E. (2020). Students' Perception and Satisfaction with Online Classes: Focused on the Operation of Christian Education Courses at A University. Christian Education Information, 67, 277-298.
  46. Yoon, Y. B. (2023). Accuracy Analysis of ChatGPT as a Korean-English Translation Tool. Korean Elementary Education, 34(4), 215-231.