Korean Journal of Agricultural Science (농업과학연구)

Institute of Agricultural Science, CNU (충남대학교 농업과학연구소)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparative nutritional analysis for protopanaxadiol-enhanced genetically modified rice and its non-transgenic counterpart

  • Na Yeon Kim (Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, National Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Sung Dug Oh (Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, National Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Soo Yun Park (Technology Cooperation Bureau, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • An Cheol Chang (Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, National Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Seong Kon Lee (Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, National Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Ye Jin Jang (Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, National Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • So-Hyeon Baek (Department of Agricultural Life Science, Sunchon National University) ;
  • Yong Eui Choi (Department of Department of Forest Resources, College of Forest and Environmental Sciences, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Jong-Chan Park (Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, National Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Doh Won Yun (Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, National Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Rural Development Administration)
  • Received : 2024.04.08
  • Accepted : 2024.05.22
  • Published : 2024.06.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In the assessment of the biosafety of genetically modified (GM) crops, a comparative approach to identifying similarities and differences between transgenic and non-transgenic crops is helpful in identifying potential safety and nutritional issues. In this study, we aimed to compare the nutritional composition of a protopanaxadiol-enhanced genetically modified rice (PPD GM rice) with its non-transgenic counterpart. The nutritional profile of PPD GM rice was assessed against that of the parental rice cultivar 'Dongjin' to ascertain nutritional equivalence. No differences were observed between PPD GM and Non-GM rice cultivar in proximate analysis, mineral content, and amino acid composition. Although significant differences were observed in crude fat, crude protein, total dietary fiber, and some minerals between PPD GM rice and Dongjin, these variances fell within the range suggested by common cultivars (Anmi and Nipponbare) and Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) data. Similarly, while some amino acids showed significant differences, these metabolites did not deviate from the OECD range. Principal component analysis (PCA) was conducted using the nutritional analysis data of PPD GM rice and Dongjin. The results revealed that PPD GM rice and Dongjin were grouped according to their respective cultivation years. This suggests that the variability in the nutritional composition of PPD GM rice tends to resemble that of the parental rice cultivar 'Dongjin' rather than being solely attributed to genetic modification. Overall, our findings indicate that the nutritional composition of PPD GM rice is substantially equivalent to that of its non-transgenic counterpart.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

본 연구는 농촌진흥청 연구개발사업(과제번호: PJ01369102, PJ016726)의 지원으로 수행되었습니다.

References

  1. AOAC (Association of Official Agricultural Chemists). 2000a. Fat (crude) or ether extract in meat. AOAC official methods. 960.39. AOAC, Rockville, USA.
  2. AOAC (Association of Official Agricultural Chemists). 2000b. Determination of lead, calcium, copper, iron, zinc, sodium, magnesium, phosphorus, potassium, manganese in food. AOAC official methods 999.11. AOAC, Rockville, USA.
  3. AOAC (Association of Official Agricultural Chemists). 2005a. Ash of floure. AOAC official methods 923.03. AOAC, Rockville, USA.
  4. AOAC (Association of Official Agricultural Chemists). 2005b. Nitrogen (total) in fertilizers. AOAC official methods 955.04. AOAC, Rockville, USA.
  5. AOAC (Association of Official Agricultural Chemists). 2005c. Protein efficiency ratio. AOAC official methods 982.30. AOAC, Rockville, USA.
  6. Choi H, Moon JK, Park BS, Park HW, Park SY, Kim TS, Kim DH, Ryu TH, Kweon SJ, Kim JH. 2012. Comparative nutritional analysis for genetically modified rice, Iksan483 and Milyang204, and nontransgenic counterparts. Journal of the Korean Society for Applied Biological Chemistry 55:19-26. [in Korean] https://doi.org/10.1007/s13765-012-0004-5
  7. Chun JH, Adhikari PB, Park SB, Han JY, Choi YE. 2015. Production of the dammarene sapogenin (protopanaxadiol) in transgenic tobacco plants and cultured cells by heterologous expression of PgDDS and CYP716A47. Plant Cell Reports 34:1551-1560. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-015-1806-9
  8. Conner AJ, Jacobs JME. 2000. Food risks from transgenic crops in perspective. Nutrition 16:709-711. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0899-9007(00)00331-2
  9. Du J, Zeng D, Wang B, Qian Q, Zheng S, Ling HQ. 2013. Environmental effects on mineral accumulation in rice grains and identification of ecological specific QTLs. Environmental Geochemistry and Health 35:161-170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10653-012-9473-z
  10. Han JY, Baek SH, Jo HJ, Yun DW, Choi YE. 2019. Genetically modified rice produces ginsenoside aglycone (protopanaxadiol). Planta 250:1103-1110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-019-03204-4
  11. Herman RA, Chassy BM, Parrott W. 2009. Compositional assessment of transgenic crops: An idea whose time has passed? Trends in Biotechnology 27:555-557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2009.07.003
  12. Huang Y, Tong C, Xu F, Chen Y, Zhang C, Bao J. 2016. Variation in mineral elements in grains of 20 brown rice accessions in two environments. Food Chemistry 192:873-878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.07.087
  13. ISAAA (International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech applications). Global status of commercialized biotech/GM crops in 2019: Biotech crops drive socioeconomic development and sustainable environment in the new frontier. ISAAA Brief No. 55. 2019. p. 8. ISAAA, Manila, Philippines.
  14. Kim JH, Kang SA, Han SM, Shim I. 2009. Comparison of the antiobesity effects of the protopanaxadiol- and protopanaxatriol-type saponins of red ginseng. Phytotherapy Research: An International Journal Devoted to Pharmacological and Toxicological Evaluation of Natural Product Derivatives 23:78-85. https://doi.org/10.1002/ptr.2561
  15. Kim JH, Yi YS, Kim MY, Cho JY. 2017. Role of ginsenosides, the main active components of Panax ginseng, in inflammatory responses and diseases. Journal of Ginseng Research 41:435-443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgr.2016.08.004
  16. Lee SY, Yeo YS, Park SY, Oh SW, Yoon EK, Shin KS, Woo HJ, Lim MH. 2015. Composition analysis of herbicide tolerant ab rice and insect-resistant BT rice. Korean Journal of Breeding Science 47:255-263. [in Korean] https://doi.org/10.9787/KJBS.2015.47.3.255
  17. Lee YT, Cho Y. 2018. Nutritional assessment for grain and whole rice plant of drought-tolerant GM rice (Agb0103). Journal of the Korean Society of International Agriculture 30:233-240. [in Korean] https://doi.org/10.12719/KSIA.2018.30.3.233
  18. MFDS (Ministry of Food and Drug Safety). 2019a. Crude fiber (Henneberg-Stohmann method) in MFDS food code Chapter 8, 2.1.4.2. MFDS, Cheongju, Korea.
  19. MFDS (Ministry of Food and Drug Safety). 2019b. Total dietary fiber (enzyme-weight method) in MFDS food code Chapter 8, 2.1.4.3. MFDS, Cheongju, Korea.
  20. Mohanan P, Yang TJ, Song YH. 2023. Genes and regulatory mechanisms for ginsenoside biosynthesis. Journal of Plant Biology 66:87-97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12374-023-09384-7
  21. OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development). 2016. Consensus document on compositional considerations for new varieties of rice (Oryza sativa): Key food and feed nutrients and anti-nutrients. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. p. 11. OECD, Paris, France.
  22. Park JS, Park EM, Kim DH, Jung K, Jung JS, Lee EJ, Hyun JW, Kang JL, Kim HS. 2009. Anti-inflammatory mechanism of ginseng saponins in activated microglia. Journal of Neuroimmunology 209:40-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroim.2009.01.020
  23. RDA (Rural Development Administration). 2012. Standard of analysis and survey for agricultural research. pp. 315-338. RDA, Jeonju, Korea.
  24. Ren Y, Lv J, Wang H, Li L, Peng Y, Qu LJ. 2009. A comparative proteomics approach to detect unintended effects in transgenic Arabidopsis. Journal of Genetics and Genomics 36:629-639. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1673-8527(08)60155-1
  25. Sim JE, Oh SD, Kim YJ, Ahn SK, Choi J, Park SY, Park SK, Kim TJ, Kang K, Kim JK. 2023. Chemical profiling of insect-resistant rice shows that geographical variations produce greater differences in chemical composition than genetic modifications. Plant Biotechnology Reports 17:137-144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11816-023-00822-z
  26. Woo HJ, Shin KS, Lim MH, Park SK. 2014. Comparison of the nutritional compositions of oxidative stress-tolerant transgenic rice and conventional rice. Journal of Plant Biotechnology 41:206-211. [in Korean] https://doi.org/10.5010/JPB.2014.41.4.206