DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Evaluation of the operational efficiency of major coastal ports in China based on the PCA-DEA model

PCA-DEA 모델을 기반으로 한 중국 주요연안 항만의 운영 효율성 평가

  • Haiqing Zhang ;
  • Hyangsook Lee
  • 장해청 (인천대학교 동북아물류대학원) ;
  • 이향숙 (인천대학교 동북아물류대학원)
  • Received : 2024.03.05
  • Accepted : 2024.03.31
  • Published : 2024.03.31

Abstract

Coastal ports play an essential role in developing a country and a city. Port efficiency is an important factor affecting port trade, and the importance of port efficiency for port performance has been recognized in previous literature. DEA (Data Envelopment Analysis) and SFA (Stochastic Frontier Analysis) are widely used in this field of research. However, these two methods are limited in selecting input and output variables. In addition, the literature studies on Chinese coastal ports mainly focus on the study of port clusters in local areas, which lacks a holistic approach and generally lacks up-to-date data. Therefore, to fill the gap in this area of research, this paper introduces a model combining principal component analysis and data envelopment analysis to analyze the operational efficiency of the top 17 coastal ports in China in terms of throughput based on the most recent data available in 2021. This paper identifies container throughput as the output variable, and 13 second indicators are selected as input variables from four primary indicators: land, capital, labor, and infrastructure. Four principal components were selected from 13 second indicators using PCA.After that, DEA (BBC) and DEA (CCR) were used to analyze the 17 ports, among which five were Shanghai, Ningbo-Zhoushan, Guangzhou, Xiamen, and Dongguan, respectively, DEA efficient, and the remaining 12 ports were non-DEA efficient. Finally, improvement directions for each port are derived, and brief suggestions are made. This paper provides some reference value for developing and constructing coastal ports in China.

국내 운송을 담당하는 연안항들은 국가와 도시의 발전에 필수적인 역할을 하고 있다. 항만 효율성은 항만 경쟁력을 확보하기 위한 중요한 요소로, 이에 대한 연구는 기존 문헌에서 지속적으로 진행되었다. 중국의 경우 주로 지방의 항만 클러스터에 대한 연구에 초점을 맞추고 있는데, 미시적 관점에서만 접근하고 있으며, 최신 자료도 부재한 상황이다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 최신 자료를 활용하여 중국 상위 17개 연안항의 운영 효율성을 종합적으로 분석하고자 한다. 본 연구에서는 컨테이너 처리량을 산출변수로 선정하고, 크게 토지, 자본, 노동, 인프라에 속하는 13개 지표로부터 PCA(Principal Component Analysis) 분석을 통해 4개의 투입변수를 최종 선정하였다.그런 다음 17개 항구의 운영 효율성을 DEA (데이터 포위 분석)로 분석했습니다. 분석 결과, 상하이, 닝보-저우산, 광저우, 샤먼, 둥관의 5개 항만이 효율적인 반면, 나머지 12개의 항만은 상대적으로 비효율적인 것으로 나타났다. 본 연구는 중국의 연안항을 보다 거시적 관점에서 비교·분석한 것으로 이를 통해 상대적 비교가 가능하며, 향후 항만의 발전 전략 및 정책 수립을 위한 기초자료로 활용할 수 있을 것이다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This research was supported by the 4th Educational Training Program for the Shipping, Port and Logistics from the Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries.

References

  1. Talley, W. K. (2006). Port performance: an economics perspective. Research in Transportation Economics, 17, 499-516. 
  2. Cullinane, K., & Wang, T. F. (2006). Port governance in China. Research in Transportation Economics, 17, 331-356. 
  3. Song, L., & van Geenhuizen, M. (2014). Port infrastructure investment and regional economic growth in China: Panel evidence in port regions and provinces. Transport Policy, 36, 173-183. 
  4. (WTO)World Trade Organization(2022) World Trade Report 2021 https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/reser_e/wtr_e.htm 
  5. (MOT) Ministry of Transport of the People's Republic of China. Annual report 2021 https://xxgk.mot.gov.cn/2020/ndbg/2021/ 
  6. Shanghai International Port (Group) Co., Ltd. (SIPG). Port Annual Report 2021 https://www.portshanghai.com.cn/xxpl/index.jhtml?index=2 
  7. Ningbo Zhoushan Port Group Co. Ltd. Port Annual Report 2021 https://www.zjseaport.com/jtwwen/gywm/jtjj/ 
  8. Guangzhou Port Company Limited. Port Annual Report 2021 https://www.gzport.com/foreground/index.html?id=e5e4ecaf19b14bd798705bf1d77f286a 
  9. Shenzhen Yantian Port Group Co.,Ltd. Port Annual Report 2021 https://www.ytport.com/tzgg/ 
  10. Xiamen Port Holding Group Co.Ltd. Port Annual Report 2021 http://port.xm.gov.cn/ 
  11. Dongguan Port Group. Port Annual Report 2021 https://www.dgportgroup.com/ 
  12. Tianjin Port (Group) Co.,Ltd. Port Annual Report 2021 https://www.ptacn.com/channels/12.html 
  13. Beibu Gulf Port. Annual Report 2021 https://www.bbwgw.com/bbwport/index 
  14. Qingdao Port International Co.Ltd. Annual Report 2021 https://www.qingdao-port.com/portal/en 
  15. Rizhao Port Group Co., Ltd. Annual Report 2021 http://en.rzport.com/zoujingangkou.jsp 
  16. Jiangsu Lianyungang Port Co.Ltd. Port Annual Report 2021 https://www.sbgx123.com/lyggk/index.html 
  17. LiaoNing Port Group. Annual Report 2021 http://www.liaoningport.com/html/en/index.html 
  18. Yantai Port. Annual Report 2021 https://www.yantaiport.com.cn/ 
  19. Tangshan Port Group Co.Ltd. Annual Report 2021 http://www.jtport.com.cn/ 
  20. Fuzhou Port Group Co.,Ltd Annual Report 2021 https://www.fzport.com/contents/list?tid=144 
  21. Li, H., Jiang, L., Liu, J., & Su, D. (2022). Research on the evaluation of logistics efficiency in Chinese coastal ports based on the four-stage DEA model. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 10(8), 1147.. 
  22. Ghiara, H., & Tei, A. (2021). Port activity and technical efficiency: determinants and external factors. Maritime Policy & Management, 48(5), 711-724. 
  23. Pagano, A. M., Wang, G. W., Sanchez, O. V., & Ungo, R. (2013). Impact of privatization on port efficiency and effectiveness: results from Panama and US ports. Maritime Policy & Management, 40(2), 100-115. 
  24. Schoyen, H., & Odeck, J. (2013). The technical efficiency of Norwegian container ports: A comparison to some Nordic and UK container ports using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). Maritime Economics & Logistics, 15, 197-221. 
  25. Tongzon, J. (2001). Efficiency measurement of selected Australian and other international ports using data envelopment analysis. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 35(2), 107-122. 
  26. Choi, Y. (2011). The efficiency of major ports under logistics risk in Northeast Asia. Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research, 28(01), 111-123. 
  27. Sachish, A. (1996). Productivity functions as a managerial tool in Israeli ports. Maritime policy and Management, 23(4), 341-369. 
  28. Tongzon, J. L. (1995). Determinants of port performance and efficiency. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 29(3), 245-252. 
  29. Roll, Y., & Hayuth, Y. E. H. U. D. A. (1993). Port performance comparison applying data envelopment analysis (DEA). Maritime policy and Management, 20(2), 153-161. 
  30. Barros, C. P., & Athanassiou, M. (2004). Efficiency in European seaports with DEA: evidence from Greece and Portugal. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 6, 122-140. 
  31. Pang, L.Port Performance Evaluation and Analysis Discussion. Port Economics .05(2005):43-44. 
  32. Huang, J. Y., & Yan, Y. X. (2004). Design scheme of comprehensive evaluation index system of port container transport competitiveness. Shipp Manag, 26(9), 8-10. 
  33. Wang, L., & Bi, Z. W. (2010). Evaluating the operational efficiency of major inland ports in China using the 3-Stage DEA model. Ind Econ Res, 4, 40-48. 
  34. Bendall, H. B., & Stent, A. F. (1987). On measuring cargo handling productivity. Maritime Policy and Management, 14(4), 337-343. 
  35. Talley, W. K. (1994). Performance indicators and port performance evaluation. Logistics and Transportation Review, 30(4), 339. 
  36. Liu, Z. (1995). The comparative performance of public and private enterprises: the case of British ports. Journal of Transport Economics and policy, 263-274. 
  37. Cullinane, K., Song, D. W., & Gray, R. (2002). A stochastic frontier model of the efficiency of major container terminals in Asia: assessing the influence of administrative and ownership structures. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 36(8), 743-762. 
  38. Cullinane, K., & Song, D. W. (2003). A stochastic frontier model of the productive efficiency of Korean container terminals. Applied economics, 35(3), 251-267. 
  39. Cullinane, K., Song, D. W., Ji, P., & Wang, T. F. (2004). An application of DEA windows analysis to container port production efficiency. Review of network Economics, 3(2). 
  40. Cullinane, K., Ji, P., & Wang, T. F. (2005). The relationship between privatization and DEA estimates of efficiency in the container port industry. Journal of economics and business, 57(5), 433-462. 
  41. Cullinane, K., Song, D. W., & Wang, T. (2005). The application of mathematical programming approaches to estimating container port production efficiency. Journal of productivity analysis, 24, 73-92. 
  42. Banker, R. D., Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1984). Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management science, 30(9), 1078-1092. 
  43. Pearson, K. (1901). LIII. On lines and planes of closest fit to systems of points in space. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin philosophical magazine and journal of science, 2(11), 559-572. 
  44. Figueroa-Garcia, J. C., & Castro-Cabrera, C. E. (2015, August). On Solving CCR-DEA Problems Involving Type-2 Fuzzy Uncertainty Using Centroid-Based Optimization. In International Conference on Intelligent Computing (pp. 187-195). Cham: Springer International Publishing. 
  45. Hatami-Marbini, A., Tavana, M., Saati, S., & Agrell, P. J. (2013). Positive and normative use of fuzzy DEA-BCC models: A critical view on NATO enlargement. International Transactions in Operational Research, 20(3), 411-433. 
  46. Martinez-Budria, E., Diaz-Armas, R., Navarro-Ibanez, M., & Ravelo-Mesa, T. (1999). A study of the efficiency of Spanish port authorities using data envelopment analysis. International Journal of Transport Economics/Rivista internazionale di economia dei trasporti, 237-253. 
  47. Rajasekar, T., & Deo, M. (2018). The size effect of Indian major ports on its efficiency using Dea-Additive models. Int. J. Adv. Manag. Econ, 1, 12-18. 
  48. Jiang, B., & Li, J. (2009). DEA-based performance measurement of seaports in northeast Asia: Radial and non-radial approach. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 25(2), 219-236. 
  49. Dong, G., Zhu, J., Li, J., Wang, H., & Gajpal, Y. (2019). Evaluating the environmental performance and operational efficiency of container ports: An application to the maritime silk road. International journal of environmental research and public health, 16(12), 2226. 
  50. Zheng, X. B., & Park, N. K. (2016). A study on the efficiency of container terminals in Korea and China. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 32(4), 213-220. 
  51. Iyer, K. C., & Nanyam, V. N. (2021). Technical efficiency analysis of container terminals in India. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 37(1), 61-72. 
  52. van Dyck, G. K. (2015). Assessment of port efficiency in West Africa using data envelopment analysis. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 5(04), 208. 
  53. Xu, L., & Xu, S. (2021, September). Evaluation and Forecast of Port Enterprise Innovation Efficiency Based on ES-DEA. In 2021 5th Annual International Conference on Data Science and Business Analytics (ICDSBA) (pp. 362-365). IEEE. 
  54. Liu, S., Park, S. H., Choi, Y. S., & Yeo, G. T. (2022). Efficiency evaluation of major container terminals in the top three cities of the Pearl River Delta using SBM-DEA and undesirable DEA. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 38(2), 99-106. 
  55. Mustafa, F. S., Khan, R. U., & Mustafa, T. (2021). Technical efficiency comparison of container ports in Asian and Middle East region using DEA. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 37(1), 12-19. 
  56. Cullinane, K., & Wang, T. F. (2006). Data envelopment analysis (DEA) and improving container port efficiency. Research in Transportation Economics, 17, 517-566. 
  57. Pjevcevic, D., Radonjic, A., Hrle, Z., & Colic, V. (2012). DEA window analysis for measuring port efficiencies in Serbia. Promet-Traffic & Transportation, 24(1), 63-72. 
  58. Cullinane, K., & Wang, T. (2010). The efficiency analysis of container port production using DEA panel data approaches. OR spectrum, 32(3), 717-738. 
  59. Dewarlo, O. (2019). DEA window analysis for measuring port performances efficiency of four islands countries located in west Indian ocean countries. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 9(12), 2098-2111. 
  60. Wang, C. N., Nguyen, P. H., Nguyen, T. L., Nguyen, T. G., Nguyen, D. T., Tran, T. H., ... & Phung, H. T. (2022). A two-stage DEA approach to measure operational efficiency in Vietnam's port industry. Mathematics, 10(9), 1385.