DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of Non-invasive Transcutaneous Electrical Stimulation in Women With Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Prospective Study

  • Ji-hyun Kim (Department of Physical Therapy, The Graduate School, Yonsei University) ;
  • Hye-seon Jeon (Department of Physical Therapy, College of Health Sciences, Yonsei University) ;
  • Oh-yun Kwon (Department of Physical Therapy, College of Health Sciences, Yonsei University) ;
  • Ui-jae Hwang (Department of Physical Therapy, College of Health Sciences, Yonsei University) ;
  • Eun Young Park (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, Yonsei University) ;
  • Su-jin Kim (Department of Urology, Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital, College of Medicine, Hallym University)
  • Received : 2024.07.20
  • Accepted : 2024.08.06
  • Published : 2024.08.20

Abstract

Background: Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) impacts the social, physical, and psychological well-being and quality of life of the patient. Several techniques exist for its management, including transcutaneous electrical stimulation (TES). Objects: We aimed to demonstrate the effects of TES on ultrasonographic variables and quality of life in women with SUI. Methods: This prospective study recruited 21 women who had been diagnosed with grade 1 or 2 SUI between July 2018 and March 2019. The exclusion criteria were pregnancy and a history of urogenital surgery. All participants were assessed at baseline and 8 weeks after intervention initiation. The bladder neck position (BNP), length of the urethra (LU), funneling index (FI), and rhabdosphincter thickness (RT) were measured. The Incontinence-Quality of Life (I-QOL) was used to assess incontinence-specific quality of life. Statistical significance level was set at p < 0.05. Results: Twenty-one patients with SUI used TES for 8 weeks. BNP and FI significantly decreased after intervention (p < 0.05). LU, anterior and posterior RT (indicators of external sphincter hypertrophy) significantly increased post-intervention (p < 0.05). The total I-QOL score increased from 64.81 to 71.86 after the intervention (p < 0.05). Conclusion: This intervention improved BNP, LU, FI, RT, and subjective indicators such as quality of life in women with SUI. Therefore, TES can be an effective non-surgical treatment method for improving SUI symptoms and quality of life in these patients.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

The authors received financial and administrative support from the Yonsei University Research Fund (grant number 2018-51-0251). The funders had no role in the study design, data collection, analysis, decision to publish, or manuscript preparation.

References

  1. Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, Griffiths D, Rosier P, Ulmsten U, et al.; Standardisation Sub-committee of the International Continence Society. The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function: report from the Standardisation Subcommittee of the International Continence Society. Neurourol Urodyn 2002;21(2):167-78.
  2. Buckley BS, Lapitan MC; Epidemiology Committee of the Fourth International Consultation on Incontinence, Paris, 2008. Prevalence of urinary incontinence in men, women, and children--current evidence: findings of the Fourth International Consultation on Incontinence. Urology 2010;76(2):265-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2009.11.078
  3. Hung HC, Hsiao SM, Chih SY, Lin HH, Tsauo JY. Effect of pelvic-floor muscle strengthening on bladder neck mobility: a clinical trial. Phys Ther 2011;91(7):1030-8. https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20100186
  4. Jha S, Walters SJ, Bortolami O, Dixon S, Alshreef A. Impact of pelvic floor muscle training on sexual function of women with urinary incontinence and a comparison of electrical stimulation versus standard treatment (IPSU trial): a randomised controlled trial. Physiotherapy 2018;104(1):91-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physio.2017.06.003
  5. Wyman JF, Harkins SW, Choi SC, Taylor JR, Fantl JA. Psychosocial impact of urinary incontinence in women. Obstet Gynecol 1987;70(3 Pt 1):378-81.
  6. Syan R, Brucker BM. Guideline of guidelines: urinary incontinence. BJU Int 2016;117(1):20-33. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.13187
  7. Sapsford R. The pelvic floor: a clinical model for function and rehabilitation. Physiotherapy 2001;87(12):620-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9406(05)61107-8
  8. DeLancey JO. Structural support of the urethra as it relates to stress urinary incontinence: the hammock hypothesis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994;170(6):1713-20; discussion 1720-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9378(12)91840-2
  9. Cassado J, Pessarrodona A, Tulleuda R, Cabero L, Valls M, Quintana S, et al. Introital ultrasonography: a comparison of women with stress incontinence due to urethral hypermobility and continent women. BJU Int 2006;98(4):822-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06404.x
  10. Shek KL, Dietz HP. The urethral motion profile: a novel method to evaluate urethral support and mobility. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2008;48(3):337-42. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1479-828X.2008.00877.x
  11. Kuo HC. Transrectal sonography of the female urethra in incontinence and frequency-urgency syndrome. J Ultrasound Med 1996;15(5):363-70. https://doi.org/10.7863/jum.1996.15.5.363
  12. Dietz HP, Clarke B. The urethral pressure profile and ultrasound imaging of the lower urinary tract. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2001;12(1):38-41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001920170092
  13. Thompson JA, O'Sullivan PB, Briffa NK, Neumann P. Comparison of transperineal and transabdominal ultrasound in the assessment of voluntary pelvic floor muscle contractions and functional manoeuvres in continent and incontinent women. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2007;18(7):779-86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-006-0225-4
  14. Miller JM, Perucchini D, Carchidi LT, DeLancey JO, AshtonMiller J. Pelvic floor muscle contraction during a cough and decreased vesical neck mobility. Obstet Gynecol 2001;97(2):255-60.
  15. Rud T. Urethral pressure profile in continent women from childhood to old age. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1980;59(4):331-5. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016348009154090
  16. Klauser A, Frauscher F, Strasser H, Helweg G, Kolle D, Strohmeyer D, et al. Age-related rhabdosphincter function in female urinary stress incontinence: assessment of intraurethral sonography. J Ultrasound Med 2004;23(5):631-7; quiz 638-9.
  17. Appell RA. Electrical stimulation for the treatment of urinary incontinence. Urology 1998;51(2A Suppl):24-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0090-4295(98)90004-8
  18. Kobashi KC, Leach GE. Stress urinary incontinence. Curr Opin Urol 1999;9(4):285-90.
  19. Goode PS, Burgio KL, Locher JL, Roth DL, Umlauf MG, Richter HE, et al. Effect of behavioral training with or without pelvic floor electrical stimulation on stress incontinence in women: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2003;290(3):345-52. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.290.3.345
  20. Giuseppe PG, Pace G, Vicentini C. Sexual function in women with urinary incontinence treated by pelvic floor transvaginal electrical stimulation. J Sex Med 2007;4(3):702-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2006.00318.x
  21. Krauss DJ, Lilien OM. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulator for stress incontinence. J Urol 1981;125(6):790-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(17)55205-2
  22. Yokozuka M, Namima T, Nakagawa H, Ichie M, Handa Y. Effects and indications of sacral surface therapeutic electrical stimulation in refractory urinary incontinence. Clin Rehabil 2004;18(8):899-907. https://doi.org/10.1191/0269215504cr803oa
  23. Kim J, Kwon O, Jeon H, Hwang U, Gwak K, Yoon H, et al. Effects of transcutaneous electrical stimulation on physiological symptoms and psychological satisfaction in women with stress urinary incontinence: a preliminary study. Phys Ther Korea 2019;26(3):67-75. https://doi.org/10.12674/ptk.2019.26.3.067
  24. Yang JM, Huang WC. Discrimination of bladder disorders in female lower urinary tract symptoms on ultrasonographic cystourethrography. J Ultrasound Med 2002;21(11):1249-55. https://doi.org/10.7863/jum.2002.21.11.1249
  25. Nishibayashi M, Kobayashi K, Miki A, Okagaki R, Nagata I, Urashima M, et al. Bladder neck evaluation by perineal ultrasound before and after reconstructive surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. J Med Ultrason (2001) 2009;36(4):193.
  26. McLean L, Varette K, Gentilcore-Saulnier E, Harvey MA, Baker K, Sauerbrei E. Pelvic floor muscle training in women with stress urinary incontinence causes hypertrophy of the urethral sphincters and reduces bladder neck mobility during coughing. Neurourol Urodyn 2013;32(8):1096-102. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.22343
  27. Eriksen BC, Mjolnerod OK. Changes in urodynamic measurements after successful anal electrostimulation in female urinary incontinence. Br J Urol 1987;59(1):45-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.1987.tb04577.x
  28. Hahn I, Sommar S, Fall M. A comparative study of pelvic floor training and electrical stimulation for the treatment of genuine female stress urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn 1991;10(6):545-54. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.1930100604
  29. Fall M, Lindstrom S. Functional electrical stimulation: physiological basis and clinical principles. Int Urogynecol J 1994;5(5):296-304. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00376246
  30. Delancey J, Gosling J, Creed K, Dixon J, Delmas V, Landon D, et al. Gross anatomy and cell biology of the lower urinary tract. Incontinence Health Publications; 2002; 19-82.