DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Serial Vascular Responses of Balloon-Expandable Stent With Biodegradable Film-Type Graft in a Rabbit Iliac Artery Dissection Model (BioGard Study)

  • Sang Min Park (Division of Cardiology, Nowon Eulji Medical Center, Eulji University School of Medicine) ;
  • Kyung-Chan Choi (Department of Pathology, Cardiovascular Center, Chuncheon Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine) ;
  • Byeong Han Lee (Laboratory Animal Center, Osong Medical Innovation Foundation) ;
  • Sang Yol Yoo (Department of Radiology, H Plus Yangji Hospital) ;
  • Christopher Y. Kim (Utah Cardiology)
  • 투고 : 2024.02.01
  • 심사 : 2024.05.07
  • 발행 : 2024.08.01

초록

Background and Objectives: Arterial dissection during endovascular therapy rarely occurs but can be lethal. A fabric-based covered graft stents yield poor clinical outcomes. A novel balloon-expandable stent with biodegradable film graft for overcoming these issues was evaluated in a rabbit iliac artery model. Method: Eighteen rabbits with iliac artery dissections were induced by balloon over-inflation on angiography (Ellis type 2 or 3) and treated using the test device (3.0×24 mm). Subsequently, survived twelve animals underwent histologic examinations and micro-computed tomography (CT) at 0, 2, 4, and 8 weeks and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months and angiography at one-year. Results: There were no adverse cardiovascular events during the one-year. Early-stage histologic examination revealed complete sealing of disrupted vessels by the device, exhibiting mural hematoma, peri-stent red thrombi, and dense infiltration of inflammatory cells. Mid- and long-term histologic examination showed patent stents with neointimal hyperplasia over the stents (% area stenosis: 11.8 at 2 weeks, 26.1 at 1 month, 29.7 at 3 months, 49.2 at 9 months, and 51.0 at 1 year), along with mild peri-strut inflammatory response (Grade: 1-2 at mid-term and 0-1 at long-term). The graft film became scarcely visible after six months. Both CT and angiography revealed no instances of thrombotic occlusion or in-stent restenosis (% diameter stenosis: 5.7 at 2 weeks, 12.3 at 1 month, 14.2 at 3 months, 25.1 at 9 months, and 26.6 at 1 year). Conclusions: The novel balloon-expandable stent with a biodegradable film graft demonstrates feasibility in managing severe artery dissection and preventing lethal vascular events in animal model.

키워드

과제정보

Authors thank to In Kwon Jung, PhD and Mr. Jung Sun Jang at R&D Center of Genoss for their technical support.

참고문헌

  1. Al-Lamee R, Ielasi A, Latib A, et al. Incidence, predictors, management, immediate and long-term outcomes following grade III coronary perforation. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2011;4:87-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2010.08.026
  2. Hendry C, Fraser D, Eichhofer J, et al. Coronary perforation in the drug-eluting stent era: incidence, risk factors, management and outcome: the UK experience. EuroIntervention 2012;8:79-86. https://doi.org/10.4244/EIJV8I1A13
  3. Cheng CI, Wu CJ, Hsieh YK, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention for iatrogenic left main coronary artery dissection. Int J Cardiol 2008;126:177-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2007.03.125
  4. Shimony A, Joseph L, Mottillo S, Eisenberg MJ. Coronary artery perforation during percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Can J Cardiol 2011;27:843-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjca.2011.04.014
  5. Kinnaird T, Kwok CS, Kontopantelis E, et al. Incidence, determinants, and outcomes of coronary perforation during percutaneous coronary intervention in the United Kingdom between 2006 and 2013: an analysis of 527 121 cases from the British Cardiovascular Intervention Society Database. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2016;9:e003449.
  6. Al-Sekaiti R, Ali M, Sallam M. Radial artery perforation after coronary intervention: is there a role for covered coronary stent? Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2011;78:632-5. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.22945
  7. Chatterjee A, White JS, Leesar MA. Management of radial artery perforation during transradial catheterization using a polytetrafluoroethylene-covered coronary stent. Cardiovasc Revasc Med 2017;18:133-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2016.08.002
  8. Romaguera R, Waksman R. Covered stents for coronary perforations: is there enough evidence? Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2011;78:246-53. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.23017
  9. Lee WC, Hsueh SK, Fang CY, Wu CJ, Hang CL, Fang HY. Clinical outcomes following covered stent for the treatment of coronary artery perforation. J Interv Cardiol 2016;29:569-75. https://doi.org/10.1111/joic.12347
  10. Kawamoto H, Tanaka K, Ruparelia N, et al. Short-term and long-term outcomes after polytetrafluoroethylene-covered stent implantation for the treatment of coronary perforation. Am J Cardiol 2015;116:1822-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.09.019
  11. Ruusalepp A, Vaage J, Valen G. A model of neointima formation in the atherosclerotic carotid artery of mice. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2003;2:196-200. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1569-9293(03)00042-2
  12. Hoglund VJ, Dong XR, Majesky MW. Neointima formation: a local affair. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2010;30:1877-9. https://doi.org/10.1161/ATVBAHA.110.211433
  13. Balastegui MT, Ramos-Pla JJ, Ferrer-Puchol MD, et al. Anatomical variations in the aortic bifurcation in New Zealand white rabbits on arteriography. Anat Rec (Hoboken) 2014;297:663-9. https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.22874
  14. Harrison KL, Jenkins MJ. The effect of crystallinity and water absorption on the dynamic mechanical relaxation behavior of polycaprolactone. Polym Int 2004;53:1298-304. https://doi.org/10.1002/pi.1517
  15. Stafiej P, Kung F, Thieme D, et al. Adhesion and metabolic activity of human corneal cells on PCL based nanofiber matrices. Mater Sci Eng C 2017;71:764-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2016.10.058
  16. Nishimiya K, Matsumoto Y, Uzuka H, et al. Beneficial effects of a novel bioabsorbable polymer coating on enhanced coronary vasoconstricting responses after drug-eluting stent implantation in pigs in vivo. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2016;9:281-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2015.09.041
  17. Lee JM, Lee J, Jeong H, et al. Development of a rabbit model for a preclinical comparison of coronary stent types in-vivo. Korean Circ J 2013;43:713-22. https://doi.org/10.4070/kcj.2013.43.11.713
  18. Nakazawa G, Torii S, Ijichi T, et al. Comparison of vascular responses following new-generation biodegradable and durable polymer-based drug-eluting stent implantation in an atherosclerotic rabbit iliac artery model. J Am Heart Assoc 2016;5:e003803.
  19. Ellis SG, Ajluni S, Arnold AZ, et al. Increased coronary perforation in the new device era. Incidence, classification, management, and outcome. Circulation 1994;90:2725-30. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.90.6.2725
  20. Park SM, Hong MK, Kim SH, Jung S, Kim BK, Choi D. Comparison of efficacy between ramipril and carvedilol on limiting the expansion of abdominal aortic aneurysm in mouse model. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther 2019;24:172-81. https://doi.org/10.1177/1074248418798631
  21. Kornowski R, Hong MK, Tio FO, Bramwell O, Wu H, Leon MB. In-stent restenosis: contributions of inflammatory responses and arterial injury to neointimal hyperplasia. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998;31:224-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0735-1097(97)00450-6
  22. Huber MS, Mooney JF, Madison J, Mooney MR. Use of a morphologic classification to predict clinical outcome after dissection from coronary angioplasty. Am J Cardiol 1991;68:467-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9149(91)90780-O
  23. Morice MC, Colombo A, Meier B, et al. Sirolimus- vs paclitaxel-eluting stents in de novo coronary artery lesions: the REALITY trial: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2006;295:895-904. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.295.8.895
  24. Patel VG, Brayton KM, Tamayo A, et al. Angiographic success and procedural complications in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary chronic total occlusion interventions: a weighted meta-analysis of 18,061 patients from 65 studies. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2013;6:128-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2012.10.011
  25. Danek BA, Karatasakis A, Karmpaliotis D, et al. Development and validation of a scoring system for predicting periprocedural complications during percutaneous coronary interventions of chronic total occlusions: the Prospective Global Registry for the Study of Chronic Total Occlusion Intervention (PROGRESS CTO) Complications Score. J Am Heart Assoc 2016;5:e004272.
  26. Schellhammer F, Berlis A, Bloss H, Pagenstecher A, Schumacher M. Poly-lactic-acid coating for endovascular stents. Preliminary results in canine experimental arteriovenous fistulae. Invest Radiol 1997;32:180-6. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004424-199703000-00008
  27. Bastijanic JM, Etscheidt J, Sattiraju M, et al. Fatigue and in vivo validation of a peritoneum-lined self-expanding nitinol stent-graft. J Endovasc Ther 2014;21:735-46. https://doi.org/10.1583/14-4762.1
  28. Urban P, Mehran R, Colleran R, et al. Defining high bleeding risk in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Circulation 2019;140:240-61. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.040167
  29. Lumsden AB, Chen C, Coyle KA, et al. Nonporous silicone polymer coating of expanded polytetrafluoroethylene grafts reduces graft neointimal hyperplasia in dog and baboon models. J Vasc Surg 1996;24:825-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0741-5214(96)70019-8
  30. You Y, Min BM, Lee SJ, Lee TS, Park WH. In vitro degradation behavior of electrospun polyglycolide, polylactide, and poly(lactide-co-glycolide). J Appl Polym Sci 2005;95:193-200. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.21116