DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Risk of Atrial Fibrillation and Adverse Outcomes in Patients With Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices

  • So-Ryoung Lee (Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital) ;
  • Ji Hyun Lee (Department of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Center, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital) ;
  • Eue-Keun Choi (Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital) ;
  • Eun-Kyung Jung (Medtronic Korea, Ltd.) ;
  • So-Jeong You (Medtronic Korea, Ltd.) ;
  • Seil Oh (Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital) ;
  • Gregory YH Lip (Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital)
  • 투고 : 2023.03.23
  • 심사 : 2023.08.23
  • 발행 : 2024.01.01

초록

Background and Objectives: Comprehensive epidemiological data are lacking on the incident atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). This study aimed to examine the incidence, risk factors, and AF-related adverse outcomes of patients with CIEDs. Methods: This was an observational cohort study that analyzed patients without prevalent AF who underwent CIED implantation in 2009-2018 using a Korean nationwide claims database. The subjects were divided into three groups by CIED type and indication: pacemaker (n=21,438), implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD)/cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with heart failure (HF) (n=3,450), and ICD for secondary prevention without HF (n=2,146). The incidence of AF, AF-associated predictors, and adverse outcomes were evaluated. Results: During follow-up, the incidence of AF was 4.3, 7.3, and 5.1 per 100 person-years in the pacemaker, ICD/CRT with HF, and ICD without HF cohorts, respectively. Across the three cohorts, older age and valvular heart disease were commonly associated with incident AF. Incident AF was consistently associated with an increased risk of ischemic stroke (3.8-11.4-fold), admission for HF (2.6-10.5-fold), hospitalization for any cause (2.4-2.7-fold), all-cause death (4.1-5.0-fold), and composite outcomes (3.4-5.7-fold). Oral anticoagulation rates were suboptimal in patients with incident AF (pacemaker, 51.3%; ICD/CRT with HF, 51.7%; and ICD without HF, 33.8%, respectively). Conclusions: A substantial proportion of patients implanted CIED developed newly diagnosed AF. Incident AF was associated with a higher risk of adverse events. The importance of awareness, early detection, and appropriate management of AF in patients with CIED should be emphasized.

키워드

과제정보

This research was supported by a grant from the Patient-Centered Clinical Research Coordinating Center (PACEN) funded by the Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea (grant number: HC21C0028), and by the Korea Medical Device Development Fund grant funded by the Korea government (the Ministry of Science and ICT, the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy, the Ministry of Health & Welfare, the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety) (project number: HI20C1662, 1711138358, KMDF_PR_20200901_0173).

참고문헌

  1. Greenspon AJ, Patel JD, Lau E, et al. Trends in permanent pacemaker implantation in the United States from 1993 to 2009: increasing complexity of patients and procedures. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;60:1540-5.
  2. Lee JH, Lee SR, Choi EK, et al. Temporal trends of cardiac implantable electronic device implantations: a nationwide population-based study. Korean Circ J 2019;49:841-52.
  3. Chao TF, Liu CJ, Tuan TC, et al. Lifetime risks, projected numbers, and adverse outcomes in Asian patients with atrial fibrillation: a report from the Taiwan Nationwide AF Cohort Study. Chest 2018;153:453-66.
  4. van Rees JB, Borleffs CJ, de Bie MK, et al. Inappropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks: incidence, predictors, and impact on mortality. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011;57:556-62.
  5. Santini M, Gasparini M, Landolina M, et al. Device-detected atrial tachyarrhythmias predict adverse outcome in real-world patients with implantable biventricular defibrillators. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011;57:167-72.
  6. Cheol Seong S, Kim YY, Khang YH, et al. Data resource profile: the national health information database of the National Health Insurance Service in South Korea. Int J Epidemiol 2017;46:799-800.
  7. Lee HJ, Choi EK, Han KD, et al. Bodyweight fluctuation is associated with increased risk of incident atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm 2020;17:365-71.
  8. Lee SR, Choi EK, Kwon S, et al. Oral anticoagulation in Asian patients with atrial fibrillation and a history of intracranial hemorrhage. Stroke 2020;51:416-23.
  9. Austin PC. Balance diagnostics for comparing the distribution of baseline covariates between treatment groups in propensity-score matched samples. Stat Med 2009;28:3083-107.
  10. Glotzer TV, Daoud EG, Wyse DG, et al. The relationship between daily atrial tachyarrhythmia burden from implantable device diagnostics and stroke risk: the TRENDS study. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2009;2:474-80.
  11. Kim M, Kim TH, Yu HT, et al. Prevalence and predictors of clinically relevant atrial high-rate episodes in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices. Korean Circ J 2021;51:235-47.
  12. Kaplan RM, Koehler J, Ziegler PD, Sarkar S, Zweibel S, Passman RS. Stroke risk as a function of atrial fibrillation duration and CHA2DS2-VASc score. Circulation 2019;140:1639-46.
  13. Al-Gibbawi M, Ayinde HO, Bhatia NK, et al. Relationship between device-detected burden and duration of atrial fibrillation and risk of ischemic stroke. Heart Rhythm 2021;18:338-46.
  14. Belkin MN, Soria CE, Waldo AL, et al. Incidence and clinical significance of new-onset device-detected atrial tachyarrhythmia: a meta-analysis. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2018;11:e005393.
  15. Healey JS, Connolly SJ, Gold MR, et al. Subclinical atrial fibrillation and the risk of stroke. N Engl J Med 2012;366:120-9.
  16. Pedersen KB, Madsen C, Sandgaard NC, Diederichsen AC, Bak S, Brandes A. Subclinical atrial fibrillation in patients with recent transient ischemic attack. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2018;29:707-14.
  17. Chent XL, Ren XJ, Liang Z, Han ZH, Zhang T, Luo Z. Analyses of risk factors and prognosis for new-onset atrial fibrillation in elderly patients after dual-chamber pacemaker implantation. J Geriatr Cardiol 2018;15:628-33.
  18. Wachter R, Freedman B. Subclinical atrial fibrillation and the risk of recurrent ischemic stroke. Thromb Haemost 2021;121:697-9.
  19. Turagam MK, Garg J, Whang W, et al. Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ann Intern Med 2019;170:41-50.
  20. Johnson JN, Tester DJ, Perry J, Salisbury BA, Reed CR, Ackerman MJ. Prevalence of early-onset atrial fibrillation in congenital long QT syndrome. Heart Rhythm 2008;5:704-9.
  21. Hayashi H, Sumiyoshi M, Nakazato Y, Daida H. Brugada syndrome and sinus node dysfunction. J Arrhythm 2018;34:216-21.
  22. Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS): the task force for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Developed with the special contribution of the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) of the ESC. Eur Heart J 2021;42:373-498.
  23. Lee SS, Ae Kong K, Kim D, et al. Clinical implication of an impaired fasting glucose and prehypertension related to new onset atrial fibrillation in a healthy Asian population without underlying disease: a nationwide cohort study in Korea. Eur Heart J 2017;38:2599-607.
  24. Connolly SJ, Kerr CR, Gent M, et al. Effects of physiologic pacing versus ventricular pacing on the risk of stroke and death due to cardiovascular causes. N Engl J Med 2000;342:1385-91.
  25. Pastore G, Zanon F, Baracca E, et al. The risk of atrial fibrillation during right ventricular pacing. Europace 2016;18:353-8.