Journal of Wellbeing Management and Applied Psychology (웰빙융합연구)

Korea Wellbeing Convergence Association (한국웰빙융합학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on Securing Objectivity in Small-Scale Environmental Impact Assessments Using Delphi Analysis

  • Dong-Myung CHO (SM Environment & Consulting.CO.,LTD) ;
  • Ju-Yeon LEE (SM Environment & Consulting.CO.,LTD) ;
  • Woo-Taeg KWON (Department of Environmental Health & Safety, Eulji University)
  • Received : 2024.07.30
  • Accepted : 2024.08.19
  • Published : 2024.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: Since August 2000, the small-scale environmental impact assessment system has prevented indiscriminate development. However, its qualitative reports lack objectivity and consistency. This study analyzes these issues through literature and expert surveys and proposes improvements. Research Methodology: Samples were selected based on regional consultation numbers. Mitigation measures were categorized into qualitative and quantitative factors. Issues were identified, and improvements suggested. The Delphi method helped select evaluation items and propose a scoring table. Results and Conclusions: The Delphi method selected 14 absolute and 22 relative evaluation items, excluding 3 invalid ones. A 100-point scoring table was created, with points assigned based on element significance. A 1-point bonus was added for top-scoring elements to promote eco-friendly planning.

Keywords

References

  1. Ministry of Environment. (2022). Environmental White Paper.
  2. Lee, J. H. (2020). Improvement Measures for Environmental Impact Assessment Consultation Decisions Considering Land and Natural Ecological Environment. Environmental Impact Assessment, 29, 45-60.
  3. Han, E. M. (2020). Study on the Implementation Plan for Post-management of Small-scale Environmental Impact Assessments. Doctoral Dissertation, Dankook University, i-ii.
  4. Song, N. D. (2022). Study on Application Methods of Post-Environmental Impact Investigation for Small-scale Environmental Impact Assessments. Master's Thesis, Hansei University, 83.
  5. Sa, G. H., Joo, Y. J., Lee, S. Y., ... & Lee, J. Y. (2022). Study on Institutional Improvement Measures for Enhancing and Streamlining Environmental Impact Assessments. Korea Environment Institute, 36-42.
  6. Nam, Y. S. (2013). Comparative Study of Strategic Environmental Assessment Systems in Korea and Germany. Korea Legislation Research Institute, 56-69.
  7. Seong, H. C., & Kang, M. S. (2024). Comparative Study of Environmental Impact Assessment Systems in Local Governments in Korea and Japan I - Focusing on Target Projects and Evaluation Items. Environmental Impact Assessment, 13(2), 57-71.
  8. Lee, B. C. (2012). Study on Risk Factors in Real Estate Project Financing - Focused on Case Analysis and Delphi Analysis. Doctoral Dissertation, Jeonju University, 78-79.
  9. Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A Quantitative Approach to Content Validity. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 563-575.
  10. Kang, Y. J. (2008). Understanding and Application Cases of Delphi Technique. Korea Employment Agency for the Disabled Employment Development Institute.
  11. Lee, G. N. (2010). Development of Evaluation Criteria for Cyber Education Programs in Talent Development. Doctoral Dissertation, Chungnam National University.
  12. Choi, J. K. (2002). Development of Quantitative Evaluation Techniques for Environmentally Friendly Road Route Selection. Domestic Doctoral Dissertation, Konkuk University.
  13. Kim, D. K. (2010). Study on the Quantification System for Environmental Impact Assessment of Railroad Route Selection. Domestic Doctoral Dissertation, Seoul National University of Science and Technology, Graduate School of Railroads.
  14. Park, S. J., Lee, D. G., & Jeong, S. K. (2021). Study on Land Use Evaluation Items in the Land Environment Field of Environmental Impact Assessment. Environmental Impact Assessment, 30, 297-304.
  15. Ban, Y. W., Joo, K. S., Jeong, H. K., & Hwang, K. H. (2010). Improvement Measures for Environmental Impact Assessment Report Writing and Consultation Procedures Through Expert Surveys. Environmental Impact Assessment, 19(2), 141-151.
  16. Park, J. H., & Choi, J. K. (2018). Derivation of Improvement Plans for Evaluation Item Adjustment and Operational System Through Analysis of Current Status of Evaluation Items in Environmental Impact Assessment. Environmental Impact Assessment, 27, 1-16.
  17. Lee, J. S., Lee, W. K., & Jeon, S. W. (2006). Development of Environmental Capacity Estimation Model Using National Environmental Assessment Indicators. Environmental Impact Assessment, 15(6), 385-394.
  18. Lee, J. W., & Cho, K. D. (2022). Analysis of Current Status of Local Government Environmental Impact Assessment Ordinances and Preparation of Consultation Guidelines. Environmental Impact Assessment, 31, 226-240.
  19. Ministry of Environment. (2019). 2020 Environmental Technology Development Project Implementation Plan Announcement and Business Guide. 58-61.
  20. Seoul Metropolitan Government. (2022). Environmental Impact Assessment Items and Review Standards for Buildings and Redevelopment/ Reconstruction Projects (Guidelines for Preparing Environmental Impact Assessment Reports). Notification No. 2022-332.
  21. Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology. (2024). Green Building Certification Criteria Operational Rules.