DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Time Trend of Occupational Noise-induced Hearing Loss in a Metallurgical Plant With a Hearing Conservation Program

  • Adalva V. Couto Lopes (Departamento de Fonoaudiologia, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco-UFPE) ;
  • Cleide F. Teixeira (Departamento de Fonoaudiologia, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco-UFPE) ;
  • Mirella B.R. Vilela (Departamento de Fonoaudiologia, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco-UFPE) ;
  • Maria L.L.T. de Lima (Departamento de Fonoaudiologia, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco-UFPE)
  • Received : 2023.09.05
  • Accepted : 2024.04.10
  • Published : 2024.06.30

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to analyze the trend of occupational noise-induced hearing loss (ONIHL) in Brazilian workers at a metallurgical plant with a hearing conservation program (HCP), which has been addressed in a previous study. Methods: All 152 workers in this time series (20032018) participated in the HCP and used personal protective equipment. All annual audiometry records in the company's software were collected from the electronic database. The trend of ONIHL was analyzed with the joinpoint regression model. The hearing thresholds of ONIHL cases at the end of the series were compared with those found in a national reference study. Results: The binaural mean hearing thresholds at 3, 4, and 6 kHz at the end of the series were higher for ages ≥50 years, exposures ≥85 dB (A), time since admission >20 years, and maintenance workers. Significance was found only in the group divided by age. There was an increasing time trend of ONIHL, though with a low percentage variation for the period (AAPC = 3.5%; p = 0.01). Hearing thresholds in this study differed from the reference one. Conclusion: Despite the unmet expectation of a stationary trend in the study period, the time pace of ONIHL evolution did not follow what was expected for a population exposed to noise. These findings signal to the scientific community and public authorities that good ONIHL control is possible when HCP is well implemented.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Gratitude is extended to the company that provided and authorized the use of its data and to the grant provided for this study by the CAPES - Brazil e Finance Code 001.

References

  1. Brasil. Ministerio da Saude. Perda Auditiva Induzida por Ruido (PAIR). Brasilia. 200640p (Saude do Trabalhador. Protocolos de Complexidade Diferenciada 5 - Normas e Manuais Tecnicos). Retrieved in 2023, Aug 5, from, https://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/publicacoes/protocolo_perda_auditiva.pdf.
  2. Cavalcante F, Ferrite S, Meira TC. Exposure to noise in the available: industry in Brazil. Rev CEFAC 2013;15(5):1364-70. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-18462013005000021.
  3. Campo P, Maguin K. Solvent-induced hearing loss: mechanisms and prevention strategy. IJOMEH 2007;20(3):265-70. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10001-007-0031-3.
  4. Metwally FM, Aziz HM, Mahdy-Abdallah H, Elgelil KSA, El-Tahlawy EM. Effect of combined occupational exposure to noise and organic solvents on hearing. Toxicol Ind Health 2011;28(10):901-7. https://doi.org/10.1177/0748233711427051.
  5. Hormozi M, Ansari-Moghaddam A, Mirzaei R, Haghighi JD, Eftekharian F. The risk of hearing loss associated with occupational exposure to organic solvents mixture with and without concurrent noise exposure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. IJOMEH 2017;30(4):521-35. https://doi.org/10.13075/ijomeh.1896.01024.
  6. Cunha IA, Shibuya EK, Fernandes RP, Bernardi APA, Gerges SNY, Gerges RNC., FUNDACENTRO. Guia de diretrizes e parametros minimos para elaboracao - gestao do Programa de Conservacao Auditiva (PCA). Sao Paulo (Brasil: Fundacentro; 201821p.
  7. Pettersson H, Hagberg M, Nilsson T, Burstrom L, Lundstrom R. Noise and handarm vibration exposure in relation to the risk of hearing loss. Noise and Health 2012;14(59):159e65. https://doi.org/10.4103/1463-1741.99887.
  8. Singh AK, Meena ML, Chaudhary H. Assessment of low-cost tool intervention among carpet alignment workers exposed to hand-arm vibration and shift in hearing threshold. Int J Hum Factor Ergon 2018;5(3):189-209. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijhfe.2018.095910.
  9. Ding E, Liu J, Shen H, Gong W, Zhang H, Song H, Zhu B. Notch polymorphisms associated with sensitivity of noise-induced hearing loss among Chinese textile factory workers. BMC Med Genet 2018;19(168). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12881-018-0676-8.
  10. Lavinsky J, Crow AL, Pan C, Wang J, Aaron KA, Ho MK, Li Q, Salehide P, Myint A, Monges-Hernadez M, Eskin E, Allayee H, Lusis AJ, Friedman RA. Genome-wide association study identifies Nox3 as a critical gene for susceptibility to noiseinduced hearing loss. PLOS Genet 2015;11(4):e1005094. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1005094.
  11. Brasil. Ministerio do Trabalho e Previdencia. Portaria SEPRT 6.734, de 09 de marco de 2020. Atualizacao da Norma Regulamentadora No 7 - Programa de Controle Medico de Saude Ocupacional. Diario Oficial da Uniao de 2020. Retrieved in 2023, aug 6, from, https://www.gov.br/trabalho-e-emprego/ptbr/acesso-a-informacao/participacao-social/conselhos-e-orgaos-colegiados/comissao-tripartite-partitaria-permanente/normas-regulamentadora/normas-regulamentadoras-vigentes/norma-regulamentadora-no-7-nr-7.
  12. Noise and Hearing Conservation Committee. ACOEM evidence-based statement: noise-induced hearing loss. J Occup Environ Med 2003;45(6):579-81. https://doi.org/10.1097/00043764-200306000-00001.
  13. Almeida SIC, Albernaz PLM, Zaia PA, Xavier OG, Karazawa EHI. Natural history of noise-induced hearing loss. Rev Ass Med Brasil 2000;46(2):143-58. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-42302000000200009.
  14. Lie A, Skogstad M, Johannessen HA, Tynes T, Mehlum IS, Nordby KC, Engdahl B, Tambs K. Occupational noise exposure and hearing: a systematic review. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2016;89(3):351-72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-015-1083-5.
  15. Chen Y, Zhang M, Qiu W, Sun X, Wang X, Dong Y, Chen Z, Hu W. Prevalence and determinants of noise-induced hearing loss among workers in the automotive industry in China: a pilot study. J Occup Health 2019;61(5):387-97. https://doi.org/10.1002/1348-9585. 12066.
  16. Almaayeh M, Al-Musa A, Khader YS. Prevalence of noise-induced hearing loss among Jordanian industrial workers and its associated factors. Work 2018;61(2):267-71. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-182797.
  17. Nyarubeli IP, Tungu AM, Moen BE, Bratveit M. Prevalence of noise-induced hearing loss among Tanzanian iron and steel workers: a cross-sectional study. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2019;16(8):1367. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16081367.
  18. Ruggieri M, Cattan S, Giardini LDL, Oliveira KAS. Audition deficiency induced by noise in 472 workers of the ABC Paulista area. Arq Med ABC 1991;14(1):19-23.. https://www.portalnepas.org.br/amabc/article/view/471.
  19. Miranda CR, Dias CR, Pena PGL, Nobre LCC, Aquino R. Occupation deafness in industrialist workers of metropolitan region of Salvador. Bahia BJORL 1998;64:109-14.. http://oldfiles.bjorl.org/conteudo/acervo/acervo.asp?id=2565.
  20. Araujo SA. Noise-induced hearing loss in metallurgical workers. Rev Bras Otorrinolaringol 2002;68(1):47-52. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-72992002000100008.
  21. Caldart AU, Adriano CF, Terruel I, Martins RF, Caldart AU, Mocellin M. The prevalence of noise-induced hearing loss among textile industry workers. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2006;10(3):192-6.. http://arquivosdeorl.org.br/conteudo/pdfForl/380.pdf.
  22. Regis ACFC, Crispim KGM, Ferreira AP. Incidence and prevalence of noiseinduced hearing loss in workers of a metallurgical company in Manaus - AM, Brazil. Rev CEFAC 2014;16(5):1456-62. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-0216201410813.
  23. Antunes JLF, Cardoso MRA. Using time series analysis in epidemiological studies. Epidemiol Serv Saude 2015;24(3):565-76. https://doi.org/10.5123/S1679-49742015000300024.
  24. Rouquayrol MZ, Almeida Filho N. Epidemiologia & Saude. 6a ed. Rio de Janeiro (Brasil): Medsi; 2003708p.
  25. Lopes AVC, Teixeira CF, Vilela MBR, Lima MLLT. Impact of a hearing conservation program on occupational noise-induced hearing loss. Rev CEFAC 2022;24(5):e6322. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-0216/20222456322.
  26. Brasil. Ministerio do Trabalho e Previdencia. Portaria SEPRT 6.735, de 10 de marco de 2020. Atualizacao da Norma Regulamentadora No 9 - Avaliacao e controle das exposicoes ocupacionais a agentes fisicos, quimicos e biologicos. Diario Oficial da Uniao de 2020. Retrieved in 2023, aug 6, from, https://www.gov.br/trabalho-e-emprego/pt-br/acesso-a-informacao/participacao-social/conselhos-e-orgaos-colegiados/comissao-tripartite-partitaria-permanente/normas-regulamentadora/normas-regulamentadoras-vigentes/normaregulamentadora-no-9-nr-9.
  27. Brasil. Ministerio do Trabalho e Previdencia. Portaria MTb 3.214, de 08 de junho de 1978. Norma Regulamentadora No 15 - Atividades e operacoes insalubres. Diario Oficial da Uniao de 1978. Retrieved in 2023, aug 6, from, https://www.gov.br/trabalho-e-emprego/pt-br/acesso-a-informacao/participacao-social/conselhos-e-orgaos-colegiados/comissao-tripartitepartitaria-permanente/normas-regulamentadora/normas-regulamentadorasvigentes/norma-regulamentadora-no-15-nr-15.
  28. Frederiksen TW, Ramlau-Hansen CH, Stokholm ZA, Grynderup MB, Hansen AM, Kristiansen J, Vestergaard JM, Bonde JP, Kolstad HA. Noiseinduced hearing loss - a preventable disease? results of a 10-year longitudinal study of workers exposed to occupational noise. Noise & Health 2017;19(87):103-11. 10.4103/nah.NAH_100_16.
  29. Rabinowitz P, Cantley LF, Galusha D, Trufan S, Swersey A, Dixon-Ernst C, Ramirez V, Neitzel R. Assessing hearing conservation program effectiveness: results of a multisite assessment. J Occup Environ Med 2018;60(1):29-35. https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000001125.
  30. International Organization for Standardization. ISO 1999: Acoustics - Determination of occupational noise exposure and estimation of noise-induced hearing impairment. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization; 2013. Genebra: ISO.
  31. Kim H-J, Fay MP, Feuer EJ, Midthune DN. Permutation test for joinpoint regression with applications to cancer rates. Statist Med 2000;19(3):335-51. 10.1002/(SICI) 1097-0258(20000215)19:3<335:AID-SIM336>3.0.CO;2-Z.
  32. Pereira TM, Silva LMS, Dias MSA, Monteiro LD, Silva MRF, Alencar OM. Temporal trend of leprosy in a region of high endemicity in the Brazilian Northeast. Rev Bras Enferm 2019;72(5):1356-62. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2018-0682.
  33. Shapiro SS, Wilk MB. An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika 1965;52(3/4):591-611.
  34. Kruskal WH, Wallis WA. Use of ranks in one-criterion variance analysis. J Am Stat Assoc 1952:583-621.
  35. Dunn OJ. Multiple comparisons using rank sums. Technometrics 1964:241e52.
  36. Dantas ANM, Higuchi MIG. Health professionals approach to the hearing loss prevention program in the manaus industrial Pole. Rev CEFAC 2013;15(6):1418-26. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-18462013000600003.
  37. Goncalves CGO, Ribeiro JM. Analise dos programas de preservacao auditiva em empresas do interior do Parana. Rev.Tuiuti: Ciencia e Cultura 2013;46:129-36.
  38. Guerra MR, Lourenco PMC, Bustamante-Teixeira MT, Alves MJM. Prevalence of noise-induced hearing loss in metallurgical company. Rev Saude Publica 2005;39(2):238-44.. https://www.scielosp.org/article/rsp/2005.v39n2/238-244/.
  39. Goncalves CGO, Iguti AM. Program for hearing loss prevention in four metallurgical factories in Piracicaba, Sao Paulo, Brazil. Cad Saude Publica 2006;22(3):609-18. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-311X2006000300016.
  40. Oliva FC, Morata TC, Lacerda ABM, Steinmetz L, Bramatti L, Vivan AG, Goncalves CGO, Marques JM. Significant auditory threshold shift among workers exposed to different noise levels. Rev Soc Bras Fonoaudiol 2011;16(3):260-5. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-80342011000300005.
  41. Rabinowitz PM, Galusha D, Dixon-Ernst C, Slade MD, Cullen MR. Do ambient noise exposure levels predict hearing loss in a modern industrial cohort? Occup Environ Med 2007;64(1):53-9. https://doi.org/10.1136/oem.2005.025924.