Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases

The Korean Academy of Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases (대한결핵및호흡기학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Oscillometry-Defined Small Airway Dysfunction in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

  • Amit K. Rath (Department of Pulmonary Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences) ;
  • Dibakar Sahu (Department of Pulmonary Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences) ;
  • Sajal De (Department of Pulmonary Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences)
  • Received : 2023.09.06
  • Accepted : 2023.12.26
  • Published : 2024.04.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Background: The prevalence of small airway dysfunction (SAD) in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) across different ethnicities is poorly understood. This study aimed to estimate the prevalence of SAD in stable COPD patients. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study of 196 consecutive stable COPD patients. We measured pre- and post-bronchodilator (BD) lung function and respiratory impedance. The severity of COPD and lung function abnormalities was graded in accordance with the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) guidelines. SAD was defined as either difference in whole-breath resistance at 5 and 19 Hz > upper limit of normal or respiratory system reactance at 5 Hz < lower limit of normal. Results: The cohort consisted of 95.9% men, with an average age of 66.3 years. The mean forced expiratory volume 1 second (FEV1) % predicted was 56.4%. The median COPD assessment test (CAT) scores were 14. The prevalence of post-BD SAD across the GOLD grades 1 to 4 was 14.3%, 51.1%, 91%, and 100%, respectively. The post-BD SAD and expiratory flow limitation at tidal breath (EFLT) were present in 62.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 56.1 to 69.9) and 28.1% (95% CI, 21.9 to 34.2), respectively. COPD patients with SAD had higher CAT scores (15.5 vs. 12.8, p<0.01); poor lung function (FEV1% predicted 46.6% vs. 72.8%, p<0.01); lower diffusion capacity for CO (4.8 mmol/min/kPa vs. 5.6 mmol/min/kPa, p<0.01); hyperinflation (ratio of residual volume to total lung capacity % predicted: 159.7% vs. 129%, p<0.01), and shorter 6-minute walk distance (367.5 m vs. 390 m, p=0.02). Conclusion: SAD is present across all severities of COPD. The prevalence of SAD increases with disease severity. SAD is associated with poor lung function and higher symptom burden. Severe SAD is indicated by the presence of EFLT.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to thank all the participants in this study, Ms. Rajyalakshmi Kundrapu and Mr. Bheem Prasad Jaiswal.

References

  1. Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease. Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease 2023 report: global strategy for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [Internet]. Fontana: GOLD; 2024 [cited 2024 Jan 2]. Available from: https://goldcopd.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/GOLD-2023-ver-1.1-2Dec2022_WMV.pdf. 
  2. McNulty W, Usmani OS. Techniques of assessing small airways dysfunction. Eur Clin Respir J 2014;1:25898. 
  3. Higham A, Quinn AM, Cancado JED, Singh D. The pathology of small airways disease in COPD: historical aspects and future directions. Respir Res 2019;20:49. 
  4. Chiu HY, Hsiao YH, Su KC, Lee YC, Ko HK, Perng DW. Small airway dysfunction by impulse oscillometry in symptomatic patients with preserved pulmonary function. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract 2020;8:229-35.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaip.2019.06.035
  5. Singh D. Small airway disease in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Tuberc Respir Dis (Seoul) 2017;80:317-24.  https://doi.org/10.4046/trd.2017.0080
  6. King GG, Bates J, Berger KI, Calverley P, de Melo PL, Dellaca RL, et al. Technical standards for respiratory oscillometry. Eur Respir J 2020;55:1900753. 
  7. De S, Banerjee N, Kushwah GDS, Dharwey D. Regression equations of respiratory impedance of Indian adults measured by forced oscillation technique. Lung India 2020;37:30-6.  https://doi.org/10.4103/lungindia.lungindia_260_19
  8. Aarli BB, Calverley PM, Jensen RL, Eagan TM, Bakke PS, Hardie JA. Variability of within-breath reactance in COPD patients and its association with dyspnoea. Eur Respir J 2015;45:625-34.  https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.00051214
  9. Graham BL, Steenbruggen I, Miller MR, Barjaktarevic IZ, Cooper BG, Hall GL, et al. Standardization of spirometry 2019 update: an official American Thoracic Society and European Respiratory Society technical statement. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2019;200:e70-88.  https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201908-1590ST
  10. Chhabra SK, Kumar R, Gupta U, Rahman M, Dash DJ. Prediction equations for spirometry in adults from northern India. Indian J Chest Dis Allied Sci 2014;56:221-9.  https://doi.org/10.5005/ijcdas-56-4-221
  11. Quanjer PH, Stanojevic S, Cole TJ, Baur X, Hall GL, Culver BH, et al. Multi-ethnic reference values for spirometry for the 3-95-yr age range: the global lung function 2012 equations. Eur Respir J 2012;40:1324-43.  https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.00080312
  12. ATS Committee on Proficiency Standards for Clinical Pulmonary Function Laboratories. ATS statement: guidelines for the six-minute walk test. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002;166:111-7.  https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.166.1.at1102
  13. McDonough JE, Yuan R, Suzuki M, Seyednejad N, Elliott WM, Sanchez PG, et al. Small-airway obstruction and emphysema in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. N Engl J Med 2011;365:1567-75.  https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1106955
  14. Janson C, Malinovschi A, Amaral AFS, Accordini S, Bousquet J, Buist AS, et al. Bronchodilator reversibility in asthma and COPD: findings from three large population studies. Eur Respir J 2019;54:1900561. 
  15. Pisi R, Aiello M, Zanini A, Tzani P, Paleari D, Marangio E, et al. Small airway dysfunction and flow and volume bronchodilator responsiveness in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 2015;10:1191-7.  https://doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S82509
  16. Crisafulli E, Pisi R, Aiello M, Vigna M, Tzani P, Torres A, et al. Prevalence of small-airway dysfunction among COPD patients with different GOLD stages and its role in the impact of disease. Respiration 2017;93:32-41.  https://doi.org/10.1159/000452479
  17. Crim C, Celli B, Edwards LD, Wouters E, Coxson HO, Tal-Singer R, et al. Respiratory system impedance with impulse oscillometry in healthy and COPD subjects: ECLIPSE baseline results. Respir Med 2011;105:1069-78.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmed.2011.01.010
  18. Lu L, Peng J, Wu F, Yang H, Zheng Y, Deng Z, et al. Clinical characteristics of airway impairment assessed by impulse oscillometry in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: findings from the ECOPD study in China. BMC Pulm Med 2023;23:52. 
  19. Mikamo M, Shirai T, Mori K, Shishido Y, Akita T, Morita S, et al. Predictors of expiratory flow limitation measured by forced oscillation technique in COPD. BMC Pulm Med 2014;14:23. 
  20. Paredi P, Goldman M, Alamen A, Ausin P, Usmani OS, Pride NB, et al. Comparison of inspiratory and expiratory resistance and reactance in patients with asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Thorax 2010;65:263-7.  https://doi.org/10.1136/thx.2009.120790
  21. Beech A, Jackson N, Dean J, Singh D. Expiratory flow limitation in a cohort of highly symptomatic COPD patients. ERJ Open Res 2022;8:00680-2021.  https://doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00680-2021
  22. Dean J, Kolsum U, Hitchen P, Gupta V, Singh D. Clinical characteristics of COPD patients with tidal expiratory flow limitation. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 2017;12:1503-6.  https://doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S137865
  23. Aarli BB, Calverley PM, Jensen RL, Dellaca R, Eagan TM, Bakke PS, et al. The association of tidal EFL with exercise performance, exacerbations, and death in COPD. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 2017;12:2179-88.  https://doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S138720
  24. Anderson WJ, Lipworth BJ. Relationships between impulse oscillometry, spirometry and dyspnoea in COPD. J R Coll Physicians Edinb 2012;42:111-5. https://doi.org/10.4997/JRCPE.2012.204