DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Anatomy of the clitoris: the corona of the glans clitoris, clitoral coronal papillae, and the coronopreputial frenulum

  • Matthew J. Zdilla (Department of Pathology, Anatomy, and Laboratory Medicine (PALM), West Virginia University School of Medicine)
  • Received : 2024.01.30
  • Accepted : 2024.04.06
  • Published : 2024.06.30

Abstract

The corona of the glans clitoris is a clinically important yet poorly understood anatomical structure. There has been longstanding confusion regarding the prevalence of the corona of the glans clitoris and, moreover, its very existence. Therefore, this anatomical study assesses the prevalence of the corona of the glans clitoris and the gross anatomy of the proximal glans clitoris. Anatomy was assessed in 104 female donor bodies ranging in age from 50 to 102 years with an average age-at-death of 78.1±10.9 years (mean±SD). All clitorises (100%; 104:104 dorsums and 100%; 208:208 sides) were found to have a well-defined clitoral corona. Three of 104 (2.9%) coronas possessed grossly visible, outward-projecting, bluntly rounded papillae. Some donors possessed a coronopreputial frenulum. Clitoropreputial adhesions were common and associated with clitoral pearls. Clitoral pearls were identified in 37.8% (14:37) of unembalmed donors and observed to create clitoral craters, structural deformations in the surface of the corona and glans. The results of this study suggest that the corona of the glans clitoris is a ubiquitous anatomical structure. The clitoral coronal papillae and coronopreputial frenulum are novel, previously undescribed, anatomical structures. This study identifies that the corona of the glans clitoris is prone to pathological processes such as clitoral pearl formation and clitoral deformation. In addition to novel anatomical findings, the results of this study call attention to the need for life-long clitoral examinations. Furthermore, the corona of the glans clitoris should be regularly included in anatomical texts and accurately depicted in anatomical illustrations.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

The author would like to acknowledge the West Virginia Anatomical Board and the West Virginia University Human Gift Registry. For assistance with laboratory and donor access, the author wishes to acknowledge Robert J. Bolyard and Anthony Cress of the West Virginia University Human Gift Registry, Holly Vopal, PhD of West Liberty University, and Amanda Troy, PhD of Duquesne University College of Osteopathic Medicine. Most importantly, the author would like to acknowledge the individuals who donated their bodies for the advancement of science and healthcare, without whom, this work would not have been possible.

References

  1. Allen LE, Hardy BE, Churchill BM. The surgical management of the enlarged clitoris. J Urol 1982;128:351-4.
  2. Farkas A, Chertin B, Hadas-Halpren I. 1-Stage feminizing genitoplasty: 8 years of experience with 49 cases. J Urol 2001;165(6 Pt 2):2341-6.
  3. Perovic SV, Djordjevic ML. Metoidioplasty: a variant of phalloplasty in female transsexuals. BJU Int 2003;92:981-5.
  4. Lesma A, Bocciardi A, Montorsi F, Rigatti P. Passerini-glazel feminizing genitoplasty: modifications in 17 years of experience with 82 cases. Eur Urol 2007;52:1638-44.
  5. Kujur AR, Joseph V, Chandra P. Nerve sparing clitoroplasty in a rare case of idiopathic clitoromegaly. Indian J Plast Surg 2016;49:86-90.
  6. Adams MC, DeMarco RT, Thomas JC. Surgery for intersex disorders and urogenital sinus. In: Docimo SG, Canning D, Khoury A, Salle JLP, editors. The Kelalis-King-Belman textbook of clinical pediatric urology. 6th ed. CRC Press; 2018. p.1215-31.
  7. Aerts L, Rubin RS, Randazzo M, Goldstein SW, Goldstein I. Retrospective study of the prevalence and risk factors of clitoral adhesions: women's health providers should routinely examine the glans clitoris. Sex Med 2018;6:115-22.
  8. Myers MC, Romanello JP, Nico E, Marantidis J, Rowen TS, Sussman RD, Rubin RS. A retrospective case series on patient satisfaction and efficacy of non-surgical lysis of clitoral adhesions. J Sex Med 2022;19:1412-20.
  9. Verkauf BS, Von Thron J, O'Brien WF. Clitoral size in normal women. Obstet Gynecol 1992;80:41-4.
  10. Nigam A, Prakash A, Saxena P, Yadav R, Raghunandan C. Hirsutism and abnormal genitalia. J Indian Acad Clin Med 2011;12:46-8.
  11. Mayer JCA. Beschreibung des ganzen menschlichen korpers, mit den wichtigsten neueren anatomischen entdeckungen bereichert, nebst physiologischen erlauterungen. G. J. Decker; 1788. German.
  12. Bernstein JG. Handbuch nach alphabetischer ordnung uber die vorzuglichsten gegenstande der anatomie, physiologie und gerichtliche arzneigelahrtheit, fur praktische wundarzte. Schwickertschen Verlage; 1794. German.
  13. Hempel AF. Anfangsgrunde der anatomie. Johann Christian Daniel Schneider; 1801. German.
  14. Moser A. Lehrbuch der geschlechtskrankheiten des weibes, nebst einem anhange, enthaltend die regeln fur die untersuchung der weiblichen geschlechtstheile. Nach den neuesten quellen und eigener erfahrung. Hirschwald; 1843. German.
  15. Eckley WT, Eckley CB. Practical anatomy, including a special section on the fundamental principles of anatomy. P. Blakiston's Son & Co.; 1899.
  16. Eckley WT, Eckley CB. A manual of dissection and practical anatomy: founded on Gray and Gerrish. Lea Brothers & Company; 1903.
  17. Pratt EH. Sympathetic nerve waste. JAAOS 1914;2:62-6.
  18. Di Marino V, Lepidi H. External morphology of the clitoris. In: Di Marino V, Lepidi H, editors. Anatomic study of the clitoris and the bulbo-clitoral organ. Springer; 2014. p.27-38.
  19. Federative International Programme for Anatomical Terminology. Terminologia anatomica. 2nd ed. International Anatomical Terminology; 2019.
  20. Jeppson PC, Balgobin S, Washington BB, Hill AJ, Lewicky-Gaupp C, Wheeler T 2nd, Ridgeway B, Mazloomdoost D, Balk EM, Corton MM, DeLancey J; Society of Gynecologic Surgeons Pelvic Anatomy Group. Recommended standardized terminology of the anterior female pelvis based on a structured medical literature review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2018;219:26-39.
  21. Hill AJ, Balgobin S, Mishra K, Jeppson PC, Wheeler T 2nd, Mazloomdoost D, Anand M, Ninivaggio C, Hamner J, Bochenska K, Mama ST, Balk EM, Corton MM, Delancey J; Society of Gynecologic Surgeons Pelvic Anatomy Group. Recommended standardized anatomic terminology of the posterior female pelvis and vulva based on a structured medical literature review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2021;225:169.e1-16.
  22. Zdilla MJ. Recommended standardized anatomic terminology of the posterior female pelvis and vulva. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2022;227:118.
  23. Zdilla MJ. What is a vulva? Anat Sci Int 2022;97:323-46.
  24. Hill AJ, Balgobin S, Delancey J. Reply: Further discussion and clarification of female vulvar anatomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2022;227:119.
  25. Goldstein I, Meston CM, Davis S, Traish A. Women's sexual function and dysfunction: study, diagnosis and treatment. Taylor & Francis; 2005.
  26. Khatun S. Principles and practices of premalignant and malignant disorders of vulva. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers; 2019.
  27. Fahmy MAB. Normal and abnormal prepuce. Springer; 2020.
  28. Radke SM, Stockdale CK. Chronic clitoral pain and clitorodynia. In: Goldstein AT, Pukall CF, Goldstein I, Krapf JM, Goldstein SW, Goldstein G, editors. Female sexual pain disorders: evaluation and management. 2nd ed. John Wiley & Sons; 2020. p.375-80.
  29. Sadeghipour Roudsari S, Esmailzadehha N. Aposthia: a case report. J Pediatr Surg 2010;45:e17-9.
  30. Nayak SB, Pai SU, Shenoy MG, Reghunathan D. Accessory fold of skin on the ventral surface of the penis: is it a redundant prepuce? Andrologia 2018;50:e12941.
  31. Esse I, Kincaid CM, Terrell CA, Mesinkovska NA. Female genital mutilation: overview and dermatologic relevance. JAAD Int 2023;14:92-8.
  32. Deibert GA. The separation of the prepuce in the human penis. Anat Rec 1933;57:387-99.
  33. Gairdner D. The fate of the foreskin, a study of circumcision. Br Med J 1949;2:1433-7, illust.
  34. Sonthalia S, Singal A. Smegma pearls in young uncircumcised boys. Pediatr Dermatol 2016;33:e186-9.
  35. Baskin L, Shen J, Sinclair A, Cao M, Liu X, Liu G, Isaacson D, Overland M, Li Y, Cunha GR. Development of the human penis and clitoris. Differentiation 2018;103:74-85.
  36. Liu X, Liu G, Shen J, Yue A, Isaacson D, Sinclair A, Cao M, Liaw A, Cunha GR, Baskin L. Human glans and preputial development. Differentiation 2018;103:86-99.
  37. Puri A, Sikdar S, Prakash R. Pediatric penile and glans anthropometry nomograms: an aid in hypospadias management. J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg 2017;22:9-12.
  38. van der Putte SC, Sie-Go DM. Development and structure of the glandopreputial sulcus of the human clitoris with a special reference to glandopreputial glands. Anat Rec (Hoboken) 2011;294:156-64.
  39. Krapf J, Mautz T, Lorenzini S, Holloway J, Goldstein A. Clinical presentation of clitorodynia associated with clitoral adhesions and keratin pearls. J Sex Med 2022;19(8 Suppl 3):S14.
  40. Bragiel RM, Umasankar N, Burgis JT, Tomlin KV. Treatment of clitoral keratin pearls with topical estrogen cream: case report. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 2023;36:321-3.
  41. Winfrey OK, Fei YF, Dendrinos ML, Rosen MW, Smith YR, Quint EH. Lichen sclerosus throughout childhood and adolescence: not only a premenarchal disease. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 2022;35:624-8.
  42. Winter AG, Rubin RS. Vulvoscopic evaluation of vulvodynia. In: Goldstein AT, Pukall CF, Goldstein I, Krapf JM, Goldstein SW, Goldstein G, editors. Female sexual pain disorders: evaluation and management. 2nd ed. John Wiley & Sons; 2020. p.125-31.
  43. Romanello JP, Myers MC, Nico E, Rubin RS. Clitoral adhesions: a review of the literature. Sex Med Rev 2023;11:196-201.
  44. Tagatz GE, Kopher RA, Nagel TC, Okagaki T. The clitoral index: a bioassay of androgenic stimulation. Obstet Gynecol 1979;54:562-4.
  45. Sane K, Pescovitz OH. The clitoral index: a determination of clitoral size in normal girls and in girls with abnormal sexual development. J Pediatr 1992;120(2 Pt 1):264-6.
  46. Ackerman AB, Kronberg R. Pearly penile papules. Acral angiofibromas. Arch Dermatol 1973;108:673-5.
  47. Agharbi FZ, Kelati A, Chiheb S. The role of dermatoscopy to differentiate vestibular papillae from condyloma acuminate in a pregnant woman. Clin Med Rev Case Rep 2022;9:386.
  48. Cook LS, Koutsky LA, Holmes KK. Clinical presentation of genital warts among circumcised and uncircumcised heterosexual men attending an urban STD clinic. Genitourin Med 1993;69:262-4.
  49. Shah RB, Amin MB. Diseases of the penis, urethra, and scrotum. In: Zhou M, Magi-Galluzzi C, editors. Genitourinary pathology. Churchill Livingstone; 2006. p.419-76.
  50. Love LW, Badri T, Ramsey ML. Pearly penile papule. In: Aboubakr S, Abu-Ghosh A, Adibi Sedeh P, Aeby TC, Aeddula NR, Agadi S, et al., editors. StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing; 2022.