Acknowledgement
이 논문은 2021년도 정부(교육부)의 재원으로 한국연구재단의 지원을 받아 수행된 기초연구사업임(NRF-2021R1I1A3040733).
References
- 강은희(2018). 스마트 지원 수업 설계에서 초등 예비교사들이 보이는 스마트 도구에 대한 인식과 활용의 차이. 초등과학교육, 37(1), 66-79.
- 교육부(2020). 기초를 다지고, 첨단을 누리며, 미래를 이끄는 과학교육 종합계획(안)[2020-2024년]. 세종: 교육부.
- 교육부(2021). 2022 개정 교육과정 총론 주요사항(시안). 세종: 교육부 교육과정정책과.
- 교육부(2022a). 초.중등학교 교육과정 총론. 교육부 고시 제2022-33호 [별책 1]. 세종시: 교육부.
- 교육부(2022b). 과학과 교육과정. 교육부 고시 제2022-33호 [별책 9]. 세종시: 교육부.
- 소경희, 박지애, 최유리(2020). 교육개혁 실천에 있어서 교사들의 '의미-만들기(sense-making)' 과정에 대한 개념적 이해. 교육과정연구, 38(4), 131-155.
- 이다희, 황우형(2018). 수학교사의 테크놀로지 교수 내용지식(TPACK)에 대한 연구: TPACK에 대한 인식 및 교육요구도 분석 중심으로. 수학교육, 57(1), 1-36.
- 차현정, 박정우, 윤혜경(2022). 과학 수업에서의 실감형 콘텐츠 활용에 대한 초등 교사의 인식과 요구. 초등과학교육, 41(3), 480-500.
- 차현정, 가석현, 윤혜경(2023). 초등 예비교사의 VR/AR 활용 과학 수업 계획 과정에서 나타나는 TPACK 특징: 인식적 네트워크 분석을 중심으로. 한국과학교육학회지, 43(3), 225-236. https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2023.43.3.225
- Angeli, C., & Valanides, N. (2005). Preservice elementary teachers as information and communication technology designers: an instructional systems design model based on an expanded view of pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Computer Assisted learning, 21(4), 292-302. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2005.00135.x
- Angeli, C., & Valanides, N. (2009). Epistemological and methodological issues for the conceptualization, development, and assessment of ICT-TPCK: Advances in technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK). Computers & Education, 52(1), 154-168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.07.006
- Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
- Barrett, D., & Green, K. (2009). Pedagogical content knowledge as a foundation for an interdisciplinary graduate program. Science Educator, 18(1), 17-28.
- Bell, R. L., & Trundle, K. C. (2008). The use of a computer simulation to promote scientific conceptions of moon phases. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(3), 346-372. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20227
- Billici, S. C., Guzey, S. S., & Yamak, H. (2016). Assessing pre-service science teachers' technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) through observations and lesson plans. Research in Science & Technological Education, 34(2), 237-251. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2016.1144050
- Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. Boston, MA: D.C. Heath & Co Publishers.
- Ertmer, P. A., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A., & Tondeur, J. (2015). Teachers' beliefs and uses of technology to support 21stcentury teaching and learning. In H. Fives, & M. G. Gill (Eds.), International handbook of research on teacher beliefs (pp. 403-418). New York: Routledge.
- Griffin, P., McGaw, B., & Care, E. (2012). Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills. Dordrecht; New York: Springer.
- Guzey, S. S., & Roehrig, G. H. (2009). Teaching science with technology: Case studies of science teachers' development of technology, pedagogy, and content knowledge. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 25-45.
- Jaipal, K., & Figg, C. (2010). Unpacking the "Total PACKage": Emergent TPACK characteristics from a study of preservice teachers teaching with technology. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 18(3), 415-441.
- Jang, S. J., & Chen, K. C. (2010). From PCK to TPACK: Developing a transformative model for pre-service science teachers. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 19(6), 553-564. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-010-9222-y
- Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge? Contemporary Issues in Technology & Teacher Education, 9(1), 60-70.
- Lee, C. J., & Kim, C. (2014). An implementation study of a TPACK-based instructional design model in a technology integration course. Educational Technology Research and Development, 62, 437-460. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-014-9335-8
- Leem, J. (2001). An analytical study on the concept of virtual education and cyber education. Journal of Educational Technology, 17(3), 165-194. https://doi.org/10.17232/KSET.17.3.165
- McCrory, R. (2008). Science, technology, and teaching: The topic-specific challenges of TPCK in science. In M. J. Koehler, & P. Mishra (Eds.), Handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK) for Educators (pp. 193-206). New York, NY: Routledge.
- McLellan, H. (1996). Situated learning perspectives. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
- Merrill, M. D. (2007). The future of instructional design: The proper study of instructional design. In R. A. Reiser, & J. V. Dempsey (Eds.), Trends and issues in instructional design and technology (pp. 336-341). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education Inc.
- Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
- Nichols, S. E., Tippins, D., & Wieseman, K. (1997). A "toolkit" for developing critically reflective science teachers. Research in Science Education, 27(2), 175-194. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02461315
- Niess, M. L. (2005). Preparing teachers to teach science and mathematics with technology: Developing a technology pedagogical content knowledge. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(5), 509-523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2005.03.006
- OCED. (2005). Definition and selection of key competencies: Executive summary. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/pisa/definition-selection-key-competencies-summary.pdf
- OECD. (2018). The future of education and skills: Education 2030. Position paper. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/education/2030/E2030%20Position%20Paper%20(05.04.2018).pdf
- Papanikolaou, K., Makri, K., & Roussos, P. (2017). Learning design as a vehicle for developing TPACK in blended teacher training on technology enhanced learning. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0046-1
- Schnittka, C., & Bell, R. (2009). Preservice biology teachers' use of interactive display systems to support reforms-based science instruction. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(2), 131-159.
- Schon, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner. New York: Basic Books.
- UNESCO. (2018). A global framework of reference on digital literacy skills for indicator 4.4.2. Information Paper No. 51. Retrieved from https://uis.unesco.org/sites/default/files/documents/ip51-global-framework-reference-digital-literacy-skills-2018-en.pdf
- UNESCO. (2021). Reimagining our futures together: A new social contract for education. France: the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. Retrieved from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000379707
- Valanides, N., & Angeli, C. (2008a). Professional development for computer-enhanced learning: A case study with science teachers. Research in Science & Technological Education, 26(1), 3-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635140701847397
- Valanides, N., & Angeli, C. (2008b). Distributed cognition in a sixth-grade classroom: An attempt to overcome alternative conceptions about light and color. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 40(3), 309-336.
- Wekerle, C., & Kollar, I. (2022). Using technology to promote student learning? An analysis of pre- and in-service teachers' lesson plans. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 31(5), 597-614. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2022.2083669
- Yeh, Y. F., Chan, K. K. H., & Hsu, Y. S. (2021). Toward a framework that connects individual TPACK and collective TPACK: A systematic review of TPACK studies investigating teacher collaborative discourse in the learning by design process. Computer & Education, 171, 104238.
- Zhao, Y., Pugh, K., Sheldon, S., & Byers, J. L. (2002). Conditions for classroom technology innovations. Teachers College Record, 104(3), 482-515. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9620.00170