Clinical Endoscopy

  • 제57권2호
  • /
  • Pages.246-252
  • /
  • 2024
  • /
  • 2234-2400(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2234-2443(eISSN)
대한소화기내시경학회 (The Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Safety of endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy in patients with malignant biliary obstruction and ascites

  • Tsukasa Yasuda (Department of Gastroenterology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital) ;
  • Kazuo Hara (Department of Gastroenterology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital) ;
  • Nobumasa Mizuno (Department of Gastroenterology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital) ;
  • Shin Haba (Department of Gastroenterology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital) ;
  • Takamichi Kuwahara (Department of Gastroenterology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital) ;
  • Nozomi Okuno (Department of Gastroenterology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital) ;
  • Yasuhiro Kuraishi (Department of Gastroenterology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital) ;
  • Takafumi Yanaidani (Department of Gastroenterology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital) ;
  • Sho Ishikawa (Department of Gastroenterology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital) ;
  • Masanori Yamada (Department of Gastroenterology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital) ;
  • Toshitaka Fukui (Department of Gastroenterology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital)
  • 투고 : 2023.03.05
  • 심사 : 2023.05.11
  • 발행 : 2024.03.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Background/Aims: Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided hepaticogastrostomy (EUS-HGS) is useful for patients with biliary cannulation failure or inaccessible papillae. However, it can lead to serious complications such as bile peritonitis in patients with ascites; therefore, development of a safe method to perform EUS-HGS is important. Herein, we evaluated the safety of EUS-HGS with continuous ascitic fluid drainage in patients with ascites. Methods: Patients with moderate or severe ascites who underwent continuous ascites drainage, which was initiated before EUS-HGS and terminated after the procedure at our institution between April 2015 and December 2022, were included in the study. We evaluated the technical and clinical success rates, EUS-HGS-related complications, and feasibility of re-intervention. Results: Ten patients underwent continuous ascites drainage, which was initiated before EUS-HGS and terminated after completion of the procedure. Median duration of ascites drainage before and after EUS-HGS was 2 and 4 days, respectively. Technical success with EUS-HGS was achieved in all 10 patients (100%). Clinical success with EUS-HGS was achieved in 9 of the 10 patients (90%). No endoscopic complications such as bile peritonitis were observed. Conclusions: In patients with ascites, continuous ascites drainage, which is initiated before EUS-HGS and terminated after completion of the procedure, may prevent complications and allow safe performance of EUS-HGS.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Sharaiha RZ, Kumta NA, Desai AP, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage versus percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage: predictors of successful outcome in patients who fail endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Surg Endosc 2016;30:5500-5505. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-4913-y
  2. Lee TH, Choi JH, Park DH, et al. Similar efficacies of endoscopic ultrasound-guided transmural and percutaneous drainage for malignant distal biliary obstruction. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2016;14:1011-1019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2015.12.032
  3. Sharaiha RZ, Khan MA, Kamal F, et al. Efficacy and safety of EUS-guided biliary drainage in comparison with percutaneous biliary drainage when ERCP fails: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2017;85:904-914. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2016.12.023
  4. Nakai Y, Kogure H, Isayama H, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage for benign biliary diseases. Clin Endosc 2019;52:212-219. https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2018.188
  5. Giovannini M, Moutardier V, Pesenti C, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided bilioduodenal anastomosis: a new technique for biliary drainage. Endoscopy 2001;33:898-900. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2001-17324
  6. Kawakubo K, Isayama H, Kato H, et al. Multicenter retrospective study of endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage for malignant biliary obstruction in Japan. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2014;21:328-334. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbp.27
  7. Bang JY, Navaneethan U, Hasan M, et al. Stent placement by EUS or ERCP for primary biliary decompression in pancreatic cancer: a randomized trial (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 2018;88:9-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2018.03.012
  8. Paik WH, Lee TH, Park DH, et al. EUS-guided biliary drainage versus ERCP for the primary palliation of malignant biliary obstruction: a multicenter randomized clinical trial. Am J Gastroenterol 2018;113:987-997. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41395-018-0122-8
  9. Park JK, Woo YS, Noh DH, et al. Efficacy of EUS-guided and ERCP-guided biliary drainage for malignant biliary obstruction: prospective randomized controlled study. Gastrointest Endosc 2018;88:277-282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2018.03.015
  10. Isayama H, Nakai Y, Itoi T, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for safe performance of endoscopic ultrasound/ultrasonography-guided biliary drainage: 2018. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2019;26:249-269. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbp.631
  11. Hamada T, Isayama H, Nakai Y, et al. Transmural biliary drainage can be an alternative to transpapillary drainage in patients with an indwelling duodenal stent. Dig Dis Sci 2014;59:1931-1938. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-014-3062-1
  12. Khashab MA, El Zein MH, Sharzehi K, et al. EUS-guided biliary drainage or enteroscopy-assisted ERCP in patients with surgical anatomy and biliary obstruction: an international comparative study. Endosc Int Open 2016;4:E1322-E1327. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-110790
  13. Nakai Y, Kogure H, Isayama H, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage for unresectable hilar malignant biliary obstruction. Clin Endosc 2019;52:220-225. https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2018.094
  14. Kongkam P, Tasneem AA, Rerknimitr R. Combination of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic ultrasonography-guided biliary drainage in malignant hilar biliary obstruction. Dig Endosc 2019;31 Suppl 1:50-54. https://doi.org/10.1111/den.13371
  15. Poincloux L, Rouquette O, Buc E, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage after failed ERCP: cumulative experience of 101 procedures at a single center. Endoscopy 2015;47:794-801. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1391988
  16. Paik WH, Park DH. Outcomes and limitations: EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy. Endosc Ultrasound 2019;8(Suppl 1):S44-S49. https://doi.org/10.4103/eus.eus_51_19
  17. Martins FP, Rossini LG, Ferrari AP. Migration of a covered metallic stent following endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy: fatal complication. Endoscopy 2010;42 Suppl 2:E126-E127. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0029-1243911
  18. Prachayakul V, Thamtorawat S, Siripipattanamongkol C, et al. Bleeding left hepatic artery pseudoaneurysm: a complication of endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy. Endoscopy 2013;45 Suppl 2 UCTN:E223-E224. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1344064
  19. Nakajima TE, Yamaguchi K, Boku N, et al. Randomized phase II/III study of 5-fluorouracil/l-leucovorin versus 5-fluorouracil/l-leucovorin plus paclitaxel administered to patients with severe peritoneal metastases of gastric cancer (JCOG1108/WJOG7312G). Gastric Cancer 2020;23:677-688. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-020-01043-x
  20. Hara H, Kadowaki S, Asayama M, et al. First-line bolus 5-fluorouracil plus leucovorin for peritoneally disseminated gastric cancer with massive ascites or inadequate oral intake. Int J Clin Oncol 2018;23:275-280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-017-1198-7
  21. Cotton PB, Eisen GM, Aabakken L, et al. A lexicon for endoscopic adverse events: report of an ASGE workshop. Gastrointest Endosc 2010;71:446-454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2009.10.027
  22. Maranki J, Hernandez AJ, Arslan B, et al. Interventional endoscopic ultrasound-guided cholangiography: long-term experience of an emerging alternative to percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography. Endoscopy 2009;41:532-538. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0029-1214712
  23. Chantarojanasiri T, Ratanachu-Ek T, Pausawasdi N. What you need to know before performing endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy. Clin Endosc 2021;54:301-308. https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2021.103
  24. Ogura T, Higuchi K. Technical tips for endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy. World J Gastroenterol 2016;22:3945-3951. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v22.i15.3945
  25. Sportes A, Camus M, Greget M, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy versus percutaneous transhepatic drainage for malignant biliary obstruction after failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a retrospective expertise-based study from two centers. Therap Adv Gastroenterol 2017;10:483-493. https://doi.org/10.1177/1756283X17702096
  26. Marx M, Caillol F, Sfumato P, et al. EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy in the management of malignant biliary obstruction: Experience and learning curve in a tertiary referral center. Dig Liver Dis 2022;54:1236-1242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dld.2022.05.008
  27. Okuno N, Hara K, Mizuno N, et al. Infectious peritonitis after endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage in a patient with ascites. Gastrointest Interv 2018;7:40-43. https://doi.org/10.18528/gii180006
  28. Ogura T, Yamamoto K, Sano T, et al. Stent length is impact factor associated with stent patency in endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2015;30:1748-1752. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgh.13021
  29. Okuno N, Hara K, Mizuno N, et al. Stent migration into the peritoneal cavity following endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy. Endoscopy 2015;47 Suppl 1 UCTN:E311.