Clinical Endoscopy

The Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (대한소화기내시경학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

What method can we choose if rapid on-site evaluation is not available for the endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition of upper gastrointestinal subepithelial lesions?

  • Yu Kyung Cho (Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea)
  • Received : 2023.12.13
  • Accepted : 2023.12.27
  • Published : 2024.01.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Keywords

References

  1. Lee JS, Cho CM, Kwon YH, et al. Comparison of diagnostic performances of slow-pull suction and standard suction in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy for gastrointestinal subepithelial tumors. Clin Endosc 2022;55:637-644. https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2021.257
  2. Schmidt RL, Witt BL, Matynia AP, et al. Rapid on-site evaluation increases endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration adequacy for pancreatic lesions. Dig Dis Sci 2013;58:872-882. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-012-2411-1
  3. Matynia AP, Schmidt RL, Barraza G, et al. Impact of rapid onsite evaluation on the adequacy of endoscopic-ultrasound guided fine-needle aspiration of solid pancreatic lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2014;29:697-705. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgh.12431
  4. Polkowski M, Jenssen C, Kaye P, et al. Technical aspects of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided sampling in gastroenterology: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Technical Guideline: March 2017. Endoscopy 2017;49:989-1006. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-119219
  5. Iwashita T, Yasuda I, Mukai T, et al. Macroscopic on-site quality evaluation of biopsy specimens to improve the diagnostic accuracy during EUS-guided FNA using a 19-gauge needle for solid lesions: a single-center prospective pilot study (MOSE study). Gastrointest Endosc 2015;81:177-185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2014.08.040
  6. Mohan BP, Madhu D, Reddy N, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy sampling by macroscopic on-site evaluation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2022;96:909-917. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2022.07.026
  7. Okuwaki K, Masutani H, Kida M, et al. Diagnostic efficacy of white core cutoff lengths obtained by EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy using a novel 22G franseen biopsy needle and sample isolation processing by stereomicroscopy for subepithelial lesions. Endosc Ultrasound 2020;9:187-192. https://doi.org/10.4103/eus.eus_18_20
  8. Masutani H, Okuwaki K, Kida M, et al. On-site stereomicroscope quality evaluations to estimate white core cutoff lengths using EUSFNA biopsy sampling with 22-gauge needles. Gastrointest Endosc 2019;90:947-956. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2019.08.033
  9. Okuwaki K, Imaizumi H, Kida M, et al. Usefulness of the automated multiband imaging system for EUS-FNA biopsy specimen evaluation in patients with upper gastrointestinal subepithelial lesions. Endosc Ultrasound 2022;11:283-290. https://doi.org/10.4103/EUS-D-21-00143
  10. Nakatani S, Okuwaki K, Watanabe M, et al. Stereomicroscopic onsite evaluation in endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition of upper gastrointestinal subepithelial lesions. Clin Endosc 2024;57:89-95. https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2022.288