DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Parenchymal-sparing anatomical hepatectomy based on portal ramification of the right anterior section: A prospective multicenter experience with short-term outcomes

  • Truong Giang Nguyen (Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, National Hospital of Tropical Diseases) ;
  • Thanh Khiem Nguyen (Department of Gastrointestinal and Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Bach Mai Hospital) ;
  • Ham Hoi Nguyen (Department of Gastrointestinal and Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Bach Mai Hospital) ;
  • Hong Son Trinh (Department of Oncology, Viet Duc University Hospital) ;
  • Tuan Hiep Luong (Department of Gastrointestinal and Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Bach Mai Hospital) ;
  • Minh Trong Nguyen (Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, National Hospital of Tropical Diseases) ;
  • Van Duy Le (Department of Gastrointestinal and Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Bach Mai Hospital) ;
  • Hai Dang Do (Organ Transplantation Center, Viet Duc University Hospital) ;
  • Kieu Hung Nguyen (Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, National Hospital of Tropical Diseases) ;
  • Van Minh Do (Department of Gastrointestinal and Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Bach Mai Hospital) ;
  • Quang Huy Tran (Department of Anatomy, Hanoi Medical University) ;
  • Cuong Thinh Nguyen (108 Institute of Clinical Medical and Pharmaceutical Sciences)
  • Received : 2023.06.22
  • Accepted : 2023.08.16
  • Published : 2024.02.29

Abstract

Backgrounds/Aims: Parenchymal-sparing anatomical hepatectomy (Ps-AH) based on portal ramification of the right anterior section (RAS) is a new technique to avoid unnecessarily transecting too much liver parenchyma, especially in cases of major anatomical hepatectomy. Methods: We prospectively assessed 26 patients with primary hepatic malignancies having undergone major Ps-AH based on portal ramification of the RAS from August 2018 to August 2022 (48 months). The perioperative indications, clinical data, intra-operative index, pathological postoperative specimens, postoperative complications, and follow-up results were retrospectively evaluated. Results: Among the 26 patients analyzed, there was just one case that had intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma The preoperative level of α-Fetoprotein was 25.2 ng/mL. All cases (100%) had Child-Pugh A liver function preoperatively. The ventral/dorsal RAS was preserved in 19 and 7 patients, respectively. The mean surgical margin was 6.2 mm. The mean surgical time was 228.5 minutes, while the mean blood loss was 255 mL. In pathology, 5 cases (19.2%) had microvascular invasion, and in the group of HCC patients, 92% of all cases had moderate or poor tumor differentiation. Six cases (23.1%) of postoperative complications were graded over III according to the Clavien-Dindo system, including in three patients resistant ascites or intra-abdominal abscess that required intervention. Conclusions: Parenchymal-sparing anatomical hepatectomy based on portal ramification of the RAS to achieve R0-resection was safe and effective, with favorable short-term outcomes. This technique can be used widely in clinical practice.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

The authors were thankful to the board and colleagues of the Department of Gastrointestinal and Hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery, Bach Mai Hospital; the Department of Hepatobiliary-pancreatic Surgery, Vietnam National Cancer Hospital and the Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, National Hospital of Tropical Diseases, Hanoi, Vietnam for their assistance during the time of in-hospital treatment and observation of our patients.

References

  1. Rumgay H, Ferlay J, de Martel C, Georges D, Ibrahim AS, Zheng R, et al. Global, regional and national burden of primary liver cancer by subtype. Eur J Cancer 2022;161:108-118.
  2. Takasaki K, Kobayashi S, Tanaka S, Saito A, Yamamoto M, Hanyu F. Highly anatomically systematized hepatic resection with Glissonean sheath code transection at the hepatic hilus. Int Surg 1990;75:73-77.
  3. Heimbach JK, Kulik LM, Finn RS, Sirlin CB, Abecassis MM, Roberts LR, et al. AASLD guidelines for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology 2018;67:358-380.
  4. Yang S, Lin H, Song J. Efficacy and safety of various primary treatment strategies for very early and early hepatocellular carcinoma: a network meta-analysis. Cancer Cell Int 2021;21:681.
  5. Chen L, Sun T, Chen S, Ren Y, Yang F, Zheng C. The efficacy of surgery in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a cohort study. World J Surg Oncol 2020;18:119.
  6. Yang B, Zheng B, Yang M, Zeng Z, Yang F, Pu J, et al. Liver resection versus transarterial chemoembolization for the initial treatment of Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage B hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatol Int 2018;12:417-428.
  7. Kokudo T, Hasegawa K, Matsuyama Y, Takayama T, Izumi N, Kadoya M, et al. Survival benefit of liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma associated with portal vein invasion. J Hepatol 2016;65:938-943.
  8. Kokudo T, Hasegawa K, Matsuyama Y, Takayama T, Izumi N, Kadoya M, et al. Liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma associated with hepatic vein invasion: a Japanese nationwide survey. Hepatology 2017;66:510-517.
  9. Yin L, Li H, Li AJ, Lau WY, Pan ZY, Lai EC, et al. Partial hepatectomy vs. transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for resectable multiple hepatocellular carcinoma beyond Milan Criteria: a RCT. J Hepatol 2014;61:82-88.
  10. Couinaud C. Surgical anatomy of the liver revisited. C. Couinaud 15 rue Spontini F 75116 Paris, 1989:25-28.
  11. Hjortsjo CH. The topography of the intrahepatic duct systems. Acta Anat (Basel) 1951;11:599-615.
  12. Kogure K, Kuwano H, Fujimaki N, Ishikawa H, Takada K. Reproposal for Hjortsjo's segmental anatomy on the anterior segment in human liver. Arch Surg 2002;137:1118-1124.
  13. Cho A, Okazumi S, Miyazawa Y, Makino H, Miura F, Ohira G, et al. Proposal for a reclassification of liver based anatomy on portal ramifications. Am J Surg 2005;189:195-199.
  14. Doyle DJ, Goyal A, Garmon EH. American Society of Anesthesiologists Classification [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2023 Jul 11]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK441940/.
  15. Wyatt J, Hubscher S, Goldin R, Tiniakos D. Dataset for histopathological reporting of liver resection specimens (including gallbladder) and liver biopsies for primary and metastatic carcinoma [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2023 Jul 11]. Available from: https://www.rcpath.org/resourceLibrary/dataset-for-histopathological-reporting-of-liver-resection-specimens-and-liver-biopsies-for-primary-and-metastatic-carcinoma.html.
  16. Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD, et al. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 2009;250:187-196.
  17. Kurimoto A, Yamanaka J, Hai S, Kondo Y, Sueoka H, Ohashi K, et al, Parenchyma-preserving hepatectomy based on portal ramification and perfusion of the right anterior section: preserving the ventral or dorsal area. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2016;23:158-166.
  18. Kanemura E, Togo S, Shizawa R, Tanaka K, Shimada H. Subdivision of liver anterior segment into two units according to hepatic venous drainage. Hepato-gastroenterology 2000;47:1056-1059.
  19. Sugioka A, Kato Y, Tanahashi Y. Systematic extrahepatic Glissonean pedicle isolation for anatomical liver resection based on Laennec's capsule: proposal of a novel comprehensive surgical anatomy of the liver. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2017;24:17-23.
  20. Li L, Wang HQ, Wang Q, Yang J, Yang JY. Anterior vs conventional approach hepatectomy for large liver cancer: a meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol 2014;20:17235-17243.
  21. Liddo G, Buc E, Nagarajan G, Hidaka M, Dokmak S, Belghiti J. The liver hanging manoeuvre. HPB (Oxford) 2009;11:296-305.
  22. Liu PH, Su CW, Hsu CY, Hsia CY, Lee YH, Huang YH, et al. Solitary large hepatocellular carcinoma: staging and treatment strategy. PLoS One 2016;11:e0155588.
  23. Smyrniotis V, Kostopanagiotou G, Theodoraki K, Tsantoulas D, Contis JC. The role of central venous pressure and type of vascular control in blood loss during major liver resections. Am J Surg 2004;187:398-402.
  24. Nguyen HH, Nguyen TK, Le VD, Luong TH, Dang KK, Nguyen VQ, et al. Isolated complete caudate lobectomy with Glissonean pedicle isolation using Takasaki's technique and right-left approach: preliminary experience from two case reports. World J Surg Oncol 2022;20:31.
  25. Ryu M, Cho A. New liver anatomy: portal segmentation and the drainage vein. Springer, 2009.
  26. Kobayashi T, Ebata T, Yokoyama Y, Igami T, Sugawara G, Mizuno T, et al. Study on the segmentation of the right anterior sector of the liver. Surgery 2017;161:1536-1542.
  27. Ogiso S, Ikai I, Narita M, Murakami T, Hata H, Yamaguchi T, et al. Parenchyma-sparing anatomical liver resection based on Hjortsjo's concept. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2013;398:751-758.
  28. Tanaka K, Matsumoto C, Takakura H, Matsuo K, Nagano Y, Endo I, et al. Technique of right hemihepatectomy preserving ventral right anterior section guided by area of hepatic venous drainage. Surgery 2010;147:450-458.
  29. Shindoh J, Satou S, Aoki T, Beck Y, Hasegawa K, Sugawara Y, et al. Hidden symmetry in asymmetric morphology: significance of Hjortsjo's anatomical model in liver surgery. Hepatogastroenterology 2012;59:519-525.