Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society (한국도서관정보학회지)

Korean Library and Information Science Society (한국도서관정보학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Study on Open Access Transformative Agreement

오픈액세스 전환계약서 분석 연구

  • Youngim Jung ;
  • Byoung-goon An
  • 정영임 (한국과학기술정보연구원, 과학기술연합대학원대학교) ;
  • 안병군 (한국과학기술정보연구원)
  • Received : 2024.05.23
  • Accepted : 2024.06.17
  • Published : 2024.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Since the introduction of the OA transformative agreement as a new way of licensing electronic resources, the number of OA transformative agreements has continued to grow. Despite the wide range of content that should be included in the agreement due to the nature of the OA transformative agreement, there is a lack of research on OA transformative agreements. As a basis for developing a standard for OA transformative agreements, this study examines the current status of OA transformative agreements and analyzes the differences between two types of OA transformative agreements and the subscription contract. It was found that the number of OA transformative agreements has increased significantly worldwide, but the disclosure of OA transformative agreements has not been universalized. The overall structure of two different types of OA transformative agreements and a subscription contract is similar, but there are differences in the detailed clauses. In the OA transformative agreement, the detailed clauses related to the characteristic of the transformative agreement were newly created, or the details of the transformative agreement were added to the existing clauses of the subscription agreement. There were also some differences between the two types of agreements, identifying clauses that differed in content regardless of the OA transformative agreement. The study concluded that it is important to standardize the OA transformative agreement, as the number of different clauses between agreement types may increase the burden on librarians. This study is significant in that it provides a basis for the development of standardized agreements by examining the overall status of OA transformative agreements and analyzing actual agreements.

전자정보 라이선스 계약의 새로운 방안으로 OA 전환계약이 제시된 이후 현재까지 OA 전환계약의 체결은 지속적으로 증가하는 한편, OA 전환계약의 특성상 계약서에 포함되어야 하는 내용이 광범위함에도 불구하고 관련 연구는 미비한 상황이다. 본 연구는 OA 전환계약서의 표준 모델 개발을 위한 기초 연구로, OA 전환계약의 현황을 조사하고 유형별 OA 전환계약서와 구독 계약서의 차이를 분석하였다. 이를 통해 세계적으로 OA 전환계약이 큰 폭으로 증가하는데 반해 OA 전환계약서의 공개는 보편화되지 못한 현황을 확인할 수 있었다. 또한 OA 전환계약서와 구독 계약서의 전반적인 구조는 유사하지만, 세부 조항에는 차이가 있다는 점을 밝혔으며 상이한 부분을 유형화하였다. OA 전환계약서에는 전환계약과 관련된 세부 조항이 신설되거나 기존 구독 계약서의 조항에 전환계약 관련 내용이 추가되어 있었으며 OA 전환계약과 무관하게 내용상 차이가 있는 조항도 확인되었다. 분석을 통해 계약 유형에 따라 계약서의 세부 조항이 상이하다는 사실을 확인하였으며, 이는 장기적으로 도서관 사서의 부담을 가중시킬 수 있으므로 OA 전환계약서의 표준화가 필수적임을 밝혔다. 본 연구는 OA 전환계약의 현황을 조사하고 계약 유형별 실제 계약서의 분석을 진행함으로써 표준계약서 개발의 기반을 제시했다는 점에서 의의가 있다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

이 논문은 2024년도 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI)의 기본사업으로 수행된 연구임 (과제번호: (KISTI) K-24-L1-M1-C2).

References

  1. Hwang, Ok-Gyung (2004). A study on the model license for electronic journal. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 38(1), 199-228.
  2. Jung, Youngim (2021). Current Status of AI Applications in Scholarly Publishing Services (AI TREND WATCH 2021-22), Korea Information Society Development Institute.
  3. Jung, Youngim (2023, July 20). Analyzing electronic information license agreements and preparing model agreements for the Open Access era. Online Seminar.
  4. Jung, Youngim, Kim, Hwanmin, Jeong, Ginu, An, Byoung-goon, & Kim, Wanjong (2024). Analysis of the costs of the transition to Open Access for major domestic research and higher education institutions with the global expansion of Open Access publishing. KISTI Issue Brief, 70, Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information.
  5. Jung, Youngim, Kim, Jae-Hun, & Kim, Jeong-Hwan (2010). Study on Availability of KESLI Consortium Model License by Comparative Analysis of International Standard License Models. KSLA Bulletin, 2, 43-56.
  6. Korean Council for University Education (2023). Standard Contract of the University Consortium.
  7. Korea Education and Research Information Service (2004). University license Database list. ACE KERIS University License. Available: https://ace.riss.kr/library/consDB/consDBList.do
  8. Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information (2008). Study on the Development of a KESLI Standard Agreement Model. Daejeon: Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information.
  9. Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information (2015). Consortia list. KESLI. Available: https://www.kesli.or.kr/web/selectCoiConsList.do?key=138
  10. Ryu, Shiwon (2024). Recommendations on copyright policy making process in the age of artificial intelligence. Government Legislation, 704, 109-146.
  11. Bebbington, L. (2001). Managing content: licensing, copyright, and privacy issues in managing electronic resources. Legal Information Management, 1(2), 4-12. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1472669600000360
  12. Clifford, L., Rachael, S., Heather S., & Richard, S. (2023, December 19). Closing plenary: Open access, open scholarship, & machine learning: a panel & community conversation. CNI: Coalition for Networked Information. Available: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ABziVkLAm0
  13. Cox, J. (2000). Model generic licenses: cooperation and competition. Serials Review, 26(1), 3-9.
  14. CRKN(Canadian Research Knowledge Network) (2013). History of CRKN. Canadian Research Knowledge Network. Available: https://www.crkn-rcdr.ca/en/history-crkn
  15. David, F. & Vinh-The, L. (2003). Canadian national site licensing project: getting ready for CNSLP at the university of saskatchewan library. The Serials Librarian, 43(3), 39-57.
  16. ESAC Initiative (2014). ESAC Transformative Agreement Registry. ESAC. Available: https://esac-initiative.org/about/transformative-agreements/agreement-registry/
  17. ESAC Initiative (2015). Guidelines for transformative agreements. ESAC Initiative. Available: https://esac-initiative.org/about/transformative-agreements/guidelines-for-transformative-agreements/
  18. Hinchliffe, L. J. (2019, April 23). Transformative agreements: A primer. The Scholarly Kitchen. Available: https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2019/04/23/transformative-agreements/
  19. Hoffman, E. (2005). The Canadian national site licensing project and the logic model. The Bottom Line, 18(1), 14-23. https://doi.org/10.1108/08880450510582015
  20. ICOLC(International Coalition of Library Consortia) (2024, March 22). ICOLC statement on AI in licensing. ICOLC. Available: https://icolc.net/statements/icolc-statement-ai-licensing
  21. JISC(Joint Information Systems Committee) (2023a). Jisc Model Licences. Licence subscriptions manager. Available: https://subscriptionsmanager.jisc.ac.uk/about/jisc-model-licence
  22. JISC(Joint Information Systems Committee) (2023b). Guide to the Model Licence (FAQ). Available: https://subscriptionsmanager.jisc.ac.uk/about/guide-to-model-licence
  23. LIBLICENSE Project (2015). Liblicense Model License Agreement with Commentary. Center for Research Libraries. Available: http://liblicense.crl.edu/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/modellicensenew2014revmay2015.pdf.
  24. NISO(National Information Standards Organization) (2008, January 5). NISO issues best practices for Shared E-Resource Understanding (SERU). Library Technology Guides. Available: https://librarytechnology.org/pr/13055
  25. NISO(National Information Standards Organization) (2015, May 31). Shared E-Resource Understanding (SERU). NISO. Available: https://www.niso.org/standards-committees/seru
  26. Okerson, A. (1997, April 24-25). The transition to electronic content licensing: the institutional context in 1997. Paper presented at the Scholarly Communication and Technology Conference of the Andrew. W. Mellon Foundation. Emory University, US.
  27. Rachael, S. (2023, October 24). UC Berkeley Library to Copyright Office: Protect fair uses in AI training for research and education. Berkeley Library Update. Available: https://update.lib.berkeley.edu/2023/10/24/uc-berkeley-library-to-copyright-office-protect-fair-uses-in-ai-training-for-research-and-education/
  28. Rachael, S., Timothy, V., & Samantha, T. (2024, January 10). Licensing reearch content via agreements that authorize uses of artificial intelligence. Authors Alliance. Available: https://www.authorsalliance.org/2024/01/10/licensing-research-content-via-agreements-that-authorize-uses-of-artificial-intelligence/
  29. Sag, M. (2023). Copyright safety for generative AI. Houston Law Review, 61(2), 295-347. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4438593
  30. Sandiumenge, I. (2023). Copyright Implications of the Use of Generative AI. SSRN. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4531912
  31. SERU: A Shared Electronic Resource Understanding. NISO RP-7-2012.
  32. UC Publisher Strategy and Negotiation Task Force (2019). Negotiating with scholarly journal publishers: A toolkit from the University of California. UCSF: Department of Orthopaedic Surgery. Available: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8cn0q1nw
  33. Wise, A. & Estelle, L. (2023). A free toolkit to foster open access agreements. Insights: the UKSG Journal, 36(1), 3. Available: https://doi.org/10.1629/uksg.585.