Acknowledgement
The authors are deeply grateful to the National Institute of Forest Science for funding during the research period.
References
- Ahn SE, Rho P. Development and application of index framework to assess cost-effectiveness of payments for forest ecosystem services in Korea. J Korean For Soc. 2016;105(3):377-90. https://doi.org/10.14578/jkfs.2016.105.3.377.
- Ares A, Berryman SD, Puettmann KJ. Understory vegetation response to thinning disturbance of varying complexity in coniferous stands. Appl Veg Sci. 2009;12(4):472-87. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1654-109X.2009.01042.x.
- Bennett EM, Peterson GD, Gordon LJ. Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services. Ecol Lett. 2009;12(12):1394-404. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01387.x.
- Bradford JB, D'Amato AW. Recognizing trade-offs in multi-objective land management. Front Ecol Environ. 2012;10(4):210-6. https://doi.org/10.1890/110031.
- Braun-Blanquet J. Pflanzensoziologie: grundzuge der vegetationskunde. 3rd ed. Vienna: Springer; 1964. German.
- Burton JI, Ares A, Olson DH, Puettmann KJ. Management trade-off between aboveground carbon storage and understory plant species richness in temperate forests. Ecol Appl. 2013;23(6):1297-310. https://doi.org/10.1890/12-1472.1.
- Carpenter SR, Mooney HA, Agard J, Capistrano D, Defries RS, Diaz S, et al. Science for managing ecosystem services: beyond the millennium ecosystem assessment. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106(5): 1305-12. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0808772106.
- Chan KM, Shaw MR, Cameron DR, Underwood EC, Daily GC. Conservation planning for ecosystem services. PLoS Biol. 2006;4(11):e379. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0040379.
- Cho W, Lim W, Choi WI, Yang HM, Ko DW. Modeling the effects of forest management scenarios on aboveground biomass and wood production: a study in Mt. Gariwang, South Korea. J Korean Soc For Sci. 2023;112(2):173-87. https://doi.org/10.14578/jkfs.2023.112.2.173.
- Choi AS, Oh CO. Economic valuation of the ecosystem services in Seocheon intertidal mudflats. Environ Resour Econ Rev. 2018;27(2):233-60. https://doi.org/10.15266/KEREA.2018.27.2.233.
- Day M, Baldauf C, Rutishauser E, Sunderland TCH. Relationships between tree species diversity and above-ground biomass in Central African rainforests: implications for REDD. Environ Conserv. 2014;41(1):64-72. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892913000295.
- Deng X, Li Z, Gibson J. A review on trade-off analysis of ecosystem services for sustainable land-use management. J Geogr Sci. 2016;26(7):953-68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-016-1309-9.
- Egoh B, Reyers B, Rouget M, Richardson DM, Le Maitre DC, van Jaarsveld AS. Mapping ecosystem services for planning and management. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 2008;127(1-2):135-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2008.03.013.
- Fahey RT, Puettmann KJ. Ground-layer disturbance and initial conditions influence gap partitioning of understorey vegetation. J Ecol. 2007; 95(5):1098-109. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2007.01283.x.
- Kang S, Tenhunen J. Complex terrain and ecological heterogeneity (TERRECO): evaluating ecosystem services in production versus water quantity/quality in mountainous landscapes. Korean J Agric For Meteorol. 2010;12(4):307-16. https://doi.org/10.5532/KJAFM.2010.12.4.307.
- Kim M, Kraxner F, Forsell N, Song C, Lee WK. Enhancing the provisioning of ecosystem services in South Korea under climate change: the benefits and pitfalls of current forest management strategies. Reg Environ Chang. 2021;21(1):6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-020-01728-0.
- Kim MS, Kim JS, Kim HS, Park CW, Bae KH. Changes in community structure of understory vegetation by silvicultural treatments in a Larix kaempferi plantation forest. J Agric Life Sci. 2020;54(2):25-35. https://doi.org/10.14397/jals.2020.54.2.25.
- Korea Meteorological Administration. 2023. https://data.kma.go.kr/stcs/grnd/grndRnList.do?pgmNo=69. Accessed 27 Jun 2023.
- Korea National Arboretum. Korean plant names index. 2003. http://www.nature.go.kr/kbi/plant/pilbk/selectPlantPilbkGnrlList.do. Accessed 22 Jul 2021.
- Lafond V, Cordonnier T, Mao Z, Courbaud B. Trade-offs and synergies between ecosystem services in uneven-aged mountain forests: evidences using Pareto fronts. Eur J For Res. 2017;136(5-6):997-1012 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-016-1022-3.
- Lee ST, Son YM, Lee KJ, Hwang J, Choi JC, Shin HC, et al. Aboveground carbon storage of Quercus acuta stands by thinning intensity. Korean J Agric For Meteorol. 2005;7(4):282-8.
- Li X, Li Y, Zhang J, Peng S, Chen Y, Cao Y. The effects of forest thinning on understory diversity in China: a meta-analysis. Land Degrad Dev. 2020;31(10):1225-40. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.3540.
- Liu J, Mooney H, Hull V, Davis SJ, Gaskell J, Hertel T, et al. Sustainability. Systems integration for global sustainability. Science. 2015; 347(6225):1258832. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1258832.
- Liu L, Wang Z, Wang Y, Zhang Y, Shen J, Qin D, et al. Trade-off analyses of multiple mountain ecosystem services along elevation, vegetation cover and precipitation gradients: a case study in the Taihang Mountains. Ecol Indic. 2019;103:94-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.03.034.
- Lu N, Fu B, Jin T, Chang R. Trade-off analyses of multiple ecosystem services by plantations along a precipitation gradient across Loess Plateau landscapes. Landsc Ecol. 2014;29(10):1697-708. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-014-0101-4.
- Mandal RA, Dutta IC, Jha PK, Karmacharya S. Relationship between carbon stock and plant biodiversity in collaborative forests in Terai, Nepal. Int Sch Res Not. 2013;2013:625767. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/625767.
- Maron M, Cockfield G. Managing trade-offs in landscape restoration and revegetation projects. Ecol Appl. 2008;18(8):2041-9. https://doi.org/10.1890/07-1328.1.
- Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis. Washington, D.C.: Island Press; 2005.
- Nilsson M, Wardle DA. Understory vegetation as a forest ecosystem driver: evidence from the northern Swedish boreal forest. Front Ecol Environ. 2005;3(8):421-8. https://doi.org/10.1890/1540-9295(2005)003[0421:UVAAFE]2.0.CO;2.
- Peterson GD, Beard TD Jr, Beisner BE, Bennett EM, Carpenter SR, Cumming GS, et al. Assessing future ecosystem services: a case study of the Northern Highlands Lake District, Wisconsin. Conserv Ecol 2003;7(3):1.
- Rana E, Thwaites R, Luck G. Trade-offs and synergies between carbon, forest diversity and forest products in Nepal community forests. Environ Conserv. 2017;44(1):5-13. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892916000448.
- Rodriguez JP, Beard TD Jr, Bennett EM, Cumming GS, Cork S, Agard J, et al. Trade-offs across space, time, and ecosystem services. Ecology and Society. 2006;11(1):28.
- Son YM, Kim RH, Lee KH, Pyo JK, Kim SW, Hwang SJ, et al. Carbon emission factors and biomass allometric equations by species in Korea. Report 14-08. Seoul: Korea Forest Research Institute; 2014. pp.93.
- Xu X, Wang X, Hu Y, Wang P, Saeed S, Sun Y. Short-term effects of thinning on the development and communities of understory vegetation of Chinese fir plantations in Southeastern China. PeerJ. 2020;8:e8536. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.8536.
- Zhou X, Wen Y, Goodale UM, Zuo H, Zhu H, Li X, et al. Optimal rotation length for carbon sequestration in Eucalyptus plantations in subtropical China. New For. 2017;48(5):609-27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-017-9588-2.
- Zhou X, Zhu H, Wen Y, Goodale UM, Li X, You Y, et al. Effects of understory management on trade-offs and synergies between biomass carbon stock, plant diversity and timber production in eucalyptus plantations. For Ecol Manag. 2018;410:164-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2017.11.015.
- Zhu J, Dai E, Zheng D, Wang X. Characteristic of tradeoffs between timber production and carbon storage for plantation under harvesting impact: a case study of Huitong National Research Station of Forest Ecosystem. J Geogr Sci. 2018;28(8):1085-98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-018-1543-4.