한국수학교육학회지시리즈E:수학교육논문집 (Communications of Mathematical Education)

  • 제38권2호
  • /
  • Pages.145-165
  • /
  • 2024
  • /
  • 1226-6663(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-9935(eISSN)
한국수학교육학회 (Korean Society of Mathematical Education)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

이중 수사(數詞) 사용에서 나타나는 한국어학습자의 오류 유형 분석

Analysis of the error types made by Korean language learners in the use of dual numerals

  • 도주원 (서울용암초등학교)
  • Do, Joowon (Seoul Yongam Elementary School)
  • 투고 : 2024.05.16
  • 심사 : 2024.06.24
  • 발행 : 2024.06.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구의 목적은 이중 수사 사용에서 나타나는 한국어학습자의 오류 유형을 분석하여 효과적인 명수법 지도 방안 마련을 위한 기초 자료를 제공하는 것이다. 이를 위해 언어적·문화적 배경이 다양하고 국어, 수학 학업성취도가 다른 다문화 배경의 한국어학습자를 대상으로 이중 수사를 사용하는 명수법에서 나타나는 오류 유형을 분석하는 사례연구를 하였다. 한국어학습자에게 나타난 오류를 범주화한 오류 유형을 분석틀로 활용하였다. 연구 결과로부터 얻은 결론은 다음과 같다. 첫째, 학생들이 오류가 많이 나타난 고유어 수사 사용과 관련된 명수법에 익숙해질 수 있도록 자주 사용할 기회를 제공할 필요가 있다. 둘째, 국어 학업성취도 하 수준의 한국어학습자에게 한자어 수사를 사용한 명수법 지도 시 한자어 수사의 승법적 기수법의 체계에 유의하여 지도할 필요가 있다. 셋째, 외래어 분류사를 한국어로 정확하게 읽고 분류사 '시'와 '시간'을 구분하여 읽도록 지도할 필요가 있으며, 고유어/한자어 수사를 한자어 분류사와 함께 연이어 적절하게 사용할 수 있도록 지도할 필요가 있다. 본 연구의 결과는 언어적, 문화적 배경이 다양한 한국어학습자의 이중 수사를 사용하는 명수법의 효과적인 지도 방안 마련에 기여할 수 있을 것이다.

The purpose of this study is to analyze the types of errors made by Korean language learners in the use of dual numerals and provides basic data for developing an effective teaching numeration using dual numerals. To this end, a case study was conducted to analyze the types of errors that appear in numeration using dual numerals targeting Korean language learners with diverse linguistic and cultural backgrounds and different academic achievements in Korean and mathematics. Error types that categorized errors made by Korean language learners were used as an analysis framework. The conclusions obtained from the research results are as follows. First, it is necessary to provide students with opportunities to use them frequently so that they can become familiar with the use of native language numerals, which often causes errors. Second, when teaching Korean language learners with low-level Korean language academic achievement how to use Chinese numerals, it is necessary to pay attention to the multiplicative numeral system of Chinese numerals. Third, it is necessary to teach children to accurately read foreign word classifiers used with Chinese numerals accurately in Korean and distinguish between the classifiers 'o'clock' and 'hours'. There is a need to provide guidance so that native language/Chinese numerals can be used appropriately in succession along with Chinese classifiers. The results of this study may contribute to the development of an effective teaching numeration using dual numerals for Korean language learners with diverse linguistic and cultural backgrounds.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Kang, Y. (2022). Discussion on the guidance of dual numeral system. Education of Primary School Mathematics, 25(2), 161-178. 
  2. Choi-koh, S. (2013). The characteristics of multi-cultural students, North Korean defectors, and students of low-SES on the mathematical achievement test. The Korea Journal of Learning Disabilities, 10(20), 1-26. 
  3. Ministry of Education (2015). Mathematics curriculum. 2015-74(Book 8). Author. 
  4. Ministry of Education (2017a). Mathematics 1-1. Chunjae Education. 
  5. Ministry of Education (2017b). Mathematics 1-2. Chunjae Education. 
  6. Ministry of Education (2017c). Mathematics 2-1. Chunjae Education. 
  7. Ministry of Education (2017d). Mathematics 2-2. Chunjae Education. 
  8. Ministry of Education (2018a). Mathematics 3-1. Chunjae Education 
  9. Ministry of Education (2018b). Mathematics 3-2. Chunjae Education 
  10. Ministry of Education (2018c). Mathematics 4-1. Chunjae Education 
  11. Ministry of Education (2019). Mathematics 6-1. Chunjae Education. 
  12. Ministry of Education (2023). The results of the 2023 basic statistics survey on education are announced. Retrieved from https://www.moe.go.kr/boardCnts/viewRenew.do?boardID=294&boardSeq=96191&lev=0&m=0204 
  13. Kwon, S. (2011). Writing Korean numerals in technical writing. Journal of Engineering Education Research, 14(2), 30-39. 
  14. Kim, H. & Ko, H. (2021). A classification analysis of students from multicultural families based on their mathematics achievement over time. The Mathematical Education, 60(2), 191-207. 
  15. Do, J. (2021). An analysis of characteristics of the perception for mathematics learning of Korean language learners in 6th grade of elementary school. The Mathematical Education, 60(4), 529-542. 
  16. Do, J. & Chang, H. (2022). An analysis of Korean language learners' understanding according to the types of terms in school mathematics. Communications of Mathematical Education, 36(3), 335-353. 
  17. Park, J. & Noh, J. (2017). A teaching method for students in muiti-cultural family to improve mathematical performance capability with math word problems. The Journal of Korean Language and Literature, 59, 351-382. 
  18. Seoul Metropolitan Office of Education (2024). Basic plan for multicultural education for the 2024 academic year to create a culture of mutual respect where diversity coexists. Author. 
  19. Song, H. (2008). A survey on the mathematics learning achievement of children from multicultural families: 4th, 5th, and 6th grades of elementary school [Master's thesis, Korea National University of Education]. 
  20. Ahn, H., Yoon, H., Min, B., & Cho, Y. (2009). Development of language and cognitive diagnostic tools for students from multicultural families. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology. 
  21. Won, J. (2014). Korean language education implications for culturally linguistically diverse students. The Education of Korean Language. 144, 1-36. 
  22. Yu, J. (1997). Subcategorization of dependent nouns for NLP. Annual Conference on Human and Language Technology, 10, 136-142. 
  23. Lee, J. & Namgung, J. (2008). Educational research methods and data analysis using SPSS. Kyohak Research Company. 
  24. Lee, H. (2012). A study on children's language abilities of multicultural families -focuse on elementary 1, 2, 3 grade students. Korean Education, 92, 471-494. 
  25. Jang, Y. & Choi-Koh, S. (2009). A case study on the instructional dimensions in teaching mathematics to the elementary school students from multi-cultural backgrounds. The Mathematical Education, 48(4), 419-442. 
  26. Jang, C. (2011). The Korean language eductioan method for the child of the muiticultural families: Around the expression education of the lower grades of primary school. Journal of Multi-Cultural Contents Studies, 11, 357-389. 
  27. Cho, R. (1992). On numerical reading in theaching the Korean language and literature on elementary school teachers. Chinese Korean Literature, 1992(2), 56-58. 
  28. Cho, S. (2022). A few remarks on numeration - with a viewpoint of elementary school math -. Journal of Elementary Mathematics Education in Korea, 26(3), 175-192. 
  29. Cho, Y. & Lee, O. (2010). An analysis of the results of a mathematics diagnostic test taken by multicultural Koreans in their first of school year of elementary school. The Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics, 20(2), 103-119. 
  30. Jo, Y., Kang, E., & Ko, H. (2013). Analysis on the achievement characteristics of the students of multicultural and North Korean migrant families by school classes in 2011 National Assessment Educational Achievement. School Mathematics, 15(1), 179-199. 
  31. Ju, M., Moon, J., Jung, S., Cho, S., Estrella, I. A., & Song, R. (2020). An explorative study about development of mathematics instructional materials for bilingual students. Journal of Curriculum Evaluation, 23(2), 75-99. 
  32. National center for multi-culture education (2018). Educational support materials for immigrant and foreign students. National Institute for Lifelong Education. 
  33. Chae, W. (1983). A study of numerals and numeral classifier constructions in Korean. Language Research, 55(1), 1-11. 
  34. Chae, W. (2001). Numerals and their meanings. Korean Semantics, 8, 109-132. 
  35. Choi, M. (2012). Difficulties in learning mathematics among students from multicultural families and the research of teaching method [Master's Thesis, Korea National University of Education]. 
  36. Choi, C. (1995). Readability: Theory and application. Hanshin Journal, 12, 311-348. 
  37. Statistics Korea (2023). Domestic migration background population is increasing, and by 2040 we will become a multicultural country. Author. 
  38. H, H. (2008). This is the only way to write it (Supplementary Edition). Hankyoreh Publication. 
  39. Korea Educational Development Institution. (2021). Data analysis on educational statistics, K-12. Author. 
  40. Li, W. & Yi. S. (2018). Comparative linguistic study on number expression in Korean and Chinese. Hanminjok Emunhak, 80, 129-157.
  41. I, J. Y. & Chang, H. (2014). Teaching mathematics for Korean language learners based on ELL education models. ZDM, 46(6), 939-951.
  42. OECD (2019). OECD future of education and skills 2030: OECD learning compass 2030 - a series of concept notes. Author. 미래학교자치연구소 역 (2023). OECD 미래교육과 역량 2030: OECD 학습 나침반 2030 개념노트 시리즈. 기역.
  43. Pfeiffer, W. (2010). Technical communication: A practical approach (7th Edition), Pearson Prentice-Hall.