대한수의학회지 (Korean Journal of Veterinary Research)

  • 제64권2호
  • /
  • Pages.17.1-17.10
  • /
  • 2024
  • /
  • 2466-1384(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2466-1392(eISSN)
대한수의학회 (The Korean Society of Veterinary Science)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

홀스타인과 저지종의 초유 내 영양 성분, 면역글로불린 및 미생물 군집 변화 비교: 국내 관찰 연구

Comparison of nutritive composition, immunoglobulin and microbial community in the colostrum between Holstein and Jersey cows: an observational study in Korea

  • 엄준식 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원 낙농과) ;
  • 임동현 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원 낙농과) ;
  • 최하영 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원 낙농과) ;
  • 성원제 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원 낙농과) ;
  • 허태영 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원 낙농과) ;
  • 김상범 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원 낙농과) ;
  • 이성실 (경상국립대학교 응용생명과학부(BK21)) ;
  • 문여황 (경상국립대학교 동물생명융합학부) ;
  • 김언태 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원 낙농과)
  • Jun-Sik Eom (Dairy Science Division, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Dong-Hyun Lim (Dairy Science Division, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Ha-Young Choi (Dairy Science Division, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Won-Jae Sung (Dairy Science Division, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Tai-Young Hur (Dairy Science Division, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Sang-Bum Kim (Dairy Science Division, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Sung-Sill Lee (Division of Applied Life Science (BK21), Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Yea-Hwang Moon (Division of Animal Bioscience and Integrated Biotechnology, Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Eun-Tae Kim (Dairy Science Division, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration)
  • 투고 : 2024.04.23
  • 심사 : 2024.06.07
  • 발행 : 2024.06.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

This study examined the colostrum nutritive composition, immunoglobulin (Ig), and microbial community in Holstein and Jersey dairy cows according to the time after calving. The experiment used seven Holstein and three Jersey dairy cows. Colostrum was collected immediately after calf calving, 12, and 24 hours, and stored at -80℃ until analysis. An analysis of the nutritive composition in colostrum was performed using LactoScop. The immune indicators were analyzed using an ELISA Kit, and the microbial community was assessed using a Macrogen Inc. The protein level was high in all colostrum samples from Holstein dairy cows compared with Jersey dairy cows, but there was no significant difference according to the time after calving. Immune index analysis revealed high IgG and IgA concentrations in the colostrum of Holstein cows immediately after calving and 12 and 24 hours after calving, but the differences were not significant. The microbial community at the genus level revealed Staphylococcus to be predominant at a high rate in the colostrum of Holstein dairy cows and Enterococcus in Jersey dairy cows 12 hours after calving. Pseudomonas was predominant at a high rate in the colostrum of Jersey lactating cows immediately and 12 hours after calving. Chryseobacterium was predominant at a high rate in Holstein dairy cows 12 and 24 hours after calving. In conclusion, these results are expected to be used as research data on the correlation between quality, immunity, and microbial community in the colostrum.

키워드

과제정보

This work was performed with the support of the "Cooperative Research Program for Agriculture Science and Technology Development (Project No. PJ01500604)", Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea. This work was supported by the fund Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea. The author Jun-Sik Eom was supported by the Research Associate Fellowship Program (2024) of the National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea.

참고문헌

  1. Garrido-Cardenas JA, Manzano-Agugliaro F. The metagenomics worldwide research. Curr Genet 2017;63:819-829.
  2. Zhang R, Huo W, Zhu W, Mao S. Characterization of bacterial community of raw milk from dairy cows during subacute ruminal acidosis challenge by high-throughput sequencing. J Sci Food Agric 2015;95:1072-1079.
  3. Quigley L, O'Sullivan O, Stanton C, Beresford TP, Ross RP, Fitzgerald GF, Cotter PD. The complex microbiota of raw milk. FEMS Microbiol Rev 2013;37:664-698.
  4. Hammon HM, Steinhoff-Wagner J, Flor J, Schonhusen U, Metges CC. Lactation Biology Symposium: role of colostrum and colostrum components on glucose metabolism in neonatal calves. J Anim Sci 2013;91:685-695.
  5. Staley TE, Bush LJ. Receptor mechanisms of the neonatal intestine and their relationship to immunoglobulin absorption and disease. J Dairy Sci 1985;68:184-205.
  6. Godden SM, Lombard JE, Woolums AR. Colostrum management for dairy calves. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract 2019;35:535-556.
  7. Barrington GM, Parish SM. Bovine neonatal immunology. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract 2001;17:463-476.
  8. Lindner JD, Santarelli M, Yamaguishi CT, Soccol CR, Neviani E. Recovery and identification of bovine colostrum microflora using traditional and molecular approaches. Food Technol Biotechnol 2011;49:364-368.
  9. Pakkanen R, Aalto J. Growth factors and antimicrobial factors of bovine colostrum. Int Dairy J 1997;7:285-297.
  10. Van Hese I, Goossens K, Ampe B, Haegeman A, Opsomer G. Exploring the microbial composition of Holstein Friesian and Belgian Blue colostrum in relation to the transfer of passive immunity. J Dairy Sci 2022;105:7623-7641.
  11. Linehan K, Ross RP, Stanton C. Bovine colostrum for veterinary and human health applications: a critical review. Annu Rev Food Sci Technol 2023;14:387-410.
  12. Jeong SG, Ham JS, Kim DH, Chae HS, You YM, Jang AR, Kwon IK, Lee SG. Colostrum management and use in domestic dairy farms. J Anim Sci Technol 2009;51:163-170.
  13. Hyon YS, Kim WS. Effect of parity on immune-related proteins components in bovine colostrum. J Dairy Sci Biotechnol 2016;34:193-198.
  14. Okamoto M, Robinson JB, Christopherson RJ, Young BA. Summit metabolism of newborn calves with and without colostrum feeding. Can J Anim Sci 1986;66:937-944.
  15. Soufleri A, Banos G, Panousis N, Fletouris D, Arsenos G, Kougioumtzis A, Valergakis GE. Evaluation of factors affecting colostrum quality and quantity in Holstein dairy cattle. Animals (Basel) 2021;11:2005.
  16. Morrill KM, Conrad E, Lago A, Campbell J, Quigley J, Tyler H. Nationwide evaluation of quality and composition of colostrum on dairy farms in the United States. J Dairy Sci 2012;95:3997-4005.
  17. Lim DH, Mayakrishnan V, Lee HJ, Ki KS, Kim TI, Kim Y. A comparative study on milk composition of Jersey and Holstein dairy cows during the early lactation. J Anim Sci Technol 2020;62:565-576.
  18. Butler JE. Bovine immunoglobulins: an augmented review. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 1983;4:43-152.
  19. Korhonen H, Marnila P, Gill HS. Milk immunoglobulins and complement factors. Br J Nutr 2000;84 Suppl 1:S75-S80.
  20. Quigley JD, Lago A, Chapman C, Erickson P, Polo J. Evaluation of the Brix refractometer to estimate immunoglobulin G concentration in bovine colostrum. J Dairy Sci 2013;96:1148-1155.
  21. Dunn A, Ashfield A, Earley B, Welsh M, Gordon A, Morrison SJ. Evaluation of factors associated with immunoglobulin G, fat, protein, and lactose concentrations in bovine colostrum and colostrum management practices in grassland-based dairy systems in Northern Ireland. J Dairy Sci 2017;100:2068-2079.
  22. Parrish DB, Wise GH, Hughes JS, Atkeson FW. Properties of the colostrum of the dairy cow. V. Yield, specific gravity and concentrations of total solids and its various components of colostrum and early milk. J Dairy Sci 1950;33:457-465.
  23. Lokke MM, Engelbrecht R, Wiking L. Covariance structures of fat and protein influence the estimation of IgG in bovine colostrum. J Dairy Res 2016;83:58-66.
  24. Bartier AL, Windeyer MC, Doepel L. Evaluation of on-farm tools for colostrum quality measurement. J Dairy Sci 2015;98:1878-1884.
  25. Fasse S, Alarinta J, Frahm B, Wirtanen G. Bovine colostrum for human consumption: improving microbial quality and maintaining bioactive characteristics through processing. Dairy 2021;2:556-575.
  26. Moossavi S, Sepehri S, Robertson B, Bode L, Goruk S, Field CJ, Lix LM, de Souza RJ, Becker AB, Mandhane PJ, Turvey SE, Subbarao P, Moraes TJ, Lefebvre DL, Sears MR, Khafipour E, Azad MB. Composition and variation of the human milk microbiota are influenced by maternal and early-life factors. Cell Host Microbe 2019;25:324-335.
  27. Niyazbekova Z, Yao XT, Liu MJ, Bold N, Tong JZ, Chang JJ, Wen Y, Li L, Wang Y, Chen DK, Ma WT. Compositional and functional comparisons of the microbiota in the colostrum and mature milk of dairy goats. Animals (Basel) 2020;10:1955.
  28. Stelwagen K, Carpenter E, Haigh B, Hodgkinson A, Wheeler TT. Immune components of bovine colostrum and milk. J Anim Sci 2009;87(13 Suppl):3-9.
  29. Jiang C, Hou X, Gao X, Liu P, Guo X, Hu G, Li Q, Huang C, Li G, Fang W, Mai W, Wu C, Xu Z, Liu P. The 16S rDNA high-throughput sequencing correlation analysis of milk and gut microbial communities in mastitis Holstein cows. BMC Microbiol 2023;23:180.
  30. Lima SF, Teixeira AG, Lima FS, Ganda EK, Higgins CH, Oikonomou G, Bicalho RC. The bovine colostrum microbiome and its association with clinical mastitis. J Dairy Sci 2017;100:3031-3042.
  31. Zhou C, Bhinderwala F, Lehman MK, Thomas VC, Chaudhari SS, Yamada KJ, Foster KW, Powers R, Kielian T, Fey PD. Urease is an essential component of the acid response network of Staphylococcus aureus and is required for a persistent murine kidney infection. PLoS Pathog 2019;15:e1007538.
  32. Espeche MC, Pellegrino M, Frola I, Larriestra A, Bogni C, Nader-Macias ME. Lactic acid bacteria from raw milk as potentially beneficial strains to prevent bovine mastitis. Anaerobe 2012;18:103-109.
  33. Hantsis-Zacharov E, Shaked T, Senderovich Y, Halpern M. Chryseobacterium oranimense sp. nov., a psychrotolerant, proteolytic and lipolytic bacterium isolated from raw cow's milk. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2008;58(Pt 11):2635-2639.
  34. Coton M, Delbes-Paus C, Irlinger F, Desmasures N, Le Fleche A, Stahl V, Montel MC, Coton E. Diversity and assessment of potential risk factors of Gram-negative isolates associated with French cheeses. Food Microbiol 2012;29:88-98.
  35. Liang T, Xie X, Zhang J, Ding Y, Wu Q. Bacterial community and composition of different traditional fermented dairy products in China, South Africa, and Sri Lanka by high-throughput sequencing of 16S rRNA genes. LWT 2021;144:111209.
  36. Stacy A, Andrade-Oliveira V, McCulloch JA, Hild B, Oh JH, Perez-Chaparro PJ, Sim CK, Lim AI, Link VM, Enamorado M, Trinchieri G, Segre JA, Rehermann B, Belkaid Y. Infection trains the host for microbiota-enhanced resistance to pathogens. Cell 2021;184:615-627.
  37. Chen B, Tang G, Guo W, Lei J, Yao J, Xu X. Detection of the core bacteria in colostrum and their association with the rectal microbiota and with milk composition in two dairy cow farms. Animals (Basel) 2021;11:3363.
  38. Bartkiene E, Lele V, Sakiene V, Zavistanaviciute P, Ruzauskas M, Stankevicius A, Grigas J, Pautienius A, Bernatoniene J, Jakstas V, Zadeike D, Viskelis P, Juodeikiene G. Fermented, ultrasonicated, and dehydrated bovine colostrum: changes in antimicrobial properties and immunoglobulin content. J Dairy Sci 2020;103:1315-1323.
  39. Hang BP, Wredle E, Dicksved J. Analysis of the developing gut microbiota in young dairy calves-impact of colostrum microbiota and gut disturbances. Trop Anim Health Prod 2020;53:50.
  40. Quintieri L, Fanelli F, Caputo L. Antibiotic resistant Pseudomonas Spp. spoilers in fresh dairy products: an underestimated risk and the control strategies. Foods 2019;8:372.
  41. Van Hese I, Goossens K, Vandaele L, Opsomer G. Invited review: microRNAs in bovine colostrum-focus on their origin and potential health benefits for the calf. J Dairy Sci 2020;103:1-15.