Korean Journal of Veterinary Research (대한수의학회지)

The Korean Society of Veterinary Science (대한수의학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Ultrasonographic evaluation of pennation angle in canine tibialis cranialis muscle in South Korea: an observational study

  • Jaehwan Kim (Gimhae Veterinary Medical Center) ;
  • Tae Sung Hwang (Institute of Animal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Hee Chun Lee (Institute of Animal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Gyeongsang National University)
  • Received : 2024.04.12
  • Accepted : 2024.06.10
  • Published : 2024.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In human, ultrasonography is used to measure the pennation angle in various muscles to identify muscle functions such as force production, and to study alterations of the pennation angle during muscle contraction, hypertrophy, and atrophy. However, assessments of the pennation angle have not yet been conducted in dogs. This study aims to assess the normal pennation angle of the tibialis cranialis muscle in dogs using ultrasound and to detect changes in this angle in dogs with muscular atrophy. Sixty-eight healthy dogs were examined to establish normal values, while 12 ataxic and 12 lame dogs with suspected hindlimb muscle atrophy were also included. The pennation angle was measured using ultrasound at the midpoint between the proximal end of the tibia and the malleolus, measuring the angle between the muscle bundle and the deep aponeurosis. To confirm the significance between the 5 breeds and to identify a difference between normal and atrophied muscles, statistical analysis was conducted. The study found no significant difference in pennation angle between breeds, with mean values (± standard deviation) of 4.97° (± 1.88) in neutral, 7.25° (± 2.68) in flexion, and 3.31° (± 1.33) in extension positions. Decrease of the pennation angle was identified in muscle atrophy and the flexion position was determined to be the most appropriate for pennation angle measurement of tibialis cranialis muscle. We recommend considering the pennation angle as a valuable indicator of muscle health in dogs, as it demonstrates significant potential for diagnosing and monitoring muscular conditions.

Keywords

References

  1. Shahar R, Milgram J. Morphometric and anatomic study of the hind limb of a dog. Am J Vet Res 2001;62:928-933. 
  2. Fukunaga T, Kawakami Y, Kuno S, Funato K, Fukashiro S. Muscle architecture and function in humans. J Biomech 1997;30:457-463. 
  3. Azizi E, Brainerd EL, Roberts TJ. Variable gearing in pennate muscles. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2008;105:1745-1750. 
  4. Maganaris CN, Baltzopoulos V. Predictability of in vivo changes in pennation angle of human tibialis anterior muscle from rest to maximum isometric dorsiflexion. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 1999;79:294-297. 
  5. Lieber RL, Friden J. Functional and clinical significance of skeletal muscle architecture. Muscle Nerve 2000;23:1647-1666. 
  6. Manal K, Roberts DP, Buchanan TS. Optimal pennation angle of the primary ankle plantar and dorsiflexors: variations with sex, contraction intensity, and limb. J Appl Biomech 2006;22:255-263. 
  7. Narici MV, Maganaris CN, Reeves ND, Capodaglio P. Effect of aging on human muscle architecture. J Appl Physiol (1985) 2003;95:2229-2234. 
  8. Binzoni T, Bianchi S, Hanquinet S, Kaelin A, Sayegh Y, Dumont M, Jequier S. Human gastrocnemius medialis pennation angle as a function of age: from newborn to the elderly. J Physiol Anthropol Appl Human Sci 2001;20:293-298. 
  9. Martin DC, Medri MK, Chow RS, Oxorn V, Leekam RN, Agur AM, McKee NH. Comparing human skeletal muscle architectural parameters of cadavers with in vivo ultrasonographic measurements. J Anat 2001;199(Pt 4):429-434. 
  10. Fukunaga T, Ichinose Y, Ito M, Kawakami Y, Fukashiro S. Determination of fascicle length and pennation in a contracting human muscle in vivo. J Appl Physiol (1985) 1997;82:354-358. 
  11. Ledoux WR, Hirsch BE, Church T, Caunin M. Pennation angles of the intrinsic muscles of the foot. J Biomech 2001;34:399-403. 
  12. Hodges PW, Pengel LH, Herbert RD, Gandevia SC. Measurement of muscle contraction with ultrasound imaging. Muscle Nerve 2003;27:682-692. 
  13. Hayashi I, Enokida M, Nagira K, Yamasita T, Tsukutani Y, Murakami T, Nagashima H. Change in the pennation angle of the supraspinatus muscle after rotator cuff tear repair. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2019;28:888-892. 
  14. Rutherford OM, Jones DA. Measurement of fibre pennation using ultrasound in the human quadriceps in vivo. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 1992;65:433-437. 
  15. Risselada M, Kramer M, van Bree H. Approaches for ultrasonographic evaluation of long bones in the dog. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2003;44:214-220. 
  16. Cannon MS, Puchalski SM. Ultrasonographic evaluation of normal canine iliopsoas muscle. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2008;49:378-382. 
  17. Lamb CR, Duvernois A. Ultrasonographic anatomy of the normal canine calcaneal tendon. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2005;46:326-330. 
  18. Kramer M, Gerwing M, Hach V, Schimke E. Sonography of the musculoskeletal system in dogs and cats. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 1997;38:139-149. 
  19. Appell HJ. Muscular atrophy following immobilisation: a review. Sports Med 1990;10:42-58. 
  20. Haddad F, Roy RR, Zhong H, Edgerton VR, Baldwin KM. Atrophy responses to muscle inactivity. I. Cellular markers of protein deficits. J Appl Physiol (1985) 2003;95:781-790. 
  21. Valderrabano V, von Tscharner V, Nigg BM, Hintermann B, Goepfert B, Fung TS, Frank CB, Herzog W. Lower leg muscle atrophy in ankle osteoarthritis. J Orthop Res 2006;24:2159-2169. 
  22. Newsholme SJ, Lexell J, Downham DY. Distribution of fibre types and fibre sizes in the tibialis cranialis muscle of beagle dogs. J Anat 1988;160:1-8.