International Journal of Advanced Culture Technology

The International Promotion Agency of Culture Technology (국제문화기술진흥원)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Leadership Level and Development of Female Military Leaders in the Army

  • Shim Jin-Sun (Defense Solution Subdivion, Hyundai Rotem)
  • Received : 2024.03.09
  • Accepted : 2024.05.01
  • Published : 2024.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study aims to empirically analyze the effects of leadership level and toxic leadership on leadership performance results among male and female military leaders in the Army, and to verify whether the leader's gender has a moderating effect in this process. Additionally, by comparing and analyzing the leadership level, toxic leadership, and leadership performance results of female military leaders by position, this study seeks to examine the characteristics of female military leadership according to position. The research model was established with leadership level and toxic leadership as independent variables, leadership performance results as the dependent variable, and the leader's gender as a moderating variable. Data were collected through a survey of 216 male and female officers serving in the positions of platoon leader, company commander, and battalion commander in the Army. The collected data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, reliability analysis, correlation analysis, and hierarchical regression analysis. The results showed that leadership level had a significant positive effect on leadership performance results, while toxic leadership had a significant negative effect. The leader's gender moderated the relationship between leadership level and leadership performance results, with female leaders receiving lower evaluations than male leaders at the same level of leadership competency. Gender also moderated the relationship between toxic leadership and leadership performance results, with female leaders exhibiting the same level of toxic leadership receiving lower performance evaluations than male leaders. In the comparative analysis of female military leadership characteristics by position, the leadership level of the platoon leader and company commander groups was not significantly different from that of male soldiers, but the battalion commander group showed slightly lower leadership competency compared to male soldiers. Based on these results, this study suggests ways to improve the leadership level of female military leaders, reduce toxic leadership, and prepare support measures to strengthen the leadership competency of female military officers at the battalion commander level and above from policy, institutional, and educational perspectives.

Keywords

References

  1. Ministry of National Defense. (2021). 2021 National Defense White Paper.
  2. Dok, G. S. (2002). Major issues and role expectations for the utilization of female soldiers. Journal of the Korea Institute for Defense Analysis, 14(2), 157-180.
  3. Na, D. S. (2020). A study on the human rights situation of female soldiers. Soongsil Law Review, 43, 175-200.
  4. Kwon, J. E., Kim, H. S., & Kim, J. Y. (2019). Utilization of work-family balance support systems and retention intention of married female soldiers. Korean Journal of Military Art and Science, 75(2), 127-152.
  5. Cho, S. W. (2019). A study on the motivation of female soldiers to support the military. The Quarterly Journal of Defense Policy Studies, 35(2), 77-104.
  6. Cho, E. Y., & Seo, D. H. (2018). A critical review of perceptions of female soldiers. The Korea Association of Military Culture Studies, 9, 127-164.
  7. Kim, J. Y. (2018). Measures to expand the role of female soldiers. The Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 9(4), 1357-1374.
  8. Chung, J. S., Kim, C. H., & Jang, H. J. (2016). A study on the development of female soldier utilization policy. The Quarterly Journal of Defense Policy Studies, 32(4), 63-92.
  9. Son, G. H., Koo, B. S., & Park, C. H. (2018). The relationship between female soldiers' work-family conflict and military morale. The Korean Journal of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 31(2), 461-483.
  10. Carreiras, H. (2006). Gender and the military: Women in the armed forces of Western democracies. Routledge.
  11. Eagly, A. H., & Johnson, B. T. (1990). Gender and leadership style: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 108(2), 233-256.
  12. Powell, G. N. (2018). Women and men in management (5th ed.). Sage Publications.
  13. Kim, Y. H. (2012). Challenges and opportunities for female leaders in the military organization. The Quarterly Journal of Defense Policy Studies, 28(1), 193-220.
  14. Yardley, M. (2020). The challenges faced by women in leadership roles in the UK Armed Forces. Journal of Business Ethics, 168, 369-383.
  15. Army Headquarters. (2021). Army leadership guiding manual.
  16. Judge, T. A., & Piccolo, R. F. (2004). Transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic test of their relative validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(5), 755-768.
  17. Kim, N. H., & Lee, J. W. (2018). The effect of junior officers' leadership competency on subordinates' job satisfaction and organizational commitment. The Quarterly Journal of Defense Policy Studies, 34(1), 141-171.
  18. Kim, M. H. (2020). The effects of servant leadership on job crafting and innovative behavior: The moderating effect of leader trust. Journal of Human Resource Management Research, 27(2), 75-91.
  19. Kim, J. W., Jeon, E. C., & Kim, S. K. (2021). The effects of military leaders' authentic leadership on subordinates' innovative behavior and organizational commitment. The Korean Leadership Quarterly, 12(1), 49-72.
  20. Lipman-Blumen, J. (2005). The allure of toxic leaders: Why followers rarely escape their clutches. Ivey Business Journal, 69(3), 1-8.
  21. Schmidt, A. A. (2008). Development and validation of the toxic leadership scale. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Maryland, College Park.
  22. Steele, J. P. (2011). Antecedents and consequences of toxic leadership in the US Army: A two year review and recommended solutions. Center for Army Leadership, Fort Leavenworth, Kansas.
  23. Lee, G. S. (2020). A study on the effects of toxic leadership on subordinates' counterproductive work behavior and turnover intention in the military. Journal of the Korea Society of Computer and Information, 25(9), 195-205.
  24. Kim, S. H., & Yoo, J. H. (2021). The effect of leader's toxic leadership on subordinates' organizational citizenship behavior in the military: Mediating effect of psychological distress and job burnout. Military Research, 164, 1-29.
  25. Webster, J. R., Adams, G. A., Maranto, C. L., Sawyer, K., & Thoroughgood, C. (2018). Workplace contextual supports for LGBT employees: A review, meta-analysis, and agenda for future research. Human Resource Management, 57(1), 193-210.
  26. Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109(3), 573-598.
  27. Avolio, B. J., Bass, B. M., & Jung, D. I. (1999). Re-examining the components of transformational and transactional leadership using the Multifactor Leadership. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 72(4), 441-462.
  28. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.