Journal of the Korean Society for information Management (정보관리학회지)

Korean Society for Information Management (한국정보관리학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An Exploratory Study on Video Information Literacy

영상정보 활용능력에 관한 탐색적 연구

  • Min Kyung Na ;
  • Jee Yeon Lee
  • 나민경 (연세대학교 대학도서관발전연구소) ;
  • 이지연 (연세대학교 문헌정보학과)
  • Received : 2024.05.06
  • Accepted : 2024.06.18
  • Published : 2024.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In this study, we conducted a literature review and exploratory research to identify the characteristics of recently popular video information and to propose the basic capabilities required for video information literacy. Through a literature review, the distinct characteristics of video information were examined from various perspectives, differentiating it from other types of information. Subsequently, we had one-on-one, in-depth, semi-structured interviews with 16 participants in their teens to 50s to collect their video usage experiences. The interview contents were categorized to create a codebook, and content analysis was performed. Based on this analysis, we derived the characteristics of video information. Finally, the characteristics of video information were identified through the literature review and interview analysis outcomes, and these characteristics were classified into properties of video and characteristics related to video information usage. Based on the identified characteristics of video information, this study proposed the basic capabilities required for video information literacy.

본 연구는 최근 이용률이 높은 영상정보의 특성을 탐색하고 이를 기반으로 영상정보 활용을 위한 기초능력을 파악하고자 문헌 연구와 탐색 연구를 진행하였다. 문헌 연구를 통해 다른 유형의 정보와 달리 영상이 가지는 특성을 다양한 측면에서 파악하였다. 다음으로 10대부터 50대에 해당하는 16명을 인터뷰 참여자로 선정하고 영상 이용 경험에 관한 반구조화된 1:1 심층 인터뷰를 진행하였다. 인터뷰 내용을 범주별로 조직화하여 코드북을 제작하고 내용 분석을 진행하였으며 이를 토대로 영상정보의 특성을 확인하였다. 최종적으로 문헌 연구와 인터뷰 내용 분석을 통해 영상정보의 특성을 확인하였으며, 이를 영상정보의 속성과 영상정보 이용의 특성으로 구분하였다. 본 연구에서 확인한 영상정보 특성을 기반으로 영상정보 활용을 위한 기초능력을 제안하였다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

이 연구는 2022년 대한민국 교육부와 한국연구재단의 지원을 받아 수행된 연구임(NRF-2022S1A5C2A03093597).

References

  1. Chang, Yoon Ho & Choi, Byoung Gu (2023). Fake news detection on social media using video information: Focused on YouTube. The Journal of Information Systems, 32(2), 87-108. https://doi.org/10.5859/KAIS.2023.32.2.87
  2. Chung, Yongkuk & Xin, Wei (2020). Effects of perceived quality of TikTok on user satisfaction and continuance intention: and the role of commercial viability. Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 20(6), 77-89. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2020.20.06.077
  3. Heo, Jin & Kim, In-Sook (2023). The influence of the negative perception of YouTube's harmful contents and the third-person effect on the support of media literacy education and reinforcement of regulation for contents creators. Locality & Communication, 27(4), 170-201. https://doi.org/10.47020/JLC.2023.11.27.4.170
  4. Kim, Jin-Ah & Kim, Tae-Soo (2001). A study on the development of metadata of moving images. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 18(4), 15-35.
  5. Kim, Kwang-Su (2002). A theory on critical thinking. Journal of The Society of Philosophical Studies, 58, 5-42.
  6. Kim, Yong & So, Min-Ho (2009). A study on implementation of XML-based information retrieval system for video contents. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 26(4), 113-128. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2009.26.4.113
  7. Kim, Young-Jeong (2004). Critical thinking: Critical thinking and engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education Research, 11(2), 94-101.
  8. Korea Press Foundation (2022a). Tweens' and Teens' Media Use in Korea 2022. Seoul: Korea Press Foundation.
  9. Korea Press Foundation (2022b). Media Users in Korea 2022. Seoul: Korea Press Foundation.
  10. Lee, Byeong-Ki (2012). Information Literacy Instruction. Seoul: Joeungeulteo. https://doi.org/10.978.8993419/184
  11. Lee, Harim & Yu, Hong Sik (2017). An exploratory study on negative characteristics of multi channel network content, and introduction of relevant regulations. Korea Speech, Media & Communication Association, 16(1), 119-152. http://doi.org/10.22902/jsmcr.2017.16.1.004
  12. Lee, Jin (2020). A study on types of short-form video Contents. Humanities Contents, (58), 121-139. https://doi.org/10.18658/humancon.2020.09.121
  13. Lee, Seungwon, Shim, Seungbum, Choi, Keunwon, Ho, Gyuhyun, & Na, Eun-Yeong (2022). The effects of gratification sought and gratification obtained by the use of short-form video contents: Applying the gratification discrepancy model. Journal of Cybercommunication Academic Society, 39(4), 105-162. https://doi.org/10.36494/JCAS.2022.12.39.4.105
  14. Ministry of Education (2022). An Introduction to Elementary and Secondary School Curriculum. Sejong: Ministry of Education.
  15. National Institute of Korean Language (2008). Standard Korean Dictionary. Seoul: National Institute of Korean Language.
  16. Park, Jae-Hyun, Baik, Jeong-Yi, Yang, Kyoung-Hee, & Choi, Youngin (2019). A study on the collaborative communication competence assessment framework. Korean Association for Literacy, 10(6), 75-111. http://doi.org/10.37736/kjlr.2019.12.10.6.75
  17. Park, Juhyeon & Kang, Bong-suk (2020). A study on the development of media information literacy concept and educational contents. Journal of Korean Library and information Science Society, 51(3), 223-250. https://doi.org/10.16981/KLISS.51.3.202009.223
  18. Park, Soyeon (2015). Evaluation of mobile-based web search services: Suggestions for needed improvements. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 49(4), 317-334. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2015.49.4.317
  19. Shin, Dong-Heon, Chang, Byeng-Hee, & Lee, Yang-Hwan (2010). An exploratory study on factors affecting the use of video-type news content. Korean Journal of Journalism & Communication Studies, 54(4), 49-72.
  20. Song, Gin & Lee, Yeong-Ju (2016). An exploratory study on the uses of web-based video contents: Focusing on demographics, characteristics of content and media consumption, and genre preference. Journal of Cybercommunication Academic Society, 33(2), 43-85.
  21. Suh, Soonshik, Min, Kyungseok, Hwang, Kyunghyun, Jang, Yunjeong, & Kim, Hyesook (2009). Developing and validating ICT literacy test for elementary school students. Journal of Educational Technology, 25(3), 193-220. https://doi.org/10.17232/KSET.25.3.193
  22. Sung, Eunmo (2015). The relationship of smart media literacy's factors for primary school student on subject attitude and achievement. The Journal of Educational Information and Media, 21(2), 215-243. https://doi.org/10.15833/KAFEIAM.21.2.215
  23. Yang, Jung-Ae (2021). YouTube Users' Perceptions of YouTubers. Media Issue, 7(1), 1-16.
  24. American Association of School Librarian and Association for Educational Communications and Technology (1998). Information Power: Building Partnership for Learning. Chicago: American Library Association.
  25. Breivik, P. S. (1989). Information Literacy. New York: Macmillan.
  26. Bughin, J. R. (2007). How Companies can Make the Most of User-Generated Content. New York: The McKinsey Quarterly.
  27. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 319-340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
  28. Facione, P. (1990). Critical thinking: A statement of expert consensus for purposes of educational assessment and instruction(The Delphi Report). Available: https://philarchive.org/archive/faccta
  29. Gardiner, W. L. (2018). Can Computers Tum Teaching Inside-Out, Transform Education, and Redefine Literacy? In Media Literacy Around the World. London: Routledge, 359-376. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351292924-18
  30. Hampapur, A. & Jain, R. C. (1998). Video Data Management Systems: Metadata and Architecture. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  31. Jana, P. K., Patoda, S., Roy, P. K., Ghosh, B., Kar, S., Debnath, A., Mukherjee, S., Chatterjee A., Majumdar, A., & Dutta, S. (2023). Information on recent monkeypox outbreak: systematic search and content analysis of Youtube videos. Mayo Clinic Proceedings: Digital Health, 1(1), 40-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcpdig.2023.01.005
  32. Klobas, J. E., McGill, T. J., Moghavvemi, S., & Paramanathan, T. (2018). Compulsive YouTube usage: A comparison of use motivation and personality effects. Computers in Human Behavior, 87, 129-139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.05.038
  33. Knowles, M. S. (1975). Self-directed Learning: A Guide for Learners and Teachers. Newyork: Association Press. https://doi.org/10.1177/105960117700200220
  34. Kwon, J. H. & You, S. Y. (2023). Early dementia: Content analysis of the information provided by YouTube videos in Korea. The Journal for Nurse Practitioners, 19(5), 104589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nurpra.2023.104589
  35. Ladhari, R. & Morales, M. (2008). Perceived service quality, perceived value and recommendation: A study among Canadian public library users. Library Management, 29(4/5), 352-366. https://doi.org/10.1108/01435120810869129
  36. Lee, E., Lee, J. A., Moon, J. H., & Sung, Y. (2015). Pictures speak louder than words: Motivations for using Instagram. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 18(9), 552-556. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2015.0157
  37. Li, X., Shi, M., & Wang, X. S. (2019). Video mining: Measuring visual information using automatic methods. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 36(2), 216-231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2019.02.004
  38. Linlin, W., Wanyu, H., Yuting, L., Huimin, Q., Zhi, L., Qinchen, J., Tingting, W., Fan, W., Minghao, P., & Wei, Z. (2023). Research on the mechanism of short video information interaction behavior of college students with psychological disorders based on grounded theory. BMC Public Health, 23(1), 2256. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-17211-4
  39. Menon, D. (2022). Factors influencing Instagram reels usage behaviours: An examination of motives, contextual age and narcissism. Telematics and Informatics Reports, 5, 100007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teler.2022.100007
  40. Mudiyanselage, A. C. R., Saini, R., & Coyne, E. (2024). Evaluation of the understandability, actionability and reliability of YouTube videos for brain, head, and neck cancer information. European Journal of Oncology Nursing, 102605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejon.2024.102605
  41. Nielsen, J. (2006). The 90-9-1 rule for participation inequality in social media and online communities. Available: http://www.useit.com/alertbox/participation_inequality.html
  42. Nong, W., He, Z., Ye, J. H., Wu, Y. F., Wu, Y. T., Ye, J. N., & Sun, Y. (2023). The relationship between short video flow, addiction, serendipity, and achievement motivation among Chinese vocational school students: The post-epidemic era context. Healthcare, 11(4), 462. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11040462
  43. Omar, B. & Dequan, W. (2020). Watch, share or create: The influence of personality traits and user motivation on TikTok mobile video usage. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 14(04), 121-137. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v14i04.12429
  44. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2018). The future of education and skills: Education 2030. OECD Education Working Papers. Available: https://www.oecd.org/education/2030-project/contact/E2030_Position_Paper_(05.04.2018).pdf
  45. Qi, P., Bu, Y., Cao, J., Ji, W., Shui, R., Xiao, J., Wang, D., & Chua, T. S. (2023). FakeSV: A multimodal benchmark with rich social context for fake news detection on short video platforms. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 37(12), 14444-14452. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v37i12.26689
  46. Qin, Y., Omar, B., & Musetti, A. (2022). The addicion behavior of short-form video app TikTok: The information quality and system quality perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 932805. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.932805
  47. Rosenthal, S. (2020). Media literacy, scientific literacy, and science videos on the internet. Frontiers in Communication, 5, 581585. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2020.581585
  48. Shao, G. (2009). Understanding the appeal of user generated media: A uses and gratification perspective. Internet Research, 19(1), 7-25. https://doi.org/10.1108/10662240910927795
  49. Turner, K. H., Jolls, T., Hagerman, M. S., O'Byrne, W., Hicks, T., Eisenstock, B., & Pytash, K. E. (2017). Developing digital and media literacies in children and adolescents. Pediatrics, 140, S122-S126. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2016-1758p
  50. Xie, J., Xu, X., Zhang, Y., Tan, Y., Wu, D., Shi, M., & Huang, H. (2023). The effect of short-form video addiction on undergraduates' academic procrastination: A moderated mediation model. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1298361. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1298361
  51. Ye, J. H., Wu, Y. T., Wu, Y. F., Chen, M. Y., & Ye, J. N. (2022). Effects of short video addiction on the motivation and well-being of Chinese vocational college students. Frontiers in Public Health, 10, 847672. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.847672
  52. Yesilada, M. & Lewandowsky, S. (2022). Systematic review: YouTube recommendations and problematic content. Internet Policy Review, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.14763/2022.1.1652
  53. Zimmerman, B. J. & Schunk, D. H. (2004). Self-regulating intellectual processes and outcomes: A social cognitive perspective. In Motivation, Emotion, and Cognition, 323-349. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410610515-22