정보관리학회지 (Journal of the Korean Society for information Management)

  • 제41권2호
  • /
  • Pages.1-18
  • /
  • 2024
  • /
  • 1013-0799(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2586-2073(eISSN)
한국정보관리학회 (Korean Society for Information Management)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

국내 문헌정보학 주요 저널의 자아 인용정체성 분석

A Comparative Analysis of Ego-Centered Journal Citation Identities in Library and Information Science

  • 김혜진 (국립공주대학교 문헌정보교육과, 학교도서관연구소)
  • 투고 : 2024.02.22
  • 심사 : 2024.05.22
  • 발행 : 2024.06.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

이 연구는 자아 인용분석 기법을 적용하여 국내 문헌정보학 4개 학회지의 자아 인용정체성을 분석·비교하여 제시하였다. 자아 인용정체성이란 특정 연구자가 빈번하게 인용하고 있는 저자집합을 파악함으로써 그 학문적 정체성을 분석한 것을 의미한다. 이 연구에서는 분석단위를 국내 문헌정보학 주요 학회지로 정하고 참고문헌들(references)을 분석하여 저널 자아 인용정체성을 비교하여 제시하였다. 이를 위해 2012년부터 2022년 9월까지 발행된 국내 문헌정보학 분야의 4개 학회지 - 『한국문헌정보학회지』, 『한국비블리아학회지』, 『한국도서관·정보학회지』, 『정보관리학회지』의 발행논문 서지정보와 수록된 참고문헌 정보를 자동수집하였다. 분석결과, 저널당 피인용횟수(CCR), 자기인용비율(SCR), 저널동시인용 분석 등을 통해 4개 학회지 모두 대체적으로 내부정보에 대한 충성도가 높은 것으로 나타났고, 정보관리학회지가 4개 학회지 중에서 가장 다양한 인용저널을 포함하는 것으로 분석되었다. 그리고 4개 학회지는 모두 자아를 제외한 3개 학회지와 JASIST가 저널 인용정체성에 포함되는 것으로 나타났다. 마지막으로 한국도서관·정보학회지가 가장 고유한 인용 네트워크 구조를 가지는 것으로 나타났다.

This study aims to compare ego-centered journal citation identities among four domestic journals in library and information science. Ego-centered citation identity refers to the set of authors that an author frequently cites. The target journals for this study are Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science (KSLIS), Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science (KBIBLIA), Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society (KLISS), and Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management (KOSIM). As a result of citation/citee ratio (CCR), self-citing rates (SCR), and journal co-cited analysis, the journal citation identities of four journals contained the other three journals besides the ego journal and JASIST. Furthermore, KOSIM had the most diverse range of journal citation identity and the four journals mattered the intra-journal information. KLISS showed the most unique cited journal network structure among the four journals.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Jang, Yeonmi & Lee, Jae Yun (2024). Acknowledgement types and bibliometric characteristics of library and information science journal articles. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 41(1), 313-338. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2024.41.1.313
  2. Jeong, Yoo Kyung (2023). Overlap analysis of research areas in four library and information science journals. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 40(4), 259-277. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2023.40.4.259
  3. Kim, Soojung, Lee, Jongwook, Jeong, In Yeong, & Oh, Sanghee (2022). Perceptions of academic journals and scholarly events in library and information science: focus group interviews. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 53(4), 319-345. http://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.53.4.202212.319
  4. Kwahk, Kee-Young (2014). Social Network Analysis. Seoul: Chungram.
  5. Lee, Jae Yun (2012a). Exploring a researcher's personal research history through self-citation network and citation identity. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 29(1), 157-174. http://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2012.29.1.157
  6. Lee, Jae Yun (2012b). Ego-centered topic citation analysis on Folksonomy research documents. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 29(4), 295-312. http://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2012.29.4.295
  7. Lee, Jae Yun (2023). A study on scholarly communication trends in korean library and information science studies through author group analysis. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 57(2), 409-434. http://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2023.57.2.409
  8. Lee, Jongwook, Kim, Soojung, & Oh, Sanghee (2023). Perceptions of academic journals and scholarly events in library and information science: an online survey. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 57(1), 365-386. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2023.57.1.365
  9. Cronin, B. & Shaw, D. (2002). Identity-creators and image-makers: Using citation analysis and thick description to put authors in their place. Scientometrics, 54(1), 31-49. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1015628320056
  10. Doreian, P. & Fararo, T. J. (1985). Structural equivalence in a journal network. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 36(1), 28-37. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630360103
  11. Garfield, E. (2004). Historiographic mapping of knowledge domains literature. Journal of Information Science, 30(2), 119-145. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551504042802
  12. Lorrain, F. & White, H. C. (1971). Structural equivalence of individuals in social networks. The Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 1(1), 49-80. https://doi.org/10.1080/0022250X.1971.9989788
  13. Nebelong-Bonnevie, E. & Frandsen, T. F. (2006). Journal citation identity and journal citation image: a portrait of the Journal of Documentation. Journal of Documentation, 62(1), 30-57. https://doi.org/10.1108/00220410610642039
  14. Persson, O. (1994). The intellectual base and research fronts of JASIS 1986-1990. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 45(1), 31-38. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199401)45:1%3C31::AID-ASI4%3E3.0.CO;2-G
  15. Rousseau, R. (1999). Temporal differences in self-citation rates of scientific journals. Scientometrics, 44(3), 521-531. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02458493
  16. Shibata, N., Kajikawa, Y., Takeda, Y., & Matsushima, K. (2009). Comparative study on methods of detecting research fronts using different types of citation. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(3), 571-580. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20994
  17. White, H. D. (2001). Authors as citers over time. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(2), 87-108. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4571(2000)9999:9999%3C::AID-ASI1542%3E3.0.CO;2-T
  18. White, H. D. & McCain, K. W. (1998). Visualizing a discipline: An author co-citation analysis of information science, 1972-1995. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49, 327-355. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(19980401)49:4%3C327::AID-ASI4%3E3.0.CO;2-4